Institutional members access full text with Ovid®

Share this article on:

Incidence of Knee Sepsis After ACL Reconstruction at One Institution: The Impact of a Clinical Pathway

Sechriest, V. Franklin II MD; Lieutenant Commander; Carney, Joseph R. MD; Medical Corps, U.S. Navy; Kuskowski, Michael A. PhD; Lieutenant Commander; Haffner, James L. RN, MSN, MSPH; Nurse Corps, U.S. Navy; Mullen, Mollie J. MBA, RN; Covey, Captain Dana C. MD; Medical Corps, U.S. Navy

Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery - American Volume: 1 May 2013 - Volume 95 - Issue 9 - p 843–849
doi: 10.2106/JBJS.L.00408
Scientific Articles
Supplementary Content
Disclosures

Background: After experiencing an unusually high incidence of knee sepsis after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, we sought to (1) describe how we resolved this problem through temporary discontinuation of the procedure, formation of a multidisciplinary ACL Task Force, systematic investigation of clinical data and institutional care practices, and development and implementation of an evidence-based ACL Clinical Pathway (the Pathway); and (2) report our findings and results.

Methods: From 1999 through 2008, thirty-seven cases of knee sepsis after ACL reconstruction were recorded at our institution. In 2008 (yearly incidence, 4.4%), ACL reconstructions were temporarily suspended and a Task Force was assembled to (1) identify infection risk factors or epidemiological links among cases, (2) inspect environment and processes for possible infection sources, and (3) update existing perioperative practices according to current evidence-based guidelines to reduce surgical site infection risk. These actions led to the development of the Pathway for patients and providers. The rates of knee sepsis before and after the Pathway was implemented were compared.

Results: There was no consistent risk factor or epidemiologic link among the cases of knee sepsis other than the time and place of the ACL reconstruction. Process review identified shortfalls in decontamination and sterilization of some surgical equipment. Perioperative care practices review revealed wide interprovider variation. Pathway implementation reduced the rate of knee sepsis after ACL reconstruction from 1.96% (twenty-four cases after 1226 ACL reconstructions performed from 2002 to 2008) to 0% (zero cases after 500 ACL reconstructions performed from 2008 to 2011); the difference was significant (p = 0.003).

Conclusions: When a Task Force investigation suggested that knee sepsis after ACL reconstruction was a multifactorial problem, we implemented and standardized evidence-based perioperative care practices via the institution-wide Pathway, which significantly improved the quality and consistency of care for patients undergoing ACL reconstruction, as well evidenced by the elimination of knee sepsis.

Clinical Relevance: For the care of surgical patients in many settings, there remains disparity between the best available evidence and actual clinical practices. This study shows how a hospital community implemented and standardized a bundle of evidence-based practices to significantly improve the quality of clinical outcomes for patients undergoing an orthopaedic procedure.

1c/o Elaine P. Henze, BJ, ELS, Medical Editor and Director, Editorial Services, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University/Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center, 4940 Eastern Ave., #A665, Baltimore, MD 21224-2780. E-mail address for E.P. Henze: ehenze1@jhmi.edu

2Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Naval Medical Center San Diego, 34800 Bob Wilson Drive, Suite 5, San Diego, CA 92134-1005

Copyright 2013 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated
You currently do not have access to this article

To access this article: