JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes:
Brief Report: Epidemiology and Prevention
Temporal Trends in Sexual Behavior Among Men Who Have Sex With Men in the United States, 2002 to 2006–2010
Leichliter, Jami S. PhD; Haderxhanaj, Laura T. MPH, MS; Chesson, Harrell W. PhD; Aral, Sevgi O. PhD
Division of STD Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.
Correspondence to: Jami S. Leichliter, PhD, Division of STD Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Rd MS E-44, Atlanta, GA 30333 (email: email@example.com).
This research was supported in part by an appointment to the Research Participation Program at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) administered by the Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education through an interagency agreement between the US Department of Energy and CDC.
The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Presented in part at the National STD Prevention Conference, March 13, 2012, Minneapolis, MN.
The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Received September 26, 2012
Accepted February 18, 2013
Abstract: Little is known about national trends in sexual behavior among MSM in the US. Data from the 2002 and 2006–2010 National Survey of Family Growth were used to compare sexual behaviors of sexually active MSM. Mean number of recent male partners significantly decreased from 2.9 in 2002 to 2.1 in 2006–2010 (P = 0.027), particularly among young MSM. Other sexual risk behaviors did not change or decrease over time. Our findings that sexual risk decreased as HIV and syphilis increased among MSM suggest that factors in addition to individual-level sexual risk should also be examined in relation to recent disease increases.
There have been recent increases in HIV and primary and secondary (P&S) syphilis among men who have sex with men (MSM), especially among young or minority MSM, in the United States.1,2 From 2006 to 2009, estimated HIV incidence increased 35% among MSM 13–29 year olds and 48% among black MSM 13–29 year olds.1 Similarly, from 2005 to 2008, rates of reported P&S syphilis increased 74% among black MSM (adjusted for age and region of the United States), and 160% and 117% among 15–19 and 20–24 year olds, respectively (adjusted for age, region, and race or ethnicity).2 Furthermore, analysis of trends in HIV and P&S syphilis from 2004 to 2008 found that increases among black men 13–24 year olds were identified in nearly all parts of the United States included in the study, indicating that the increase was widespread rather than limited to a few areas.3 For both diseases, it is possible that increases among MSM began earlier. From 2000 to 2004, P&S syphilis increased 81% among men (believed to be driven by MSM),4 and HIV/AIDS cases seemed to increase in 2004 among MSM.5
Although studies have examined temporal trends in sexual behaviors among MSM before and after highly active antiretroviral therapy and in the late 1990s and early 2000s,6–9 few studies have examined recent behavioral trends in MSM in the United States. One study, a random digit dialing survey in Seattle, compared the sexual behavior of MSM from 2003 to 2006 and found a significant decrease in median number of sex partners in the past year over time and no change in unprotected anal intercourse.10 However, given the widespread increases in HIV and P&S syphilis in the United States, national data on temporal trends in the sexual behaviors of MSM are needed. To date, there has been a lack of data from national population-based surveys that include MSM. The purpose of this study was to examine nationally representative data on sexually active MSM to determine if behaviors changed recently while P&S syphilis and HIV increased among MSM.
We used data from the 2002 and 2006–2010 National Survey of Family Growth (NSFG). NSFG is a multistage national probability sample of 15–44 year olds living in US households, with over-samples of 15–24 year olds, blacks, and Hispanics. Detailed information on the survey design and sampling procedures has been previously described11,12; however, in 2006, NSFG switched from periodic administration (ie, conducting the survey every 3–7 years) to continuous administration (ie, conducting interviews from June 2006 to June 2010). The same primary sampling units were used in 2002 and 2006–2010. The sample sizes and response rates for males were 4928 (78%) in 2002 and 10,403 (75%) in 2006–2010.13,14 All questions about same-sex partners and sexual risk included in this analysis were collected via audio computer assisted self-interview.
We used SAS-callable SUDAAN (release 10.0, Research Triangle Institute, Durham, NC) for analyses, to account for the complex sampling procedures used by NSFG, and data were weighted for nonresponse. For men who reported one or more male anal and/or oral sex partners in the 12 months before interview (referred to as “sexually active MSM”), we used t tests to compare mean number of male sex partners (top coded at 6 or more partners by NSFG; range,1–6 or more partners) across time by demographics, including age, race/ethnicity, household income as related to federal poverty level, education, and residing in a metropolitan statistical area. Additionally, we used χ2 tests to compare reported sexual risk behaviors [specific sexually transmitted disease (STD)/HIV risk behaviors, including those with male partners], sex with female partners, and STD/HIV testing across time.
The percentage of men who reported having a male sex partner in the past 12 months did not differ across time with 2.7% (n = 197) of all men categorized as sexually active MSM in 2002 and 2.1% (n = 272) in 2006–2010 (P = 0.103); thus, there were an estimated population total of 1.3–1.7 million sexually active MSM aged 15–44 years in the United States during the survey years (Table 1). Among all sexually active MSM, there was a significant decrease across time in the reported number of male partners in the past 12 months with an average of 2.9 partners in 2002 and 2.3 in 2006–2010 (P = 0.035). This decreasing trend was also identified among sexually active 15- to 24-year old MSM (2.9 partners in 2002 to 2.1 in 2006–2010, P = 0.027), and there was a nonsignificant decreasing trend for 35–44 year olds (P = 0.072). Also, there were no significant differences in the average number of male partners reported by any racial or ethnic group (Hispanic, non-Hispanic white, and non-Hispanic black) across time.
We found significant decreases in number of male partners in the past 12 months for some subpopulations. Specifically, sexually active MSM with an income less than 150% of the federal poverty level reported a mean of 3.0 male partners in 2002 significantly decreasing to 2.1 male partners in 2006–2010 (P = 0.032). Additionally, mean number of partners decreased for sexually active MSM with some college experience from 3.2 in 2002 to 2.3 in 2006–2010 (P = 0.033) and, for those living in a metropolitan statistical area, other than a central city, from 3.2 in 2002 to 2.1 in 2006–2010 (P = 0.009). There were no changes over time for the remaining subpopulations by income, education, or residence.
Similarly, we found no changes over time or declines in several STD/HIV risk behaviors (past 12 months) and STD/HIV testing (past 12 months or lifetime). Specifically, there was no significant difference across time in sexually active MSM who reported spending time in jail, not using a condom at last sex, injection drug use (IDU) and/or sex with a male IDU, or sex with an HIV-infected male (Table 2). In both time frames, more than half of sexually active MSM (56.7% in 2002 and 58.3% in 2006–2010) reported that they did not use a condom at last sex with a male partner. We found a significant decrease in reports of exchanging sex with a male for money or drugs from 15.1% in 2002 to 3.1% in 2006–2010 (P = 0.002). Additionally, there were no differences in reports of STD testing in the past 12 months (P = 0.945) or in receipt of last HIV test (P = 0.319).
Finally, there was a significant decrease in sexually active MSM who reported a female partner in the past 12 months (MSMW) from 38.4% in 2002 to 24.8% in 2006–2010 (P = 0.027). MSMW were 1.0% (2002) to 0.5% (2006–2010) of all men (P = 0.004) with an estimated population total of 315,642 MSMW in 2006–2010. Although we found a significant decrease in condom use at last sex among MSMW (P = 0.039), the decrease in overall numbers of MSMW meant that there were significantly fewer MSMW who did not use a condom at last sex, down from 292,114 in 2002 to 210,930 in 2006–2010. Among MSMW, reports of sex with an at-risk female (exchange sex, IDU, or HIV-positive) in the past 12 months significantly declined from 32.1% in 2002 to 11.0% in 2006–2010 (P = 0.009).
We conducted post hoc analyses to examine average number of male partners by age and race or ethnicity within survey year. We found no differences between 15 to 24, 25 to 34, and 35 to 44 year olds in 2002 (P = 0.575 and 0.729, respectively) or 2006–2010 (P = 0.183 and 0.724, respectively). Additionally, there were no differences in number of male partners between white MSM and Hispanic and non-Hispanic black MSM in 2002 (P = 0.140 and 0.122, respectively) or between white MSM and Hispanic MSM (P = 0.872) or white MSM and black MSM (P = 0.054) in 2006–2010.
During the time when HIV and P&S syphilis were increasing, self-reported number of male sex partners and several STD/HIV-related sexual risk behaviors were stable or decreasing among sexually active MSM in the United States. Our findings were generally consistent with a previous study of recent behavioral trends among MSM in Seattle,10 and a study of MSM in Peru that found increases in HIV while condom use was increasing and STDs were decreasing.9 Additionally, we found no evidence that increases in STD/HIV testing were related to the overall disease increases as recent testing among sexually active MSM did not differ across time.
Consistent with a review and meta-analysis,15,16 we found that subpopulations most affected by the recent increases in HIV and P&S syphilis1,2 did not report a higher number of male sex partners. Specifically, adolescent and young adult MSM did not report a higher number of male partners than other adult MSM. Additionally, sexually active black and Hispanic MSM did not report more partners than their white counterparts, and, in 2006–2010, blacks reported fewer partners than whites although the difference was not statistically significant. These findings suggest that factors other than an individual's sexual behavior should also be examined in relation to the increases in HIV and P&S syphilis.
It is possible that sexual network factors are associated with the increases in HIV and P&S syphilis. Partner-level factors such as sexual risk, a lack of awareness of HIV infection, and less access to HIV care have been associated with disparities in HIV infection among MSM. One study found that black MSM had higher reports of same-race partners and partners who were significantly older than MSM of other racial or ethnic groups,17 and a 2005–2006 study found that black MSM who were HIV-positive but not aware of their infection were more likely to believe that having sex with a same-race partner (ie, assortative mixing) lowered their HIV risk.18 A 2008 study that included multiple partner-level factors found that having a partner with an unknown HIV status was associated with HIV and was more commonly reported by black than white MSM.19 Furthermore, black men were estimated to have the highest number of unidentified HIV infections,20 and studies have found that minority MSM (black, Hispanic, mixed race) were more likely to be unaware of their HIV infection.21–23 Additionally, access to antiretroviral therapy which has been associated with reduced HIV transmission24 is lower among black MSM.25 Finally, it is possible that STD/HIV prevalence within the partner pool are related to the increases in P&S syphilis and HIV, as young and minority MSM have higher rates of HIV and STD. Thus, sexual network factors, including partner risk and underlying disease prevalence, may contribute to a higher risk of acquiring HIV and syphilis.4,5
There are limitations to this study. The same-sex measures included in NSFG through 2010 were limited; therefore, we could not examine the number of unprotected anal intercourse partners, partner characteristics (eg, type, age, or race of partner), or whether MSM had partners who were nonmonogamous. Also, 2002 NSFG did not assess the use of crystal methamphetamines. NSFG relies on self-reported data, so the potential nonreporting of same-sex behaviors exists; however, the use of audio computer assisted self-interview minimizes the chance that disclosure of same-sex sexual behaviors would have changed over time. It is possible that behavioral trends influence morbidity trends with a time lag that was not possible to assess given available survey years. Finally, it is possible that household surveys may underestimate the riskiest MSM populations (eg, core groups); therefore, findings may be most useful in combination with venue-based26 and convenience samples.
Data on MSM from national probability samples may be useful for STD/HIV prevention, particularly aiding in the identification of larger patterns of risk. Our findings suggest the need to also consider issues in addition to sexual behavior, such as sexual networks and disease prevalence in the sexual network, to better identify the factors associated with the observed increases in syphilis/HIV in young and minority MSM.
1. Prejean J, Song R, Hernandez A, et al.. Estimated HIV incidence in the United States, 2006–2009. PLoS One. 2011;6:e17502.
2. Su JR, Beltrami JF, Zaidi AA, et al.. Primary and secondary syphilis among black and Hispanic men who have sex with men: case report data from 27 states. Ann Intern Med. 2011;155:145–151.
3. Torrone EA, Bertolli J, Li J, et al.. Increased HIV and primary and secondary syphilis diagnoses among young men—United States, 2004-2008. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2011;58;328–335.
4. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Trends in Reportable Sexually Transmitted Diseases in the United States, 2004. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2005. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/std/stats04/trends2004.htm
6. Chen SY, Gibson S, Katz MH, et al.. Continuing increases in sexual risk behavior and sexually transmitted diseases among men who have sex with men: San Francisco, Calif, 1999-2001, USA. Am J Public Health. 2002;92:1387–1388.
7. Elford J, Hart G. If HIV prevention works, why are rates of high-risk sexual behavior increasing among MSM? AIDS Educ Prev. 2003;15:294–308.
8. George C, Alary M, Otis J, et al.. Noneligible increasing temporal trends in unprotected anal intercourse among men who have sexual relations with other men in Montreal. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2006;41:365–370.
9. Sanchez J, Lama JR, Kusunoki L, et al.. HIV-1, sexually transmitted infections, and sexual behaviors trends among men who have sex with men in Lima, Peru. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2007;44:578–585.
10. Menza TW, Kerani RP, Handsfield HH, et al.. Stable sexual risk behavior in a rapidly changing risk environment: findings from population-based surveys of men who have sex with men in Seattle, Washington, 2003-2006. AIDS Behav. 2011;15:319–329.
11. Lepkowski J, Mosher W, Davis K, et al.. National Survey of Family Growth, Cycle 6: Sample Design, Weighting, Imputation, and Variance Estimation. Vital and Health Statistics, Series 2, No. 142. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics; 2006.
12. Lepkowski JM, Mosher WD, Davis KE, et al.. The 2006-2010 National Survey of Family Growth: Sample Design and Analysis of a Continuous Survey. Vital and Health Statistics Series 2, No. 150. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics; 2010.
13. Martinez GM, Chandra A, Abma JC, et al.. Fertility, contraception, and fatherhood: data on men and women from cycle 6 (2002) of the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth. Vital Health Stat 23. 2006;26:.
14. Chandra A, Billioux VG, Copen CE, et al.. HIV Risk-related Behaviors in the United States Household Population Aged 15–44: Data from the National Survey of Family Growth, 2002 and 2006–2010. National Health Statistics Reports; No 46. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics; 2012.
15. Millett GA, Peterson JL, Wolitski RJ, et al.. Greater risk for HIV infection of black men who have sex with men: a critical literature review. Am J Public Health 2006;96:1–142.
16. Millett GA, Flores SA, Peterson JL, et al.. Explaining disparities in HIV infection among black and white men who have sex with men: a meta-analysis of HIV risk behaviors. AIDS. 2007;21:2083–2091.
17. Berry M, Raymond H, McFarland W. Same race and older partner selection may explain higher HIV prevalence among black men who have sex with men. AIDS. 2007;21:2349–2350.
18. Millett GA, Ding H, Marks G, et al.. Mistaken assumptions and missed opportunities: correlates of undiagnosed HIV infection among black and Latino men who have sex with men. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2011;58:64–71.
19. Oster AM, Wiegand RE, Sionean C, et al.. Understanding disparities in HIV infection between black and white MSM in the United States. AIDS. 2011;25:1103–1112.
20. Campsmith ML, Rhodes PH, Hall HI, et al.. Undiagnosed HIV prevalence among adults and adolescents in the United States at the end of 2006. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2010;53:619–624.
21. MacKellar DA, Valleroy LA, Secura G, et al.. Unrecognized HIV infection, risk behaviors, and Perceptions of risk among young men who have sex with men: opportunities for advancing HIV prevention in the third decade of HIV/AIDS. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2005;38:603–614.
22. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. HIV prevalence, unrecognized infection, and HIV testing among men who have sex with men (MSM)—five U.S. cities, June 2004-April 2005. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2005;54:597–601.
23. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Prevalence and awareness of HIV infection among men who have sex with men—21 cities, United States, 2008. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2010;59:1201–1207.
24. Donnell D, Baeten JM, Kiarie J, et al.. Heterosexual HIV-1 transmission after initiation of antiretroviral therapy: a prospective cohort analysis. Lancet. 2010;375:2056–2057.
25. Millett GA, Jeffries WL, Peterson JL. Common roots: a contextual review of HIV epidemics in black men who have sex with men across the African diaspora. Lancet. 2012;380:411–423.
26. Sanchtz T, Finlayson T, Drake A, et al.. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) risk, prevention, and testing behaviors—United States, National HIV Behavioral Surveillance System: men who have sex with men, November 2003-April 2005. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2006;55.
trends; national probability sample; sexual behavior; MSM
© 2013 by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
What does "Remember me" mean?
By checking this box, you'll stay logged in until you logout. You'll get easier access to your articles, collections,
media, and all your other content, even if you close your browser or shut down your
To protect your most sensitive data and activities (like changing your password),
we'll ask you to re-enter your password when you access these services.
What if I'm on a computer that I share with others?
If you're using a public computer or you share this computer with others, we recommend
that you uncheck the "Remember me" box.
Highlight selected keywords in the article text.
Data is temporarily unavailable. Please try again soon.
Readers Of this Article Also Read