Skip Navigation LinksHome > July/August 2013 - Volume 37 - Issue 4 > Focal Liver Lesion Classification and Characterization in No...
Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography:
doi: 10.1097/RCT.10.1097/RCT.0b013e3182951fe9
Abdominal Imaging

Focal Liver Lesion Classification and Characterization in Noncirrhotic Liver: A Prospective Comparison of Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance–Related Parameters

Colagrande, Stefano MD*; Regini, Francesco MD*; Pasquinelli, Filippo MD*; Mazzoni, Lorenzo Nicola MS; Mungai, Francesco MD*; Filippone, Antonella MD; Grazioli, Luigi MD§

Collapse Box


Purpose: The objective of this study was to prospectively verify if diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance (DwMR)–related parameters such as perfusion fraction (f) and slow diffusion coefficient (D), according to Le Bihan theory, are more effective than apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) for classification and characterization of the more frequent focal liver lesions (FLLs) in noncirrhotic liver.

Methods: Sixty-seven patients underwent standard liver magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and free-breath multi-b DwMR study. Two regions of interest were defined by 2 observers, including 1 FLL for each patient (21 hemangiomas, 21 focal nodular hyperplasias, 25 metastases) and part of surrounding parenchyma, respectively. For every FLL, D, f, and ADC were estimated both as absolute value and as ratio between FLL and surrounding parenchyma by fitting the reduced equation of the bicompartmental model to experimental data; t test, analysis of variance, and receiver operating characteristic analysis were performed.

Results: t Test showed significant differences in ADClesion, f lesion, D lesion, ADCratio, and D ratio values between benign and malignant FLLs, more pronounced for ADClesion (P < 0.0009) and ADCratio (P = 0.001). Applying cutoff values of 1.55 × 10 − 3 mm2/s (ADClesion) and 0.89 (ADCratio), the DwMR study presented sensitivities and specificities, respectively, of 84% and 80% (for ADClesion), 72% and 80% (ADCratio).

Conclusions: Apparent diffusion coefficient (by fitting procedures) better performs than do D and f in FLL classification, especially when its values are less than 1.30 or greater than 2.00 × 10 − 3 mm2/s.

© 2013 by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins



Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.