Skip Navigation LinksHome > November/December 2004 - Volume 28 - Issue 6 > Differentiation of Adrenal Adenomas From Metastases With Une...
Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography:
Abdominal Imaging

Differentiation of Adrenal Adenomas From Metastases With Unenhanced Computed Tomography

Gufler, Hubert*; Eichner, Gerrit†; Grossmann, Annette‡; Krentz, Helga§; Schulze, Christian Georg‡; Sauer, Sabine*; Grau, Gabriele‡

Collapse Box


Objective: To investigate whether the diagnostic accuracy of unenhanced computed tomography (CT) regarding the differentiation of adrenal adenomas from adrenal metastases is increased by applying a combination of morphologic criteria instead of only measuring the density values of the tumor.

Patients and Methods: Unenhanced CT scans of 56 patients with an adrenal mass and a history of an extra-adrenal malignancy were analyzed for size, attenuation, contour, and structure characteristics of the adrenal tumor. Coefficients yielded by multiple logistic regression analysis were used for the construction of an additive total score (score S) that included several diagnostic criteria. The reliability of the total score and all parameter combinations was tested by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. The nature of the adrenal lesion was determined by follow-up CT (40 patients), percutaneous biopsy (15 patients), or surgery (1 patient). Twenty-four of the neoplasms were adenomas, and 32 were found to be metastases.

Results: The score of the combined CT parameters showed the largest area under the ROC curve. The highest predictive power indicated by the model was calculated at a cutoff value of 7.05, with a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 96.8% for the detection of metastases. At 6.85 points as the cutoff value, the scoring system still maintained a sensitivity of 95.8% and a specificity of 96.9%.

Conclusion: The differentiation between adrenal adenomas and metastases is improved by applying our scoring system compared with any single parameter alone. The total score is obtained by adding 10% of the density values to the size in centimeters, plus 2 if the contour of the lesion is blurred and plus 1 if the structure is inhomogeneous. By setting the threshold at 7 points, all but 1 lesion were classified correctly.

© 2004 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.



Article Tools


Article Level Metrics

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.