Institutional members access full text with Ovid®

Share this article on:

Comparison of the Collagen Meniscus Implant with Partial Meniscectomy: A Prospective Randomized Trial

Rodkey, William G. DVM; DeHaven, Kenneth E. MD; Montgomery, William H. III MD; Baker, Champ L. Jr. MD; Beck, Charles L. Jr. MD; Hormel, Scott E. MD; Steadman, J. Richard MD; Cole, Brian J. MD; Briggs, Karen K. MPH

Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery - American Volume: 01 July 2008 - Volume 90 - Issue 7 - p 1413–1426
doi: 10.2106/JBJS.G.00656
Scientific Articles

Background: Loss of meniscal tissue leads to increased pain and decreased clinical function and activity levels. We hypothesized that patients receiving a collagen meniscus implant would have better clinical outcomes than patients treated with partial medial meniscectomy alone.

Methods: Three hundred and eleven patients with an irreparable injury of the medial meniscus or a previous partial medial meniscectomy, treated by a total of twenty-six surgeon-investigators at sixteen sites, were enrolled in the study. There were two study arms, one consisting of 157 patients who had had no prior surgery on the involved meniscus (the “acute” arm of the study) and one consisting of 154 patients who had had one, two, or three prior meniscal surgical procedures (the “chronic” arm). Patients were randomized either to receive the collagen meniscus implant or to serve as a control subject treated with a partial meniscectomy only. Patients underwent frequent clinical follow-up examinations over two years and completed validated outcomes questionnaires over seven years. The patients who had received a collagen meniscus implant were required by protocol to have second-look arthroscopy at one year to determine the amount of new tissue growth and to perform a biopsy to assess tissue quality. Reoperation and survival rates were determined.

Results: In the acute group, seventy-five patients received a collagen meniscus implant and eighty-two were controls. In the chronic group, eighty-five patients received the implant and sixty-nine were controls. The mean duration of follow-up was fifty-nine months (range, sixteen to ninety-two months). The 141 repeat arthroscopies done at one year showed that the collagen meniscus implants had resulted in significantly (p = 0.001) increased meniscal tissue compared with that seen after the original index partial meniscectomy. The implant supported meniscus-like matrix production and integration as it was assimilated and resorbed. In the chronic group, the patients who had received an implant regained significantly more of their lost activity than did the controls (p = 0.02) and they underwent significantly fewer non-protocol reoperations (p = 0.04). No differences were detected between the two treatment groups in the acute arm of the study.

Conclusions: New biomechanically competent meniscus-like tissue forms after placement of a collagen meniscus implant, and use of the implant appears safe. The collagen meniscus implant supports new tissue ingrowth that appears to be adequate to enhance meniscal function as evidenced by improved clinical outcomes in patients with a chronic meniscal injury. The collagen meniscus implant has the utility to be used to replace irreparable or lost meniscal tissue in patients with a chronic meniscal injury. The implant was not found to have any benefit for patients with an acute injury.

Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions to Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

1Steadman Hawkins Research Foundation, 108 South Frontage Road West, Suite 303, Vail, CO 81657. E-mail address:

2University of Rochester, 601 Elmwood Avenue, #665, Rochester, NY 14642

3San Francisco Orthopaedic Surgeons Medical Group, 1 Shrader Street, Suite 650, San Francisco, CA 94117

4Hughston Orthopaedic Clinic, P.O. Box 9517, 6262 Veterans Parkway (31909), Columbus, GA 31908

5Center of Orthopaedic and Rehabilitation Excellence, 3584 West 9000 South, Suite 405, West Jordan, UT 84088

6Orthopaedic Physician Associates, 1600 East Jefferson Street, Suite 600, Seattle, WA 98122

7Steadman Hawkins Clinic, 181 West Meadow Drive, Suite 400, Vail, CO 81657

8Rush University Medical Center, 1725 West Harrison Avenue, Suite 1063, Chicago, IL 60612

9Steadman Hawkins Research Foundation, 181 West Meadow Drive, Suite 1000, Vail, CO 81657

Copyright 2008 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated
You currently do not have access to this article

To access this article: