Abstract: It has been hypothesized that immune activation and inflammation may increase HIV-1 susceptibility, and that cytokines may be useful biomarkers for risk. Within a prospective cohort, we conducted a nested case–control analysis of plasma cytokine levels among women who acquired HIV-1 <3 months after sampling, compared with 3 different control groups. We observed associations between lower interleukin (IL)-6 and IL-10 and higher IL-7 levels with HIV-1 acquisition, however, these associations were inconsistent when comparing with different control groups. Inconsistent results within our study and among previous studies suggest that reproducible findings are needed before cytokines are useful biomarkers for HIV-1 susceptibility.
*Division of Human Biology, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA;
†Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA;
‡Department of Medicine, Stanford Immunology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA;
Departments of §Medicine;
‖Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA;
¶Department of Medical Microbiology, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya;
#Coast Provincial General Hospital, Women's Health Project, Mombasa, Kenya;
**Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA;
††Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; and
‡‡Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA.
Correspondence to: Dara A. Lehman, MHS, PhD, Division of Human Biology, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, 1100 Fairview Ave N, mailstop C3-168, Seattle, WA 98109 (e-mail:email@example.com).
Supported by Grants from the National Institutes of Health P01 HD064915 and R37 AI038518.
The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Received December 30, 2013
Accepted December 30, 2013
Sexual acquisition of HIV-1 is a relatively rare event, and risk varies between individuals and over time in the same individual.1,2 The probability of transmission during any 1 sex act depends on a complex set of factors in the infected individual, the uninfected individual, and the virus itself. In the exposed individual, susceptibility has been associated with multiple host factors, including immunologic responses and status,3,4 which may vary over time. It has been hypothesized that systemic immune activation and inflammation, known to recruit and activate HIV-susceptible cells, may increase HIV-1 susceptibility. Although some studies suggest that increased immune activation increases susceptibility,5,6 others suggest that it may be protective.7,8 These previous studies compared immune activation markers at a single time point in cohorts of high-risk exposed seronegative individuals to uninfected individuals presumed to be HIV-susceptible, without assessing times associated with HIV-1 acquisition. This approach assumes that both the factors measured and HIV-1 susceptibility are static, which is unlikely. Only 1 study measured immune activation near the time of HIV-1 acquisition, a time of known susceptibility.9 In that study, immune activation was directly measured in peripheral blood mononuclear cells, and plasma cytokines were also used as a biomarker. The results suggested that women who acquired HIV-1 had higher levels of proinflammatory cytokines and activated natural killer cells than the HIV-exposed seronegative controls, suggesting that suppressing innate immune activation could reduce HIV-1 risk.9
To further examine relationships between immune activation and HIV-1 acquisition, we conducted a case–control analysis of plasma cytokine levels among women who acquired HIV-1 less than 3 months after sampling, compared with 3 different control groups: these same individuals at an earlier time point when infection did not occur, a random selection of uninfected women, and a group of highly exposed but uninfected women.
HIV-negative female sex workers in Mombasa, Kenya, were enrolled in a prospective cohort.10,11 Interviews, physical examinations, and plasma collection occurred monthly before seroconversion. Time of HIV-1 infection was estimated as previously described.10 Women were included as cases if they had a well-defined HIV-infection date as documented by a preseroconversion RNA-positive sample or <30 days between HIV-negative and HIV-positive serology. Case samples, collected between 1993 and 2007, were restricted to <90 days before the estimated date of infection (median 24, range, 10–90 days). Three control groups were defined. First, external control samples were from women who never seroconverted during follow-up and matched cases on time since enrollment with a 3:1 ratio of controls to cases. Second, a set of control samples, with a similar distribution across calendar year, was chosen from women considered to be relatively resistant to HIV infection, as they remained HIV negative during >8 years of follow-up with reported unprotected sex. Third, internal control samples were from case women but from an earlier time point (9–12 months before infection).
Ethical approval was obtained from Kenyatta National Hospital in Nairobi, the University of Washington and the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center.
HIV-1 serology was performed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (Detect-HIV; BioChem ImmunoSystems, Montreal, Canada), and positive samples were confirmed by a second enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (either Recombigen; Cambridge Biotech, Worcester, MA or Biorad HIV 1-2; Biorad, Hercules, CA).
Blood was collected in heparinized tubes, plasma was frozen at −80°C and shipped to Seattle. Plasma HIV-1 RNA levels were determined by the Gen-Probe HIV-1 viral load assay (Gen-Probe, San Diego, CA).10
Cytokine concentrations were determined using Milliplex MAP High Sensitivity Human Cytokine 13-plex (Millipore, Billerica, MA) on Luminex200 (Luminex, Austin, TX). Multiple samples from the same woman were tested on the same plate to avoid interassay variability. The lower limit of detection (LOD) for each cytokine was based on a standard curve using a custom export and quality control program in conjunction with Ruminex, a package for use with the R statistics program.12 Samples with cytokine levels below the LOD were assigned the midpoint between the LOD and zero.
Statistical analysis was performed using Stata9.2 (Stata, College Station, TX). For cytokines in which <80% of the data were above the LOD, data were dichotomized to above or below detection, and χ2 tests were used for cases versus external controls or McNemar's test for cases versus internal controls (matched). For cytokines with >80% of the data above detection, continuous data were analyzed using Mann–Whitney U tests for cases versus external controls or Wilcoxon matched signed-rank tests for cases versus internal controls. A 5% false discovery rate was used to correct for multiple comparisons.
To test the hypothesis that systemic immune activation is correlated with HIV-1 acquisition, we first compared plasma cytokine levels in 162 cases (ie, women who acquired HIV-1 within 3 months of the sample tested) with 470 external controls (women uninfected throughout follow-up, median 4.8 years, range, 0.3–17.8) with year of sample collection (storage time) distributed similarly across groups (Table 1). Overall, these groups seemed similar in terms of known risk factors such as hormonal contraceptive use, frequency of unprotected sex, number of sex partners, and other sexually transmitted infections (STIs) (Table 1). However, compared with the external controls, there were significantly higher proportions of cases with an STI (P = 0.005) and depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) use (P = 0.0013). Neither the presence of an STI, nor DMPA use, was associated with levels of any of the cytokines tested (data not shown). In both the cases and external control groups, plasma cytokine levels were highest for interleukin (IL)-8, IL-10, IL-6, and tumor necrosis factor α. For all other cytokines, >20% of the data were below the LOD (Table 2). There were no statistically significant differences in levels (for cytokines with >80% of samples detectable) or % detectable (if <80% of samples were detectable) between cases and external controls (Table 2, columns 3–5).
The external controls described above were randomly chosen from the larger cohort, and some of these external controls were likely susceptible despite remaining uninfected during study follow-up. Therefore, we also compared cytokine levels in women who became infected with women who appeared more resistant to HIV infection. We selected women who remained uninfected despite ≥8 years of follow-up with reported unprotected sex (N = 86). The cases and resistant women had similar risk factors at the time of sampling as evidenced by similar sexual risk behaviors but differed in hormonal contraceptive use by pill (P < 0.001) or DMPA (P = 0.002) and in prevalence of STIs (P = 0.049) (Table 1). Although the average number of unprotected sex acts per week was similar in the 2 groups, the resistant women remained uninfected for a median 13.4 years of sex work while the cases became infected after a median of 1 year (Table 1). We compared plasma cytokine levels in 162 cases with 86 resistant women (Table 2, columns 3 and 6). Only IL-7 differed between groups, with a higher proportion of samples with detectable IL-7 in cases versus resistant controls (48% vs 34%, P = 0.03). As this study was designed to be hypothesis generating, we present unadjusted analysis in Table 2. However, when we controlled for a 5% false discovery rate, the difference was no longer statistically significant.
Finally, we determined whether cytokine levels at the time of HIV-1 acquisition differed from cytokine levels in the same women at a time not associated with HIV-1 infection. Sixty-five of the cases had an additional sample 9–12 months before infection, a time unlikely to be associated with infection while minimizing the potential for major changes in other risk factors. Similar to the results described above, most cytokines were detectable in <80% of samples, and the proportion detectable did not differ significantly between cases and their internal controls (Table 2, columns 8 and 9). Median IL-10 and IL-6 levels were significantly lower at the time of HIV-1 acquisition than in the period 9–12 months before infection (Table 2). However, after controlling for multiple comparisons, only trends remained (P = 0.13 and P = 0.12, respectively).
Systemic cytokine levels have been proposed as potential biomarkers for HIV-1 disease progression13 or acquisition risk.5,9 However, the reliability of cytokine biomarkers remains unclear, as different studies show associations with different cytokines, sometimes in different directions.5–8 Here, we show that systemic cytokine levels were not strongly associated with HIV-1 acquisition. In the largest study to date, we compared plasma cytokine levels in women at a time of known susceptibility with 3 different control groups without consistent results. In women who became HIV-1 infected, we saw evidence of decreased IL-6 and IL-10 levels at a time of known susceptibility compared with an earlier sample. However, these associations were not apparent when comparing women who became infected with women who did not, including a group of women who appeared HIV-1-resistant. When we assessed the association of calendar year of sample collection and cytokine levels, we surprisingly found that increases in length of storage time was associated with an increase in select cytokine levels: IL-7, IL-6, and IL-8 (data not shown). Our study was designed to minimize effects of sample storage time by ensuring that groups of case and control samples had similar calendar year distribution, but we cannot rule out an influence of this on the internal control findings. In addition, it is surprising that lower levels of both IL-6 and IL-10 were associated with acquisition, as these cytokines have opposing functions: IL-6 is a proinflammatory cytokine secreted by monocytes and macrophages, whereas IL-10 is an immunosuppressive cytokine produced by monocytes and regulatory T cells.
We are only aware of one other case–control study that analyzed cytokines at the last preinfection visit for cases to assess a time of known susceptibility.9 Despite the facts that our study design was similar, that we used the same high-sensitivity cytokine 13-plex kit, and that our sample size was larger, our results were discordant with this previous study. Naranbhai et al observed higher IL-2, IL-7, IL-12p70, and tumor necrosis factor α levels in cases compared with controls. Of the associations they observed, we only saw marginal evidence of an association between increased detection of IL-7and HIV-1 acquisition. However, our study did not include analysis of cellular activation, which strengthened the results of the Naranbhai study. In addition, our study was limited to 13 cytokines. We cannot rule out that cytokines that are consistently elevated in HIV-infected individuals, such as IP-10,14–17 may be useful markers for HIV susceptibility.
Other studies showing a correlation between cytokine levels and HIV-1 transmission risk include studies in which intracellular cytokine levels in blood5 or cytokine levels in genital secretions6,18 were compared in exposed seronegative individuals versus HIV-negative individuals presumed to be susceptible. There was no overlap in the cytokines associated with infection in these different studies, and samples were not tested in individuals near the time of HIV-1 acquisition. Our data may suggest that there are some differences between cytokine levels near acquisition compared with 1 year prior, which may partially explain differences between studies.
One study that showed an association between genital cytokine levels and protection from HIV-1 in a cohort of highly exposed seronegative individuals also tested plasma cytokine levels and did not observe a correlation with acquisition.6 Many studies suggest that systemic cytokine concentrations are not predictive of genital cytokine concentrations,6,16,19 and that local genital inflammation may result in increased HIV-1 susceptible cells at the site of exposure, and thus may better predict transmission. Indeed, genital cytokine levels have been associated with increased HIV-1 shedding,16,19–21 an association that was not reflected at the systemic level.6,16,19 A limitation of the current study was that genital samples were not available, and we may have missed cytokine biomarkers of HIV-1 susceptibility specific to genital secretions.
Another potential limitation is the bead-based cytokine assay used, which we and others have observed shows high interassay variability.22–24 We attempted to minimize this by testing samples from the same woman on the same plate, and we intermingled cases and external controls among plates because, in our hands, samples tested on the same plate showed reproducible results.
In this study, our 162 case samples were within a relatively narrow window, 10–90 days, before infection. This interval between sample and infection was narrower than the Naranbhai study with a median 127 days (range, 15–404) before infection. However, it is possible that changes in the immune milieu that affect HIV-1 susceptibility are very transient and could require sample timing be even more refined than was possible here.
In conclusion, we observed evidence of associations between HIV infection and lower concentrations of IL-6, IL-10, and more frequent detection of IL-7. These relationships did not remain statistically significant after controlling for multiple comparisons and were not consistent across different control groups. Our results are not consistent with previous studies despite our larger sample size and multiple control groups. The inconsistency between studies suggests that plasma cytokine profiles may not yet be useful for tracking HIV-1 susceptibility. To identify potential immune correlates for HIV-1 risk, data from larger studies with multiple measures of immune activation in addition to cytokine levels, such as detailed cellular measures from both systemic and genital samples with as tight sampling as possible would be needed. The convergence of markers indicative of the same biological processes within and across studies may provide insight into biological mechanisms underling acquisition and provide support for cytokines as correlates. In the meantime, the utility of cytokines as biomarkers for susceptibility may be limited until a given cytokine is significantly correlated with acquisition across multiple studies.
The authors gratefully thank the clinical and laboratory staff in Mombasa and the women who participated in the study. They thank Nisha Duggal for her work on early pilot experiments, and Susan Graham and Katie Odem-Davis for helpful discussion.
1. Boily MC, Baggaley RF, Wang L, et al.. Heterosexual risk of HIV-1 infection per sexual act: systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Lancet Infect Dis. 2009;9:118–129.
2. Powers KA, Poole C, Pettifor AE, et al.. Rethinking the heterosexual infectivity of HIV-1: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2008;8:553–563.
3. Miyazawa M, Lopalco L, Mazzotta F, et al.. The “immunologic advantage” of HIV-exposed seronegative individuals. AIDS. 2009;23:161–175.
4. Iqbal SM, Kaul R. Mucosal innate immunity as a determinant of HIV susceptibility. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2008;59:44–54.
5. Mclaren PJ, Ball TB, Wachihi C, et al.. HIV‐Exposed seronegative commercial sex workers show a quiescent phenotype in the CD4 +T cell compartment and reduced expression of HIV‐Dependent host factors. J Infect Dis. 2010;202:S339–S344.
6. Lajoie J, Juno J, Burgener A, et al.. A distinct cytokine and chemokine profile at the genital mucosa is associated with HIV-1 protection among HIV-exposed seronegative commercial sex workers. Mucosal Immunol. 2012;5:277–287.
7. Suy A, Castro P, Nomdedeu M, et al.. Immunological profile of heterosexual highly HIV‐exposed uninfected individuals: predominant role of CD4 and CD8 T‐Cell activation. J Infect Dis. 2007;196:1191–1201.
8. Biasin M, Caputo SL, Speciale L, et al.. Mucosal and systemic immune activation is present in human immunodeficiency virus-exposed seronegative women. J Infect Dis. 2000;182:1365–1374.
9. Naranbhai V, Karim SSA, Altfeld M, et al.. Innate immune activation enhances HIV acquisition in women, diminishing the effectiveness of tenofovir microbicide gel. J Infect Dis. 2012;206:993–1001.
10. Lavreys L, Baeten JM, Kreiss JK, et al.. Injectable contraceptive use and genital ulcer disease during the early phase of HIV-1 infection increase plasma virus load in women. J Infect Dis. 2004;189:303–311.
11. Martin HL, Nyange PM, Richardson BA, et al.. Hormonal contraception, sexually transmitted diseases, and risk of heterosexual transmission of human immunodeficiency virus type 1. J Infect Dis. 1998;178:1053–1059.
12. Defawe OD, Fong Y, Vasilyeva E, et al.. Optimization and qualification of a multiplex bead array to assess cytokine and chemokine production by vaccine-specific cells. J Immunol Methods. 2012;382:117–128.
13. Roberts L, Passmore J-AS, Williamson C, et al.. Plasma cytokine levels during acute HIV-1 infection predict HIV disease progression. AIDS. 2010;24:819–831.
14. Simmons RP, Scully EP, Groden EE, et al.. HIV-1 infection induces strong production of IP-10 through TLR7/9-dependent pathways. AIDS. 2013;27:2505–2517.
15. Liovat AS, Rey-Cuillé MA, Lecuroux C, et al.. Acute plasma biomarkers of T cell activation set-point levels and of disease progression in HIV-1 infection. PLoS One. 2012;7:e46143.
16. Blish CA, McClelland RS, Richardson BA, et al.. Genital inflammation predicts HIV-1 shedding independent of plasma viral load and systemic inflammation. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2012;61:436–440.
17. Keating SM, Golub ET, Nowicki M, et al.. The effect of HIV infection and HAART on inflammatory biomarkers in a population-based cohort of women. AIDS. 2011;25:1823–1832.
18. Lajoie J, Poudrier J, Massinga Loembe M, et al.. Chemokine expression patterns in the systemic and genital tract compartments are associated with HIV-1 infection in women from Benin. J Clin Immunol. 2009;30:90–98.
19. Gumbi PP, Nkwanyana NN, Bere A, et al.. Impact of mucosal inflammation on cervical human immunodeficiency virus (HIV-1)-specific CD8 T-cell responses in the female genital tract during chronic HIV infection. J Virol. 2008;82:8529–8536.
20. Mitchell C, Hitti J, Paul K, et al.. Cervicovaginal shedding of HIV type 1 is related to genital tract inflammation independent of changes in vaginal microbiota. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2011;27:35–39.
21. Jaspan HB, Liebenberg L, Hanekom W, et al.. Immune activation in the female genital tract during HIV infection predicts mucosal CD4 depletion and HIV shedding. J Infect Dis. 2011;204:1550–1556.
22. Scott ME, Wilson SS, Cosentino LA, et al.. Interlaboratory reproducibility of female genital tract cytokine measurements by luminex: implications for microbicide safety studies. Cytokine. 2011;56:430–434.
23. Wong H-L, Pfeiffer RM, Fears TR, et al.. Reproducibility and correlations of multiplex cytokine levels in asymptomatic persons. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2008;17:3450–3456.
24. Djoba Siawaya JF, Roberts T, Babb C, et al.. An evaluation of commercial fluorescent bead-based luminex cytokine assays. PLoS One. 2008;3:e2535.
Keywords:© 2014 by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
cytokines; HIV; acquisition; susceptibility; immune activation