Home Current Issue Previous Issues Published Ahead-of-Print For Authors Journal Info
Skip Navigation LinksHome > April 1, 2008 - Volume 47 - Issue 4 > Prevalence and Predictors of Deterioration of a Trustful Pat...
JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes:
1 April 2008 - Volume 47 - Issue 4 - pp 467-471
doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e31815f3bdc
Brief Report: Clinical Science

Prevalence and Predictors of Deterioration of a Trustful Patient-Provider Relationship Among HIV-Infected Persons Treated With Antiretroviral Therapy

Préau, Marie PhD; Leport, Catherine MD; Villes, Virginie MSc; Michelet, Christian MD; Collin, Fidéline; Carrieri, Maria-Patrizia PhD; Ragnaud, Jean-Marie MD; Taieb, Audrey MSc; Raffi, François MD; Spire, Bruno MD, PhD; the ANRS CO-8 APROCO Study Group

Collapse Box

Abstract

Objectives: We studied the evolution of the patient-provider relationship (PPR) in HIV-infected patients who reported trustful relationships at highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) treatment initiation.

Methods: Psychosocial and clinical data were obtained from the French ANRS CO-8 cohort. Break of trust was defined using the question How much do you trust the provider who usually treats you at this clinic? Predictors of a possible break of trust during the 5 years after initiating treatment for those patients reporting a trustful PPR at month 0 were identified using a Cox model.

Results: During a total follow-up of 3044 person-years, 68 (7%) patients reported having at least 1 break of trust in their PPR. Break of trust is independently associated with younger age, dissatisfaction with medical staff's explanations, cigarette smoking, and self-reported side effects and is independently inversely associated with severe HIV-related events and changes of treatment.

Conclusions: A patient's break of trust in his provider is relatively infrequent. Accounting for the influence of immunologic status and psychosocial factors, self-reported side effects are shown to be detrimental to the PPR. Interestingly, clinical events and changes of treatment prevent a possible break of trust by reinforcing the provider's role. These results underline the importance of recognizing a patient's perceived secondary effects and developing appropriate care.

© 2008 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.