Skip Navigation LinksHome > September/October 2012 - Volume 36 - Issue 5 > Low-Dose Computed Tomography of the Chest Using Iterative Re...
Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography:
doi: 10.1097/RCT.0b013e318260ce39
Thoracic Imaging

Low-Dose Computed Tomography of the Chest Using Iterative Reconstruction Versus Filtered Back Projection: Comparison of Image Quality

Lee, Youkyung MD, PhD*; Jin, Kwang Nam MD*; Lee, Nyoung Keun MD

Collapse Box

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare image quality of iterative reconstruction (IR) to filtered back projection (FBP) in low-dose computed tomography of the chest.

Methods: Forty-three consecutive patients were retrospectively enrolled. Eight series of images were reconstructed using FBP and 7 levels of IR in each subject. Image noise, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and SNR improvement were measured. Two radiologists evaluated subjective artifact, image artificiality, and subjective overall image quality with 4- or 5-point scales.

Results: Iterative reconstruction showed significantly lower image noise (135.5 ± 36.6 vs 219.9 ± 40.9) and higher SNR (0.36 ± 0.12 vs 0.21 ± 0.05) than FBP (P < 0.001). Signal-to-noise ratio improvement was 72.4% ± 44.9%. Subjective artifact of FBP was significantly higher than IR images (P < 0.001). Image artificiality of IR was significantly higher than that of FBP (P < 0.001). Overall, subjective image quality was poor in FBP and acceptable or good in IR.

Conclusions: With the use of IR, low-dose computed tomography of the chest would achieve less image noise and better image quality compared to the FBP.

© 2012 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.

  

Login

Article Tools

Share

Article Level Metrics

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.