Institutional members access full text with Ovid®

Share this article on:

Variability in Surgical Technique for Brachioradialis Tendon Transfer: Evidence and Implications

Murray, Wendy M. PhD; Hentz, Vincent R. MD; Fridén, Jan MD, PhD; Lieber, Richard L. PhD

Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery - American Volume: September 2006 - Volume 88 - Issue 9 - p 2009–2016
doi: 10.2106/JBJS.E.00973
Scientific Articles

Background: Transfer of the tendon of the brachioradialis muscle to the tendon of the flexor pollicis longus restores lateral pinch function after cervical spinal cord injury. However, the outcomes of the procedure are unpredictable, and the reasons for this are not understood. The purpose of this study was to document the degree of variability observed in the performance of this tendon transfer.

Methods: The surgical technique used for the brachioradialis tendon transfer was assessed in two ways. First, the surgical attachment length of the brachioradialis was quantified, after transfer to the flexor pollicis longus, with use of intraoperative laser diffraction to measure muscle sarcomere length in eleven individuals (twelve limbs) with tetraplegia. Second, ten surgeons who regularly performed this procedure were surveyed regarding their tensioning preferences. Using a biomechanical model of the upper extremity, we investigated theoretically the effect of different surgical approaches on the active muscle-force-generating capacity of the transferred brachioradialis in functionally relevant elbow, wrist, and hand postures.

Results: The average sarcomere length (and standard deviation) of the transferred brachioradialis was 3.5 ± 0.3 μm. That length was significantly correlated to the in situ sarcomere length (r2 = 0.53, p < 0.05). Surgical tensioning preferences varied considerably; however, six of the ten surgeons positioned the patient's elbow between full extension (0° of elbow flexion) and 50° of flexion when selecting the attachment length, and six of the ten stated that their goal was to tension the transfer slightly tighter than its resting tension. The computer simulations suggested that a “tighter” brachioradialis transfer would produce its peak active force in an elbow position that is more flexed than the elbow position in which a “looser” transfer would produce its peak active force.

Conclusions: This study provides evidence that experienced surgeons perform this tendon transfer differently from one another. Biomechanical simulations suggested that these differences could result in substantial variability in the active force that the transferred brachioradialis can produce in functionally relevant postures.

Clinical Relevance: The surgical attachment length and the position of the patient's limb at the time of tendon transfer are both controllable and measurable parameters. Understanding the relationship between surgical technique and postoperative muscle function may provide surgeons with more control of clinical outcomes.

1 The Bone and Joint Center, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, 3801 Miranda Avenue (153), Palo Alto, CA 94304. E-mail address: murray@rrdmail.stanford.edu

2 Robert A. Chase Hand and Upper Limb Center, Department of Surgery, Stanford University and Veterans Administration Medical Center, 770 Welch Road, #400, Stanford, CA 94304-5775

3 Department of Hand Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, SE-413 45 Göteborg, Sweden

4 Departments of Orthopaedics and Bioengineering, University of California and Veterans Administration Medical Centers, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093-9151

Copyright 2006 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated
You currently do not have access to this article

To access this article: