Institutional members access full text with Ovid®

Share this article on:

Lumbar Discectomy Outcomes Vary by Herniation Level in the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial

Lurie, J.D. MD, MS; Faucett, S.C. MD, MS; Hanscom, B. MS; Tosteson, T.D. ScD; Ball, P.A. MD; Abdu, W.A. MD, MS; Frymoyer, J.W. MD; Weinstein, J.N. DO, MSc

Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery - American Volume: 01 September 2008 - Volume 90 - Issue 9 - p 1811–1819
doi: 10.2106/JBJS.G.00913
Scientific Articles

Background: The Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial showed an overall advantage for operative compared with nonoperative treatment of lumbar disc herniations. Because a recent randomized trial showed no benefit for operative treatment of a disc at the lumbosacral junction (L5-S1), we reviewed subgroups within the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial to assess the effect of herniation level on outcomes of operative and nonoperative care.

Methods: The combined randomized and observation cohorts of the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial were analyzed by actual treatment received stratified by level of disc herniation. Overall, 646 L5-S1 herniations, 456 L4-L5 herniations, and eighty-eight upper lumbar (L2-L3 or L3-L4) herniations were evaluated. Primary outcome measures were the Short Form-36 bodily pain and physical functioning scales and the modified Oswestry Disability Index assessed at six weeks, three months, six months, one year, and two years. Treatment effects (the improvement in the operative group minus the improvement in the nonoperative group) were estimated with use of longitudinal regression models, adjusting for important covariates.

Results: At two years, patients with upper lumbar herniations (L2-L3 or L3-L4) showed a significantly greater treatment effect from surgery than did patients with L5-S1 herniations for all outcome measures: 24.6 and 7.1, respectively, for bodily pain (p = 0.002); 23.4 and 9.9 for Short Form-36 physical functioning (p = 0.014); and −19 and −10.3 for Oswestry Disability Index (p = 0.033). There was a trend toward greater treatment effect for surgery at L4-L5 compared with L5-S1, but this was significant only for the Short Form-36 physical functioning subscale (p = 0.006). Differences in treatment effects between the upper lumbar levels and L4-L5 were significant for Short Form-36 bodily pain only (p = 0.018).

Conclusions: The advantage of operative compared with nonoperative treatment varied by herniation level, with the smallest treatment effects at L5-S1, intermediate effects at L4-L5, and the largest effects at L2-L3 and L3-L4. This difference in effect was mainly a result of less improvement in patients with upper lumbar herniations after nonoperative treatment.

Level of Evidence: Prognostic Level I. See Instructions to Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

1Multidisciplinary Clinical Research Center (J.D.L., B.H., T.D.T., P.A.B., W.A.A., J.W.F., and J.N.W.), Department of Medicine, Dartmouth Medical School (J.D.L.), and the Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice (J.N.W.), Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center (S.C.F.), One Medical Center Drive, Lebanon, NH 03756. E-mail address for J.D. Lurie:

Copyright 2008 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated
You currently do not have access to this article

To access this article: