Institutional members access full text with Ovid®

Share this article on:

Comparison of Ten-Year Survivorship of Hip Prostheses with Use of Conventional Polyethylene, Metal-on-Metal, or Ceramic-on-Ceramic Bearings

Milošev, Ingrid PhD; Kovač, Simon MD; Trebše, Rihard MD; Levašič, Vesna MD; Pišot, Venčeslav MD

Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery - American Volume: 3 October 2012 - Volume 94 - Issue 19 - p 1756–1763
doi: 10.2106/JBJS.J.01858
Scientific Articles
Supplementary Content
Disclosures

Background: To improve the long-term performance of hip prostheses, alternative bearings with metal-on-metal (MoM) and ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) couples have been introduced. Although currently the results from the use of these bearings are in the midterm stage, there have been few comparative studies of these different bearings.

Methods: From 2000 to 2002, 487 total hip replacements were performed with use of a BICON-PLUS acetabular cup and an SL-PLUS femoral stem (Plus Orthopedics, Rotkreuz, Switzerland, now Smith & Nephew Orthopaedics). The patients were divided into three groups according to the type of bearing that was used: an MoM group (sixty-nine prostheses), a metal-on-polyethylene (MoP) group (200 prostheses), and a CoC group (218 prostheses). Patient demographic data and data with regard to revision operations were evaluated from the hospital computer database. The mean follow-up period was 8.5 years (range, 6.9 to 10.5 years). Patient activity was assessed with use of the University of California at Los Angeles activity scale.

Results: The mean patient age was sixty years at the time of the index arthroplasty in the MoM and CoC groups, and seventy-one years in the MoP group. Based on a scale of ten, the mean postoperative activity level was six in the CoC group, five in the MoM group, and four in the MoP group. Survival at ten years with regard to revision for any reason was 0.984, 0.956, and 0.879 for the MoP, CoC, and MoM groups, respectively. When revision for any reason was considered as the end point, survival of the MoM bearings was significantly worse than that of the MoP bearings (p = 0.005). Survival at ten years with regard to revision for aseptic loosening was 0.995, 0.990, and 0.894 for the MoP, CoC, and MoM groups, respectively. When revision for aseptic loosening was considered as the end point, survival of the MoM group was significantly worse than that of either the MoP group (p = 0.001) or the CoC group (p = 0.003).

Conclusions: When comparing two groups of patients of similar mean age and mean activity level undergoing total hip arthroplasty with the use of alternative bearings, CoC bearings had better survival than did MoM bearings at the ten-year follow-up; the difference was significant when revision for aseptic loosening was defined as a failure. However, neither the CoC nor the MoM alternative bearings provided improved midterm results when compared with the results of the conventional MoP bearings. For older, less active patients, traditional metal-on-polyethylene bearings are the appropriate choice.

Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Valdoltra Orthopaedic Hospital, Jadranska c. 31, SI-6280 Ankaran, Slovenia. E-mail address: ingrid.milosev@ijs.si. E-mail address for S. Kovač: simon.kovac@ob-valdoltra.si. E-mail address for R. Trebše: rihard.trebse@ob-valdoltra.si. E-mail address for V. Levašič: vesna.levasic@ob-valdoltra.si. E-mail address for V. Pišot: venceslav.pisot@ob-valdoltra.si

Copyright 2012 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated
You currently do not have access to this article

To access this article: