Institutional members access full text with Ovid®

Share this article on:

Enhancement of Periprosthetic Bone Quality with Topical Hydroxyapatite-Bisphosphonate Composite

Suratwala, Sanjeev J. MD; Cho, Samuel K. MD; van Raalte, Jonathan J.; Park, Sang Hyun PhD; Seo, Sung Wook MD; Chang, Seong-Sil MD, PhD; Gardner, Thomas R. MCE; Lee, Francis Young-In MD, PhD

Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery - American Volume: 01 October 2008 - Volume 90 - Issue 10 - p 2189–2196
doi: 10.2106/JBJS.G.00409
Scientific Articles
Supplementary Content

Background: Implant loosening is associated with inflammatory bone loss induced by ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene wear debris. We hypothesized that a hydroxyapatite-bisphosphonate composite improves periprosthetic bone quality and osseous integration of an intramedullary implant even in the presence of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene particles in an experimental rat femur model.

Methods: A preliminary in vitro study determined the optimal concentration of zoledronate (50 μM) that would maximally decrease osteoclasts without harming osteoblasts. Hydroxyapatite-coated intramedullary nails were implanted bilaterally in the femora of sixteen rats (the control group), and hydroxyapatite-zoledronate-coated nails were implanted bilaterally in the femora of sixteen rats (the experimental group). Ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene particles were introduced into the femoral canal before implantation. Eight rats from each group were killed at six weeks, and the remaining rats were killed at six months. Periprosthetic bone mass was analyzed by dual x-ray absorptiometry and microcomputed tomography. Osseous integration was examined by biomechanical testing of pullout strength.

Results: The mean bone area (and standard deviation) in the periprosthetic bone region was significantly greater (p < 0.0001) in the hydroxyapatite-zoledronate group (2.388 ± 0.960 mm2) than in the control group (0.933 ± 0.571 mm2). This difference was larger in the six-week group than in the six-month group (p = 0.03). The average peak pullout force for the treated femora (241.0 ± 95.1 N) was significantly greater (p < 0.0001) than that for the controls (55.6 ± 49.0 N). This difference was similar in the six-week and six-month groups. The energy required for nail pullout was significantly greater (p < 0.0001) for the treated femora (521.6 ± 293.8 N-mm) than for the controls (142.2 ± 152.1 N-mm). This difference in energy to pullout was similar in the six-week and six-month groups. Regression analysis demonstrated a high correlation between periprosthetic bone mass and peak pullout force for both the six-week (r = 0.766, p = 0.0005) and six-month (r = 0.838, p < 0.0001) groups.

Conclusions: Surface modification of implants with hydroxyapatite-zoledronate improves periprosthetic bone quality and osseous integration.

Clinical Relevance: Hydroxyapatite-based site-specific delivery of bisphosphonates may be one way of reducing ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene wear particle-induced periprosthetic osteolysis and implant loosening.

1Center for Orthopaedic Research, BB 1412, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Columbia University, 630 West 168th Street, New York, NY 10032

2Tissue Healing Laboratory, Los Angeles Orthopaedic Hospital, University of California at Los Angeles, 2400 South Flower Street, Los Angeles, CA 90060

Copyright 2008 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated
You currently do not have access to this article

To access this article: