Skip Navigation LinksHome > May/June 2007 - Volume 22 - Issue 3 > Preparing for the Worst While Hoping for the Best: The Relev...
Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing:
doi: 10.1097/01.JCN.0000267821.74084.72
Articles

Preparing for the Worst While Hoping for the Best: The Relevance of Hope in the Heart Failure Illness Trajectory

Davidson, Patricia M. RN, BA, MEd, PhD; Dracup, Kathleen RN, DNSc; Phillips, Jane RN, BAppSci; Daly, John RN, BA, BHSc, MEd(Hons), PhD; Padilla, Geraldine PhD

Free Access
Article Outline
Collapse Box

Author Information

Patricia M. Davidson, RN, BA, MEd, PhD Associate Professor of Nursing, School of Nursing, University of Western Sydney, and Sydney West Area Health Service, Sydney, Australia.

Kathleen Dracup, RN, DNSc Dean and Professor, School of Nursing, University of California, San Francisco, Calif.

Jane Phillips, RN, BAppSci Doctoral Candidate, School of Nursing, University of Western Sydney, Sydney, Australia.

John Daly, RN, BA, BHSc, MEd(Hons), PhD Professor of Nursing and Foundation Head, School of Nursing, University of Western Sydney, Sydney NSW, Sydney, Australia.

Geraldine Padilla, PhD Associate Dean for Research, School of Nursing, University of California, San Francisco, Calif.

The authors acknowledge the support of the National Health and Medical Research Grant 219152 for this project.

Corresponding author Patricia M. Davidson, RN, BA, MEd, PhD, School of Nursing, University of Western Sydney, Sydney, Australia (e-mail: patricia_davidson@wsahs.nsw.gov.au).

Collapse Box

Abstract

Background: Patients with heart failure have higher mortality rates than those with most malignant diseases. The heart failure illness trajectory is one of gradual decline characterized by unpredictable events such as acute decompensation of heart failure or a sudden cardiac death. Health professionals have an obligation to give patients and their families concise and honest information concerning their prognosis. The challenge exists to give what ostensibly may seem a bleak prognosis within a context of hope and optimism.

Aim: To explore the role of hope in heart disease and the potential utility of this construct in the development of nursing interventions.

Methods: The electronic databases CINAHL, MEDLINE, EmBASE, and PSYCHlit were searched from 1982 to August 2004 using the key words "hope," "hopelessness," "heart disease," and "heart failure." Articles were subsequently sorted to meet the inclusion criteria of (1) a philosophical discussion of the construct of hope and/or (2) investigation of hope in heart disease.

Results: This search retrieved 768 articles, and 24 met the inclusion criteria. Key findings from the review indicate that "hope" and "hopelessness" are underdeveloped, yet important constructs and conceptually linked with depression and spirituality. Intriguing findings from descriptive, observational studies have demonstrated the positive impact of expression of hope on cardiovascular outcomes. These findings need to be validated in randomized controlled trials.

Conclusions: This critical literature review has determined that "hope" is strongly associated with the individual's future orientation. Increased understanding of this concept may assist in refining patient-focused interventions and developing therapeutic strategies to enhance hope.

Heart failure (HF) is primarily a condition of aging and a phenomenon increasing due to success in the treatment of hypertension, acute myocardial infarction, and valvular disorders.1 The prognosis of HF is poor with 5-year mortality rates of 50% and annual hospital readmission rates of 30% to 45%.2,3 Although best practice guidelines recommend frank discussion of prognosis in HF, clinicians still struggle with how to do this, and anecdotally, physicians debate whether we are helping or hindering patients when we frankly discuss issues of prognosis. Significantly, there is evidence that contemporary healthcare systems are failing to meet the needs of patients dying with end-stage HF,4-9 and a recurrent theme in the literature is patient's needs for honest and truthful information.6

Reasons postulated for clinicians not freely giving this information are difficulties in predicting prognosis, the curative paradigm of cardiology, and discomfort of clinicians in dealing with poor prognosis.7 Although clinicians may want to give their patients a realistic view of their illness trajectory, many fear that giving this information may erode hope and the impetus to comply with self-care strategies important in HF management. It is also likely that there are pragmatic reasons for avoiding these discussions, such as shortage of time and lack of experience in these difficult conversations.10-12

Our colleagues in oncology have faced many of these dilemmas and have recognized the importance of fostering hope within patients and therapeutic interactions.13 The concept of hope is regularly discussed in palliative care, yet has received scant attention in the cardiovascular literature. To date, researchers have documented the importance of hope and that it influences how an individual perceives and responds to a threat or life transition.14-18 Actively engaging patients and families in the promotion of realistic hope helps identify what is important to them. This process often aids in goal setting with the benefits of reengagement in relationships and appreciation of aesthetic pleasures.19 It is often through these activities that patients can regain a sense of purpose, meaning, and control over their life in the face of a life-limiting illness.20

We undertook a critical literature review to develop a conceptual framework to assist in delivering the important information regarding prognosis to patients with HF and their families. The electronic databases CINAHL, MEDLINE, EmBASE, and PSYCHlit were searched from 1982 to August 2004 using the key words "hope," "hopelessness," "heart disease," and "heart failure." Articles were subsequently sorted to meet the inclusion criteria of (1) a philosophical discussion of the construct of hope and/or (2) investigation of hope in heart disease. This search strategy retrieved 768 articles, and 24 met the inclusion criteria for this review article.

Back to Top | Article Outline

A Definition of Hope

Hope can be defined as a positive future orientation and is an important coping strategy in critical stages of life.21-23 Nunn and coworkers24 described 3 key aspects associated with a state of hope: temporality, desirability, and expectancy. Since the ancient philosophers, the relationship of hope and optimism with positive outcomes has long been recognized; conversely, an absence of hope is believed to have a negative impact on psychological well-being and physical health.25 It is important to note that the emotion of hope is not necessarily associated with cure but may be associated with a good death, in accordance with the individual's values, beliefs, and cultural attributes.

Conversely, the current debate around assisted suicide is likely engendered by the hopelessness experienced not only by patients but also by physicians.26,27 The challenge of medicine to address physical and psychological suffering compounds this debate.28-30 Many clinicians feel an overdeveloped sense of responsibility for their patients. In vulnerable clinicians, adverse clinical outcomes may equate with a sense of failure.7 These feelings can result in conscious or subconscious disengagement, which the patient experiences as abandonment. Clearly, the relationship between clinician and patient is an important factor in fostering or diminishing hope.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Evidence for the Role of Hope in Cardiovascular Outcomes

Published studies exploring hope in cardiovascular disease are reported in Table 1. Nursing interventions recommended by Roberts and colleagues31 to nurture hope include the provision of concrete objective information, promotion of advocacy, and the encouragement of mutual goal setting. Most published studies are observational and descriptive, with no randomized controlled trials of the assessment of interventions to improve hope. Some studies describe the importance of hope but do not exclusively investigate this construct.32 This clearly represents an important area for systematic nursing enquiry.

Table 1
Table 1
Image Tools
Back to Top | Article Outline

The Relationship Between Hope and Depression

Heart failure is largely a condition of the elderly.45 Furthermore, the most common functional psychiatric condition in the elderly is depression. A diagnosis of depression ranges from reactive adjustment to major depression.46,47 The prevalence and incidence of depression and poor quality of life is well documented in HF.48 A key function of hope is to defend against despair by focusing on the future.16 Expectations can be directed toward relief from a difficult situation. To achieve this relief, people must have a sense of control over their environment and feel that they are capable of making decisions that alter their life circumstances. Undeniably, feelings of hopelessness and despair are key characteristics of a depressive illness.49 Intuitively, the development of nursing interventions around building hope may be therapeutic in preventing and managing depression. This strategy may also serve to foster self-care behaviors.

Back to Top | Article Outline

The Link Between Hope and Spirituality

Interest has increased in spirituality as clinicians and scientists grapple with the close interaction between the body and mind. Tanyi defines spirituality as "an inherent component of being human, and is subjective, intangible, and multidimensional."50(p500) Notions of spirituality are often confused with religion, but it is important to note that the 2 are discrete concepts. Spirituality involves an existential dimension or the search for meaning in life.51 A religious belief usually involves an organization with specific beliefs, structures, and practices about a higher power or God.52 Understanding individuals' spiritual orientation is often important in discovering their sources of strength, hope, and future orientation.

In a study comparing outcomes of rehabilitation patients and those with cancer, spirituality demonstrated both a strong association with life satisfaction and quality of life, and it was a significant predictor of life satisfaction among rehabilitation subjects.53 Beery and colleagues examined the role of spirituality in 58 patients with HF. In this study, spirituality scores predicted 24% of the variance in global quality of life.9 Westlake and Dracup interviewed 87 patients with HF using a semistructured questionnaire. In this study, a 3-step process was described where spirituality contributed to attitude toward HF: (1) development of regret regarding past behaviors and lifestyles, (2) search for meaning within the present experience of HF, and (3) search for hope for the future and reclaiming optimism.43 These findings demonstrate the close relationship between hope and the individual's spiritual orientation.

Given the high rates of morbidity and mortality for patients with HF,2,54-56 it is inevitable that nurses will have to confront difficult existential and end-of-life issues. Unfortunately, some clinical environments do not support discussion of end-of-life issues. Inherent difficulties in prognostication and the focus on treatment options such a heart transplantation and implantable cardiac defibrillators make such discussions easy to delay.7 Nurses also may feel that they have inadequate skills and resources to broach end-of-life issues. Despite the fact that the nursing literature is replete with discussions of spirituality,50-53 there is a paucity of data on how to make this important concept operational in nursing interventions. Nonetheless, based on available data in HF patients, it seems that hope and spirituality are closely related.17,57-60

Back to Top | Article Outline

How Do We Best Measure Hope?

Measuring the construct of hope is subject to similar methodological difficulties seen when measuring constructs such as depression and quality of life.61,62 The challenge for clinicians and researchers is to obtain a reliable and valid psychometric measure that is sensitive to changes over time and culturally sensitive. Nunn and colleagues24 have systematically reviewed measures purported to measure hope using both indirect and direct methods. Many of the indirect measures relate to notions such as self-efficacy and locus of control. At the time of this review, the authors are not aware of a validated, disease-specific measure(s) to evaluate hope or hopelessness in patients with HF.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Why Should We Measure Hope in HF?

Patient outcomes in HF are largely predicated on patients' ability to comply with the treatment regimen.63-65 For example, failure to take medications and comply with a low-sodium diet is associated with adverse clinical outcomes. Explanations for failure to adhere to treatment recommendations range from cognitive dysfunction, lack of information, and, in some issues, complex sociodemographic factors.63,66 The ability to identify patients with less hope (ie, vulnerability) and more hope (ie, resilience) is attractive in tailoring interventions and identifying those at highest risk.24 Hope can be conceptualized as a system of goal-directed thinking responsive to feedback and the external environment, underscoring the importance of interpersonal relationships. Other measures and strategies have been developed to look at the ability of people to engage in self-care behaviors.67-69 A measurement developed to quantify hope and future orientation may assist in revealing an important reason why people do not comply with their treatment regimen. The provision of hope through advocacy, information, structure, and empowerment may contribute considerably to the benefits of disease management interventions.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Using Strategies to Increase "Hope" in Nursing Interventions for Patients With HF

Patients with a diagnosis of HF face an unpredictable illness trajectory and clinicians often recount instances where individuals defied the odds.70 Prognosis can be influenced by both pharmacological and nonpharmacological strategies. Undeniably, a variety of factors such as ejection fraction, levels and types of social support, the ability to engage in self-management and adherence to optimal pharmacological and nonpharmacological treatment play a significant role in determining patient outcomes.71,72 Existing and emerging data underscore the influence of social and psychological factors on determining prognosis.73 Evangelista and coworkers60 demonstrated a strong association between hope, mood states, and quality of life in women and identified the fostering of hope as a tool to improve quality of life.

Strategies such as positive self-talk and undertaking tasks that reflect the mantra of preparing for the worst while hoping for the best may be useful for promoting hope in patients with HF. These strategies are supported by use of tailored care plans74 and include formulation of advance care directives,75-77 promotion and support of patient self-care,69,78,79 and having significant others learn cardiopulmonary resuscitation.80 Such strategies influence hope by enhancing patient outcomes and promoting control over the future.

On the basis of this literature review, one can hypothesize that interventions focusing on nurturing hope will promote resilience and control and thereby minimize demoralization, depression, and vulnerability.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Implications for Cardiovascular Nurses

Clearly, there are opportunities in daily clinical interactions and development of interventions for cardiovascular nurses to foster hope. It is important in these interactions that nurses recognize that promotion of realistic hope requires them to

* accept that hope is not dependent on a cure (hope based on better moments),

* ensure that the patients and family have a realistic understanding of their treatment and likely illness trajectory (effective communication), and

* assist the patient and family identify what is important (reorientation) and gain a sense of control over their life.

Clearly, engaging in the promotion of hope is largely dependent on effective communication strategies, and this has implications for the education and training of nurses and their clinical supervision.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Conclusions and Recommendations for Future Research

Nunn and coworkers24 suggest that the investigation of hope is at an early stage in comparison with other constructs of personal experience. We conclude on the basis of our review that to nurture "hope" with patients, clinicians must use an empathetic approach. An empathetic approach is essential in assisting patients explore and process issues such as previous achievements, lost opportunities, regrets, religion, spirituality, and goals. Within the epidemic of chronic disease81,82 and the increasing importance of individual self-care strategies, further investigation of the constructs of hope and hopelessness is important. Increased understanding of these constructs should assist in developing interventions and strategies to assist patients and their families cope with the HF illness experience.

Back to Top | Article Outline

REFERENCES

1. McMurray J, Stewart S. Epidemiology, aetiology, and prognosis of heart failure. Heart. 2000;83:596-602.

2. Stewart S, MacIntyre K, Hole D, Capewell S, McMurray J. More 'malignant' than cancer? Five-year survival following a first admission for heart failure. Eur J Heart Fail. 2001;3:315-322.

3. Zannad F, Briancon S, Juilliere Y, et al. Incidence, clinical and etiologic features and outcomes of advanced chronic heart failure: The EPICAL study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999;33:734-742.

4. Califf R, Vidaillet H, Goldman L. Advanced congestive heart failure: what do patients want? Am Heart J. 1998;135:S320-S326.

5. Gibbs LM, Addington-Hall J, Gibbs JS. Dying from heart failure: lessons from palliative care. Many patients would benefit from palliative care at the end of their lives. BMJ. 1998;317:961-962.

6. Addington-Hall JM, Gibbs JSR. Heart failure now on the palliative care agenda. Palliat Care Med. 2000;14:361-362.

7. Davidson P, Introna K, Daly J, Dunford M, Dracup K. Synergising acute care and palliative care philosophies to optimise nursing care in cardiorespiratory disease. AustCrit Care. 2002;15:64-69.

8. Zambroski CH. Hospice as an alternative model of care for older patients with end-stage heart failure. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2004;19(1):76-83.

9. Beery T, Baas L, Fowler C, Allen G. Spirituality in persons with heart failure. J Holist Nurs. 2002;20:5-30.

10. Arber A, Gallagher A. Breaking bad news revisited: the push for negotiated disclosure and changing practice implications. Int J Palliat Care. 2003;9:166-172.

11. Fried TR, Bradley EH, O'Leary J. Prognosis communication in serious illness: perceptions of older patients, caregivers, and clinicians. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2003;51(10):1398-1403.

12. Sherman D, Matzo M, Panke J, Grant M, Rhome A. End-of-Life Nursing Education Consortium curriculum: an introduction to palliative care. Nurse Educ. 2003;28:111-120.

13. Ebright P, Lyon B. Understanding hope and factors that enhance hope in women with breast cancer. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2002;29:561-568.

14. Herth K. Abbreviated instrument to measure hope: development and psychometric evaluation. The Herth Hope Index. J Adv Nurs. 1992;17:1251-1259.

15. Herth K. Enhancing hope in people with a first recurrence of cancer. J Adv Nurs. 2000;32:1431-1441.

16. Herth K, Cutcliffe J. Concept of hope. The concept of hope in nursing: research/education/policy/practice. Br J Nurs. 2002;11:1404-1411.

17. Evangelista L, Doering L, Dracup K, Vassilakis M, Kobashigawa J. Hope, mood states and quality of life in female heart transplant recipients. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2003;22:681-686.

18. Daly J, Jackson D, Davidson P. The experience of hope for survivors of acute myocardial infarction (AMI): a qualitative research study. Aust J Adv Nurs. 1999;16:38-44.

19. Clark DM, Kissane DW. Demoralization: its phenomenology and importance [Heart of the matter]. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2002;36:733-742.

20. Seligman ME. Optimism, pessimism and mortality. Mayo Clin Proc. 2000;75:133-134.

21. Scheier M, Carver C. Effects of optimism on psychological and physical well-being: theoretical overview and empirical update. Cogn Ther Res. 1992;16:201-228.

22. Kylma J, Vehvilainen-Julkunen K, Lahvdevirta J. Dynamics of hope in HIV/AIDS affected people: an exploration significant others' experiences. Res Theory Nurs Pract. 2003;17:191-205.

23. Kylma J, Vehvilainen-Julkunen K. Hope in nursing research: a meta-analysis of the ontological and epistemological foundations of the research on hope. J Adv Nurs. 1997;25:364-371.

24. Nunn KP, Lewin TJ, Walton JM. The construction and characteristics of an instrument to measure personal hopefulness. Psychol Med. 1996;26:531-546.

25. Sullivan M. Hope and hopelessness at the end of life. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2003;11:393-405.

26. Addington-Hall J, Seale C. Euthanasia: why people want to die earlier. Br J Nurs. 1994;3(22):1156-1157.

27. Hassan R. The euthanasia debate. Med J Aust. 1996;165:535.

28. American Medical Association (AMA) Council on Scientific Affairs. Good care of the dying patient. JAMA. 1996;75:474-478.

29. Lynn J, Teno J, Phillips R, et al. Perceptions by family members of the dying experience of older and seriously ill patients. Ann Intern Med. 1997;126:97-106.

30. Freeborne N, Lynn J, Desbiens N. Insights about dying from the SUPPORT project. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000;48:S199-S205.

31. Roberts S, Johnson L, Keely B. Fostering hope in the elderly congestive heart failure patient in critical care. Geriatr Nurs. 1999;20:195-199.

32. Svedlund M, Danielson E. Myocardial infarction: narrations by afflicted women and their partners of lived experiences in daily life following an acute myocardial infarction. J Clin Nurs. 2004;13:438-446.

33. Rideout E, Montemuro M. Hope, morale and adaptation in patients with chronic heart failure. J Adv Nurs. 1986;11:429-438.

34. Anda R, Williamson D, Jones D, et al. Depressed affect, hopelessness, and the risk of ischemic heart disease in a cohort of U.S. adults. Epidemiology. 1993;4:285-294.

35. Everson S, Goldberg D, Kaplan G, et al. Hopelessness and risk of mortality and incidence of myocardial infarction and cancer. Psychosom Med. 1996;58:113-121.

36. Johnson L, Roberts S. Hopelessness in the myocardial infarction patient. Prog Cardiovasc Nurs. 1996;11:19-32.

37. Fontana JA. The emergence of the person-environment interaction in a descriptive study of vigor in heart failure. Adv Nurs Sci. 1996;18:70-82.

38. Johnson L, Dahlen R, Roberts S. Assessment techniques. Supporting hope in congestive heart failure patients. Dimens Crit Care Nurs. 1997;16:65-78.

39. Everson S, Kaplan G, Goldberg D, Salonen R, Salonen J. Hopelessness and 4-year progression of carotid atherosclerosis. The Kuopio Ischemic Heart Disease Risk Factor Study. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1997;17:1490-1495.

40. Roberts S, Johnson L, Keely B. Fostering hope in the elderly congestive heart failure patient in critical care. Geriatr Nurs. 1999;20:195-199.

41. Everson S, Kaplan G, Goldberg D, Salonen J. Hypertension incidence is predicted by high levels of hopelessness in Finnish men. Hypertension. 2000;35:561-567.

42. Buetow S, Goodyear-Smith F, Coster G. Coping strategies in the self-management of chronic heart failure. Fam Pract. 2001;18:117-122.

43. Westlake C, Dracup K. Role of spirituality in adjustment of patients with advanced heart failure. Prog Cardiovasc Nurs. 2001;16:119-125.

44. Ai AL, Peterson C, Tice T, Bolling SF, Koenig H. Faith-based and secular pathways to hope and optimism subconstructs in middle-aged and older cardiac patients. J Health Psychol. 2004;9:435-450.

45. Ghali J. The Cohere Registry: hype or hope. J Card Fail. 2000;6:272-275.

46. Cole M, N D. Risk factors for depression among elderly community subjects: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Psychiatry. 2003;160:1147-1156.

47. Himeloch S, Weller W, Wu A, Anderson G, Cooper L. Chronic medical illness, depression and the use of acute medical services among medicare beneficiaries. Med Care. 2004;42:512-520.

48. Vaccarino V, Kasl S, Abramson J, Krumholz H. Depressive symptoms and risk of functional decline and death in patients with heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;38:199-205.

49. Alloy L, Abramson L, Metalsky G, et al. The hopelessness theory of depression: attributional aspects. Br J Clin Psychol. 1988;27:5-21.

50. Tanyi R. Towards clarification of the meaning of spirituality. J Adv Nurs. 2002;39:500-509.

51. Draper P, McSherry W. A critical view of spirituality and spiritual assessment. J Adv Nurs. 2002;39:1-2.

52. Baldacchino D, Draper P. Spiritual coping strategies: a review of the nursing research literature. J Adv Nurs. 2001;34:833-841.

53. Tate D, Forchheimer M. Quality of life, life satisfaction, and spirituality: comparing outcomes between rehabilitation and cancer patients. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;81:400-410.

54. Stewart S, MacIntyre K, Capewell S, McMurray JJ. Heart failure and the aging population: an increasing burden in the 21st century? Heart. 2003;89:49-53.

55. Jones AM, O'Connell JE, Gray CS. Living and dying with congestive heart failure: addressing the needs of older congestive heart failure patients. Age Ageing. 2003;32:566-568.

56. Davidson P, Introna K, Daly J, et al. Cardiorespiratory nurses' perceptions of palliative care in nonmalignant disease: data for the development of clinical practice. Am J Crit Care. 2003;12:47-53.

57. Puchalski C. Spirituality and end-of-life care: a time for listening and caring. J Palliat Med. 2002;5:289-294.

58. Westlake C, Dracup K. Role of spirituality in adjustment of patients with advanced heart failure. Prog Cardiovasc Nurs. 2001;16:119-125.

59. Westlake C, Dracup K, Creaser J, et al. Correlates of health-related quality of life in patients with heart failure. Heart Lung. 2002;31:85-93.

60. Evangelista LS, Doering L, Dracup K. Meaning and life purpose: the perspectives of post-transplant women. Heart Lung. 2003;32:250-257.

61. Hays R, Anderson R, Revicki D. Psychometric considerations in evaluating health-related quality of life measures. Qual Health Res. 1993;2:441-449.

62. Kinney M, Burfitt S, Stullenbarger E, Rees B, DeBolt MR. Quality of life in cardiac patient research: a meta-analysis. Nurse Res. 1996;45:173-180.

63. McAlister FA, Murphy NF, Simpson CR, et al. Influence of socioeconomic deprivation on the primary care burden and treatment of patients with a diagnosis of heart failure in general practice in Scotland: population based study. BMJ. 2004;328:1110.

64. McAlister FA, Stewart S, Ferrua S, McMurray JJ. Multidisciplinary strategies for the management of heart failure patients at high risk for admission. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;44:810-819.

65. Mc Dermott M, Schmit B, Wallner E. Impact of medication nonadherence on coronary heart disease outcomes. Arch Intern Med. 1997;157:1921-1929.

66. Vaccarino V, Gahbauer E, Kasl SV, Charpentier PA, Acampora D, Krumholz HM. Differences between African Americans and whites in the outcome of heart failure: evidence for a greater functional decline in African Americans. Am Heart J. 2002;143:1058-1067.

67. Rockwell JM, Riegel B. Predictors of self-care in persons with heart failure. Heart Lung. 2001;30:18-25.

68. Riegel B, Glaser D, Thomas V, Gocka I, Gillespie T. Development of an instrument to measure cardiac illness dependency. Heart Lung. 1997;26:448-457.

69. Jaarsma T, Halfens R, Huijer Abu-Saad H, et al. Effects of education and support on self-care and resource utilization in patients with heart failure. Eur Heart J. 1999;20:673-682.

70. The SUPPORT Principal Investigators. A controlled trial to provide care for seriously ill hospitalized patients. The Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatments (SUPPORT). JAMA. 1995;274:1591-1598.

71. Grady KL, Dracup K, Kennedy G, et al. Team management of patients with heart failure. A statement for healthcare professional from the Cardiovascular Nursing Council of the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2000;102:2443-2456.

72. Zannad F, Briancon S, Juilliere Y, et al. Incidence, clinical and etiologic features, and outcomes of advanced chronic heart failure: the EPICAL Study. Epidemiologie de l'Insuffisance Cardiaque Avancee en Lorraine. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999;33:734-742.

73. Bunker S, Colquhoun DM, Esler MD, et al. Stress and coronary heart disease: psychosocial risk factors. Med J Aust. 2003;178:272-276.

74. Davidson P, Cockburn J, Daly J, Sanson-Fisher R. Patient-centered needs assessment: rationale for a psychometric measure for assessing needs in heart failure. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2004;19:162-170.

75. Tilden VP. Advance directives. Am J Nurs. 2000;100:49-51.

76. Tilden VP, Tolle SW, Garland MJ, Nelson CA. Decisions about life-sustaining treatment. Impact of physicians' behaviors on the family. Arch Intern Med. 1995;155:633-638.

77. Lynn J, Goldstein NE. Advance care planning for fatal chronic illness: avoiding commonplace errors and unwarranted suffering. Ann Intern Med. 2003;138:812-818.

78. Jaarsma T, Halfens R, Senten M, Saad HHA, Dracup K. Developing a supportive-educative program for patients with advanced heart failure within Orem's general theory of nursing. Nurs Sci Q. 1998;11:79-85.

79. Jaarsma T, Halfens R, Tan F, Abu-Saad HH, Dracup K, Diederiks J. Issues in cardiac care. Self-care and quality of life in patients with advanced heart failure: the effect of a supportive educational intervention. Heart Lung. 2000;29:319-330.

80. Dracup K, Heaney DM, Taylor SE, Guzy PM, Breu C. Can family members of high-risk cardiac patients learn cardiopulmonary resuscitation? Arch Intern Med. 1989;149:61-64.

81. Wagner EH. Chronic disease management: what will it take to improve care for chronic illness? Eff Clin Pract. 1998;1:2-4.

82. Wagner EH. Meeting the needs of chronically ill people. BMJ. 2001;323:945-946.

Cited By:

This article has been cited 2 time(s).

Critical Care Nurse
Edgar Allan Poe, "The Pit and the Pendulum," and Ventricular Assist Devices
Zambroski, CH; Combs, P; Cronin, SN; Pfeffer, C
Critical Care Nurse, 29(6): 29-39.
10.4037/ccn2009249
CrossRef
Jama-Journal of the American Medical Association
Discordance between patient-predicted and model-predicted life expectancy among ambulatory patients with heart failure
Allen, LA; Yager, JE; Funk, MJ; Levy, WC; Tulsky, JA; Bowers, MT; Dodson, GC; O'Connor, CM; Felker, GM
Jama-Journal of the American Medical Association, 299(): 2533-2542.

Back to Top | Article Outline
Keywords:

heart failure; hope; hopelessness; illness trajectory; prognosis

© 2007 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.

Login

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.