Institutional members access full text with Ovid®

Share this article on:

Lumbar Total Disc Replacement: Seven to Eleven-Year Follow-Up

Tropiano, Patrick MD; Huang, Russel C. MD; Girardi, Federico P. MD; Cammisa, Frank P. Jr. MD; Marnay, Thierry MD

Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery - American Volume: March 2005 - Volume 87 - Issue 3 - p 490–496
doi: 10.2106/JBJS.C.01345
Scientific Articles
Supplementary Content

Background: Symptomatic lumbar degenerative disc disease is a challenging entity to treat. The results of arthrodesis may be compromised in the short term by pseudarthrosis and in the long term by pain at the iliac-crest donor site and by junctional degeneration. Total disc replacement has the potential to provide long-lasting relief to these patients. The purpose of this study was to present the clinical and radiographic results assessed seven to eleven years following a Prodisc total lumbar disc replacement.

Methods: Sixty-four patients had single or multiple-level implantation of a total lumbar disc replacement between 1990 and 1993. The mean duration of follow-up was 8.7 years. Clinical results were evaluated by assessing preoperative and postoperative lumbar pain, radiculopathy, disability, and modified Stauffer-Coventry scores. Preoperative and postoperative radiographs were evaluated as well. Subgroup analysis was performed to determine if gender, an age of less than forty-five years, previous surgery, or multilevel surgery had an effect on outcome.

Results: At an average of 8.7 years postoperatively, there were significant improvements in the back-pain, radiculopathy, disability, and modified Stauffer-Coventry scores. Thirty-three of the fifty-five patients with sufficient follow-up had an excellent result, eight had a good result, and fourteen had a poor result. Neither gender nor multilevel surgery affected outcome. An age of less than forty-five years and prior lumbar surgery had small but significant negative effects on outcome. Radiographs did not demonstrate loosening, migration, or mechanical failure in any patient. Five patients had approach-related complications.

Conclusions: The Prodisc lumbar total disc replacement appears to be effective and safe for the treatment of symptomatic degenerative disc disease. Gender and multilevel surgery did not affect the outcomes, whereas prior lumbar surgery or an age of less than forty-five years was associated with slightly worse outcomes. Longer follow-up of this cohort of patients and randomized trials comparing disc replacement with arthrodesis are needed.

Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions to Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hôpital CHU Nord, Chemin des Bourrelly, 13915 Marseille CEDEX 20, France

2 The Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY 10021. E-mail address for R.C. Huang:

3 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Clinique du Parc, 50 Rue Emile-Combes, Boite Postal 20, 34171 Castelnau-le-Lez, France

Copyright 2005 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated
You currently do not have access to this article

To access this article: