Skip Navigation LinksHome > September/October 2011 - Volume 35 - Issue 5 > Nodal Staging of Rectal Cancer: High-Resolution Pelvic MRI V...
Text sizing:
A
A
A
Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography:
doi: 10.1097/RCT.0b013e318225720f
Abdominal Imaging

Nodal Staging of Rectal Cancer: High-Resolution Pelvic MRI Versus 18F-FDGPET/CT

Kim, Dae Jung MD; Kim, Joo Hee MD; Ryu, Young Hoon MD; Jeon, Tae Joo MD; Yu, Jeong-Sik MD; Chung, Jae-Joon MD

Collapse Box

Abstract

Aim: To compare high-resolution pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) for the preoperative assessment of nodal staging in rectal cancer.

Materials and Methods: Thirty patients who had surgery for rectal cancer were retrospectively enrolled during a 6-month period. Each patient underwent high-resolution pelvic MRI and PET/CT preoperatively within the same week. An experienced radiologist predicted nodal staging on MR, and an experienced nuclear medicine physician similarly predicted nodal staging on PET/CT. Their predictions were compared with pathologic staging results, retrospectively.

Results: The accuracies of nodal status prediction from MR and PET/CT were 83% and 70%, respectively. Magnetic resonance imaging had a sensitivity of 94% and a specificity of 67%, whereas PET/CT had a sensitivity of 61% and a specificity of 83%. A combination of MRI and PET/CT revealed a sensitivity of 94%, a specificity of 83%, and an accuracy of 90%.

Conclusion: High-resolution pelvic MRI was more accurate than PET/CT for the prediction of regional nodal status. Magnetic resonance imaging had a high sensitivity and PET/CT had a high specificity for N staging in rectal cancer.

Copyright © 2011 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

  

Login

Article Tools

Share

Article Level Metrics

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.