Skip Navigation LinksHome > September/October 2010 - Volume 34 - Issue 5 > Comparative Study of the Diagnostic Ability of Magnetic Reso...
Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography:
doi: 10.1097/RCT.0b013e3181e23ff2
Abdominal Imaging

Comparative Study of the Diagnostic Ability of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Multidetector Row Computed Tomography for Anomalous Pancreaticobiliary Ductal Junction

Nakamoto, Atsushi MD; Kim, Tonsok MD, PhD; Hori, Masatoshi MD, PhD; Onishi, Hiromitsu MD, PhD; Nakaya, Yasuhiro MD, PhD; Tsuboyama, Takahiro MD; Tatsumi, Mitsuaki MD, PhD; Tomoda, Kaname MD, PhD

Collapse Box


Objective: To compare the diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and multidetector row computed tomography (MDCT) for an anomalous pancreaticobiliary ductal junction (PBJ).

Methods: This study included 26 patients who underwent MR imaging, MDCT, and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Seventeen of the patients were diagnosed by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography as having an anomalous PBJ. Three radiologists independently reviewed MR images alone, contrast-enhanced CT images alone, and MR images and CT images combined. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to compare diagnostic capabilities.

Results: The mean area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (Az [95% confidence interval]) was 0.75 (0.73-0.77) for MR imaging alone, 0.79 (0.70-0.89) for CT alone, and 0.84 (0.82-0.86) for the 2 modalities combined. Only between the combination and MR imaging alone was there significant difference in Az value (P < 0.05).

Conclusions: The diagnostic performance of MR imaging and MDCT was equivalent for an anomalous PBJ. The addition of MDCT to MR imaging improved the diagnostic performance.

Copyright © 2010 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.



Article Tools


Article Level Metrics

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.