Higher Total Knee Arthroplasty Revision Rates Among United States Blacks Than Whites: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis

Bass, Anne R. MD; McHugh, Kelly; Fields, Kara BA; Goto, Rie MSLIS; Parks, Michael L. MD; Goodman, Susan M. MD

Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery - American Volume:
doi: 10.2106/JBJS.15.00976
Evidence-Based Orthopaedics
Abstract

Background: Reportedly 2% to 5.7% of total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) require revision within 5 years. The purpose of this study was to determine whether blacks are at higher risk of TKA revision than whites in the United States.

Methods: We performed a systematic review of English-language articles published from 2000 to 2015. Study inclusion criteria were (1) performance of the study in the United States, (2) TKA as the primary procedure studied, (3) a follow-up period at least 2 years, (4) reporting of revision rates, and (5) analysis of patient race as an independent predictor of revision. We then performed a random-effects meta-analysis to calculate a pooled hazard ratio for TKA revision in blacks compared with whites.

Results: A total of 4,286 studies were identified and screened by title; 106, by abstract; and 24, by full text. Six studies met the inclusion criteria. Only 4 of the 6 studies could undergo meta-analysis because of overlapping study populations in 3 of them. The meta-analysis represented 451,960 patients who underwent TKA, of whom 28,772 (6.4%) were black. Of the total, 31,568 patients (7.0%) underwent revision surgery. The risk of revision TKA was significantly higher among blacks than whites (pooled hazard ratio, 1.38; 95% confidence interval, 1.20 to 1.58; p < 0.001). Analysis of the 3 studies with overlapping study populations demonstrated discordant results as a result of adjustment compared with non-adjustment for insurance eligibility, a surrogate for socioeconomic status.

Conclusions: Blacks in the United States are at higher risk of revision TKA than whites. Socioeconomic status contributed to revision risk and is an important confounder in analyses of race.

Level of Evidence: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Author Information

1Rheumatology (A.R.B. and S.M.G.), Research (K.M.), Healthcare Research Institute (K.F.), Education (R.G.), and Orthopedics (M.L.P.), Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY

E-mail address for A.R. Bass: Bassa@hss.edu

Article Outline

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a successful operation that results in substantial improvement in quality of life for most patients1. Although TKA utilization in the United States has increased exponentially over the last 2 decades2,3, there are persistent disparities in utilization between blacks and whites4. Blacks are less willing to undergo joint replacement5,6 in part because of a perception of increased surgical risk7. Unfortunately, this perception has a basis in reality since blacks do in fact experience short-term complications of TKA more frequently than whites4,8-11. However, whether long-term outcomes of TKA are worse for United States blacks than whites is less clear.

The need for revision is the most definitive marker of long-term TKA failure; 2% to 5.7% of patients require revision TKA within 5 years12-17, most commonly for aseptic loosening or instability13,18. The risk of revision TKA is higher in patients who undergo surgery at a low-volume hospital19-21. Patient-related factors associated with an increased revision risk include being younger16,22-24 and having medical comorbidities16,20,25, but whether race and/or socioeconomic status contribute to revision risk is not clear. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine whether blacks in the United States are at greater risk of revision TKA than whites.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Materials and Methods

This systematic review was designed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines26.

Back to Top | Article Outline
Inclusion Criteria

We reviewed English-language articles published in peer-reviewed journals since January 1, 2000, to determine whether there was an association between black race and the risk of revision following TKA. We limited our search to studies published during or after 2000 to minimize bias related to temporal changes in TKA outcomes27. We restricted our review to articles published in peer-reviewed journals to ensure methodological oversight. We specifically avoided the use of “race” and similar terms in our search to minimize the effect of publication bias. That is, we surmised that authors might only use the term “race” in their title or abstract if race was found to be associated with revision risk, but not if an association was not found.

Study inclusion criteria were (1) performance of the study in the United States, (2) TKA as the primary procedure studied, (3) a follow-up period of at least 2 years, (4) reporting of revision rates, and (5) analysis of patient race as an independent predictor of revision.

Back to Top | Article Outline
Information Sources and Search Strategy

A medical librarian searched the MEDLINE database in PubMed, the Embase database, and the Cochrane Library (including the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Health Technology Assessment Database, and NHS United Kingdom National Health Service] Economic Evaluation Database) using the following search strategy:

“Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee*”[MeSH Major Topic] OR (total[Title/Abstract] AND knee[Title/Abstract] AND (arthroplasty[Title/Abstract] OR replacement[Title/Abstract]))

AND

(((“risk”[MeSH Terms] OR “risk”[All Fields] OR “risk of”[All Fields]) AND failure[All Fields]) OR ((“risk”[MeSH Terms] OR “risk”[All Fields] OR “risk of”[All Fields]) AND revision[All Fields]) OR (rate[All Fields] AND failure[All Fields]) OR (rate[All Fields] AND revision[All Fields]) OR (revision[All Fields] AND (“risk”[MeSH Terms] OR “risk”[All Fields])) OR (“mortality”[Subheading] OR “mortality”[All Fields] OR “survival”[All Fields] OR “survival”[MeSH Terms])).

AND

(“2000/01/01”[PDAT]: “3000/12/31”[PDAT])

All searches were performed on March 31, 2015. The search returned 4,286 results.

Back to Top | Article Outline
Study Selection

Two reviewers (A.R.B, S.M.G) screened all titles, the abstracts of selected articles, and the full text of chosen abstracts (Fig. 1). We excluded studies with the following attributes: (1) study not performed in the United States, (2) procedure other than TKA (for example, unicompartmental knee arthroplasty [UKA] or total hip arthroplasty), (3) no reporting of revision rates, (4) study of TKA utilization or epidemiology, (5) study assessing outcomes of revision TKA, (6) literature review or expert opinion article, (7) wrong surgical outcome (such as short-term complications, mortality, or cost), (8) race not included in population demographics, or (9) race not analyzed as an independent variable.

We contacted the authors of papers in which revision was a primary outcome and the racial characteristics of the study population were provided, but in which the impact of race on revision rates was not published. In these cases we requested additional unpublished data from the authors. If they were unable to provide either hazard ratios (HRs) plus confidence intervals (CIs) for the risk of revision based on race, or raw data adequate for us to analyze, then the article was excluded. Data were extracted from the selected manuscripts by 1 of the authors using a standardized approach.

All included studies were graded 2b according to the Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine levels of evidence28. The risk of bias within studies was low.

Back to Top | Article Outline
Statistical Analysis

From each eligible study, we extracted a TKA revision HR estimate and corresponding 95% CI for blacks compared with whites from the multivariable Cox proportional hazards model with the most complete adjustment for potential confounders. Given an expected regional variation in effect size, a random-effects model was used to estimate a pooled TKA revision HR estimate with a 95% CI. We used the inverse variance method for pooling and the DerSimonian-Laird method29 to estimate between-study variance. A p value of <0.05 was considered significant for the test of overall effect. We assessed between-study heterogeneity using the Cochran Q test, with p < 0.10 considered significant, and calculated I2 to quantify the proportion of the total variation in effect estimates that can be attributed to heterogeneity as opposed to chance30. Potential publication bias was assessed by visual examination of a funnel plot, the Egger linear regression test31, and the Begg rank correlation test32, with p < 0.10 considered significant. Results of the funnel plot asymmetry tests were interpreted in the context of their noted lack of power when <10 studies are included in the analysis33,34.

Analyses were performed using the meta package implemented in R software (version 3.1.0; R Foundation for Statistical Computing).

Back to Top | Article Outline

Results

Study Selection

All 4,286 identified studies were screened by title; 106, by abstract; and 24, by full text (Fig. 1). We contacted the authors of 3 studies that documented race but did not analyze it as an independent variable15,17,35 and were able to obtain additional data from 1 of them that we included in our analysis17. In the case of 2 additional publications in which race was documented but not analyzed25,36, the authors used the same data set to analyze the impact of race on revision rates in separate publications that were included in the meta-analysis13,37.

Six studies were selected for review (Table I)12-14,16,17,37. Three of the studies analyzed a nationally representative sample of Medicare beneficiaries from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (“national Medicare 5% sample”) and included overlapping populations12,17,37. Only 1 of these studies was included in the meta-analysis17. It was chosen because it encompassed the greatest time span and controlled for the most variables. Although all 4 studies suggested an increased risk of revision in blacks, we performed a meta-analysis to estimate the average magnitude of this risk.

Back to Top | Article Outline
Meta-Analysis and Study Characteristics

The meta-analysis represented 451,960 patients who underwent TKA, of whom 28,772 (6.4%) were black. Of the total patient population, 31,568 (7.0%) underwent revision surgery. The random-effects model suggested that blacks had a greater risk of revision compared with whites (pooled HR, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.20 to 1.58; p < 0.001) (Fig. 2). There was evidence of moderate heterogeneity among studies (p = 0.087; I2 = 54.4%). Neither the Egger linear regression test nor the Begg rank correlation test indicated publication bias (p = 0.996 and 0.497, respectively).

Four studies were included in the meta-analysis13,14,16,17. The study by Blum et al. used administrative data to assess racial differences in surgical complications, mortality, and revision after TKA using 2001-2007 Pennsylvania Health Care Cost Containment Council data14. They fitted a Cox proportional hazards model incorporating 5 years of follow-up, and censored patients at death or at the end of follow-up. Although they found no difference in 30-day or 1-year surgical complications or mortality for blacks compared with whites, the 5-year revision risk was 39% higher for blacks (p = 0.01).

Bolognesi et al. compared the risk of surgical complications and revision in patients undergoing UKA and TKA using data from the 1999-2009 national Medicare 5% sample17. The association of race with revision risk was not published, but at our request the authors provided results of a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model demonstrating a nonsignificant 13% increase in 5-year TKA revision risk in blacks compared with whites. Patients undergoing UKA compared with TKA had a comparable 1-year risk of infection, venous thromboembolism, or death, but more than double the risk of revision at 5 years (HR, 2.4; 95% CI, 2.03 to 2.83).

Dy et al. used the New York State Department of Health Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System hospital discharge database as well as the California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development hospital discharge database to analyze patient, hospital, and community-specific variables associated with TKA revision risk16. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to evaluate the time to revision TKA in the overall cohort, 5 and 9 years after index surgery. The revision risk was 39% higher in blacks (p < 0.001), and higher in patients who were of younger age, male, or underwent surgery at a low-hospital volume.

Namba et al. utilized 2001-2010 data from the Kaiser Permanente National Total Joint Replacement Registry to assess risk factors for aseptic TKA revision13. This registry includes Kaiser-insured patients from Southern and Northern California, Colorado, Georgia, Hawaii, the Northwest, and Mid-Atlantic states. Median follow-up was 2.9 years (interquartile range, 1.2 to 4.9 years). A Cox proportional hazards model revealed a 73% greater risk of TKA revision in blacks compared with whites. Revision risk was also associated with younger age, lower body mass index, diabetes, unilateral compared with bilateral TKA, and high-flexion implants.

All 4 studies controlled for age, sex, comorbidities, and hospital surgical volume (Table I). Three controlled for insurance status (Medicare compared with Medicaid)14,16,17 and the fourth study included only Kaiser Permanente-insured individuals13. Two studies controlled for geographic region (United States region and also urban compared with rural)16,17, and 1 cohort was geographically localized14. Hospital teaching status was controlled for in 3 studies14,16,17 and length of stay, in 2 of them14,17.

Three studies analyzed the national Medicare 5% sample from overlapping time periods from 1997 to 200912,17,37, of which only 1 was included in the meta-analysis17. These 3 studies all controlled for age, sex, and comorbidities. Only 1 of these 3 studies found a significant increase in revision risk for blacks37. This study differed from the other 2 in that it did not control for insurance or socioeconomic status (either Medicaid eligibility17 or eligibility for state subsidies for Medicare12) (Fig. 3). Hospital volume was controlled for only in the study by Bolognesi et al.17 but the HR for revision risk among blacks in that study was similar to the HR found in the study by Curtin et al.12 (HR, 1.13 compared with 1.19, respectively), suggesting that hospital volume was not a significant confounder in the national Medicare 5% sample.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Discussion

Our meta-analysis demonstrates that blacks are at significantly higher risk of TKA revision than whites in the United States (pooled HR, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.20 to 1.58; p < 0.001) and that insurance/socioeconomic status is an important confounder in analyses of race. Specifically, in 3 published analyses of the national Medicare 5% sample12,17,37 race was a significant risk factor for TKA revision only in the study not controlling for insurance (Medicaid eligibility or eligibility for state subsidies for Medicaid), a surrogate marker for socioeconomic status. All studies that were included in the meta-analysis either controlled for insurance status14,16,17 or included patients insured by a single payer13. There was moderate heterogeneity among studies (p = 0.087; I2 = 54.4%) that could reflect regional differences among the study populations. In addition, 1 of the studies13 only analyzed the risk of aseptic revision, whereas the others included both septic and aseptic revisions. Neither the Egger linear regression test nor the Begg rank correlation test indicated publication bias; however, funnel plot asymmetry tests have low power when <10 studies are included in the analysis. Our meta-analysis was limited by the fact that many studies do not analyze race as a predictor of revision risk, even when the demographic data are available. We contacted the authors of 3 such studies15,17,35 but were only able to obtain adequate data from 1 of them17. Nonetheless, our findings are in keeping with other studies that show worse TKA outcomes in blacks 2 to 5 years after surgery, including greater pain38, poorer function39,40, and less overall patient satisfaction41.

Two-thirds of patients who undergo revision arthroplasty do so for aseptic failure (including loosening, instability, periprosthetic fracture, and arthrofibrosis) and one-third, for infection16. Blacks are more likely to have diabetes42, a risk factor for wound infection43 that is, in turn, a risk factor for septic prosthetic failure44. Blacks are at higher risk of postoperative arthrofibrosis45, and manipulation under anesthesia is a risk factor for aseptic revision46. Although blacks are more likely to live near high-volume hospitals, they are less likely than whites to use high-quality hospitals47. Even when blacks have surgery in high-volume hospitals they more commonly undergo surgery performed by residents48, and senior surgical residents have higher rates of complications than attending surgeons48. The risk of revision arthroplasty increases when the procedure lasts >120 minutes49, which is more likely with inexperienced surgeons.

The higher prevalence of poverty among blacks in the United States can make it difficult to interpret the association of race with surgical outcomes; 16% of blacks have incomes below the poverty level compared with 12% of whites, and being poor is associated with poor health50. Although most administrative databases lack data on patient socioeconomic status, insurance status can serve as a crude surrogate for income. Thirty-two percent of blacks compared with 15% of whites are insured by Medicaid51, and 21% to 26% of blacks compared with 13% to 16% of whites are uninsured50,51. Browne et al. demonstrated that Medicaid payer status is associated with a higher risk of postoperative in-hospital complications following joint arthroplasty after controlling for race52. In contrast, studies performed in countries with publicly funded universal health-care systems, such as the United Kingdom and Finland, found no significant relationship between socioeconomic status and short-term complications of joint replacement surgery53 or the risk of revision arthroplasty54. This suggests that societal factors can mitigate the impact of poverty on health-care outcomes.

Eliminating health disparities is a priority of both the United States Surgeon General55 and the United States Department of Health and Human Services56 in part because of their cost to society. It has been estimated that eliminating such disparities for minorities during the years from 2003 to 2006 would have reduced direct medical care expenditures by approximately $230 billion and indirect costs associated with illness and premature death by more than $1 trillion (in 2008 inflation-adjusted dollars)57. With regard to TKA revision specifically, hospital-level interventions should be undertaken to reduce the disparity in the risk among blacks and other disadvantaged groups. For example, preoperative education has been shown to reduce the risk of postoperative arthrofibrosis58, and preoperative diabetes and obesity management could help to reduce the risk of septic prosthetic failure. Future studies should address whether disparities in arthroplasty revision exist for both aseptic and septic revisions, since this will help to guide targeted interventions.

Investigation performed at the Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY

Disclosure: There was no external funding for this study. On the Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest forms, which are provided with the online version of the article, one or more of the authors checked “yes” to indicate that the author had a relevant financial relationship in the biomedical arena outside the submitted work.

Back to Top | Article Outline

References

1. Shan L, Shan B, Suzuki A, Nouh F, Saxena A. Intermediate and long-term quality of life after total knee replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015 ;97(2):156–68.
2. Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, Mowat F, Halpern M. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 ;89(4):780–5.
3. Losina E, Thornhill TS, Rome BN, Wright J, Katz JN. The dramatic increase in total knee replacement utilization rates in the United States cannot be fully explained by growth in population size and the obesity epidemic. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012 ;94(3):201–7.
4. Singh JA, Lu X, Rosenthal GE, Ibrahim S, Cram P. Racial disparities in knee and hip total joint arthroplasty: an 18-year analysis of national Medicare data. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014 ;73(12):2107–15. Epub 2013 Sep 18.
5. Ibrahim SA, Siminoff LA, Burant CJ, Kwoh CK. Differences in expectations of outcome mediate African American/white patient differences in “willingness” to consider joint replacement. Arthritis Rheum. 2002 ;46(9):2429–35.
6. Allen KD, Golightly YM, Callahan LF, Helmick CG, Ibrahim SA, Kwoh CK, Renner JB, Jordan JM. Race and sex differences in willingness to undergo total joint replacement: the Johnston County Osteoarthritis Project. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2014 ;66(8):1193–202.
7. Lavernia CJ, Alcerro JC, Rossi MD. Fear in arthroplasty surgery: the role of race. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010 ;468(2):547–54. Epub 2009 Sep 18.
8. Ibrahim SA, Stone RA, Han X, Cohen P, Fine MJ, Henderson WG, Khuri SF, Kwoh CK. Racial/ethnic differences in surgical outcomes in veterans following knee or hip arthroplasty. Arthritis Rheum. 2005 ;52(10):3143–51.
9. Cai X, Cram P, Vaughan-Sarrazin M. Are African American patients more likely to receive a total knee arthroplasty in a low-quality hospital? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 ;470(4):1185–93. Epub 2011 Aug 31.
10. Schoenfeld AJ, Tipirneni R, Nelson JH, Carpenter JE, Iwashyna TJ. The influence of race and ethnicity on complications and mortality after orthopedic surgery: a systematic review of the literature. Med Care. 2014 ;52(9):842–51.
11. Soohoo NF, Farng E, Lieberman JR, Chambers L, Zingmond DS. Factors that predict short-term complication rates after total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010 ;468(9):2363–71.
12. Curtin B, Malkani A, Lau E, Kurtz S, Ong K. Revision after total knee arthroplasty and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in the Medicare population. J Arthroplasty. 2012 ;27(8):1480–6. Epub 2012 Apr 3.
13. Namba RS, Cafri G, Khatod M, Inacio MC, Brox TW, Paxton EW. Risk factors for total knee arthroplasty aseptic revision. J Arthroplasty. 2013 ;28(8)(Suppl):122–7. Epub 2013 Aug 15.
14. Blum MA, Singh JA, Lee GC, Richardson D, Chen W, Ibrahim SA. Patient race and surgical outcomes after total knee arthroplasty: an analysis of a large regional database. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2013 ;65(3):414–20.
15. Singh JA, Kwoh CK, Richardson D, Chen W, Ibrahim SA. Sex and surgical outcomes and mortality after primary total knee arthroplasty: a risk-adjusted analysis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2013 ;65(7):1095–102.
16. Dy CJ, Marx RG, Bozic KJ, Pan TJ, Padgett DE, Lyman S. Risk factors for revision within 10 years of total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 ;472(4):1198–207. Epub 2013 Dec 18.
17. Bolognesi MP, Greiner MA, Attarian DE, Watters TS, Wellman SS, Curtis LH, Berend KR, Setoguchi S. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty among Medicare beneficiaries, 2000 to 2009. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013 ;95(22):e174.
18. Lombardi AV Jr, Berend KR, Adams JB. Why knee replacements fail in 2013: patient, surgeon, or implant? Bone Joint J. 2014 ;96-B(11)(Supple A):101–4.
19. Badawy M, Espehaug B, Indrekvam K, Engesæter LB, Havelin LI, Furnes O. Influence of hospital volume on revision rate after total knee arthroplasty with cement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013 ;95(18):e131.
20. Jämsen E, Peltola M, Eskelinen A, Lehto MU. Comorbid diseases as predictors of survival of primary total hip and knee replacements: a nationwide register-based study of 96 754 operations on patients with primary osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2013 ;72(12):1975–82. Epub 2012 Dec 19.
21. Manley M, Ong K, Lau E, Kurtz SM. Total knee arthroplasty survivorship in the United States Medicare population: effect of hospital and surgeon procedure volume. J Arthroplasty. 2009 ;24(7):1061–7. Epub 2008 Nov 1.
22. Julin J, Jämsen E, Puolakka T, Konttinen YT, Moilanen T. Younger age increases the risk of early prosthesis failure following primary total knee replacement for osteoarthritis. A follow-up study of 32,019 total knee replacements in the Finnish Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop. 2010 ;81(4):413–9.
23. Stambough JB, Clohisy JC, Barrack RL, Nunley RM, Keeney JA. Increased risk of failure following revision total knee replacement in patients aged 55 years and younger. Bone Joint J. 2014 ;96-B(12):1657–62.
24. Meehan JP, Danielsen B, Kim SH, Jamali AA, White RH. Younger age is associated with a higher risk of early periprosthetic joint infection and aseptic mechanical failure after total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014 ;96(7):529–35.
25. Bozic KJ, Lau E, Ong K, Chan V, Kurtz S, Vail TP, Rubash HE, Berry DJ. Risk factors for early revision after primary TKA in Medicare patients. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 ;472(1):232–7.
26. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gøtzsche PC, Ioannidis JP, Clarke M, Devereaux PJ, Kleijnen J, Moher D. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 ;62(10):e1–34. Epub 2009 Jul 23.
27. Lalmohamed A, Vestergaard P, de Boer A, Leufkens HG, van Staa TP, de Vries F. Changes in mortality patterns following total hip or knee arthroplasty over the past two decades: a nationwide cohort study. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2014 ;66(2):311–8.
28. CEBM. Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine - levels of evidence (March 2009). http://www.cebm.net/oxford-centre-evidence-based-medicine-levels-evidence-march-2009/. Accessed 2016 Apr 29.
29. DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1986 ;7(3):177–88.
30. Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ. 2003 ;327(7414):557–60.
31. Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ. 1997 ;315(7109):629–34.
32. Begg CB, Mazumdar M. Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics. 1994 ;50(4):1088–101.
33. Sterne JA, Sutton AJ, Ioannidis JP, Terrin N, Jones DR, Lau J, Carpenter J, Rücker G, Harbord RM, Schmid CH, Tetzlaff J, Deeks JJ, Peters J, Macaskill P, Schwarzer G, Duval S, Altman DG, Moher D, Higgins JP. Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 2011;343:d4002. Epub 2011 Jul 22.
34. Terrin N, Schmid CH, Lau J. In an empirical evaluation of the funnel plot, researchers could not visually identify publication bias. J Clin Epidemiol. 2005 ;58(9):894–901.
35. Mahoney OM, Kinsey TL. 5- to 9-year survivorship of single-radius, posterior-stabilized TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008 ;466(2):436–42. Epub 2008 Jan 10.
36. Adams AL, Paxton EW, Wang JQ, Johnson ES, Bayliss EA, Ferrara A, Nakasato C, Bini SA, Namba RS. Surgical outcomes of total knee replacement according to diabetes status and glycemic control, 2001 to 2009. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013 ;95(6):481–7.
37. Ong KL, Lau E, Suggs J, Kurtz SM, Manley MT. Risk of subsequent revision after primary and revision total joint arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010 ;468(11):3070–6. Epub 2010 May 25.
38. Barrack RL, Ruh EL, Chen J, Lombardi AV Jr, Berend KR, Parvizi J, Della Valle CJ, Hamilton WG, Nunley RM. Impact of socioeconomic factors on outcome of total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 ;472(1):86–97.
39. Kamath AF, Horneff JG, Gaffney V, Israelite CL, Nelson CL. Ethnic and gender differences in the functional disparities after primary total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010 ;468(12):3355–61. Epub 2010 Jul 15.
40. Lavernia CJ, Alcerro JC, Contreras JS, Rossi MD. Ethnic and racial factors influencing well-being, perceived pain, and physical function after primary total joint arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011 ;469(7):1838–45.
41. Jacobs CA, Christensen CP, Karthikeyan T. Patient and intraoperative factors influencing satisfaction two to five years after primary total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2014 ;29(8):1576–9. Epub 2014 Mar 28.
42. Hasson BR, Apovian C, Istfan N. Racial/ethnic differences in insulin resistance and beta cell function: relationship to racial disparities in type 2 diabetes among African Americans versus Caucasians. Curr Obes Rep. 2015 ;4(2):241–9.
43. Daines BK, Dennis DA, Amann S. Infection prevention in total knee arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2015 ;23(6):356–64.
44. Jämsen E, Huhtala H, Puolakka T, Moilanen T. Risk factors for infection after knee arthroplasty. A register-based analysis of 43,149 cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 ;91(1):38–47.
45. Springer BD, Odum SM, Nagpal VS, Lombardi AV Jr, Berend KR, Kim RH, Dennis DA. Is socioeconomic status a risk factor for stiffness after total knee arthroplasty? A multicenter case-control study. Orthop Clin North Am. 2012 ;43(5):e1–7.
46. Werner BC, Carr JB, Wiggins JC, Gwathmey FW, Browne JA. Manipulation under anesthesia after total knee arthroplasty is associated with an increased incidence of subsequent revision surgery. J Arthroplasty. 2015 ;30(9)(Suppl):72-5. Epub 2015 Jun 3.
47. Kronebusch K, Gray BH, Schlesinger M. Explaining racial/ethnic disparities in use of high-volume hospitals: decision-making complexity and local hospital environments. Inquiry. 2014;51:10. Epub 2014 Jan 1.
48. Changoor NR, Ortega G, Ekladios M, Zogg CK, Cornwell EE 3rd, Haider AH. Racial disparities in surgical outcomes: does the level of resident surgeon play a role? Surgery. 2015 ;158(2):547–55. Epub 2015 May 21.
49. Young SW, Mutu-Grigg J, Frampton CM, Cullen J. Does speed matter? Revision rates and functional outcomes in TKA in relation to duration of surgery. J Arthroplasty. 2014 ;29(7):1473–1477.e1. Epub 2014 Mar 12.
50. CDC. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report: CDC health disparities and inequalities report—United States, 2013. http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/pdf/other/su6203.pdf. Accessed 2016 Apr 29.
51. The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. Disparities in health and health care: five key questions and answers. 2012. http://kff.org/disparities-policy/issue-brief/disparities-in-health-and-health-care-five-key-questions-and-answers/. Accessed 2016 Apr 29.
52. Browne JA, Novicoff WM, D’Apuzzo MR. Medicaid payer status is associated with in-hospital morbidity and resource utilization following primary total joint arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014 ;96(21):e180.
53. Hollowell J, Grocott MP, Hardy R, Haddad FS, Mythen MG, Raine R. Major elective joint replacement surgery: socioeconomic variations in surgical risk, postoperative morbidity and length of stay. J Eval Clin Pract. 2010 ;16(3):529–38. Epub 2010 Feb 18.
54. Peltola M, Järvelin J. Association between household income and the outcome of arthroplasty: a register-based study of total hip and knee replacements. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2014 ;134(12):1767–74. Epub 2014 Nov 07.
55. Surgeon General National Prevention Council 2010. National prevention strategy: elimination of health disparities. 2014. http://www.surgeongeneral.gov/priorities/prevention/strategy/health-disparities.pdf. Accessed 2016 Apr 29.
56. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy People 2020: disparities. 2015. https://www.healthypeople.gov/2020/about/foundation-health-measures/Disparities. Accessed 2016 Apr 29.
57. LaVeist TA, Gaskin D, Richard P. Estimating the economic burden of racial health inequalities in the United States. Int J Health Serv. 2011;41(2):231–8.
58. Livbjerg AE, Froekjaer S, Simonsen O, Rathleff MS. Pre-operative patient education is associated with decreased risk of arthrofibrosis after total knee arthroplasty: a case control study. J Arthroplasty. 2013 ;28(8):1282–5. Epub 2013 Mar 16.
Copyright 2016 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated