Objective: To compare patient retention at 3 stages of pre-antiretroviral (ART) care and 2 stages of post-ART care to identify when greatest attrition occurs.
Design: An observational cohort study.
Methods: We reviewed files of all adult nonpregnant individuals testing HIV-positive January 1–June 30, 2010, at a primary health clinic in Johannesburg, South Africa (N = 842). We classified retention in pre-ART stage 1 (HIV diagnosis to CD4 results notification in ≤3 months), pre-ART stage 2 (initially ineligible for ART with repeat CD4 test ≤1 year of prior CD4), pre-ART stage 3 (initiating ART ≤3 months after first eligible CD4 result), and at 0–6 and 6–12 months post-ART.
Results: Retention among all patients during pre-ART stage 1 was 69.8% [95% confidence interval (CI): 66.7% to 72.9%]. For patients initially ART ineligible (n = 221), 57.4% (95% CI: 49.5% to 65.0%) returned for a repeat CD4 during pre-ART stage 2. Among those who were ART eligible (n = 589), 73.5% (95% CI: 69.0% to 77.6%) were retained during pre-ART stage 3. Retention increased with time on ART, from 80.2% (95% CI: 75.3% to 84.5%) at 6 months to 95.3% (95% CI: 91.7% to 97.6%) between 6 and 12 months. Cumulative retention from diagnosis to 12 months on ART was 36.9% (95% CI: 33.0% to 41.1%) for those ART eligible and 43.0% (95% CI: 36.4% to 49.8%) from diagnosis to repeat CD4 testing within one year among those ART ineligible.
Conclusions: Patient attrition in the first year after HIV diagnosis was greatest before ART initiation: more than 25% at each of 3 pre-ART stages. As countries expand HIV testing and ART programs, success will depend on linkage to care, especially before ART eligibility and initiation.
*Health Economics and Epidemiology Research Office, Department of Internal Medicine, School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
†Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
‡Witkoppen Health and Welfare Centre, Johannesburg, South Africa
§Division of Infectious Diseases, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
‖Center for Global Health and Development, Boston University, Boston, MA
¶Department of Epidemiology, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston University, Boston, MA.
Correspondence to: Kate Clouse, PhD, MPH, Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Gillings School of Global Public Health, 2101 McGavran-Greenberg Hall, CB #7435, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7435 (e-mail: email@example.com).
Supported by United States Agency for International Development under the terms of agreement 674-A-00-08-00007-00 with Right to Care; National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Grant K01AI083097 (M. Fox).
The opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, or Witkoppen Health and Welfare Centre.
Presented as poster MOPE184 at the XIX International AIDS Conference (AIDS 2012), July 22–27, 2012, Washington, DC.
The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Received June 01, 2012
Accepted September 10, 2012
South Africa's national antiretroviral therapy (ART) program is currently the largest in the world, with over 1.7 million adults and children enrolled in the first 7 years.1,2 Rapid scale-up has put tremendous pressure on the limited resources of the public health sector. Despite the fact that 300,000 patients enroll in the South African ART program each year,3 an estimated 250,000 people died of AIDS in 20104 and only 52% of those currently ART eligible are receiving treatment.2
An enormous challenge to South Africa's attempts to expand the impact of its program is attrition from HIV care. Uninterrupted retention for HIV patients is critical as patients who stop treatment are at increased risk of drug resistance, morbidity, and mortality.5,6 Several studies have documented rates of retention on ART in resource-limited settings7–11 and have demonstrated that during the first year on HIV treatment, patients are at high risk for attrition (ie, programmatic loss and mortality).9,12,13 More recent work has documented high rates of attrition among patients not yet on ART from the time of testing positive to completion of CD4 staging,14,15 from completing staging to repeat CD4 testing for ART eligibility,16,17 and from ART eligibility to ART initiation.16,18,19
While these studies highlight a problem with attrition from HIV care, 3 major limitations impede conclusions about the extent of the problem. First, progression through the consecutive stages of HIV care (eg, testing positive, CD4 staging, and ART initiation) are typically studied in isolation among distinct cohorts that prevent a measure of overall program attrition from the time of testing positive through long-term ART. To our knowledge, only one study has examined retention through pre-ART and post-ART stages among patients in Southern Africa. Using data from the first year of the public ART program (2004–2005) in Mozambique, Micek et al reported data from separate HIV testing and treatment facilities and found retention was lowest at the period of enrollment at the ART sites (56.5%) and for timely ART initiation among ART eligible (31.3%) but did not report cumulative retention through all stages or describe retention among patients ineligible for ART.20
Second, operational definitions of patient retention differ greatly between studies, limiting comparability. Recommendations for standardized definitions for pre-ART care have recently been proposed,21 allowing for estimates that can be compared across programs and countries. Third, most national HIV programs do not report retention indictors during pre-ART care, so we currently have no way of quantifying the magnitude of loss to initiation at the country level.
To address the limited longitudinal measures of attrition from HIV care across multiple stages of care, we set out to measure attrition through 5 stages of early HIV care at a single site in a cohort of patients testing positive using the newly recommended definitions.
Witkoppen Health and Welfare Centre (“Witkoppen”) is a high-volume (8500 patient visits per month) primary health care clinic in Johannesburg, South Africa, operated by a nongovernmental organization receiving public and private financial support. Witkoppen provides HIV/AIDS services, integrated TB/HIV care, pre-/post-natal care, chronic care, mental health services, and social welfare assistance to a primarily low-income population residing in densely populated peri-urban formal and informal settlements in northern Johannesburg.
Pre-ART care at Witkoppen begins at the time of testing HIV positive using 2 simultaneous rapid dried blood spot tests, with results available in about 20 minutes. Blood for CD4 testing is drawn at the clinic on the same day a patient receives a positive HIV result and is sent to an off-site National Health Laboratory Services facility. Patients are scheduled to return for CD4 results 2–4 weeks after testing positive. At this second visit, ART-eligible patients attend a first adherence counseling session and are examined by a clinician. Blood is collected for additional baseline tests, and they are scheduled to return 2–4 weeks later for a second adherence counseling session and ART initiation.
Patients initially ineligible for ART receive counseling about their CD4 result, are examined by a clinician, and are scheduled to return for a follow-up CD4 test within 6 months. Patients—both pre-ART and on-ART—who miss scheduled appointments are to be phoned by clinic staff for rebooking, and if untraceable, to be referred for community outreach tracing.
ART is initiated on-site by doctors and qualified nurses. Patients at Witkoppen are generally treated according to the South African National Treatment Guidelines,22 with an important exception. In 2010, Witkoppen began initiating all HIV-positive patients with a CD4 count ≤350 cells/mm3, a year before South Africa adopted this policy nationwide.23
We conducted an observational cohort study through retrospective clinical record review of all nonpregnant adult individuals at Witkoppen testing HIV-positive for the first time between January 1 and June 30, 2010 (N = 969). Starting with a roster of eligible patients sourced from the clinic's monthly HIV testing statistics, we excluded patients whose paper files could not be located after 3 separate attempts using the clinic number provided and were unlisted in TherapyEdge-HIV, the electronic clinic HIV patient database (N = 125), suggesting an invalid clinic ID number or erroneous inclusion on the list of eligible patients. We also excluded 2 patients who transferred facilities immediately after testing HIV positive. For the 842 patients included in the analysis, we reviewed clinic files after a minimum of 12 months [median = 16.5 months, interquartile range (IQR) = 14.8–18.1 months] from the time of testing HIV positive or at least 12 months postinitiation for those who were initially eligible for ART. Data were collected using Microsoft Excel 2010 (Microsoft Corp, Redmond, WA).
Approval for this study was granted by the Human Research Ethics Committee of the University of the Witwatersrand and the Institutional Review Board of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Definition of Study Variables
Retention was defined as remaining alive and in care at Witkoppen and was determined using clinic visit dates. Attrition refers to both loss to follow-up (no clinic attendance ≥3 months after last scheduled visit) and death but does not include transfers. Patients who transfer are removed from the analysis at the start of the stage in which they transferred. Missed visits among patients who returned to care and treatment interruptions do not contribute to our definition of retention. We defined 3 stages of pre-ART care24 using standardized definitions21 for retention in each stage as defined in Table 1. For pre-ART stage 1, we report the proportion of patients who complete CD4 staging within 3 months after testing HIV-positive. For pre-ART stage 2, we report the proportion of patients not eligible for ART who received a second CD4 test within one year after the first CD4 staging. Patients eligible for ART at the time of HIV diagnosis skip pre-ART stage 2 and move directly to pre-ART stage 3, where we report the proportion of patients initiating ART within 3 months after being determined ART-eligible. Eight patients (0.9%) reported initiating ART at other facilities without transferring out and returned to Witkoppen, so the date initiated elsewhere was used. We report post-ART retention at 6 and 12 months after ART initiation. Retention within a stage is dependent on successfully completing the prior stage. Cumulative retention analyses exclude patients who transferred during the stages reported (n = 59).
We defined initial CD4 count as the value at the time of testing HIV positive. ART eligibility at the time of testing HIV positive was confirmed during the file review and is generally defined as a CD4 count ≤350 cells/mm3; however, 23 patients with CD4 values 200–350 were considered ineligible for ART because of clinician noncompliance with the clinic's ART guidelines and 3 patients with CD4 >350 were considered eligible at clinician discretion. TB treatment was defined as initiating TB treatment within one year of testing HIV positive. For patients with an available South African ID number (33.9% of patients lost to follow-up), mortality was confirmed using the National Population Register of the South African Department of Home Affairs.25
Patient characteristics at the time of testing HIV positive were summarized using counts and proportions for categorical variables, medians, and IQRs for continuous variables. We report retention at the 3 stages of pre-ART care and 2 ART time points as counts and proportions with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). We identified predictors of any pre-ART or post-ART attrition by estimating adjusted risk ratios (aRRs) and 95% CI obtained by log-binomial regression analysis.
Characteristics of the 842 eligible patients are summarized in Table 2. Overall, 55.1% were female. Patients were a median (IQR) of 34 years (28–40 years) and had a median (IQR) initial CD4 count of 211.5 (92–350) cells/mm3. Nearly half (41.5%) were born outside South Africa, mostly in Zimbabwe (75.9% of foreign born), and 72.6% tested HIV positive on their first visit to Witkoppen. Initial CD4 values were not available for 32 patients (3.8%) because of the patient leaving before CD4 testing (n = 25) or missing lab results (n = 7) and never returning for repeat testing. Of the remainder, 589 (72.7%) were ART eligible when testing HIV positive. Nearly 11% of patients initiated TB treatment within a year of HIV testing.
Patient Retention by Stage
Retention through each stage of pre- and post-ART care is shown in Figure 1, while Figure 2 shows cumulative continuous retention through all stages of early HIV care. Among patients newly diagnosed with HIV, the greatest attrition occurred in pre-ART care, with more than 25% attrition at each of the 3 pre-ART stages (Fig. 1) among those remaining in care at the beginning of each stage. Overall retention in pre-ART stage 1 was 69.8% (95% CI: 66.7% to 72.9%) and included 32 subjects with no CD4 count, none of whom completed the stage. When limited to those with a CD4 count, retention was somewhat higher for those ineligible for ART than those eligible when testing HIV positive (76.5% vs. 71.1%, respectively). The lowest proportion retained was in pre-ART stage 2 among those ART ineligible, with only 57.4% (95% CI: 49.5%–65.0%) of those who returned for their initial CD4 results returning for a repeat CD4 test within one year. Median (IQR) CD4 value at repeat testing among those previously ineligible for ART was 424 cells/mm3 (337–570) with 32.6% ART eligible at their second CD4 staging. Retention after ART initiation was higher than the pre-ART stages at 80.2% (95% CI: 75.3%–84.5%) between 0 and 6 months and 95.3% (95% CI: 91.7%–97.6%) between 6 and 12 months.
The cumulative proportion of patients who were ART eligible when testing HIV positive and who remained in care through 12 months on ART was only 36.9% (95% CI: 33.0% to 41.1%), and among those ART ineligible, 43.0% (95% CI: 36.4% to 49.8%) were retained within one year of initial CD4 staging (Fig. 2). While attrition at each stage is substantial, overall attrition steadies over time. Among those completing a stage (or retained for pre-ART stage 2), the median (IQR) time to completing stage 1 (testing to completing staging) was 16 days (9–28 days), stage 2 (completing staging until a repeat CD4 count) was 162 days (138–186 days), and stage 3 (ART eligibility to ART initiation) was 23 days (12–36 days), suggesting that most patients who complete a stage do so within the defined time periods.
During the study period, 48 (5.7%, 95% CI: 4.3% to 7.4%) patients died, however, when we limit this to the 38.8% (n = 327) of the sample with a valid South Africa ID, mortality doubles to 11.9% (95% CI: 8.7% to 15.8%). Initial CD4 results are available for 46 (95.8%) of the deceased patients; of these, 87.0% were eligible for ART. Patients who died had a lower median initial CD4 count (105 cells/mm3, IQR = 49–169) than those who did not (225 cells/mm3, IQR = 101–354), but did not differ from the overall cohort in terms of age, sex, or TB treatment. Among ART eligible patients, 2.5% (95% CI: 1.5% to 4.1%) of patients in pre-ART stage 1 and 3.9% (95% CI: 2.4% to 6.2%) of patients in pre-ART stage 3 died. After ART initiation, 2.4% (95% CI: 1.1% to 4.8%) of patients died with less than 6 months on treatment and 1.0% (95% CI: 0.2% to 3.1%) with more than 6 months on ART. Among patients who were ART ineligible, none died during pre-ART stage 1 and 2.7% (95% CI: 1.1% to 5.6%) of patients in pre-ART stage 2 died. Overall, 77.5% of ART-eligible patients who died did not initiate ART.
Predictors of Pre-ART and Post-ART Attrition
Younger age (18–29 years) was associated with increased attrition in the pre-ART stages (aRR = 1.56, 95% CI: 1.21 to 2.00), and possibly after ART initiation (aRR = 1.27, 95% CI: 0.76 to 2.13), compared with ages 30–39 (Table 3). An initial CD4 <50 cells/mm3 predicted increased attrition before (aRR = 1.51, 95% CI: 1.08 to 2.12) and after ART initiation (aRR = 2.30, 95% CI: 1.15 to 4.63), compared with an initial CD4 200–350 cells/mm3. Male sex was associated with increased likelihood of attrition before ART (aRR = 1.47, 95% CI: 1.16 to 1.87) but not after ART initiation (aRR = 0.76, 95% CI: 0.45 to 1.28). Patients born outside of South Africa tended to fail to complete 12 months on ART (aRR = 1.48, 95% CI: 0.92 to 2.40) compared with their South African counterparts. TB treatment was strongly associated with decreased attrition in the pre-ART stage (aRR = 0.04, 95% CI: 0.01 to 0.27) but not after ART initiation (aRR = 1.42, 95% CI: 0.79 to 2.53).
Retention in HIV care from the time of testing positive through lifelong ART treatment is critical for getting patients onto treatment promptly and for preventing morbidity and mortality associated with disease progression. This study, one of the first to follow a consistent cohort of newly diagnosed HIV-positive patients over a year through the various stages of pre-ART and early ART care, allowed us to summarize attrition throughout early HIV care. Our findings paint a stark picture—the proportion of patients who are ART eligible when testing positive retained continuously in care through one year on ART was less than 40%. This suggests that most patients in our study continued to be at high risk of HIV-associated death and opportunistic infections despite knowing their HIV-positive status.
This finding is consistent with a previous review of sub-Saharan African studies that estimated overall retention in pre-ART care to be 33%.24 One critical problem, however, with summarizing previous studies' results is a lack of consistent definitions of retention and time periods over which retention was measured. Thus, while many studies have previously documented high pre-ART14–18 and on-ART attrition7–11 at specific stages in care, our finding of substantial patient loss throughout the stages of early HIV care is one of the only studies to document this in a single cohort of ART-eligible and ART-ineligible patients using standardized definitions.21 Studies that only investigate retention in disjointed cohorts are also unable to comment on the timing of attrition. We found that the pre-ART periods are a time of considerable loss, with over one-quarter of patients still in care lost at each stage.
Our results also document the challenge of retention among patients ineligible for ART at the time of testing positive for HIV. Given that South Africa guidelines call for repeat CD4 testing every 6 months,22 the pre-ART stage 2 definition used gives patients ample time to return. Despite this, we found only 57.4% (95% CI: 49.5%–65.0%) of ART-ineligible individuals completed a repeat CD4 count within one year. This is true despite the fact that pre-ART services were available at the same clinic where the patient completed HIV testing and CD4 staging and did not require visiting a separate location. While low, our retention results are higher than other recent studies from South Africa which have shown retention for patients not yet eligible for ART to be between 36.0% and 46.3%,16,17 and consistent with a meta-analysis result of 54.2% among ART-ineligible patients in sub-Saharan Africa.26
Most patients in our study were ART eligible when testing positive for HIV under the site's threshold of a CD4 count ≤350 cells/mm3. Among these eligible patients, for whom moving from HIV diagnosis to CD4 staging to ART initiation can be completed within 2–8 weeks, attrition was greatest in pre-ART care. In just these few first weeks, patient attrition was 28.9% (95% CI: 25.3% to 32.6%) from testing to CD4 staging and 26.5% (95% CI: 22.4% to 31.0%) from ART eligibility to ART initiation. For those who initiated treatment, attrition 0–12 months after ART initiation remained high overall at 25.0% (95% CI: 20.1% to 30.4%), but most attrition occurred during 0–6 months on ART (19.8%, 95% CI: 15.5% to 24.7%) and stabilized between 6 and 12 months on ART (4.7%, 95% CI: 2.4% to 8.3%). This finding suggests that if patients have the motivation and support to complete the early milestones of CD4 staging and ART initiation, they are likely to remain in care. Given the substantial proportion (28.9%) of ART-eligible patients who did not return for their second clinic visit to receive CD4 results, the challenge is to retain patients within the very first weeks of HIV care: from diagnosis through CD4 staging and ART initiation. Recognition of this challenge has encouraged new efforts to retain these patients, including offering point-of-care CD4 technology and same-day ART initiation.27–29
We identified several important predictors of patient attrition within the first year of HIV care (Table 3). Differing directions of estimates for predictors of pre-ART or post-ART attrition indicate that there may be different drivers of retention within each group at these unique stages that require specific targeted interventions. For example, males had greater attrition in the pre-ART stages, but no gender difference was observed post-ART. Overall, our findings are consistent with other studies noting poorer retention among males9,11,16,18,19 and younger patients9,11,16 and highlight the need for interventions targeted to these specific groups, such as improved male involvement approaches, youth-friendly services, mobile technology, and others. Patients on TB treatment had much less likelihood of attrition during pre-ART stages, which differs from the results of an ART-eligible Durban cohort where newly diagnosed TB patients experienced 76% greater attrition than TB-free patients.30 Our finding likely is due to regular follow-up at the clinic during TB treatment and active tracing of those who default TB treatment. After ART initiation, patients in our study were as likely, or possibly more likely, to drop out of care as those not on TB treatment, highlighting the importance of communicating the need for regular ART care beyond the TB treatment period. Being born outside of South Africa was associated with a nearly 50% increased likelihood of attrition after ART initiation, similar to Bygrave et al,31 but in contrast to better retention in care among self-identified foreigners in South Africa found by McCarthy et al.32 Witkoppen has a very high proportion of patients born outside of South Africa, which is becoming increasingly common in Johannesburg public-sector clinics, if not throughout the country.28,33 In addition to migration among immigrant patients, clinics should evaluate the potential for short- or long-term migration away from the clinic among immigrant and South African patients and should facilitate links to care and provide sufficient drug supply.
Mortality in our study was low at 5.7%. Although we used the South Africa Department of Home Affairs National Population Register to verify deaths, which has been shown to be 80% complete for adults with valid ID numbers,34 this estimate of overall mortality likely is underestimated as nearly half of our cohort was not South African, and when we limited our mortality estimate to only those with a valid South African ID, mortality doubled. It is difficult to compare our mortality to findings of other studies because most focus only on either pre-ART or post-ART mortality. Among patients who died who were eligible for ART, we found that most deaths occurred before ART initiation, further emphasizing the importance of linkage to care during the critical pre-ART period and the need to fast-track patients with severe immunosuppression.
Our results should be interpreted in light of their limitations. First, the generalizability of our results may be limited given that our data represent only one facility. Retention may have been higher than in most settings given the integration of HIV testing and care on-site. Previous studies suggest that moving from facility to facility for CD4 testing, ART initiation, for example, may encourage attrition.20,35 Second, retention may be underestimated as some patients considered lost in our analysis may have continued care and initiated treatment elsewhere. We only know of the intention to continue care elsewhere among patients who requested a transfer, a common limitation of studies investigating patient retention. Third, we defined attrition based on visit dates, which does not consider missed visits or treatment interruptions, which may overestimate the true amount of patient engagement in care. Finally, due to high patient drop out throughout the study period, our sample size was reduced by the post-ART stages, limiting the precision of our regression analysis estimates for this period. Strengths of our study include a comprehensive data set that allows for retention estimates from the point of testing HIV-positive through ART retention with few missing data. The study was conducted under routine clinical conditions and represents patient retention within a real-world scenario at one clinic.
Our findings help to explicate the problem of attrition from HIV programs throughout the continuum of early HIV care. In our study, patient attrition was highest during the pre-ART period, but our findings suggest that once patients initiate ART, they are more likely to be retained. These findings support the need for retention interventions that target patient loss from the very first visit when a patient learns their HIV-positive diagnosis.
Study activities took place as part of routine services offered at Witkoppen Health and Welfare Centre, and the authors would like to thank the patients and highly dedicated staff, particularly the ARVU staff that retrieved more than 1000 paper files on multiple occasions.
2. Johnson LF. Access to antiretroviral treatment in South Africa, 2004-2011. South Afr J HIV Med. 2012;13:22–24.
3. Meyer-Rath G, Pillay Y, Blecher M, et al.. The impact of the December 2010 drug tender on the total cost of the national antiretroviral treatment programme in South Africa, 2011 to 2017. Paper presented at: 5th South Africa AIDS Conference, June 7–10, 2011, Durban, South Africa.
5. Sethi AK, Celentano DD, Gange SJ, et al.. Association between adherence to antiretroviral therapy and human immunodeficiency virus drug resistance. Clin Infect Dis. 2003;37:1112–1118.
6. Gardner EM, Hullsiek KH, Telzak EE, et al.. Antiretroviral medication adherence and class-specific resistance in a large prospective clinical trial. AIDS. 2010;24:395–403.
7. Bekker L-G, Myer L, Orrell C, et al.. Rapid scale-up of a community-based HIV treatment service: programme performance over 3 consecutive years in Guguletu, South Africa. S Afr Med J. 2006;96:315–320.
8. Lawn SD, Myer L, Harling G, et al.. Determinants of mortality and nondeath losses from an antiretroviral treatment service in South Africa: implications for program evaluation. Clin Infect Dis. 2006;43:770–776.
9. Fox MP, Rosen S. Patient retention in antiretroviral therapy programs up to three years on treatment in sub-Saharan Africa, 2007-2009: systematic review. Trop Med Int Health. 2010;15(suppl 1):1–15.
10. Cornell M, Grimsrud A, Fairall L, et al.. Temporal changes in programme outcomes among adult patients initiating antiretroviral therapy across South Africa, 2002-2007. AIDS. 2010;24:2263–2270.
11. Boyles TH, Wilkinson LS, Leisegang R, et al.. Factors influencing retention in care after starting antiretroviral therapy in a rural South african programme. PLoS One. 2011;6:e19201.
12. Brinkhof MWG, Pujades-Rodriguez M, Egger M. Mortality of patients lost to follow-up in antiretroviral treatment programmes in resource-limited settings: systematic review and meta- analysis. PLoS One. 2009;4:e5790.
13. Sanne IM, Westreich D, Macphail AP, et al.. Long term outcomes of antiretroviral therapy in a large HIV/AIDS care clinic in urban South Africa: a prospective cohort study. J Int AIDS Soc. 2009;12:38.
14. Losina E, Bassett IV, Giddy J, et al.. The “ART” of linkage: pre-treatment loss to care after HIV diagnosis at two PEPFAR sites in Durban, South Africa. PLoS One. 2010;5:e9538.
15. Larson BA, Brennan A, McNamara L, et al.. Lost opportunities to complete CD4+ lymphocyte testing among patients who tested positive for HIV in South Africa. Bull World Health Organ. 2010;88:675–680.
16. Kranzer K, Zeinecker J, Ginsberg P, et al.. Linkage to HIV care and antiretroviral therapy in Cape Town, South Africa. PLoS One. 2010;5:e13801.
17. Larson BA, Brennan A, McNamara L, et al.. Early loss to follow up after enrolment in pre-ART care at a large public clinic in Johannesburg, South Africa. Trop Med Int Health. 2010;15(suppl 1):43–47.
18. Bassett IV, Regan S, Chetty S, et al.. Who starts antiretroviral therapy in Durban, South Africa? Not everyone who should. AIDS. 2010;24 (suppl 1):S37–S44.
19. Ingle SM, May M, Uebel K, et al.. Outcomes in patients waiting for antiretroviral treatment in the Free State Province, South Africa: prospective linkage study. AIDS. 2010;24:2717–2725.
20. Micek MA, Gimbel-Sherr K, Baptista AJ, et al.. Loss to follow-up of adults in public HIV care systems in central Mozambique: identifying obstacles to treatment. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2009;52(3):397–405.
21. Fox MP, Larson B, Rosen S. Defining retention and attrition in pre-antiretroviral HIV care: proposals based on experience in Africa. Trop Med Int Health. 2012;17:1234–1244.
24. Rosen S, Fox MP. Retention in HIV care between testing and treatment in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review. PLoS Med. 2011;8:e1001056.
25. Fox MP, Brennan A, Maskew M, et al.. Using vital registration data to update mortality among patients lost to follow-up from ART programmes: evidence from the Themba Lethu Clinic, South Africa. Trop Med Int Health. 2010;15:405–413.
26. Mugglin C, Estill J, Wandeler G, et al.. Linkage to care from HIV diagnosis to antiretroviral therapy in sub-Saharan Africa: systematic review and meta-analysis. Paper presented at: 19th Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections, March 5–8, 2012. Seattle, WA. Paper 1143.
27. Jani IV, Sitoe NE, Alfai ER, et al.. Effect of point-of-care CD4 cell count tests on retention of patients and rates of antiretroviral therapy initiation in primary health clinics: an observational cohort study. Lancet. 2011;378:1572–1579.
28. Faal M, Naidoo N, Glencross DK, et al.. Providing immediate CD4 count results at HIV testing improves ART initiation. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2011;58:54–59.
29. Larson BA, Bistline K, Ndibongo B, et al.. Rapid point-of-care CD4 testing at mobile HIV testing sites to increase linkage to care: an evaluation of a pilot program in South Africa. Paper presented at: 6th IAS Conference on HIV Pathogenesis, Treatment and Prevention, July 17–20, 2011, Rome, Italy. Abstract MOAD0103.
30. Bassett IV, Chetty S, Wang B, et al.. Loss to follow-up and mortality among HIV-infected people co-infected with TB at ART initiation in Durban, South Africa. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2012;59:25–30.
31. Bygrave H, Kranzer K, Hilderbrand K, et al.. Trends in loss to follow-up among migrant workers on antiretroviral therapy in a community cohort in Lesotho. PLoS One. 2010;5:e13198.
32. McKarthy K, Chersich MF, Vearey J, et al.. Good treatment outcomes among foreigners receiving antiretroviral therapy in Johannesburg, South Africa. Int J STD AIDS. 2009;20:858–862.
35. Tayler-Smith K, Zachariah R, Massaquoi M, et al.. Unacceptable attrition among WHO stages 1 and 2 patients in a hospital-based setting in rural Malawi: can we retain such patients within the general health system? Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2010;104:313–319.
Keywords:© 2013 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.
HIV/AIDS; antiretroviral therapy (ART); retention; attrition; linkage to care; South Africa