Skip Navigation LinksHome > July 2011 - Volume 45 - Issue 6 > World Gastroenterology Organisation Global Guideline: Consti...
Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology:
doi: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e31820fb914
WGO Guideline

World Gastroenterology Organisation Global Guideline: Constipation—A Global Perspective

Lindberg, Greger MD, PhD*; Hamid, Saeed S. MD; Malfertheiner, Peter MD; Thomsen, Ole Ostergaard MD, PhD§; Fernandez, Luis Bustos MD; Garisch, James MD; Thomson, Alan MD; Goh, Khean-Lee MD**; Tandon, Rakesh MD††; Fedail, Suliman MD‡‡; Wong, Benjamin C.Y. MD§§; Khan, Aamir Ghafoor MD∥∥; Krabshuis, Justus H.¶¶; LeMair, Anton MD♯♯

Free Access
Erratum
Article Outline

Erratum

The article on page 483 of the July 2011 issue has been replaced at www.jcge.com. In the original article, the author listing was omitted. The correct author list and the author affiliations are below. In addition, a number of corrections have been made to the text. We apologize for these errors.

Greger Lindberg, MD, PhD,* Saeed S. Hamid, MD,† Peter Malfertheiner, MD,‡ Ole Ostergaard Thomsen, MD, PhD,§ Luis Bustos Fernandez, MD,‖ James Garisch, MD,¶ Alan Thomson, MD,# Khean-Lee Goh, MD,** Rakesh Tandon, MD,†† Suliman Fedail, MD,‡‡ Benjamin C.Y. Wong, MD,§§ Aamir Ghafoor Khan, MD,‖‖ Justus H. Krabshuis,¶¶ and Anton LeMair, MD##

From the *Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; †Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan; ‡Otto von Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany; §University of Copenhagen, Herlev Hospital, Herlev, Denmark; ‖Hospital Bonorino Udaondo, Buenos Aires, Argentina; ¶St Georges Hospital, Port Elizabeth, South Africa; #University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada; **University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia; ††All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India; ‡‡University of Khartoum, Khartoum, Sudan; §§Department of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong; ‖‖Lady Reading Hospital, Peshawar, Pakistan; ¶¶Highland Data, Tourtoirac, France; and ##Highland Data, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

This guideline is written and reviewed by a committee of the WGO chaired by Dr Lindberg.

Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology. 46(1):90, January 2012.

Collapse Box

Author Information

*Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden

Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan

Otto von Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany

§University of Copenhagen, Herlev Hospital, Herlev, Denmark

Hospital Bonorino Udaondo, Buenos Aires, Argentina

St Georges Hospital, Port Elizabeth, South Africa

University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada

**University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

††All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India

‡‡University of Khartoum, Khartoum, Sudan

§§Department of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong

∥∥Lady Reading Hospital, Peshawar, Pakistan

¶¶Highland Data, Tourtoirac, France

♯♯Highland Data, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

This guideline is written and reviewed by a committee of the WGO chaired by Dr Lindberg

Supported by none.

Conflict of interest: None.

Back to Top | Article Outline

INTRODUCTION

Constipation is a chronic problem in many patients all over the world. In some groups of patients such as the elderly, constipation is a significant health care problem, but in the majority of cases chronic constipation is an aggravating, but not life threatening or debilitating, complaint that can be managed in primary care with cost-effective control of symptoms.

The terminology associated with constipation is problematic. There are 2 pathophysiologies, which differ in principle but overlap: disorders of transit and evacuation disorders. The first can arise secondary to the second, and the second can sometimes follow from the first.

This guideline focuses on adult patients and does not specifically discuss children or special groups of patients (such as those with spinal cord injury).

Back to Top | Article Outline
Cascades: A Resource-sensitive Approach

A gold standard approach is feasible for regions and countries in which the full range of diagnostic tests and medical treatment options are available for the management of all types and subtypes of constipation.

A cascade is a hierarchical set of diagnostic, therapeutic, and management options for dealing with risk and disease, ranked according to the resources available.

Back to Top | Article Outline

DEFINITION AND PATHOGENESIS

The word “constipation” has several meanings, and the way it is used may differ not only between patients but also between different cultures and regions. In a Swedish population study, it was found that a need to take laxatives was the most common conception of constipation (57% of respondents). In the same study, women (41%) were twice as likely as men (21%) to regard infrequent bowel motions as representing constipation, whereas equal proportions of men and women regarded hard stools (43%), straining during bowel movements (24%), and pain when passing a motion (23%) as representing constipation. Depending on various factors—the diagnostic definition, demographic factors, and group sampling—constipation surveys show a prevalence of between 1% and >20% in western populations. In studies of the elderly population, up to 20% of community-dwelling individuals and 50% of institutionalized elderly persons reported symptoms.

Functional constipation is generally defined as a disorder characterized by persistent difficult or seemingly incomplete defecation, and/or infrequent bowel movements (once every 3 to 4 d or less) in the absence of alarm symptoms or secondary causes. Differences in the medical definition and variations in the reported symptoms make it difficult to provide reliable epidemiologic data.

Back to Top | Article Outline
Pathogenesis and Risk Factors

Functional constipation can have many different causes, ranging from changes in diet, physical activity, or lifestyle to primary motor dysfunctions due to colonic myopathy or neuropathy. Constipation can also be secondary to evacuation disorder. Evacuation disorder may be associated with a paradoxical anal contraction or involuntary anal spasm, which may be an acquired behavioral disorder of defecation in two thirds of patients (Table 1).

Table 1
Table 1
Image Tools

Although physical exercise and a high-fiber diet may be protective, the following factors increase the risk of constipation (the association may not be causative):

* Aging (but constipation is not a physiological consequence of normal aging)

* Depression

* Inactivity

* Low calorie intake

* Low income and low education level

* Number of medications being taken (independent adverse effect profiles)

* Physical and sexual abuse

* Female sex—higher incidence of self-reported constipation in women

Back to Top | Article Outline
Associated Conditions and Medications

(Tables 2 and 3)

Table 2
Table 2
Image Tools
Table 3
Table 3
Image Tools
Back to Top | Article Outline

DIAGNOSIS

Constipation is a common condition, and although a minority of patients seek medical care, in the United States alone this accounts for several million physician visits per year, whereas in the United Kingdom more than 13 million general practitioner prescriptions were written for laxatives in 2006. Gastrointestinal specialist help should focus on efficiently applying health care resources by identifying those patients who are likely to benefit from specialized diagnostic evaluation and treatment.

Back to Top | Article Outline
Diagnostic Criteria for Functional Constipation

An international panel of experts developed uniform criteria for the diagnosis of constipation—the Rome III criteria (Table 4).

Table 4
Table 4
Image Tools
Back to Top | Article Outline
Patient Evaluation

The medical history and physical examination in constipation patients should focus on identifying possible causative conditions and alarm symptoms.

* Stool consistency: This is regarded as a better indicator of colon transit than stool frequency (Fig. 1).

Figure 1
Figure 1
Image Tools

* Patient's description of constipation symptoms, symptom diary

Bloating, pain, malaise

Nature of stools

Bowel movements

Prolonged/excessive straining

Unsatisfactory defecation

* Laxative use, past and present, frequency and dosage

* Current conditions, medical history, recent surgery, psychiatric illness

* Patient's lifestyle, dietary fiber, and fluid intake

* Use of suppositories or enemas, other medications (prescription or over-the-counter)

* Physical examination:

Gastrointestinal mass

Anorectal inspection:

Fecal impaction

Stricture, rectal prolapse, rectocele

Paradoxical or nonrelaxing puborectalis activity

Rectal mass

If indicated: blood tests—biochemical profile, complete blood count, calcium, glucose, and thyroid function

Back to Top | Article Outline
Alarm Symptoms (Table 5)
Table 5
Table 5
Image Tools
Back to Top | Article Outline
Indications for Screening Tests

Laboratory studies, imaging or endoscopy, and function tests are only indicated in patients with severe chronic constipation or alarm symptoms (Table 6).

Table 6
Table 6
Image Tools
Back to Top | Article Outline
Transit Measurement

The 5-day marker retention study is a simple method for measuring colonic transit. Markers are ingested on one occasion and the remaining markers are counted on a plain abdominal radiograph 120 hours later. If >20% of the markers remain in the colon, transit is delayed. Distal accumulation of markers may indicate an evacuation disorder, and in typical cases of slow-transit constipation almost all markers remain and markers are seen in both the right and the left colon.

Several companies produce markers, but markers can also be made from a patient-safe radiopaque tube by cutting it into small pieces (2 to 3 mm in length). A suitable number of markers (20 to 24) can be placed in gelatin capsules to facilitate ingestion.

Back to Top | Article Outline
Clinical Evaluation

Classification of the patient's constipation should be possible on the basis of the medical history and appropriate examination and testing (Table 7).

Table 7
Table 7
Image Tools
Back to Top | Article Outline
Cascade Options for Investigating Severe and Treatment-refractory Constipation

Cascade: a hierarchical set of diagnostic, therapeutic, and management options for dealing with risk and disease, ranked according to the resources available.

Level 1: Limited resources

(a) Medical history and general physical examination

(b) Anorectal examination, 1-week bowel habit diary card

(c) Transit study using radiopaque markers

(d) Balloon expulsion test

Level 2: Medium resources

(a) Medical history and general physical examination

(b) Anorectal examination, 1-week bowel habit diary card

(c) Transit study using radiopaque markers

(d) Balloon expulsion test or defecography

Level 3: Extensive resources

(a) Medical history and general physical examination

(b) Anorectal examination, 1-week bowel habit diary card

(c) Transit study using radiopaque markers

(d) Defecography or magnetic resonance proctography

(e) Anorectal manometry

(f) Sphincter electromyography

Back to Top | Article Outline

TREATMENT

Scheme for General Management of Constipation (Table 8)
Table 8
Table 8
Image Tools
Back to Top | Article Outline
Symptomatic Approach

If organic and secondary constipation have been evaluated and excluded, most cases can be managed adequately with a symptomatic approach.

* A graded approach to treatment is based on recommending changes in lifestyle and diet, stopping or reducing medications that cause constipation, and administering fiber supplementation or other bulk-forming agents. A gradual increase in fiber (either as standardized supplements or incorporated in the diet) and fluid intake is generally recommended.

* The second step in the graded approach is to add osmotic laxatives. The best evidence is for the use of polyethylene glycol, but there is also good evidence for lactulose. The new drugs, lubiprostone and linaclotide, act by stimulating ileal secretion and thus increasing fecal water. Prucalopride is also approved in many countries and in Europe.

* The third step includes stimulant laxatives, enemas, and prokinetic drugs. Stimulant laxatives can be given orally or rectally to stimulate colorectal motor activity. Prokinetic drugs are also meant to increase the propulsive activity of the colon, but in contrast to stimulant laxatives, which should only be taken occasionally; they are designed to be taken daily.

Back to Top | Article Outline
Diet and Supplements

* Dietary modification may consist of a high-fiber diet (25 g of fiber) and fluid supplementation (up to 1.5 to 2.0 L/d) and may improve stool frequency and decrease the need for laxatives.

* There is no evidence that dietary and lifestyle measures have any effect on constipation in the elderly persons; fiber supplements and simple osmotic laxatives are usually an adequate approach for constipation in these patients.

* In patients with colonic dilation, fiber supplementation should be avoided.

* Psyllium supplements and lactulose may be appropriate for the treatment of chronic constipation.

Back to Top | Article Outline
Medication

* Evacuation disorders respond poorly to standard oral laxative programs. If an evacuation disorder plays a considerable role in constipation, biofeedback and pelvic muscle training may be considered. Critical success factors are the patient's level of motivation, the frequency of the training program, and participation of a behavioral psychologist and dietitian.

* If a dietary approach fails, polyethylene glycol (17 g polyethylene glycol laxative for 14 d) or lubiprostone (24 mg twice daily) can be used to promote bowel function in patients with chronic constipation.

* Prokinetic agents (eg, the 5-HT4 receptor agonist prucalopride) can be used in constipation-predominant irritable bowel syndrome.

* Simple laxative agents, such as milk of magnesia, senna, bisacodyl, and stool softeners are a reasonable choice for treating constipation.

Back to Top | Article Outline
Surgery

* If there is persistent treatment failure in slow-transit constipation, then carefully selected, well-evaluated, and informed patients may benefit from total colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis. The exceptional indication for colectomy must be established in a specialized and experienced tertiary center. Disappointing results may be seen, with fecal incontinence due to surgery and recurrent constipation, especially in patients with evacuation disorder.

* Only very few patients benefit from a (reversible) colostomy to treat constipation.

Back to Top | Article Outline
Evidence-based Summary (Table 9)
Table 9
Table 9
Image Tools
Back to Top | Article Outline
Cascade Options for Treatment of Chronic Constipation

The following cascade is intended for patients with chronic constipation without alarm symptoms and with little or no suspicion of an evacuation disorder. The main symptoms would be hard stools and/or infrequent bowel movements.

Level 1: Limited resources

(a) Dietary advice (fiber and fluid)

(b) Fiber supplementation

(c) Milk of magnesia (magnesium hydroxide in an aqueous solution)

(d) Stimulant laxatives (bisacodyl better than senna) for temporary use

Level 2: Medium resources

(a) Dietary advice (fiber and fluid)

(b) Fiber supplementation, psyllium

(c) Milk of magnesia, lactulose, macrogol

(d) Stimulant laxatives for temporary use

Level 3: Extensive resources

(a) Dietary advice (fiber and fluid)

(b) Psyllium or lactulose

(c) Macrogol or lubiprostone

(d) Prokinetics (prucalopride)

(e) Stimulant laxatives (bisacodyl or sodium picosulfate)

Back to Top | Article Outline
Cascade Options for Treatment of Evacuation Disorders

This cascade is for patients with chronic constipation without alarm symptoms, but with suspicion of an evacuation disorder. The main symptoms would be prolonged straining, a feeling of incomplete evacuation, thin stools, a feeling of blockage, or failure of treatment for constipation with hard stools.

Level 1: Limited resources

(a) Dietary and behavioral advice (fiber, fluid, timed bowel training)

(b) Therapy for chronic constipation

Level 2: Medium resources

(a) Dietary and behavioral advice (fiber, fluid, timed bowel training)

(b) Therapy for chronic constipation

(c) Biofeedback therapy

Level 3: Extensive resources

(a) Dietary and behavioral advice (fiber, fluid, timed bowel training)

(b) Therapy for chronic constipation

(c) Biofeedback therapy

(d) Surgical evaluation

Cited By:

This article has been cited 3 time(s).

Patient Preference and Adherence
Health-related quality of life in dialysis patients with constipation: a cross-sectional study
Zhang, JS; Huang, CY; Li, YL; Chen, J; Shen, FY; Yao, Q; Qian, JQ; Bao, BY; Yao, XP
Patient Preference and Adherence, 7(): 589-594.
10.2147/PPA.S45471
CrossRef
International Journal of Food Science and Technology
Preventing constipation: a review of the laxative potential of food ingredients
Gelinas, P
International Journal of Food Science and Technology, 48(3): 445-467.
10.1111/j.1365-2621.2012.03207.x
CrossRef
Zeitschrift Fur Gastroenterologie
S2k-Guideline on Chronic Obstipation: Definition, Pathophysiology, Diagnosis and Therapy
Andresen, V; Enck, P; Frieling, T; Herold, A; Ilgenstein, P; Jesse, N; Karaus, M; Kasparek, M; Keller, J; Kuhlbusch-Zicklam, R; Krammer, H; Kreis, M; Layer, P; Madisch, A; Matthes, H; Monnikes, H; Muller-Lissner, S; Preiss, J; Sailer, M; Schemann, M; Schwille-Kiuntke, J; Voderholzer, W; van der Voort, I; Wedel, T; Pehl, C
Zeitschrift Fur Gastroenterologie, 51(7): 651-672.

Back to Top | Article Outline

© 2011 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.

Login