Institutional members access full text with Ovid®

Share this article on:

The Stabilizing Mechanism of the Latarjet Procedure: A Cadaveric Study

Yamamoto, Nobuyuki MD, PhD; Muraki, Takayuki PhD; An, Kai-Nan PhD; Sperling, John W. MD; Cofield, Robert H. MD; Itoi, Eiji MD, PhD; Walch, Gilles MD; Steinmann, Scott P. MD

Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery - American Volume: 7 August 2013 - Volume 95 - Issue 15 - p 1390–1397
doi: 10.2106/JBJS.L.00777
Scientific Articles

Background: The Latarjet procedure has been used commonly for extra-articular treatment of anterior glenohumeral joint instability. Recently, the technique also has been used as a bone-grafting procedure to repair large glenoid defects. The “sling effect” and the “bone-block effect” have been proposed as the stabilizing mechanisms of this procedure. The aim of this study was to determine the stabilizing mechanisms of this procedure.

Methods: Eight fresh-frozen shoulders were prepared and tested with use of a custom testing machine instrumented with a load cell. With a 50-N axial force applied to the humerus, the humeral head was translated anteriorly. Translational force was measured at both the end-range and the mid-range arm positions, with the capsule intact, after creation of a Bankart lesion, after creation of a large glenoid defect, and after the Latarjet procedure with no load and then three different sets of loads applied to the subscapularis and conjoint tendons. Then, these two tendons were removed to observe the contribution of the sling effect to the stability. Finally, the sutures attaching the coracoacromial ligament to the capsular flap were removed in order to observe the effect of that attachment.

Results: The translational force, which decreased significantly after creation of a Bankart lesion or a large glenoid defect, returned to the intact-condition level after the Latarjet procedure was performed. At the end-range arm position, the contribution of the sling effect by the subscapularis and conjoint tendons was 76% to 77% as the load changed, and the remaining 23% to 24% was contributed by the suturing of the capsular flap. At the mid-range position, the contribution of the sling effect was 51% to 62%, and the remaining 38% to 49% was contributed by the reconstruction of the glenoid.

Conclusions: The main stabilizing mechanism of the Latarjet procedure was the sling effect at both the end-range and the mid-range arm positions.

Clinical Relevance: The Latarjet procedure remains an effective procedure for restoring stability to an unstable glenohumeral joint, particularly when there is glenoid bone deficiency.

1Biomechanics Laboratory, Division of Orthopedic Research (N.Y., T.M., and K.-N.A.), and Department of Orthopedic Surgery (J.W.S., R.H.C., and S.P.S.), Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905. E-mail address for S.P. Steinmann:

2Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tohoku University School of Medicine, Sendai 980-8574, Japan

3Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Centre Orthopédique Santy, 24 Avenue P Santy, Lyon 69008, France

Copyright 2013 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated
You currently do not have access to this article

To access this article: