Skip Navigation LinksHome > April 15, 2004 - Volume 35 - Issue 5 > The Effects of Herpes Simplex Virus-2 on HIV-1 Acquisition a...
Text sizing:
JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes:
Review Article

The Effects of Herpes Simplex Virus-2 on HIV-1 Acquisition and Transmission: A Review of Two Overlapping Epidemics

Corey, Lawrence MD*†; Wald, Anna MD, MPH*‡; Celum, Connie L. MD, MPH*; Quinn, Thomas C. MD§

Free Access
Article Outline
Collapse Box

Author Information

From the *Department of Medicine, University of Washington Program in Infectious Diseases, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; †Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of Washington Program in Infectious Diseases, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; ‡Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington Program in Infectious Diseases, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; and §Division of Infectious Diseases, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Bethesda, MD.

Received for publication September 26, 2003; accepted January 13, 2004.

Supported by NIH grant AI-30731 (LC, AW); AI 47981 and AI52054 (CC).

Reprints: Lawrence Corey, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, 1100 Fairview Avenue N, Room D3-100, PO Box 19024, Seattle, WA 98109-1024 (e-mail:

Collapse Box


Abstract: Increasing evidence demonstrates a substantial link between the epidemics of sexually transmitted HIV-1 and herpes simplex virus (HSV)-2 infection. More than 30 epidemiologic studies have demonstrated that prevalent HSV-2 is associated with a 2- to 4-fold increased risk of HIV-1 acquisition. Per-sexual contact transmission rates among couples from Rakai, Uganda indicate that at all levels of plasma HIV-1 RNA in the source partner, HSV-2-seropositive HIV-1–susceptible persons have a 5-fold greater risk of acquiring HIV-1 compared with HSV-2–negative persons. In vitro and in vivo studies suggest that mucosal HIV-1 shedding is more frequent and in greater amounts during mucocutaneous HSV-2 replication, including subclinical mucosal reactivations. Most HIV-1–infected persons are coinfected with HSV-2, and most experience frequent subclinical and clinical reactivations of HSV-2. Subclinical HSV reactivation elevates serum HIV-1 RNA levels, and daily therapy with acyclovir appears to reduce plasma HIV-1 RNA. These data show that greater attention to the diagnosis and treatment of HSV-2 among HIV-1–infected persons is warranted, especially those who continue to be sexually active, those not on antiretroviral therapy, or those whose disease is not well suppressed by antiretrovirals.

Over the past 5 years, data from Africa, Asia, and the Americas have highlighted the parallel and intersecting epidemics of HIV-1 and herpes simplex virus (HSV)-2, with growing understanding about the impact of genital HSV infection on increased risk of HIV-1 acquisition. Of all the sexually transmitted diseases (STDs), there appears to be true “epidemiologic synergy” between these 2 viruses, 1 in that HIV-1 incidence is increased in parallel with HSV-2 prevalence among HIV-1–negative and –positive persons, and HIV-1 prevalence increases HSV-2 incidence. Furthermore, HIV-1 infection changes the natural history of HSV-2 infection, and HSV infection may alter the course of HIV-1 disease.

Sexual transmission of HIV-1 continues throughout Africa, Asia, and Eastern Europe, with the rate of new HIV-1 infections again increasing in the United States and Europe after a decade of decline. An even more silent epidemic of HSV-2 is also occurring throughout all regions of the world, including the United States; 1 in 4 sexually active adults in the United States has HSV-2 infection, with a 31% increase in HSV-2 prevalence between 1978 and 1990. 2 In the United States, 40–60% of attendees in STD clinics have already acquired genital herpes, 3–5 and 20–35% of pregnant women are HSV-2 seropositive. 6–8 Mathematical models derived from HSV-2 seroprevalence studies estimate that 1.6 million new HSV-2 infections occur yearly in the United States. 9 In the United States, African American persons, especially African American women, account for a disproportionate burden of both HSV-2 and heterosexually transmitted HIV-1 infection. 2,10,11

Seroprevalence of HSV-2 in Western European countries, including France, Germany, the Netherlands, Italy, and Switzerland, now approaches that of the United States (Table 1). In South America, HSV-2 prevalence rates are similar to or higher than the United States, in both heterosexual and homosexual populations. Household serosurveys of women in Costa Rica and Brazil and serosurveys of pregnant women in Latin America show HSV-2 prevalence rates >30%. 12,13 HSV-2 infection is comparably high among men who have sex with men (MSM) in Latin America with 60–70% of HIV-1–seronegative MSM and >85% of HIV-1–seropositive MSM in Peru infected with HSV-2. 14 Comparably high HSV-2 rates have been observed in sub-Saharan Africa, where HIV prevalence is the highest. HSV-2 acquisition rates among South African teenagers are estimated to be 10–20% per year after sexual debut, and 20% of HIV-1–seronegative and 80% of HIV-1–seropositive teenagers are HSV-2 seropositive. 15 HSV-2 seroprevalence is >40% among antenatal attendees in Africa, 16 and ranges from 60% to 95% among female sex workers in sub-Saharan Africa. 16–18

Table 1
Table 1
Image Tools
Table 1
Table 1
Image Tools

HSV is now is the major cause of genital ulcer disease (GUD) in both developed 19 and developing countries. 20–22 In South Africa, where the etiology of GUD has been studied for 3 decades, HSV was demonstrated to be the cause of GUD in 1.3% of male gold miners with GUD in 1986, increasing to 10% in 1994 and 24% in 1998. 23 Similar trends over the past 2 decades have been observed in Harare, Zimbabwe, where the proportion of GUD diagnosed as herpes increased from <25% in the 1980s to 73% in 1999. 24 Recent studies have shown HSV to be the predominant cause of genital lesions in Thailand (82%) and India (50%). 25,26 In all of these studies, HSV-2 infections were substantially more frequent than other etiologies of genital ulcers. This shift likely reflects several factors, including successful treatment of syphilis and chancroid through the World Health Organization Syndromic Management Guidelines for GUD; patients with HIV-1–associated immunodeficiency have more persistent HSV-2 ulcerations and thus present for care more frequently than immunocompetent persons; and the increasing use of polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based methods to detect HSV DNA in ulcers—a technology that is 4 times more sensitive for detecting HSV on mucosal surfaces than viral isolation, and less subject to collection and transport problems. 27,28

Given the recent number of studies documenting epidemiologic, clinical, and biologic interactions between HSV-2 and HIV-1, we undertook a systematic review of the literature. This article reviews the data suggesting that HSV-2 increases the risk of HIV-1 acquisition; HSV-2 increases the risk of HIV-1 transmission; HIV-1 alters the natural history of HSV-2; HSV-2 accelerates HIV-1 disease progression; and why this accumulating evidence warrants greater attention and new approaches from clinicians, epidemiologists, and public health leaders.

Back to Top | Article Outline


We searched MEDLINE from 1968–2002 using the terms HIV-1 or AIDS and HSV or genital herpes. In addition, we reviewed abstracts from pertinent infectious disease and HIV-1 conferences, examined the bibliographies of relevant articles, and contacted directors of laboratories performing type-specific serologies. For each issue addressed, we present the available data and discuss the quality of evidence.

Back to Top | Article Outline


Epidemiologic Associations Between HSV and HIV-1 Acquisition

A recent meta-analysis of the association between HSV-2 infection and risk of HIV-1 acquisition reviewed 31 studies, involving >25,000 persons. 29 When this review was performed, the risk estimate from 9 cohort and nested case-control studies that documented HSV-2 infection prior to HIV-1 acquisition was 2.1 (95% CI 1.4, 3.2). The risk estimate from 22 case-control and cross-sectional studies was 3.9 (95% CI 3.1–5.1). The risk of HIV-1 infection in HSV-2–seropositive persons was elevated in all subgroups examined: women (odds ratio [OR] = 4.5, 95% CI 3.8–7.4), MSM (OR = 4.3, 95% CI 2.4–7.6), heterosexual men (OR = 5.1, 95% CI 3.2–8.4), developed countries (OR = 2.9, 95% CI 1.7–4.7), and developing countries (OR = 5.3, 95% CI 3.8–7.4). Most studies adjusted the estimate for the relationship between HSV-2 and HIV for sexual behavior, and the relationship remained significant. Although unmeasured confounding by high-risk sexual behavior is possible, observational studies cannot show causality, therefore the association between HSV-2 and HIV in wide geographic regions in populations with diverse sexual behavior suggests that the association is unlikely to be solely an “epiphenomenon of behavioral risk.” In one of the largest studies, Weiss et al. 30,31 evaluated factors that could distinguish between 2 cities with high HIV-1 prevalence in central Africa (Kisumu, Kenya, and Ndola, Zambia, both with HIV-1 seroprevalence of 30–32%) and 2 cities with low HIV-1 prevalence (Cotonou, Benin, and Yaounde, Cameroon, with HIV-1 seroprevalence of 3–8%). The frequency of HSV-2 infection and lack of circumcision were identified as 2 central determinants of HIV-1 prevalence. 31

Three recent studies have indicated that recent acquisition of HSV-2 increases the risk for HIV-1 acquisition even more than prevalent HSV-2 infection. In a study of 763 adults in rural Tanzania, HSV-2 increased the risk of HIV-1 acquisition among persons who seroconverted to HSV-2 in the prior 2 years (OR = 13.2, 95% CI 5.0–34.9 for men and OR = 2.4, 95% CI 0.8–6.8 for women), which was greater than the risk of prevalent HSV-2 infection (OR = 5.8, 95% CI 2.4–13.9 and OR = 1.3, 95% CI 0.6–2.8 among men and women, respectively). 32 Similarly, in a study of 2260 male STD clients and 463 female STD clinic patients and sex workers in Pune, India, persons recently infected with HSV-2 had a 3.8-fold increased risk of HIV-1 acquisition compared with 1.7-fold increased risk for those with prevalent HSV-2 infection. 33 Incident HSV-2 infection was also associated with several-fold increased risk of HIV-1 acquisition among MSM in Peru. 34 In a nested case-control study of 116 MSM who seroconverted to HIV-1 and 342 matched HIV-negative MSM controls in the United States, there was a trend toward a higher risk of HIV acquisition among those with incident HSV-2 (adjusted OR = 2.8; 95% CI 0.8–10.1) than prevalent HSV-2 infection (adjusted OR = 1.8, 95% CI 1.1–2.9). 35 Although sexual behavior may be one factor in the higher risk of HIV infection among those with incident than prevalent HSV-2 infection, these observations also have a biologic explanation in that both clinical and subclinical HSV reactivation is substantially more frequent in the first year after acquisition of HSV-2 than later. 36,37

Back to Top | Article Outline
HSV-2 Increases the Per-Contact Transmission Rate of HIV-1

The most compelling observational data about the relative effects of HSV-2 infection on HIV-1 acquisition and transmission come from recent analyses of data from the Rakai community STD intervention trial. 38 HSV-2 is prevalent in this rural district of Uganda; HSV-2 antibodies were detected in 61% of 15- to 29-year-old women and 31% of 15- to 29-year-old men, and HSV was detected in 87% of ulcers with a confirmed etiology. 39 Data from a cohort of monogamous HIV-1–discordant couples from Rakai have helped define the per-contact rate of HIV-1 acquisition and transmission in the context of other risk factors such as HIV-1 RNA of the HIV-1–infected partner. 40 Symptoms of urethritis and laboratory-confirmed STD diagnoses, including gonorrhea, Chlamydia infection, and trichomoniasis, did not increase the per-contact risk of HIV-1 acquisition, which averaged 0.0011. 41 However, as shown in Table 2, the per-contact probability of HIV-1 infection was 5-fold higher if the susceptible partner was HSV-2 seropositive than HSV-2 seronegative (0.002 vs. 0.0004 per-contact, P = 0.01), an association that was observed for both men and women. In addition, if the HSV-2–seropositive susceptible partner reported symptomatic GUD, the probability of acquisition per coital act was 0.0031. However, the risk of HIV acquisition was also increased with asymptomatic HSV-2 (probability per act = 0.0019), suggesting that subclinical HSV-2 infection is almost as important as clinically recognized lesions in increasing susceptibility to HIV. 41 Notably, the per-contact HIV-1 acquisition rate of an HSV-2-seropositive person with a partner who has plasma HIV-1 RNA <1700 copies/mL was similar to that of an HSV-2–seronegative with a partner with HIV-1 RNA of 12,000 to 39,000 copies/mL (Table 3). Although this study was conducted among persons not receiving highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), these findings highlight the potential role of HSV-2 in increasing risk of HIV transmission in the setting of viral transmission on HAART.

Table 2
Table 2
Image Tools
Table 3
Table 3
Image Tools

In summary, a review of >35 studies conducted over the past decade in 4 continents (Europe, Africa, Asia, and South and North America), which includes heterosexual men, women, and MSM, consistently shows at least 2-fold increased risk of HIV-1 acquisition in persons with HSV-2 infection. The data from HIV-1–serodiscordant couples indicate that the risk for HIV-1 acquisition conferred by HSV-2 was demonstrated at all levels of plasma HIV-1 RNA of the source partner. Thus, preventing, recognizing, and treating early HSV-2 infection may be an important component of any strategy focusing on reducing the synergistic interaction between the 2 viruses. Mathematical modeling suggests the influence of HSV-2 fueling the HIV-1 epidemic may be greatest in the early periods of HIV-1 introduction into a community, before HIV-1 prevalence rates become high; an effect that has been posited for other STDs as well. 42 Suppressive antiviral therapy will be tested for efficacy in preventing HIV-1 acquisition among HSV-2–seropositive persons at high risk of HIV-1 acquisition as a “proof of concept” in a National Institutes of Health–funded multicenter trial (HIV Prevent Trials Network [HPTN] Protocol 039).

Back to Top | Article Outline
Biologic Interactions Between HSV and HIV-1: Implications for Acquisition

The biology of herpetic infections supports the epidemiologic observations regarding an association between HSV-2 and HIV-1 acquisition. In experimental animal models, mucosal disruption leads to increased susceptibility to HIV-1, as measured by infection occurring at a lower inoculation of simian retrovirus infection. 43 In addition to mucosal disruption, herpetic ulcerations are associated with an influx of large numbers of activated CD4-bearing lymphocytes, 44,45 providing increased numbers of target cells for HIV-1 attachment and entry in the genital tract during HSV-2 reactivation. Both mucosal disruption and the presence of increased numbers of activated CD4 cells increase the likelihood that any potential exposure to HIV-1 will result in infection of the exposed host.

Several HSV proteins (ICPO, ICP27, Us11, and others) increase expression of HIV-1, 46–49 and HSV infects and replicates in activated CD4 cells and macrophages. 50 Both heat-inactivated and infectious HSV-1 and HSV-2 virions have been shown to increase HIV-1 expression in macrophages, likely through stimulation of nuclear factor (NF)-κ B activity. 51 Biopsy samples have demonstrated viruses in both keratinocytes and macrophages by electron microscopy. 52 Schacker et al. 53 demonstrated HIV-1 RNA in 25 of 26 genital herpes lesions. HIV-1 RNA often exceeded 10,000 copies/mL of swab fluid and the quantity of HIV-1 in genital samples often exceeded HIV-1 RNA levels in blood. Similar findings were reported by investigators in India that demonstrated HIV-1 in genital ulcers in 34% of consecutive HIV-1–seropositive patients with GUD. 54

Several studies have shown that subclinical HSV reactivation is also associated with increased replication of HIV-1 on mucosal surfaces. This is of great importance epidemiologically in that most HSV-2 reactivation in the genital tract is clinically inapparent but associated with the same mucosal destruction and lymphocytic infiltration as overt genital herpetic lesions; HSV is released from mucosal lesions into the submucosa and small ulcerations precede the development of subclinical reactivation. 55 Mbopi Keou et al. 56 studied HSV-2 DNA and HIV-1 RNA in cervicovaginal secretions of women without genital lesions. The amount of HSV DNA measured in genital secretions correlated with amount of HIV-1 in genital secretions (r = 0.47, P = 0.02). McClelland et al. 57 also found that quantity of HSV DNA in cervical and vaginal secretions correlated with cervical HIV RNA and proviral DNA levels in those secretions.

Back to Top | Article Outline
Does HSV-2 Infection Enhance HIV-1 Transmission?

These data on the mucosal interactions of HIV and HSV-2 suggest that HIV-1–seropositive, HSV-2–seropositive persons may transmit HIV infection more frequently than HIV-1–seropositive persons who are HSV-2 seronegative. A study of HIV-discordant couples in Uganda found similar probabilities of HIV transmission irrespective of whether the HIV-positive partner was HSV-2 seropositive or seronegative. 58 However, the high prevalence of HSV-2 antibodies in HIV-positive persons (~85%) limited the power to detect an effect. It is noteworthy that the presence of recent symptomatic genital ulceration in the HIV-positive source partner significantly increased the transmission probability per act (0.0041) when compared with no ulceration (0.0011). 39 Because HSV-2 is the most common cause of genital ulceration in this population, it suggested that HSV-2 may enhance transmission of HIV from symptomatic dually infected persons.

Prospective studies of transmission of sexually transmitted infections are challenging, particularly because in most HIV-1–discordant couples in whom the HIV-1–infected partner has HSV-2 infection, the susceptible partner is also HSV-2 seropositive and thus it is difficult to disentangle acquisition and transmission effects. Thus, the central issue of whether control of HSV-2 reactivation can control HIV-1 transmission remains to be tested. The recent demonstration that daily antiviral therapy with valacyclovir can reduce HSV-2 transmission among HSV-2–discordant heterosexual couples supports the concept that antiviral therapy can reduce transmission of a viral STD. 59 The strong biologic plausibility that HSV-2 amplifies HIV-1 transmission indicates that an intervention study is warranted to evaluate whether treating HSV-2 among HIV-1–infected persons will reduce HIV-1 transmission.

Back to Top | Article Outline
HIV-1 Is Fueling the HSV-2 Epidemic

HIV-1 infection also appears to be fueling the HSV-2 epidemic. Studies of male factory workers in Zimbabwe and men and women in rural Rakai have shown markedly higher acquisition rates for HSV-2 in HIV-1–seropositive compared with HIV-1–seronegative persons, with relative risks of 4.7 and 3.7, respectively. 60,61 HIV-1–infected persons appear to have an increased risk of acquisition of HSV-2, although it is not known whether these observations represent increased susceptibility to HSV-2 infection or are a marker for sexual exposure to HIV-1 and HSV-2 coinfected persons who shed HSV from mucosal surfaces more frequently than HIV-1–seronegative persons with HSV-2 infection.

Back to Top | Article Outline
HSV-2 Infection in the HIV-1–Positive Person

Although HSV was one of the initial opportunistic infections described in the original report of AIDS in 1981, 62 it is only recently that the natural history of this infection has been systematically studied in HIV-1–infected persons. In the setting of untreated, advanced HIV-1 disease, HSV ulcers are often large, deep, sometimes mimicking chancroid, slow to heal, often appear in “atypical” areas of the body, and can lead to scarring (Fig. 1). However, they represent only a minor part of the spectrum of genital herpes in the HIV-1–infected person and markedly underestimate the frequency of true mucosal reactivation of HSV-2 in the HIV-1–seropositive person.

Figure 1
Figure 1
Image Tools

Similar to the natural history of HSV-2 among immunocompetent persons, most HSV-2 reactivation among HIV-positive persons is subclinical. 63,64 Figure 2 and Table 4 collate data from studies conducted in Seattle of HSV reactivation among HIV-1/HSV-2–seropositive men, as measured by viral isolation and HSV DNA PCR. HSV-2 reactivation is more frequent in HIV-seropositive vs. HIV-negative men; HSV-2 DNA was detected a median of 38% of days in HIV-1–seropositive MSM vs. 25% of days among HIV-1–seronegative MSM, and HSV was isolated in culture in 13 vs. 4% of days, respectively. Forty percent of days of HSV-2 reactivation as detected by culture and 59% of days by HSV DNA PCR was subclinical in HIV-seronegative men; the corresponding proportions were 54 and 66% in HIV-seropositive MSM, indicating the high frequency of subclinical disease in the immunocompromised populations. Both CD4 T-cell count and HIV-1 plasma RNA influence HSV-2 reactivation rates. A direct correlation is observed between days HSV is detected by culture or PCR and plasma HIV RNA levels and the negative correlation between CD4 count and HSV reactivation frequency. 63 However, the variability in reactivation rates is high at all levels of CD4 count and many persons with CD4 T-cell counts >350 cell/mm3 have as frequent reactivation as those with CD4 counts of <100 cells/mm3.63, 64

Table 4
Table 4
Image Tools
Figure 2
Figure 2
Image Tools

Posavad et al. 65 recently followed a cohort of HSV-2–and HIV-infected persons receiving HAART. Although HAART therapy reduced the frequency of genital lesions, it had surprisingly little effect on reducing subclinical HSV reactivation as measured by either HSV culture or PCR. 65 Thus, HSV reactivation is still frequent among HAART-treated patients (Fig. 2). Whether these frequent episodes of subclinical HSV reactivation among patients on HAART are associated with the same increase in mucosal HIV-1 RNA shedding as previously seen among persons not on HAART is at present unknown. These data do, however, suggest the interaction between HSV-2 and HIV remains of concern even among HIV-infected persons on HAART.

Back to Top | Article Outline
HIV-1 Replication Is Influenced by HSV

Several studies have evaluated the influence of HSV reactivation on plasma HIV-1 RNA. 66 Some have shown a rise in plasma HIV-1 RNA in association with genital lesions, whereas others have not. 67,68 Some studies used genital lesions as a marker of HSV reactivation, which, as discussed here, underestimates the frequency in which mucosal HSV infection occurs by approximately 2-fold and ignores the observation that subclinical HSV-2 reactivation influences mucosal HIV-1 replication. Two recent studies that evaluate subclinical HSV shedding suggest that HSV-2 significantly influences the replication of HIV-1. Gray et al. 67 have shown that in newly infected HIV-1–seropositive men and women in Rakai, HSV-2/HIV-1–coininfected persons have HIV-1 RNA titers that are a half log higher than HSV-2–seronegative HIV-1–seropositive persons. Schacker et al. 68 directly studied the influence of HSV infection on HIV-1 replication in vivo by administering chronic daily therapy with acyclovir to HIV/HSV-2–coinfected persons and measuring plasma HIV-1 RNA levels before and after administration of acyclovir. Acyclovir reduced plasma RNA levels by an average of one-third of a log; a reduction in plasma HIV RNA levels was observed in 11 of 12 persons, and HIV-1 RNA levels returned to previous baseline upon discontinuation of therapy. These studies may provide some explanation of the older studies with zidovudine monotherapy that showed increased survival with concomitant acyclovir use. 69 Whether the addition of daily antiviral therapy for HSV-2 infection would enhance the durability of HIV suppression on HAART therapy is unknown.

Back to Top | Article Outline
Treatment of Genital Herpes in the HIV-1–Seropositive Person

Nucleoside analogues for the treatment of HSV have been available for >2 decades. 70 All 3 licensed compounds—acyclovir, famciclovir, valacyclovir—have been shown to be effective for episodic, and, more importantly, chronic daily therapy for HSV-2 infection in HIV-positive men and women. 71–75 The data from these studies are summarized in Table 5 and illustrate the safety and efficacy of all 3 medications for reducing clinical and subclinical reactivation of HSV infection in HIV-infected men and women. Thrombotic microangiopathy was observed in early studies of valacyclovir in doses of 8 g per day for prevention of cytomegalovirus disease in HIV-1–infected patients but has not been observed among patients with HIV-1 treated with lower doses of valacyclovir appropriate for HSV infections (e.g., 1–1.5 g/d). 76 Oral antiviral medications for HSV lack significant drug interactions with antiretroviral therapies.

Table 5
Table 5
Image Tools

Decreased susceptibility of HSV isolates to acyclovir was initially described in immunocompromised patients, and acyclovir-resistant HSV became an important management issue early in the HIV-1 epidemic. 77 Three mechanisms of HSV resistance to acyclovir have been described. 78,79 By far, the most common is deficiency of thymidine kinase, which renders acyclovir ineffective as the drug requires viral thymidine kinase for initial phosphorylation. 80 Other, less commonly found mutants, include strains with altered thymidine kinase and DNA polymerase mutations. 81,82 Strains resistant to acyclovir are almost always resistant to penciclovir (the active form of famciclovir). Isolates with in vitro resistance to acyclovir may be found in lesions that respond to therapy. 83–85 In general, poor clinical response to the nucleosides is associated with high-level resistance to acyclovir (>10 μg/mL). Treatment of acyclovir-resistant HSV is beyond the scope of this review; success has been achieved with foscarnet, topical trifluoridine, and topical cidofovir. 86,87 Little is known of antiviral resistance to HSV infections in the developing world and antiviral monitoring of acyclovir resistance among HIV-seropositive persons should be maintained, as nucleoside treatment of genital herpes continues to increase worldwide. 88,89 If increasing chronic suppressive use results in increasing rates of resistance, then recommendations will need to be refocused on select groups at greatest benefit and with the lowest risk of acyclovir-resistant herpes.

The frequency of acyclovir-resistant HSV infection in the United States and Western Europe appears to have stabilized and even decreased, perhaps coincident with the widespread use of HAART. A recent survey of HIV-positive persons attending STD clinics in the United States showed that 3–5% of HIV-infected persons harbored HSV-2 isolates with reduced (>2 μg/mL) susceptibility to acyclovir in vitro, which is only slightly higher than the 1% observed among HIV-negative persons recruited from the same sites 88; none of these persons displayed clinically evident, symptomatic acyclovir-resistant herpes. Anecdotal evidence suggests that frequency of acyclovir-resistant herpes declined with the introduction of HAART.

Despite the data on the clinical utility of these medications on HSV reactivation in HIV-positive populations, definitive guidelines on the use of the nucleoside analogues for HSV are not available. We recommend that genital herpes be treated to reduce the duration and severity of clinical reactivation anogenital herpes. Given the high HSV-2 seroprevalence among HIV-infected persons, treatment of HSV-2 could potentially have a substantial public health impact on HIV trans mission, which has led to intervention studies to determine what degree HSV-2 suppression reduces HIV transmission Similarly, no data are available to indicate whether anti-HSV therapy further prolongs survival among HAART-treated pa tients, as it did with zidovudine monotherapy. 90

What should clinicians do now pending these data? There are no definitive answers and resource allocations appear to drive current practice. We believe the weight of the data support more frequent use of type-specific serologies to identify HIV-infected persons with unrecognized genital herpes and daily anti-HSV therapy for HIV-infected persons. HIV-seropositive persons whose disease is poorly controlled on ART and who have frequent HSV reactivation should be considered for chronic suppressive therapy. In addition, HIV- and HSV-2–coinfected persons who are sexually active should be advised of the association between HSV-2 reactivation and mucosal HIV-1 shedding, and such persons should be considered for daily suppressive anti-HSV therapy.

Back to Top | Article Outline


Studies have indicated that >95% of HSV-2–seropositive persons reactivate HSV-2 on mucosal surfaces and hence provide support for the concept that serologic testing for HSV-2 infection identifies persons at risk for mucosal reactivation. 91 In the United States and Western Europe, 40–80% of HIV-infected persons are coinfected with HSV-2, and, as such, serologic screening for HSV-2 would identify persons at high risk of frequent mucosal HSV-2 reactivation and enhanced shedding of mucosal HIV-1. Type-specific serologic assays for antibodies to HSV-2 have been approved for clinical use by the US Food and Drug Administration and are licensed throughout Europe. These assays detect antibodies to the HSV-1 and HSV-2 glycoproteins gG1 and gG2 and have been used in a wide variety of settings involving HIV-seropositive men and women. Their utility in some areas of central Africa is still being debated, but they have had extensive use in serosurveys and clinical management in the United States and Europe. 91–93 In addition to these serologic assays, laboratory assays such as viral culture, or, preferably, HSV DNA PCR should be used to define the etiology of genital lesions in HIV-seropositive persons. 94,95 Clinical diagnosis of GUD in HIV-seropositive persons is often unreliable, and infection with multiple pathogens is common. 94 HSV DNA PCR is the assay with the greatest sensitivity for detecting HSV in genital lesions. Ballard et al. 23 have shown that the appropriate treatment of genital lesions due to HSV-2 results in reduced amount of HIV-1 shed in such lesions.

In North America and Europe, we believe that data are sufficient to urge routine serologic testing for HSV-2 among persons with HIV-1 infection. Identifying the 50–60% of HIV-infected persons who are HSV-2 seropositive provides important information about the high likelihood of intermittent perianal and genitourinary symptoms from HSV-2 reactivation and the potential that such reactivation may lead to increases in plasma HIV-1 RNA elevations. 68,96 Moreover, such persons should have anti-HSV medications included for the empiric treatment of genital ulcerations or to consider HSV as a likely co-infecting pathogen if other causes of GUD are suspected.

We believe that HSV-2 serologic assays are unlikely to be necessary to define prevalent HSV-2 infection in populations where such coinfection is nearly universal (e.g., commercial sex workers in Africa). Such persons should be considered to be coinfected and increased awareness of the high prevalence of HSV as a sole or copathogen of genital ulcers in such persons is important. More systematic surveys of the prevalence of HSV-2 in African, Caribbean, and Asian HIV-infected people should be performed.

Back to Top | Article Outline


New approaches to reducing the transmission of HSV-2 and HIV-1 are needed. The increasing number of HSV-2– and HIV-1–seropositive persons with CD4 T-cell counts of >350 cells/mm3 who are not on HAART is of concern regarding the influence HSV-2 will continue to play in promulgating the HIV-1 epidemic in North America and Europe. Although use of antivirals for episodic therapy would be less costly and easier to implement as an HIV-1 prevention strategy, episodic treatment is also likely to be less effective in preventing HIV-1 acquisition or transmission than daily suppressive therapy, given the high proportion of subclinical HSV-2 reactivation. Lastly, recent consideration by the World Health Organization to include antiviral therapy for the syndromic treatment of GUD will lead toward providing more appropriate therapy for genital ulcers in the developing world. The tight epidemiologic and clinical association between HSV-2 and HIV-1 also provide an impetus to speed development of a vaccine to prevent HSV-2 acquisition or reactivation. From both clinical and public health perspectives, there is a clear imperative to test different approaches to interrupting the synergistic link between herpes and HIV-1.

Back to Top | Article Outline


1. Wasserheit JN. Epidemiological synergy: interrelationships between human immunodeficiency virus infection and other sexually transmitted diseases. Sex Transm Dis. 1992;19:61–77.

2. Fleming DT, McQuillan GM, Johnson RE, et al. Herpes simplex virus type 2 in the United States, 1976 to 1994. N Engl J Med. 1997;337:1105–1111.

3. Rompalo AM, Shepherd M, Lawlor JP, et al. Definitions of genital ulcer disease and variation in risk for prevalent human immunodeficiency virus infection. Sex Transm Dis. 1997;24:436–442.

4. Hook EW 3rd, Cannon RO, Nahmias AJ, et al. Herpes simplex virus infection as a risk factor for human immunodeficiency virus infection in heterosexuals. J Infect Dis. 1992;165:251–255.

5. Austin H, Macaluso M, Nahmias A, et al. Correlates of herpes simplex virus seroprevalence among women attending a sexually transmitted disease clinic. Sex Transm Dis. 1999;26:329–334.

6. Nahmias A, Lee F, Beckman-Nahmias S. Sero-epidemiological and sociological patterns of herpes simplex virus infection in the world. Scand J Infect Dis. 1990;69:19–36.

7. Brown ZA, Selke SA, Zeh JE, et al. The acquisition of herpes simplex virus during pregnancy. N Engl J Med. 1997;337:509–515.

8. Sullender W, Yasukawa L, Schwartz M, et al. Type-specific antibodies to herpes simplex virus type 2 (HSV-2) glycoprotein G in pregnant women, infants exposed to maternal HSV-2 infection at delivery, and infants with neonatal herpes. J Infect Dis. 1988;157:164–171.

9. Armstrong GL, Schillinger J, Markowitz L, et al. Incidence of herpes simplex virus type 2 infection in the United States. Am J Epidemiol. 2001;153:912–920.

10. Siegel D, Golden E, Washington AE, et al. Prevalence and correlates of herpes simplex infections: the population-based AIDS in Multiethnic Neighborhoods Study. JAMA. 1992;268:1702–1708.

11. Rosenthal SL, Stanberry LR, Biro FM, et al. Seroprevalence of herpes simplex virus types 1 and 2 and cytomegalovirus in adolescents. Clin Infect Dis. 1997;24:135–139.

12. Oberle MW, Rosero-Bixby L, Lee FK, et al. Herpes simplex virus type 2 antibodies: high prevalence in monogamous women in Costa Rica. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1989;41:224–229.

13. Carvalho M, de Carvalho S, Pannuti CS, et al. Prevalence of herpes simplex type 2 antibodies and a clinical history of herpes in three different populations in Campinas City, Brazil. Int J Infect Dis. 1999;3:94–98.

14. Sanchez JL, Volquez C, Totten PA, et al. The etiology and management of genital ulcers in the Dominican Republic and Peru. Sex Transm Dis. 2002;29:559–567.

15. Auvert B, Ballard R, Campbell C, et al. HIV infection among youth in a South African mining town is associated with herpes simplex virus-2 seropositivity and sexual behaviour. AIDS. 2001;15:885–898.

16. Mbizvo MT, Mashu A, Chipato T, et al. Trends in HIV-1 and HIV-2 prevalence and risk factors in pregnant women in Harare, Zimbabwe. Cent Afr J Med. 1996;42:14–21.

17. Greenblatt RM, Lukehart SA, Plummer FA, et al. Genital ulceration as a risk factor for human immunodeficiency virus infection. AIDS. 1988;2:47–50.

18. Mostad SB, Kreiss JK, Ryncarz AJ, et al. Cervical shedding of herpes simplex virus in human immunodeficiency virus-infected women: effects of hormonal contraception, pregnancy, and vitamin A deficiency. J Infect Dis. 2000;181:58–63.

19. Mertz KJ, Trees D, Levine WC, et al. Etiology of genital ulcers and prevalence of human immunodeficiency virus coinfection in 10 US cities. The Genital Ulcer Disease Surveillance Group. J Infect Dis. 1998;178:1795–1798.

20. Chen CY, Ballard RC, Beck-Sague CM, et al. Human immunodeficiency virus infection and genital ulcer disease in South Africa: the herpetic connection [see comments]. Sex Transm Dis. 2000;27:21–29.

21. Ahmed IIJ, Mbwana J, Gunnarsson E, et al. Etiology of genital ulcer disease and association with human immunodeficiency virus infection in two Tanzanian cities. Sex Transm Dis. 2003;30:114–119.

22. Morse SA. Etiology of genital ulcer disease and its relationship to HIV infection. Sex Transm Dis. 1999;26:63–65.

23. Ballard R, Htun Y, Dangor Y, et al. HIV and genital ulcer disease: determinants of HIV shedding from lesions and consequences of therapy. Paper presented at: International Society for Sexually Transmitted Disease Research; July 11–14, 1999;Denver, CO. Abstract #055.

24. Mbengeranwa O. Trends and management of STDs in Harare, Zimbabwe. WHO/UNAIDS/LSHTM Workshop on HSV-2: Programmatic and Research Priorities in Developing Countries; February 14–16, 2001; London.

25. Beyrer C, Jitwatcharanan K, Natpratan C, et al. Molecular methods for the diagnosis of genital ulcer disease in a sexually transmitted disease clinic population in northern Thailand: predominance of herpes simplex virus infection. J Infect Dis. 1998;178:243–246.

26. Risbud A, Chan-Tack K, Gadkari D, et al. The etiology of genital ulcer disease by multiplex polymerase chain reaction and relationship to HIV infection among patients attending sexually transmitted disease clinics in Pune, India. Sex Transm Dis. 1999;26:55–62.

27. Morse SA, Trees DL, Htun Y, et al. Comparison of clinical diagnosis and standard laboratory and molecular methods for the diagnosis of genital ulcer disease in Lesotho: association with human immunodeficiency virus infection. J Infect Dis. 1997;175:583–589.

28. Wald A, Corey L, Cone R, et al. Frequent genital HSV-2 shedding in immunocompetent women. J Clin Invest. 1997;99:1092–1097.

29. Wald A, Link K. Risk of human immunodeficiency virus infection in herpes simplex virus type 2-seropositive persons: a meta-analysis. J Infect Dis. 2002;185:45–52.

30. Buve A, Carael M, Hayes RJ, et al. Multicentre study on factors determining differences in rate of spread of HIV in sub-Saharan Africa: methods and prevalence of HIV infection. AIDS. 2001;15(suppl 4):S5–14.

31. Weiss HA, Buve A, Robinson NJ, et al. The epidemiology of HSV-2 infection and its association with HIV infection in four urban African populations. AIDS. 2001;15(suppl 4):S97–108.

32. del Mar Pujades Rodriguez M, Obasi A, Mosha F, et al. Herpes simplex virus type 2 infection increases HIV incidence: a prospective study in rural Tanzania. AIDS. 2002;16:451–462.

33. Reynolds SJ, Risbud AR, Shepherd ME, et al. Recent herpes simplex virus type 2 infection and the risk of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 acquisition in India. J Infect Dis. 2003;187:1513–1521.

34. Sanchez JL, Whittington WLH, Zuckerman RA, et al. Bacterial STDs and HSV-2 acquisition among MSM HIV seroconverters in Peru. Paper presented at: Conf HIV Pathog Treatment; Buenos Aires, Argentina; February 4–8, 2001:187.

35. Renzi C, Douglas JM Jr, Foster M, et al. Herpes simplex virus type 2 infection as a risk factor for human immunodeficiency virus acquisition in men who have sex with men. J Infect Dis. 2003;187:19–25.

36. Wald A, Zeh JE, Selke SA, et al. Virologic characteristics of subclinical and symptomatic genital herpes infections. N Engl J Med. 1995;333:770–775.

37. Benedetti JK, Zeh J, Corey L. Clinical reactivation of genital herpes simplex virus infection decreases in frequency over time. Ann Intern Med. 1999;131:14–20.

38. Wawer MJ, Sewankambo NK, Serwadda D, et al. Control of sexually transmitted diseases for AIDS prevention in Uganda: a randomised community trial. Rakai Project Study Group. Lancet. 1999;353:525–535.

39. Grosskurth H, Gray RH, Hayes R, et al. Control of sexually transmitted diseases for HIV-1 prevention: understanding the implications of the Mwanza and Rakai trials. Lancet. 2000;355:1981–1987.

40. Quinn TC, Wawer MJ, Sewankambo N, et al. Viral load and heterosexual transmission of human immunodeficiency virus type 1. Rakai Project Study Group. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:921–929.

41. Gray RH, Wawer MJ, Brookmeyer R, et al. Probability of HIV-1 transmission per coital act in monogamous, heterosexual, HIV-1–discordant couples in Rakai, Uganda. Lancet. 2001;357:1149–1153.

42. Korenromp EL, Bakker R, de Vlas SJ, et al. HIV dynamics and behaviour change as determinants of the impact of sexually transmitted disease treatment on HIV transmission in the context of the Rakai trial. AIDS. 2002;16:2209–2218.

43. Baba TW, Trichel AM, An L, et al. Infection and AIDS in adult macaques after nontraumatic oral exposure to cell-free SIV. Science. 1996;272:1486–1489.

44. Cunningham AL, Turner RR, Miller AC, et al. Evolution of recurrent herpes simplex lesions: an immunohistologic study. J Clin Invest. 1985;75:226–233.

45. Koelle DM, Abbo H, Peck A, et al. Direct recovery of herpes simplex virus (HSV)-specific T lymphocyte clones from recurrent genital HSV-2 lesions. J Infect Dis. 1994;169:956–961.

46. Mosca JD, Bednarik DP, Raj NB, et al. Herpes simplex virus type-1 can reactivate transcription of latent human immunodeficiency virus. Nature. 1987;325:67–70.

47. Margolis DM, Rabson AB, Straus SE, et al. Transactivation of the HIV-1 LTR by HSV-1 immediate-early genes. Virology. 1992;186:788–791.

48. Margolis D, Ostrove J, Straus S. HSV-1 activation of HIV-1 transcription is augmented by a cellular protein that binds near the initiator element. Virology. 1993;192:370–374.

49. Diaz JJ, Dodon MD, Schaerer-Uthurralt N, et al. Post-transcriptional transactivation of human retroviral envelope glycoprotein expression by herpes simplex virus Us11 protein. Nature. 1996;379:273–277.

50. Kucera LS, Leake E, Iyer N, et al. Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) and herpes simplex virus type 2 (HSV-2) can coinfect and simultaneously replicate in the same human CD4+ cell: effect of coinfection on infectious HSV-2 and HIV-1 replication. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 1990;6:641–647.

51. Moriuchi M, Moriuchi H, Williams R, et al. Herpes simplex virus infection induces replication of human immunodeficiency virus type 1. Virology. 2000;278:534–540.

52. Heng MC, Heng SY, Allen SG. Co-infection and synergy of human immunodeficiency virus-1 and herpes simplex virus-1. Lancet. 1994;343:255–258.

53. Schacker TW, Ryncarz AJ, Goddard J, et al. Frequent recovery of HIV-1 from genital herpes simplex virus lesions in HIV-1–infected men. JAMA. 1998;280:61–66.

54. Gadkari DA, Quinn TC, Gangakhedkar RR, et al. HIV-1 DNA shedding in genital ulcers and its associated risk factors in Pune, India. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Hum Retrovirol. 1998;18:277–281.

55. Corey L, Wald A. Genital herpes. In: Holmes K, Sparling P, PA M, et al., eds. Sexually Transmitted Diseases. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1999.

56. Mbopi Keou FX, Gresenguet G, Mayaud P. et al. Genital herpes simplex virus type 2 shedding is increased in HIV-infected women in Africa. Letter. AIDS. 1999;13:536–537.

57. McClelland RS, Wang CC, Overbaugh J, et al. Association between cervical shedding of herpes simplex virus and HIV-1. AIDS. 2002;16:2425–2430.

58. Gray RH, Mawer MJ, Brookmeyer R, et al. Probability of HIV-1 transmission per coital act in monogamous, heterosexual, HIV-1-discordant couples in Rakai, Uganda. Lancet. 2001;357:1149–1153.

59. Corey L, Wald A, Patel R, et al. Once-daily valacyclovir to reduce the risk of transmission of genital herpes. N Engl J Med. 2004;3509:11–20.

60. McFarland W, Gwanzura L, Bassett MT, et al. Prevalence and incidence of herpes simplex virus type 2 infection among male Zimbabwean factory workers. J Infect Dis. 1999;180:1459–1465.

61. Kamali A, Nunn AJ, Mulder DW, et al. Seroprevalence and incidence of genital ulcer infections in a rural Ugandan population. Sex Transm Infect. 1999;75:98–102.

62. Siegal FP, Lopez C, Hammer GS, et al. Severe acquired immunodeficiency in male homosexuals, manifested by chronic perianal ulcerative herpes simplex lesions. N Engl J Med. 1981;305:1439–1444.

63. Schacker TW, Zeh JE, Hu HL, et al. Frequency of symptomatic and asymptomatic herpes simplex virus type 2 reactivations among human immunodeficiency virus-infected men. J Infect Dis. 1998;178:1616–1622.

64. Augenbraun M, Corey L, Reichelderfer P, et al. The effect of herpes simplex virus shedding on plasma HIV RNA levels in coinfected women. Clin Infect Dis. 2001;33:885–890.

65. Posavad CM, Wald A, Kuntz S, et al. No influence of HAART on local containment of HSV in HIV-infected individuals: containment of HSV correlates with HSV-specific CD8+ T cells. JAMA. (In press, 2004).

66. Serwadda D, Gray RH, Scwankambo NK, et al. Human immunodeficiency virus acquisition associated with genital ulcer disease and herpes simplex virus type 2 infection: a nested case-control study in Rakai, Uganda. J Infect Dis. 2003;188:1492–1497.

67. Gray R, Chen M, Serwadda D, et al. HIV acquisition associated with genital ulcer disease and herpes simplex virus type 2: a nested case control study in Rakai, Uganda. Paper presented at: International Conference on Sexually Transmitted Disease Research; Ottawa, Canada; 2003:178.

68. Schacker T, Zeh J, Hu H, et al. Changes in plasma human immunodeficiency virus type 1 RNA associated with herpes simplex virus reactivation and suppression. J Infect Dis. 2002;186:1718–1725.

69. Ioannidis JPA, Collier AC, Cooper DA, et al. Clinical efficacy of high-dose acyclovir in patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection: a meta-analysis of randomized individual patient data. J Infect Dis. 1998;178:349–359.

70. Whitley RJ, Gnann JW Jr. Acyclovir: a decade later. N Engl J Med. 1992;327:782–789.

71. Sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines 2002. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2002;51(RR-6):1–82.

72. Schacker TW, Hu HL, Koelle DM, et al. Famciclovir for the suppression of symptomatic and asymptomatic herpes simplex virus reactivation in HIV-infected persons: a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Ann Intern Med. 1998;128:21–28.

73. Conant MA, Schacker TW, Murphy RL, et al. Valaciclovir versus aciclovir for herpes simplex virus infection in HIV-infected individuals: two randomized trials. Int J STD AIDS. 2002;13:12–21.

74. Romanowski B, Aoki FY, Martel AY, et al. Efficacy and safety of famciclovir for treating mucocutaneous herpes simplex infection in HIV-infected individuals. Collaborative Famciclovir HIV Study Group. AIDS. 2000;14:1211–1217.

75. Schacker T, Wald A, DeJesus E, et al. Valacyclovir for the suppression of ano-genital herpes simplex virus infection in HIV-infected persons. IDSA 2002, Chicago, IL.

76. Bell W, Chulay J, Feinberg J. Manifestations resembling thrombotic microangiopathy in patients with advanced HIV disease in a cytomegalovirus prophylaxis trial (ACTG 204). Medicine (Baltimore). 1997;76:369–380.

77. Erlich K, Mills J, Chatis P, et al. Acyclovir-resistant herpes simplex virus infections in patients with the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. N Engl J Med. 1989;320:293–296.

78. Balfour H, Benson C, Braun J, et al. Management of acyclovir-resistant herpes simplex and varicella-zoster virus infections. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 1994;7:254–260.

79. Barry DW, Lehrman SN, Ellis MN. Clinical and laboratory experience with acyclovir-resistant herpes viruses. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1986;18(suppl B):75–84.

80. McLaren C, Chen MS, Ghazzouli I, et al. Drug resistance patterns of herpes simplex virus isolates from patients treated with acyclovir. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1985;28:740–744.

81. Kost RG, Hill EL, Tigges M, Straus SE. Recurrent acyclovir-resistant genital herpes in an immunocompetent patient. NEJM. 1993;329:1777–1782.

82. Sacks S, Wanklin R, Reece D, et al. Progressive esophagitis from acyclovir-resistant herpes simplex: clinical roles for DNA polymerase mutants and viral heterogeneity. Ann Intern Med. 1989;111:893–899.

83. Reyes M, Suberdar NS, Graber JM, et al. Prevalence of acyclovir resistance among patients with genital herpes simplex virus infections. Arch Intern Med. In press.

84. Safrin S, Elbeik T, Phan L, et al. Correlation between response to acyclovir and foscarnet therapy and in vitro susceptibility result for isolates of herpes simplex virus from human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1994;38:1246–1250.

85. Safrin S, Elbeik T, Phan L, et al. Correlation between response to acyclovir and foscarnet therapy and in vitro susceptibility result for isolates of herpes simplex virus from human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1994;38:1246–1250.

86. Safrin S, Assaykeen T, Follansbee S, et al. Foscarnet therapy for acyclovir-resistant mucocutaneous herpes simplex virus infection in 26 AIDS patients: preliminary data. J Infect Dis. 1990;161:1078–1084.

87. Lalezari J, Schacker T, Feinberg J, et al. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of cidofovir gel for the treatment of acyclovir-unresponsive mucocutaneous herpes simplex virus infection in patients with AIDS. J Infect Dis. 1997;176:892–898.

88. Reyes M, Shaik NS, Graber JM, et al. Acyclovir-resistant genital herpes among persons attending sexually transmitted disease and human immunodeficiency virus clinics. Arch Intern Med. 2003;163:76–80.

89. Bacon TH, Levin MJ, Leary JJ, et al. Herpes simplex virus resistance to acyclovir and penciclovir after two decades of antiviral therapy. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2003;16:114–128.

90. Ioannidis J, Collier A, Cooper D, et al. Clinical efficacy of high dose acyclovir in human immunodeficiency virus infection: a meta-analysis of randomized individual patient data. J Infect Dis. 1998;178:349–359.

91. Gupta R, Wald A, Krantz E, et al. Valacyclovir and acyclovir for suppression of shedding of herpes simplex virus in the genital tract. J Infect Dis. (Submitted)

92. Ashley RL. Sorting out the new HSV type specific antibody tests. Sex Transm Infect. 2001;77:232–237.

93. Hogrefe W, Su X, Song J, et al. Detection of herpes simplex virus type 2-specific immunoglobulin G antibodies in African sera by using recombinant gG2, Western blotting, and gG2 inhibition. J Clin Microbiol. 2002;40:3635–3640.

94. DiCarlo RP, Martin DH. The clinical diagnosis of genital ulcer disease in men. Clin Infect Dis. 1997;25:292–298.

95. Wald A, Huang ML, Carrell D, et al. Polymerase chain reaction for detection of herpes simplex virus (HSV) DNA on mucosal surfaces: comparison with HSV isolation in cell culture. J Infect Dis. 2003;188:1345–1351.

96. Schacker T, Hu HL, Koelle DM, et al. Famciclovir for the suppression of symptomatic and asymptomatic herpes simplex virus reactivation in HIV-infected persons: a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Ann Intern Med. 1998;128:21–28.

Cited By:

This article has been cited 30 time(s).

Sensitivity of V75I HIV-1 reverse transcriptase mutant selected in vitro by acyclovir to anti-HIV drugs
McMahon, MA; Siliciano, JD; Kohli, RM; Siliciano, RF
AIDS, 24(2): 319-323.
PDF (446) | CrossRef
Herpes simplex virus 2 infection increases HIV acquisition in men and women: systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies
Hayes, RJ; Freeman, EE; Weiss, HA; Glynn, JR; Cross, PL; Whitworth, JA
AIDS, 20(1): 73-83.

PDF (160)
Maternal Herpes simplex virus type 2 infection, syphilis and risk of intra-partum transmission of HIV-1: results of a case control study
Cowan, FM; Humphrey, JH; Ntozini, R; Mutasa, K; Morrow, R; Iliff, P
AIDS, 22(2): 193-201.
PDF (141) | CrossRef
Transmission probabilities of HIV and herpes simplex virus type 2, effect of male circumcision and interaction: a longitudinal study in a township of South Africa
Mahiane, S; Legeai, C; Taljaard, D; Latouche, A; Puren, A; Peillon, A; Bretagnolle, J; Lissouba, P; Nguéma, EN; Gassiat, E; Auvert, B
AIDS, 23(3): 377-383.
PDF (106) | CrossRef
Impact of aciclovir on genital and plasma HIV-1 RNA in HSV-2/HIV-1 co-infected women: a randomized placebo-controlled trial in South Africa
Delany, S; Mlaba, N; Clayton, T; Akpomiemie, G; Capovilla, A; Legoff, J; Belec, L; Stevens, W; Rees, H; Mayaud, P
AIDS, 23(4): 461-469.
PDF (384) | CrossRef
Association between genital schistosomiasis and HIV in rural Zimbabwean women
Kjetland, EF; Ndhlovu, PD; Gomo, E; Mduluza, T; Midzi, N; Gwanzura, L; Mason, PR; Sandvik, L; Friis, H; Gundersen, SG
AIDS, 20(4): 593-600.
PDF (170) | CrossRef
Negative mucosal synergy between Herpes simplex type 2 and HIV in the female genital tract
Rebbapragada, A; Wachihi, C; Pettengell, C; Sunderji, S; Huibner, S; Jaoko, W; Ball, B; Fowke, K; Mazzulli, T; Plummer, FA; Kaul, R
AIDS, 21(5): 589-598.
PDF (245) | CrossRef
The association between cervical human papillomavirus infection and HIV acquisition among women in Zimbabwe
Averbach, SH; Gravitt, PE; Nowak, RG; Celentano, DD; Dunbar, MS; Morrison, CS; Grimes, B; Padian, NS
AIDS, 24(7): 1035-1042.
PDF (176) | CrossRef
Estimating the public health impact of the effect of herpes simplex virus suppressive therapy on plasma HIV-1 viral load
Baggaley, RF; Griffin, JT; Chapman, R; Hollingsworth, TD; Nagot, N; Delany, S; Mayaud, P; de Wolf, F; Fraser, C; Ghani, AC; Weiss, HA
AIDS, 23(8): 1005-1013.
PDF (763) | CrossRef
Incident HIV and herpes simplex virus type 2 infection among men in Rakai, Uganda
Tobian, AA; Ssempijja, V; Kigozi, G; Oliver, AE; Serwadda, D; Makumbi, F; Nalugoda, FK; Iga, B; Reynolds, SJ; Wawer, MJ; Quinn, TC; Gray, RH
AIDS, 23(12): 1589-1594.
PDF (107) | CrossRef
Foreskin inflammation is associated with HIV and herpes simplex virus type-2 infections in Rakai, Uganda
Johnson, KE; Sherman, ME; Ssempiija, V; Tobian, AA; Zenilman, JM; Duggan, MA; Kigozi, G; Serwadda, D; Wawer, MJ; Quinn, TC; Rabkin, CS; Gray, RH
AIDS, 23(14): 1807-1815.
PDF (718) | CrossRef
Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology
Genital Herpes Simplex Virus Infection
Steben, M
Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology, 48(4): 838-844.

PDF (64)
Current Opinion in Infectious Diseases
Prioritizing prevention of HIV and sexually transmitted infections: first-generation vaginal microbicides
Madan, RP; Keller, MJ; Herold, BC
Current Opinion in Infectious Diseases, 19(1): 49-54.

PDF (106)
Current Opinion in Infectious Diseases
Treatment to prevent recurrent genital herpes
Martinez, V; Caumes, E; Chosidow, O
Current Opinion in Infectious Diseases, 21(1): 42-48.
PDF (123) | CrossRef
Current Opinion in Infectious Diseases
Cervicitis: a review
Lusk, MJ; Konecny, P
Current Opinion in Infectious Diseases, 21(1): 49-55.
PDF (147) | CrossRef
Current Opinion in Infectious Diseases
Acyclovir: a new use for an old drug
Vanpouille, C; Lisco, A; Margolis, L
Current Opinion in Infectious Diseases, 22(6): 583-587.
PDF (293) | CrossRef
Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology
Herpes simplex virus: incidence of neonatal herpes simplex virus, maternal screening, management during pregnancy, and HIV
Roberts, S
Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 21(2): 124-130.
PDF (105) | CrossRef
Obstetrics & Gynecology
Genital Herpes Simplex Virus Infection and Perinatal Transmission of Human Immunodeficiency Virus
Chen, KT; Segú, M; Lumey, LH; Kuhn, L; Carter, RJ; Bulterys, M; Abrams, EJ; for the New York City Perinatal AIDS Collaborative Transmission Study (PACTS) Group,
Obstetrics & Gynecology, 106(6): 1341-1348.
PDF (226) | CrossRef
JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes
Awareness of HIV Prevention Strategies Under Development: Word on the Street
Koblin, BA; Murrill, C; Xu, G; Camacho, M; Liu, K; Raj-Singh, S; Torian, L
JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, 48(2): 232-234.
PDF (298) | CrossRef
JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes
The Potential Role of Biomarkers in HIV Preventive Vaccine Trials
MacLachlan, E; Mayer, KH; Barnabas, R; Sanchez, J; Koblin, B; Duerr, A
JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, 51(5): 536-545.
PDF (143) | CrossRef
JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes
Sentinel Surveillance of Sexually Transmitted Infections/HIV and Risk Behaviors in Vulnerable Populations in 5 Central American Countries
Soto, RJ; Ghee, AE; Nuñez, CA; Mayorga, R; Tapia, KA; Astete, SG; Hughes, JP; Buffardi, AL; Holte, SE; Holmes, KK; and the Estudio Multicéntrico Study Team,
JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, 46(1): 101-111.
PDF (181) | CrossRef
Sexually Transmitted Diseases
Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Among Bar and Hotel Workers in Northern Tanzania: The Role of Alcohol, Sexual Behavior, and Herpes Simplex Virus Type 2
Ao, TT; Sam, NE; Masenga, EJ; Seage, GR; Kapiga, SH
Sexually Transmitted Diseases, 33(3): 163-169.
PDF (249) | CrossRef
Sexually Transmitted Diseases
Prevalence and Risk Factors for Herpes Simplex Virus Type 2 Antibodies Among Low- and High-Risk Populations in Indonesia
Davies, SC; Taylor, JA; Sedyaningsih-Mamahit, ER; Gunawan, S; Cunningham, AL; Mindel, A
Sexually Transmitted Diseases, 34(3): 132-138.
PDF (240) | CrossRef
Sexually Transmitted Diseases
Risk Factors for Incidence of Sexually Transmitted Infections Among Women in South Africa, Tanzania, and Zambia: Results From HPTN 055 Study
Ramjee, G; Kapiga, S; Kelly, C; Weiss, S; Daley, T; Peterson, L; Leburg, C
Sexually Transmitted Diseases, 36(4): 199-206.
PDF (258) | CrossRef
Sexually Transmitted Diseases
Herpes Simplex Virus Type 2 Infection in Young Adult Women: Risk Factors for Infection and Frequency of Viral Shedding
Fife, KH; Williams, JA; Thomas, AL; Ofner, S; Katz, BP; Fortenberry, JD
Sexually Transmitted Diseases, 37(4): 248-252.
PDF (181) | CrossRef
Sexually Transmitted Diseases
Riddle of the Sphinx Revisited: The Role of STDs in HIV Prevention
Barnabas, RV; Wasserheit, JN
Sexually Transmitted Diseases, 36(6): 365-367.
PDF (114) | CrossRef
Sexually Transmitted Diseases
Genital Ulcer Disease Treatment Policies and Access to Acyclovir in Eight Sub-Saharan African Countries
Corbell, C; Stergachis, A; Ndowa, F; Ndase, P; Barnes, L; Celum, C
Sexually Transmitted Diseases, 37(8): 488-493.
PDF (244) | CrossRef
Sexually Transmitted Diseases
Modern Management of Genital Ulcer Disease—Frappez Fort et Frappez Vite
Lewis, D
Sexually Transmitted Diseases, 37(8): 494-496.
PDF (111) | CrossRef
Sexually Transmitted Diseases
Empirical Observations Underestimate the Proportion of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infections Attributable to Sexually Transmitted Diseases in the Mwanza and Rakai Sexually Transmitted Disease Treatment Trials: Simulation Results
Orroth, KK; White, RG; Korenromp, EL; Bakker, R; Changalucha, J; Habbema, JD; Hayes, RJ
Sexually Transmitted Diseases, 33(9): 536-544.
PDF (549) | CrossRef
Sexually Transmitted Diseases
HSV-2 Serologic Testing in an HMO Population: Uptake and Psychosocial Sequelae
Richards, J; Scholes, D; Caka, S; Drolette, L; Magaret, AM; Yarbro, P; Lafferty, W; Crosby, R; Diclemente, R; Wald, A
Sexually Transmitted Diseases, 34(9): 718-725.
PDF (727) | CrossRef
Back to Top | Article Outline

herpes simplex virus infections; HIV acquisition and transmission; genital herpes

© 2004 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.


Article Tools



Article Level Metrics

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.