Skip Navigation LinksHome > December 15, 2012 - Volume 61 - Issue 5 > Consideration of Postpartum Management in HIV-Positive Haiti...
JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes:
doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e31826abdd1
Epidemiology and Prevention

Consideration of Postpartum Management in HIV-Positive Haitian Women: An Analysis of CD4 Decline, Mortality, and Follow-Up After Delivery

Coria, Alexandra AB*; Noel, Francine MD, MSCI; Bonhomme, Jerry MD; Rouzier, Vanessa MD; Perodin, Christian BS; Marcelin, Adias BS; Li, Zhongze MS; Tosteson, Tor D. ScD; Deschamps, Marie-Marcelle MD; Wright, Peter F. MD*; Pape, Jean W. MD†,§

Free Access
Article Outline
Collapse Box

Author Information

*Department of Pediatrics, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH

Centres GHESKIO, Port-au-Prince, Haiti

Biostatistics Shared Resource, Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Lebanon, NH

§Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY.

Correspondence to: Peter F. Wright, MD, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Pediatrics, One Medical Center Drive, Lebanon, NH (e-mail: peter.f.wright@hitchcock.org).

Supported by National Institutes of Health Grant 5D43TW00001823—AIDS International Training and Research Program, Johnson, WD, Principal Investigator. Alexandra Coria's effort and travel was supported by Helen's Fund of the Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center Department of Pediatrics, the Ohiyesa Foundation, a Neukom Institute Travel Grant, and the Dickey Center for International Understanding, and Dartmouth Medical School.

Presented at the XVIII International AIDS Conference, July 22, 2010, Austria, Vienna.

The authors report no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Received February 23, 2012

Accepted June 01, 2012

Collapse Box

Abstract

Background: A previous study at the GHESKIO HIV clinic confirmed that highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) prophylaxis reduced mother-to-child transmission (MTCT) and infant mortality in Haiti. This analysis looks at maternal outcomes in this cohort after delivery.

Methods: Records of 508 HIV-positive Haitian women who delivered between 1999 and 2005 were analyzed. We examined mortality, loss to follow-up, time to death or HAART initiation, and time of decline of CD4 count to 350 cells/μL.

Results: One hundred seventy women reached a CD4 ≤200 or developed clinical AIDS and were started on long-term HAART. The median CD4 count at HAART initiation was 178 (interquartile range, 106–227). CD4 decline was stratified by CD4 at delivery to project the mean months to a CD4 of 350. With an initial CD4 of 350–499 cells/μL, it was 19 months (95% confidence interval: 14 to 28) while with a CD4 >500 cells/μL, it was 71 months (95% confidence interval: 59 to 88). At study close, 257 women remained in follow-up, with loss to follow-up 3 times less in those on HAART (3.2/100 person-years) than those not on HAART (9.8/100 person-years).

Conclusions: The threshold for starting treatment was often missed in HIV-infected women after delivery. Success of follow-up of women after delivery was favorably influenced by being on HAART. Women with high (>500) initial CD4 counts had a protracted time (5–7 years) before they reach a threshold CD4 count, in contrast to those with CD4 <500 cells/μL. Strategies for postpartum treatment of women should be informed by the speed with which they are likely to progress.

Back to Top | Article Outline

INTRODUCTION

Apart from sub-Saharan Africa, the Caribbean is the region of the world most affected by HIV/AIDS. Haiti accounts for the majority of the region's current HIV infections,1,2 with an HIV seroprevalence of 2.2% in 2005.3 In pregnant women, the mean seroprevalence of HIV in Haiti was 4.4% in 2007.4 In urban areas it was higher, at a mean of 5.9%.4

Since 2006, the World Health Organization (WHO) has recommended that all HIV-positive expectant mothers in resource-poor settings receive antiretroviral prophylaxis to prevent mother-to-child transmission (MTCT).5 More recently, WHO has recommended highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) as a prophylactic regimen for all pregnant women, including those who would not otherwise qualify for treatment for their own health.6 With more women now receiving HAART as MTCT prophylaxis during pregnancy and breastfeeding, it is important to consider how they should be treated after they have completed their prophylactic regimens.

At the Haitian Group for the Study of Kaposi's Sarcoma and Opportunistic Infections (GHESKIO), a clinic based in Port-au-Prince, researchers have demonstrated that prenatal HAART effectively reduced MTCT of HIV in Port-au-Prince.7,8 These studies were conducted in a cohort of 508 HIV-positive Haitian women who gave birth between 1999 and 2005. Here, we have retrospectively analyzed the follow-up data in this maternal cohort for rates and patterns of loss to follow-up and mortality. We have also modeled the mean time to starting lifelong HAART after receiving HAART prophylaxis, to inform optimal postpartum follow-up intervals. We hope that these analyses will help inform an option to continue pregnant women on HAART indefinitely once they have received HAART prophylaxis.

Back to Top | Article Outline

METHODS

Study Population

The eligible study population was defined as all postpartum HIV-positive women in follow-up at the GHESKIO PMTCT clinic from 1999 to 2005. All women and their children were offered appropriate HIV and postnatal care consistent with the standard of care in Haiti during the study period. The first-line HAART regimen used during this time for both prophylaxis and treatment was zidovudine, lamivudine, and nevirapine. All women were offered family planning services.

Women were excluded for having 2 or more CD4 counts of less than 200 cells/μL recorded before February 27, 2003, the date that HAART became available at GHESKIO for individuals with a CD4 count below that threshold. This was done to control for the limited HIV interventions available in this cohort and health status.

Back to Top | Article Outline
Data Collection

Data on these women and their live-born infants had been previously collected through a comprehensive review of the GHESKIO electronic database and paper charts. Methods for data collection and treatment regimens are detailed elsewhere.7 For the purposes of the present study, data were updated through July 17, 2009, with respect to postpartum mortality, decline in CD4 count, subsequent pregnancy, timing of HAART initiation, and follow-up.

Back to Top | Article Outline
Definitions

CD4 count at delivery: It is defined as the measurement closest to the date of delivery, drawn within pregnancy or up to 12 weeks postpartum. If there was no CD4 count available during this period, the woman was excluded from analyses requiring this value.

CD4 count at HAART initiation: It is defined as the CD4 count closest to the date of HAART initiation, within 3 months before starting HAART. Women with no value in the appropriate time period were excluded from analyses requiring this value.

CD4 count at death: It is defined as the CD4 count closest to the date of death that was within 100 days of death. Women with no value in the appropriate time period were excluded from analyses requiring this value.

Active follow-up: Women were considered to be in active follow-up at GHESKIO if records reflected that they had been seen at the PMTCT clinic or pharmacy in the year before the study close date of July 17, 2009.

HAART initiation: This term is used to refer to initiation of HAART for the woman's own health with anticipation of lifetime therapy. It does not refer to HAART prophylaxis administered by the PMTCT program.

Back to Top | Article Outline
Outcomes Analysis

The primary outcomes studied in this cohort were mortality, loss to follow-up, time to death or HAART initiation, and time to decline of CD4 count to 350 cells/μL. Average time to subsequent pregnancy was also calculated.

Back to Top | Article Outline
Postpartum Mortality

In addition to an overall mortality rate, the death rate in the cohort was further calculated for women on HAART from delivery and for those who never started HAART. We were not able to calculate a meaningful mortality rate for those who started HAART subsequent to delivery because of the greatly varying times to HAART initiation in this group, and the fact that, by definition, they all survived at least long enough to initiate HAART.

Mean and median CD4 counts at time of HAART initiation were compared between the group that died during the study period and the group that did not. Mean and median CD4 counts at death were also calculated for women on and off HAART at death.

Furthermore, women who died were divided into 2 groups: those who died within 100 days of starting therapy and those who lived past that point. Mean and median CD4 counts were compared between groups.

Back to Top | Article Outline
Follow-Up Outcomes

The 473 eligible women were divided into 3 groups: (1) women who died during the study period; (2) women in active follow-up at study close; and (3) women who were seen after delivery but were then later lost to follow-up. Those who were no longer in active follow-up were further subdivided by reason for leaving GHESKIO: known to have transferred to another care center; known to have declined follow-up but source of subsequent care not known (often because women moved out of the area); and outcome unknown. Loss to follow-up was quantified per year for only the first 3 years after delivery, because of a decline in sample size that became impractical for analysis at longer time periods (Tables 1, 2).

Table 1
Table 1
Image Tools
Table 2
Table 2
Image Tools
Back to Top | Article Outline
Time to HAART Initiation or Death

The cohort was stratified by CD4 count at delivery into the following groups: <200, 200–349, 350–499, and ≥500 cells/μL. The endpoint was defined as HAART initiation or death (Fig. 2). Surviving women were censored at study close or if they became pregnant again.

Figure 2
Figure 2
Image Tools
Back to Top | Article Outline
Modeling of Time to CD4 ≤350 Cells/μL

Women were stratified by CD4 at delivery into 2 groups: 350–499 and ≥500 cells/μL, and projected time to a decline in CD4 count to 350 cells/μL was calculated for each group. The threshold of 350 cells/μL was chosen because of its current policy relevance. In 2010, GHESKIO increased its threshold for HAART initiation to this level from the previous one of 200 cells/μL. In the 93 multiparous women in the cohort, projections of decline in CD4 count were restricted to decline between the first delivery and 40 weeks before the second delivery, because of uncertainty regarding the effects of HAART or other ART prophylaxis on CD4 count and disease progression during pregnancy.

Back to Top | Article Outline
Time to Subsequent Pregnancy

Birth rates were calculated for years of follow-up without HAART and years after initiation of HAART. They do not include the delivery at GHESKIO, which prompted enrollment into the PMTCT program. We were not able to make a meaningful comparison between the treated and untreated women because of the great variability in time between delivery and HAART initiation. These rates were then used to estimate the average time between pregnancies while off HAART, to estimate the interval between courses of PMTCT prophylaxis in multiparous women.

Back to Top | Article Outline
Statistical Methods

All incidence rates were calculated using a normal approximation to a Poisson distribution. P values for comparison of all averages were calculated using a 2-tailed t test assuming equal variance.

For the analysis of time to HAART initiation or death, a Kaplan–Meier survival analysis was used to estimate median months from the first delivery at GHESKIO to the combined endpoint of HAART initiation or death. A log-rank test was used to determine the statistical significance of the difference among the 4 groups.

A linear mixed model was used to study the change in CD4 counts in untreated women after the first delivery at GHESKIO. To more closely approximate a Gaussian distribution, a log transformation was applied to the longitudinal record of CD4 counts. A linear trend over time was fit for each stratum. Based on the estimated slope coefficients of the trend in each stratum, an estimate of the number of months it would take to reach a CD4 count of 350 cells/μL was calculated along with approximate 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Back to Top | Article Outline
Ethics

These women had previously signed a written agreement to participate in the provision of services at GHESKIO and to allow the physicians to review their records. The GHESKIO Institutional Review Board had previously determined review of these records for study purposes to fall within provision of services. The previous study of the same cohort was approved by the GHESKIO and Weill Cornell Medical College Institutional Review Boards. The need for informed consent was further evaluated by the Dartmouth College Committee for the Protection of Human Subjects and waived according their criteria.7

Back to Top | Article Outline

RESULTS

Cohort Description

Five hundred eight pregnant HIV-infected women were enrolled in the program of GHESKIO to limit MTCT between January 1, 1999 and December 31, 2005, at a median age of enrollment of 27 years and interquartile range (IQR) of 23–32. Of the 508 women, 18 were never seen postpartum and were excluded from the analysis. An additional 17 had reached a CD4 count of <200 before the availability of HAART and were therefore excluded for the reasons detailed in the Methods section. Four hundred seventy-three women therefore met criteria to enter into this analysis (Fig. 1 and Table 1).

Figure 1
Figure 1
Image Tools

Of the 473 women who entered into analysis, 160 were put on HAART, with a total of 515 person-years on HAART. Forty-eight of these women were continued on HAART from the time of their delivery for their own health, with the additional 112 put on HAART during their follow-up period.

There were 313 women seen after delivery who had not started on HAART at study close, with a total of 1068 years of follow-up.

Back to Top | Article Outline
Postpartum Mortality

Overall mortality in the cohort was 2.8 deaths per 100 person-years of follow-up (95% CI: 2.1 to 3.6). In the women on HAART from delivery, there were 4.0 deaths per 100 person-years (95% CI: 0.5 to 7.6) in the first 3 years after delivery. In those who never received HAART, mortality was 4.9 deaths per 100 person-years (95% CI: 3.2 to 6.5) during this period.

Of the 20 women who died after initiating HAART, 18 had a CD4 count recorded at HAART initiation. All but one started HAART at a CD4 count below 350 cells/μL, with a median CD4 at HAART initiation of 113 cells/μL (IQR: 54–201). By contrast, the median CD4 at HAART initiation in those who remained in active follow-up as of July 17, 2009 was 180 (IQR: 129–229).

Of the 20 given HAART who later died, 11 died within 100 days of starting therapy. The group that died within 100 days had a lower median CD4 at HAART initiation than the group that lived past 100 days: 58 cells/μL (IQR: 33–126) versus 169 (IQR: 100–204). Mean CD4s at HAART initiation were 108 cells/μL, SD = 113, for the group that lived less than 100 days and 198 cells/μL, SD = 147, for the group that lived more than 100 days. In contrast, the median CD4 count at death for 22 women who never received HAART and had a count recorded within 100 days of death was 140 cells/μL (IQR: 53–327); the mean CD4 was 216 cells/μL, SD = 200. For 8 women on HAART who had a CD4 count within 100 days of death, the median was 140 cells/μL (IQR: 29–228); the mean was 143 cells/μL, SD = 121.

Back to Top | Article Outline
Follow-Up Outcomes

Overall, 257 (52%) of the 473 women were followed after delivery, and those who had CD4 counts >200 at the date of introduction of HAART at GHESKIO were alive and in active follow-up at study close. They had between 3.5 and 10 years of follow-up in the MTCT program (Table 1).

The remaining 216 women were censored for the following reasons: 53 died; 32 declined care; 25 transferred care; and the fate of 106 (22% of the cohort) was unknown (lost to follow-up). Follow-up was related to whether the woman was kept on HAART after delivery: 9.8 women were lost per100 life-years (95% CI: 7.4 to 12.1) in the group never put on HAART, and 3.2 women were lost per 100 life-years in those who were on HAART from delivery (95% CI 0.1 to 6.4) (Table 2). This relationship was statistically significant. The group lost to follow-up and the group in active care did not differ significantly in their median age at enrollment (27 for both), their median time of enrollment in the program (May 2004 and March 2004, respectively) or their CD4 counts at delivery (555, SD = 292 and 553, SD = 319, respectively).

Back to Top | Article Outline
Time to HAART Initiation or Death

The median maternal CD4 count at delivery of the child defining entry into the cohort was 467 (IQR: 304–696). The median CD4 count at HAART initiation was 178 (IQR: 106–227). When the cohort was stratified by CD4 at delivery, a significant difference (P < 0.0001) was found in the progression to the combined endpoint of HAART initiation or death (Fig. 2). Estimated median HAART-free survival time for women who had a CD4 of <200 cells/μL was 7 months (IQR: 2–13); for CD4 = 200–349 cells/μL, it was 33 months (IQR 18–49); for CD4 = 350–499 cells/μL, it was 50 months (IQR: 44–57). For CD4 ≥ 500 cells/μL, there was no median available because fewer than 50% of women reached the endpoint.

Back to Top | Article Outline
Modeling of Time to CD4 ≤350 Cells per Microliter

A model of average CD4 decline in untreated women after delivery of their first child yielded times to a CD4 of 350 cells/μL that were significantly different between the groups with the higher CD4s at delivery (CD4 of 350–499 cells/μL and ≥500 cells/μL) (Fig. 3). The group with CD4 counts between 350 and 499 at delivery could be expected on average to decline to 350 cells/μL in 19 (95% CI: 14 to 28) months from delivery of the index child. The group with CD4 counts ≥500 would decline in 71 (95% CI: 59 to 88) months.

Figure 3
Figure 3
Image Tools
Back to Top | Article Outline
Time to Subsequent Pregnancy

Despite the availability of family planning services, 93 of the 473 women had 106 pregnancies and deliveries subsequent to the delivery that established them in the cohort. Seventy-one women (14% of the cohort) had more than one child while not on long-term HAART. The average time between deliveries before HAART initiation was 34.3 months (SD = 14.4 months). While not on HAART, the women of this cohort gave birth to 5.8 children/100 person-years (95% CI: 4.5 to 7.1). After starting HAART, the treated women gave birth to 5.2 children/100 person-years (95% CI: 3.3 to 7.2). Five women had more than 1 child while receiving HAART; 9 women had more than one child while not on HAART.

Back to Top | Article Outline

DISCUSSION

Haiti currently recommends prophylactic HAART administration for all HIV-positive pregnant women, regardless of CD4 count, and allowing at least a 6-month postpartum period of HAART prophylaxis for breastfeeding. This approach seems to be appropriate for this population, where 97% of women were found to breastfeed, exclusively or with other foods, in a 2006 demographic and public heath survey.3 Additionally, the transition in Haiti to a target CD4 of 350 cells/μL for long-term therapeutic HAART initiation in all HIV-infected individuals further shortens the potential HAART-free interval. In this setting, understanding patterns of mortality on and off HAART after pregnancy, follow-up and success of meeting treatment targets, and the rate at which postpartum women might reasonably be expected to decline in health are all important in formulating new treatment policy for postpartum women. The present study was undertaken to shed light on these areas.

Back to Top | Article Outline
Postpartum Mortality

All-cause mortality was not significantly different in HAART and no-HAART groups (Table 2). However, nearly half of the mortality in the group on HAART occurred within 100 days of starting therapy, and mortality was associated with a lower CD4 count at HAART initiation. Recent data from Haiti show that health outcomes are significantly worse when the target for HAART initiation is 200 rather than 350.9 Other recent studies also strongly suggest that initiation of HAART at lower CD4 counts carries an increased risk of complications of AIDS or death.10–12 Our findings—that mortality in those never put on HAART occurred exclusively in women with a CD4 count <350 cells/μL within 100 days of death—are consistent with this literature and supportive of the decision to increase the CD4 threshold for treatment initiation in Haiti.

In addition, more than 25% of women started HAART at a CD4 count less than 106 cells/μL, well below the target of 200 cells/μL, in effect during the study period. Although the threshold for treatment is now 350 cells/μL, the difficulty in beginning treatment at or near the intended CD4 count indicates a need for a follow-up plan specifically targeted at identifying women around the treatment threshold. Findings reported here regarding CD4 progression, if replicable, will help inform this strategy.

A potential relationship was explored between less frequent follow-up intervals and lower CD4 counts at the start of HAART therapy. There was a nonsignificant trend toward lower CD4s at HAART initiation with longer intervals between the 2 follow-up visits previous to HAART initiation (data not shown). Clearly, once a patient is seen and documented to be infected, a rigorous follow-up plan must be in place, so that they are started on HAART at a time that optimizes their clinical outcomes.

Back to Top | Article Outline
Follow-Up

In addition to the late initiation of HAART, a higher than anticipated percentage of this cohort was lost to follow-up. It should be noted that being lost to follow-up did not include those who indicated that they had transferred care or declined follow-up. It may have partly represented movement out of or around the country, in which there is now national access to comprehensive HIV treatment. Nevertheless, many of these women had established care for themselves and their children at GHESKIO, and it is concerning that their outcomes are unknown.

The inability to comprehensively follow HIV-infected subjects before the need for HAART is not unique to GHESKIO, as shown by the fact that only 46% of HIV-infected South African adults got a repeat CD4 count with a median time between counts of 236 days,13 and that in another South African study only 15% of people with a CD4 count more than 200 returned for the results of their CD4 count.14 Rates of retention as low as 4% at 6 months have been reported from Malawi for asymptomatic HIV-infected people with higher CD4 counts.15

The loss to follow-up in these 473 women, overall 16% over 3 years, is also concerning because it does not mirror findings in another cohort at the same clinic; adults followed while receiving HAART at GHESKIO have been found to have an 8% rate of loss to follow-up over 5 years.16 However, when the group is broken down into those either on or off HAART from delivery to study close, the 48 women on HAART continuously had loss to follow-up rates similar to other GHESKIO populations on therapy. These 48 also had better follow-up in the first 3 years after delivery than those who were not on therapy, to a statistically significant degree (Table 2). Undocumented mortality, family dynamics, and misunderstanding of the need to follow-up for their own health (rather than just their children's health care) are all possible reasons for the higher rate of loss in those not started on therapy.

The question remains as to whether being placed on therapy was more likely in women who more reliably sought follow-up, or whether being on HAART is a predictor of good follow-up in and of itself. As this could be an important factor in the design of improved follow-up strategies (one of which could be keeping women on HAART indefinitely after delivery regardless of CD4 count). It is an area for future research.

Back to Top | Article Outline
Modeling of CD4 Decline

Our analysis shows that timing of CD4 progression to a critical level is predicted by the initial CD4 count. If the CD4 count is more than 500, it is unlikely to reach the threshold of 350 cells/μL in less than a year (Fig. 3). Therefore, follow-up intervals of 1 year would be appropriate while the CD4 count is above this level. However, with these longer intervals, other measures will need to be put in place to ensure that women remain in active follow-up. For women with lower CD4 counts at delivery, a shorter follow-up interval will be necessary to avoid missing the treatment threshold (Fig. 3).

Back to Top | Article Outline
When to Continue Treatment Past Delivery?

In women whose CD4 counts near delivery are between 350 and 499 cells/μL, our data indicates that it would be reasonable to extend treatment indefinitely past pregnancy and breastfeeding. We have found that without treatment these women will progress to a CD4 of less than 350 cells/μL by an average of 19 months from delivery (Fig. 3).

Recent evidence documents that maternal HAART while breastfeeding for infant prophylaxis will lower MTCT significantly during the postpartum period in resource-poor settings,17–23 and Haiti is therefore currently extending prophylactic HAART to all women up to 6 months postpartum to allow breastfeeding and considering a policy of continuous HAART after delivery. When these 6 additional months of HAART are accounted for, the additional HAART that would be administered to women with a CD4 between 350 and 499 cells/μL at delivery would average 13 months. Therefore, because follow-up is poorer in the cohort not receiving HAART (Table 2), and the average time to progression is relatively short, the benefit of the additional HAART administered in terms of improved health outcomes may well outweigh the costs of an extra 13 months of HAART, although this cost-benefit analysis is outside the scope of the current work.

Notably, for women with a CD4 of >500 cells/μL, the time to a CD4 of 350 cells/μL is significantly longer (71 months; Fig. 3). Therefore, if other studies can identify specific interventions to reduce the rate of loss to follow-up in the group with the highest CD4 count at delivery, a “watch and wait” approach with regards to starting HAART may prove to be safer and more cost-effective in these women than it is in the <500 CD4 group. This is an important area for future research. Recent WHO recommendations have provided the option of continuing all women after delivery on HAART.24

Furthermore, if a woman becomes pregnant a second time before beginning HAART, as 14% of the cohort did, she would begin yet another regime of prophylaxis. With an average birth rate of a child every 3.1 years and, ideally, at least 12 months of HAART per pregnancy (6 months before delivery and 6 months after delivery while breast feeding), a multiparous HIV-positive woman would be projected to spend about one-third of her time on HAART.

Additionally, the rate of multiparity in these women is evidence of continued heterosexual activity. Treating these women would have the additional benefit, not quantified here, of reducing transmission of the virus to partners in the community.25

Back to Top | Article Outline
Limitations

As a retrospective study, this analysis was limited in its ability to control certain variables that may have affected outcomes or follow-up in the cohort studied. In particular, we were not able to track adherence to HAART therapy or viral loads, without which data the benefits of treatment may not be correctly quantified. As we are suggesting initiation of lifelong HAART, particularly if the CD4 count at delivery is <500 cells/μL, understanding adherence, resistance patterns, and viral rebound in this population would be essential before making any true policy recommendation. The benefits of treating over the longer period depend on resistance patterns and any viral rebound, so these will be key measures to evaluate in any prospective trial. However, adherence in this group is probably representative of usual patterns of adherence for this population, so conclusions as to outcomes made here are still informative.

We also acknowledge that in analyses separating women into HAART and no-HAART groups (mortality, subsequent pregnancy, and follow-up outcomes), women never put on long-term HAART may have been healthier than those who were, introducing bias into these analyses. There was a large, although not statistically significant, difference in average CD4 at delivery between these 2 groups (Table 1). This study, as a retrospective analysis, was not powered to control for that difference, but it may have affected our reported outcomes.

Additionally, the high number of women with unknown outcomes may result in a bias that we were unable to quantify here. It is unclear from this data whether there are specific risk factors for loss to follow-up that could be addressed, or which would change the conclusions of this study. Also, our definition of loss to follow-up (seen in the year before study close) is only a rough indicator of quality of follow-up.

Randomized prospective studies such as Promise (IMPAACT 1077) are needed to elucidate these issues. Finally, analysis of certain outcomes and relationships between certain variables was limited by small sample size.

Back to Top | Article Outline
Summary and Further Research

This study begins to address some of the issues that are central to maternal HIV care. In particular, the present analysis provides a model of CD4 decline after delivery, and adds evidence that missing the target CD4 count for starting HAART was common and likely led to excess mortality in this cohort. With a better understanding of determinants of follow-up and confirmation of the CD4 decline curve modeled here, we will be able to better predict in this setting and others how to best maximize the quality of care for postpartum HIV-positive women.

Back to Top | Article Outline
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The helpful comments of Drs Paul Palumbo and Serena Koenig on late drafts of the manuscript are acknowledged with appreciation.

Back to Top | Article Outline

REFERENCES

1. UNAIDS. 2008 Report on the global AIDS epidemic. 2008. Available at: http://www.unaids.org/en/dataanalysis/epidemiology/2008reportontheglobalaidsepidemic/. Accessed August 23, 2012.

2. UNAIDS. Epidemiological fact sheets on HIV and AIDS. 2008. Available at: http://158.232.15.29/CFS/downloadpdf.htm?country_id=LACHTI&lng_code=en&pdfoption=epi. 2008 Update. Accessed August 23, 2012.

3. Cayemittes M, Placide F, Barrère B, et al.. Enqûete Mortalité, Morbidité, et Utilisation des Services EMMUS-IV 2005-2006. 2006. Available at: http://www.measuredhs.com/pubs/pdf/fr192/fr192.pdf. Accessed August 23, 2012.

4. , et al.. Etude de séro surveillance par méthode sentinelle de la prévalence du VIH, de la syphilis, de l'hépatite B et de l'hépatite C et chez les femmes enceintes en Haïti 2006/2007. 2007. Available at: http://data.unaids.org/pub/Report/2007/haitihivserosurveill2007_fr.pdf. Accessed August 23, 2012.

5. World Health Organization. Antiretroviral drugs for treating pregnant women and preventing HIV infection in infants: toward universal access: recommendations for a public health approach—2006 version. 2006. Available at: http://www.who.int/hiv/pub/guidelines/pmtctguidelines3.pdf. Accessed August 23, 2012.

6. World Health Organization. Rapid advice: use of antiretroviral drugs for treating pregnant women and preventing HIV infection in infants. 2009. Available at: http://www.who.int/hiv/pub/arv/rapid_advice_art.pdf. Accessed August 23, 2012.

7. Noel F, Mehta S, Zhu Y, et al.. Improving outcomes in infants of HIV-infected women in a developing country setting. PLoS One. 2008;3:e3723.

8. Deschamps M, Noel F, Bonhomme J, et al.. Prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV in Haiti. Rev Panam Salud Pública. 2009;25:24–30.

9. Severe P, Juste MAJ, Ambroise A, et al.. Early versus standard antiretroviral therapy for HIV-infected adults in Haiti. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:257–265.

10. Emery S, Neuhaus JA, Phillips AN, et al.. Major clinical outcomes in antiretroviral therapy (ART)–naive participants and in those not receiving ART at baseline in the SMART study. J Infect Dis. 2008;197:1133–1144.

11. Kitahata MM, Gange SJ, Abraham AG, et al.. Effect of early versus deferred antiretroviral therapy for HIV on survival. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:1815–1826. Available at: http://content.nejm.org. Accessed August 23, 2012.

12. Sterne JA, May M, et al.When to Start Consortium. Timing of initiation of antiretroviral therapy in AIDS-free HIV-1-infected patients: a collaborative analysis of 18 HIV cohort studies. Lancet. 2009;373:1352–1363. Available at: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6T1B-4W1F67B-1/2/ff5a377934d7893f449015512fc1e517. Accessed August 23, 2012.

13. Kranzer K, Zeinecker J, Ginsberg P, et al.. Linkage to HIV care and antiretroviral therapy in Cape Town, South Africa. PLoS One. 2010;5:e13801.

14. Larson BA, Brennan A, McNamara L, et al.. Lost opportunities to complete CD4+ lymphocyte testing among patients who tested positive for HIV in South Africa. Bull World Health Organ. 2010;88:675–680.

15. Tayler-Smith K, Zachariah R, Massaquoi M, et al.. Unacceptable attrition among WHO stages 1 and 2 patients in a hospital-based setting in rural Malawi: can we retain such patients within the general health system? Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2010;104:313–319.

16. Leger P, Charles M, Severe P, et al.. 5-year survival of patients with AIDS receiving antiretroviral therapy in Haiti. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:828–829. Available at: http://content.nejm.org. Accessed August 23, 2012.

17. Kesho Bora Study Group. Eighteen-month follow-up of HIV-1-infected mothers and their children enrolled in the Kesho Bora study observational cohorts. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2010;54:533–541.

18. Marazzi MC, Nielsen-Saines K, Buonomo E, et al.. Increased infant human immunodeficiency virus-type one free survival at one year of age in sub-saharan Africa with maternal use of highly active antiretroviral therapy during breast-feeding. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2009;28:483–487.

19. Mofenson LM. Protecting the next generation—eliminating perinatal HIV-1 infection. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:2316–2318.

20. Palombi L, Marazzi MC, Voetberg A, et al.. Treatment acceleration program and the experience of the DREAM program in prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV. AIDS. 2007;21(suppl 4):S65–S71.

21. Peltier CA, Ndayisaba GF, Lepage P, et al.. Breastfeeding with maternal antiretroviral therapy or formula feeding to prevent HIV postnatal mother-to-child transmission in Rwanda. AIDS. 2009;23:2415–2423.

22. Shapiro RL, Hughes MD, Ogwu A, et al.. Antiretroviral regimens in pregnancy and breast-feeding in Botswana. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:2282–2294.

23. Taha T, Kumwenda J, Cole S, et al.. Postnatal HIV‐1 transmission after cessation of infant extended antiretroviral prophylaxis and effect of maternal highly active antiretroviral therapy. J Infect Dis. 2009;200:1490–1497.

24. World Health Organization. Use of antiretroviral drugs for treating pregnant women and preventing HIV infection in infants. 2012. Available at: http://www.who.int/hiv/PMTCT_update.pdf. Accessed August 23, 2012.

25. Montaner JSG, Lima VD, Barrios R, et al.. Association of highly active antiretroviral therapy coverage, population viral load, and yearly new HIV diagnoses in British Columbia, Canada: a population-based study. Lancet. 2010;376:532–539.

Cited By:

This article has been cited 1 time(s).

JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes
Lost to Follow-Up But Perhaps Not Lost in the Health System
Delcher, C; Meredith, G; Griswold, M; Roussel, B; Duval, N; Louissaint, E; Joseph, P
JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, 61(5): e75-e77.
10.1097/QAI.0b013e3182771084
PDF (124) | CrossRef
Back to Top | Article Outline
Keywords:

Haiti; PMTCT; HAART

© 2012 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.

Login

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.