JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes:
Changes in the Soluble Mucosal Immune Environment During Genital Herpes Outbreaks
Keller, Marla J. MD*,†; Madan, Rebecca P. MD‡; Shust, Gail MD‡; Carpenter, Colleen A. BS‡; Torres, N. Merna BA‡; Cho, Sylvia BS‡; Khine, Hnin MD‡; Huang, Meei-Li PhD¶; Corey, Lawrence MD¶; Kim, Mimi ScD§; Herold, Betsy C. MD†,‡,‖
Departments of *Medicine,
†Obstetrics & Gynecology and Women's Health,
§Epidemiology & Population Health, and
‖Microbiology & Immunology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine and Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY
¶Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA.
Correspondence to: Betsy C. Herold, MD, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1300 Morris Park Avenue, Forchheimer 702, Bronx, NY 10461 (e-mail: email@example.com).
This work was supported by R01AI065309, K23AI089271, UL1RR02570, P30AI051519, and T32AI070117. The contents of this publication are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.
The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Received March 13, 2012
Accepted July 05, 2012
Background: Genital tract secretions provide variable inhibitory activity against herpes simplex virus (HSV) ex vivo. We hypothesize that the anti-HSV activity may prevent the spread of virus from the more commonly affected sites, such as the external genitalia, to the upper genital tract.
Methods: The antimicrobial activity of cervicovaginal lavage (CVL) and concentrations of mucosal immune mediators were measured in 10 HIV-seronegative women with an active external herpetic lesion and compared with 10 HIV-seronegative women who were HSV-1 and HSV-2 seronegative. Samples were obtained at the time of a symptomatic external lesion (day 0), after 1 week of oral acyclovir (day 7), and 1 week after completing treatment (day 14). Controls were evaluated at parallel intervals.
Results: The anti-HSV activity was higher in CVL obtained from cases compared to controls at presentation (day 0) (54.3% vs. 28%), fell to similar levels on day 7, and then rebounded on day 14 (69% vs. 25%). The anti-HSV activity correlated positively and significantly with the concentrations of several inflammatory proteins; the concentrations of these proteins tended to be higher in cases compared with controls and followed a similar temporal pattern.
Conclusions: Increases in inflammatory immune mediators and anti-HSV activity were detected in CVL at the time of clinical outbreaks and after completion of a short course of acyclovir. These mucosal responses may protect against HSV spread but could facilitate HIV infection and contribute to the clinical observation that, independent of clinical lesions, HSV-2 is a risk factor for HIV acquisition.
Genital herpes simplex virus (HSV) infections pose a global public health threat. In the United States, ∼17% of the population is seropositive for HSV-2 and 58% for HSV-1, which has emerged as a major cause of genital herpes in developed countries.1–3 HSV-2 seroprevalence rates approach 90%–95% among HIV-infected individuals and among female sex workers in developing countries, where HSV-2 remains the dominant cause of genital ulcerative disease.4 Incident or prevalent HSV-2 infection increases the risk of acquiring and transmitting HIV and contributes more to the spread of HIV-1 than the number of sex partners or other sexually transmitted infections (STIs).5,6
Overt genital ulcers likely promote HIV acquisition by disrupting the epithelium and recruiting activated CD4+ T cells. This is supported by the finding of increased numbers of activated T cells found at the dermal–epidermal junction in sequential biopsies of genital skin obtained during and after healing of clinically evident HSV ulcers.7 Efforts to reduce HSV and its impact on HIV include suppressive therapy with oral acyclovir (ACV), topically delivered antivirals, and prophylactic vaccines. Trials to test whether suppressive ACV could reduce HIV acquisition or transmission yielded disappointing results. Oral suppressive ACV had no impact on HIV acquisition8 nor did it affect the rate of HIV transmission from HIV-1/HSV-2 coinfected persons to their HIV-uninfected partners,9 but ACV did reduce the frequency of clinical HSV recurrences.8,9
The importance of soluble mucosal immunity is supported by the observation that genital secretions from healthy women exhibit ex vivo activity against HIV and HSV, independent of serostatus.10–12 Yet, the precise molecules that contribute to the activity against each pathogen and the biological implications are unknown. In prior studies, we found that cervicovaginal lavage (CVL) blocked HSV entry and the antiviral activity correlated with concentrations of soluble immune mediators including interleukin (IL)-8, human neutrophil peptides (HNP1-3), lactoferrin, lysozyme, and immunoglobulins.10,11 HNP1-3 are α-defensins secreted primarily by immune cells and exhibit anti-HSV and anti-HIV activity in vitro.13,14 The concentrations of these peptides are increased in the setting of inflammation and, despite their in vitro antiviral activity, CVL concentrations of HNP1-3 have been independently associated with increased HIV acquisition.15 This observation led to speculation that any protective effects of the antimicrobial peptides were overcome by the detrimental effects of inflammation, which may disrupt the epithelial barrier, recruit and activate HIV target cells, and directly augment HIV replication through activation of the long terminal repeat.
No studies have examined the endogenous anti-HSV activity or changes in concentrations of soluble mucosal immune mediators in the female genital tract in the setting of active genital herpes. We hypothesize that CVL antimicrobial activity may be increased during episodes of external herpes lesions, perhaps as a host protective response to prevent the spread of virus locally and from the more commonly involved external sites (vulva, labia, and introitus) to the upper genital tract. HSV is isolated less frequently from cervical than from vulval, perineal, perianal, or vaginal swabs.16 However, this increase in anti-HSV activity and its associated inflammatory mediators may, paradoxically, facilitate HIV infection through immune activation and recruitment of HIV target cells.
To explore this notion, we compared the antimicrobial activity and concentrations of selected immune mediators in HIV-seronegative women with an external herpetic lesion to women who were seronegative for HIV, HSV-1, and HSV-2. Samples were obtained at the time of a symptomatic lesion (day 0), after oral ACV treatment (day 7), and 1 week after completing treatment (day 14). Controls were evaluated at parallel intervals.
Women between the ages of 18 and 50 years were recruited from the New York metropolitan area between July 2006 and October 2009. Albert Einstein College of Medicine and Mount Sinai School of Medicine Institutional Review Boards and the NIAID Division of AIDS Prevention Science Review Committee approved the study. All participants provided written informed consent. Inclusion criteria for cases included an ulcerative or vesicular eruption located on the vulva, labia, or perineum, positive HSV culture or direct fluorescent antibody (DFA) test, willingness to receive anti-HSV treatment, and to abstain from sex and vaginal product use for the study duration. Control subjects had no history of genital HSV lesions, were HSV-1 and HSV-2 seronegative, and frequency matched to cases by age (within 5 years), race (black, white, Asian, or mixed), and hormonal contraceptive use. Participants were excluded for pregnancy, breastfeeding, menopause, HIV, genitourinary infection, bacterial vaginosis (BV), abnormal Pap test, positive semen test, and anti-HSV treatment for >2 days before screening.
At the initial visit, participants had urine collected for microscopy, culture, and pregnancy. A gynecological examination was performed at each visit for detection of BV (wet prep with Amsel clinical criteria), Trichomonas vaginalis (wet prep), and Candida species (KOH prep). Genital secretions were evaluated for the presence of semen with an immunoassay that detects p30 (Abacus Diagnostics, West Hills, CA). Vaginal pH was measured from a swab of the lateral vaginal wall (Whatman pH paper, pH 3.8–5.5). Suspected lesions were swabbed for DFA testing (Millipore, Temecula, CA) and culture. The lesion and vagina were sampled with a single swab for HSV DNA by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Genital secretions were collected by lavage with 10 mL of normal saline (pH ∼5.0). At the initial visit, a Pap test was collected, and Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis infection were determined by nucleic acid amplification testing of endocervical swabs (Gen-Probe, Inc, San Diego, CA). Blood was collected for HIV ELISA, syphilis (rapid plasma reagin test), serotype-specific antibodies for HSV-1 and HSV-2 (HerpeSelect, Focus Diagnostics, Cypress, CA). Controls underwent similar procedures but did not have swabs collected for HSV DFA and culture.
Cases were provided with a 7-day course of oral ACV (400 mg, 3 times a day), and cases and controls were asked to return 7 and 14 days later for pelvic exam, collection of a vaginal swab for HSV PCR, and CVL for mucosal studies.
CVL were transported to the laboratory on ice and were clarified by centrifugation at 700g for 10 minutes at 4°C. Supernatants were divided into aliquots and stored at −80°C. An aliquot of unspun CVL was stored for HSV PCR testing.
Vaginal swabs from cases and controls (days 0, 7, and 14) and unspun CVL from cases (day 0) were evaluated for HSV DNA by quantitative, real-time, fluorescence-based PCR as described.17
Measurement of Immune Mediators
The concentration of protein recovered in CVL supernatants was measured with the Micro BCA Protein Assay kit (Thermo Scientific Pierce, Rockford, IL). IL-1α, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, Interferon (IFN)-γ, IFN-α2, IL-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1ra), macrophage inflammatory protein (MIP)-1α, MIP-1β, and regulated upon activation, normal T-cell expressed and secreted (RANTES) were quantified in each CVL sample using a multiplex proteome array with beads from Millipore (Billerica, MA), measured using Luminex100 (Austin, TX) and analyzed using StarStation (Applied Cytometry Systems, Sacramento, CA). The levels of all other mediators were determined using commercial ELISA kits: secretory leukocyte protease inhibitor (SLPI) (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN), lactoferrin (Calbiochem, San Diego, CA), lysozyme (ALPCO Diagnostics, Salem, NH), human beta defensins (HBD) 1, 2 and 3 (Alpha Diagnostic International, San Antonio, TX), HNP1-3 (the ELISA does not differentiate between these 3 related peptides; HyCult Biotechnology, Uden, The Netherlands), and IgG and IgA (Cygnus Technologies, Southport, NC).
Measurement of Endogenous Antimicrobial Activity
The antimicrobial activity against HSV-2, HIV-1, and Escherichia coli (E. coli) in CVL was measured as previously described.18 For anti-HSV activity, Vero cells were infected in duplicate in 2 independent experiments with ∼50–200 pfu of HSV-2(G) mixed 1:1 with each CVL or control buffer (normal saline containing 200 μg/mL bovine serum albumin) and plaques were counted after 48 hours. For anti-HIV activity, TZM-bl cells were cultured in 96 well dishes overnight and infected in triplicate in 2 independent experiments with HIV-1BaL (approximately 103 TCID50) mixed 1:1 with CVL or control buffer. After 48-hour incubation at 37°C, the inoculum was removed by washing, cells were lysed with addition of luciferase cell culture lysis reagent (Promega, Madison, WI), and the plates were stored at −80°C until assessed for luciferase activity. To assess the bactericidal activity, E. coli (ATCC strain 4382627) was grown overnight to stationary phase and then mixed with CVL or control buffer (20 mmol/L potassium phosphate, 60 mmol/L sodium chloride, 0.2 mg/mL albumin, pH 4.5) and incubated at 37°C for 2 hours. The mixtures were further diluted in control buffer (to yield 800−1000 colonies on control plates) and plated on agar enriched with trypticase soy broth. Colonies were counted using ImageQuant TL v2005 (GE Healthcare, Waukesha, WI) after an overnight incubation at 37°C. All samples were tested in duplicate and the percentage inhibition determined relative to the colonies formed on control plates.
Sample values for mediators below the limit of detection (LOD) were set at the midpoint between zero and the LOD. Mediator concentrations were log-transformed to reduce skewness in the distribution. Categorical variables were compared between groups by Fisher exact test. Continuous variables at each time point were compared between cases and controls by either the Student t test or the Wilcoxon rank sum test. Spearman rank-order correlation coefficients were estimated to assess associations between mediators from day 0 samples. Analyses were performed with GraphPad Prism (version 4; GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA), and a 2-sided P value <0.05 was considered significant. P values were not adjusted for multiple comparisons given the limited sample sizes and descriptive nature of the analyses.
Thirty-four women with presumed herpes lesions were assessed for eligibility, and 10 were enrolled. Most exclusions were because of the absence of a positive DFA or culture (n = 14) or the presence of BV (n = 6). Eighteen women without a history of oral or genital herpes were assessed for eligibility as controls. Eight were excluded, 1 had BV, 4 were HSV-1 seropositive, 1 was HSV-2 seropositive, and 2 were seropositive for HSV-1 and HSV-2. The median age of all participants was 30 years; one case and one control were using hormonal contraception at enrollment. There were no significant differences in demographics or other characteristics between cases and controls (Table 1).
Detection of Virus From Lesions and CVL
All 10 cases had external lesions (9 labial and 1 mons pubis), which were confirmed by culture. HSV-2 was isolated from 8 cases and HSV-1 from 2 (Table 1). Two subjects enrolled during their first clinical occurrence. HSV was also detected by quantitative PCR in the lesional/vaginal swab collected at presentation in all subjects tested (one did not have a swab available for HSV PCR) (Table 1). However, HSV DNA was not detected in any of the vaginal swabs collected from the cases on days 7 or 14 nor from any swabs collected from controls.
To assess whether virus was also present within the genital secretions at clinical presentation, unspun CVL obtained on day 0 were analyzed for the presence of HSV DNA. No HSV DNA was detected in 5 samples, 4 had low levels (2 × 102–6 × 103 DNA copies/mL) and 1 subject (J37), who was experiencing her first clinical episode, had 5 × 105 copies/mL (Table 1). None of the CVL had infectious virus recovered by plaque assay.
HSV Inhibitory Activity Is Increased During Outbreaks, Falls During Treatment, and Then Rebounds Following Cessation of ACV
The median percent inhibition of HSV was higher in CVL obtained from cases compared with controls at presentation (day 0) (54.3 vs. 28; P = 0.20), declined and was similar to controls on day 7 (after ACV treatment) (25.5 vs. 29.6, P = 0.68) and rebounded on day 14 (69 vs. 25, P = 0.27) (Fig. 1A). The percent inhibition correlated positively and significantly among cases and controls with HNP1-3 (r = 0.63 and 0.64, respectively), lactoferrin (0.63 and 0.67), IL-1β (0.86 and 0.82), and IgG (0.67 and 0.70) (Table 2). The inhibitory activity also correlated significantly with MIP-1α (0.78) among cases and with lysozyme (0.83), IL-6 (0.77), and IL-8 (0.82) among controls. Conversely, the percent inhibition correlated negatively (but not significantly) with the anti-inflammatory protein, SLPI (−0.30 and −0.28). These findings suggest that inflammatory responses are associated with endogenous anti-HSV activity.
Changes In Soluble Immune Mediator Concentrations During Herpes Outbreaks
We next explored whether the concentrations of soluble mediators differed between cases and controls at each visit. There was a trend toward higher levels of inflammatory proteins and peptides in CVL from cases compared with controls (Table 3). Specifically, cases had significantly higher levels of IL-1α and IL-1β relative to controls on day 14, a time associated with a rebound in anti-HSV activity in cases (IL-1α, P = 0.004 and IL-1β, P = 0.03; (Figs. 1B, C). In contrast, significantly lower levels of SLPI were detected in cases on day 0 (P = 0.02) (Fig. 1D).
IFN-α was below the LOD cases and controls, whereas there was a trend toward increased IFN-γ for cases compared with controls (P = 0.23, P = 0.16, and P = 0.04 on days 0, 7, and 14, respectively) (Table 3). These findings are consistent with a prior study demonstrating persistent expression of IFN-γ, but not Type 1 IFNs (eg, IFN-α) in transcriptional analyses of sequential biopsy specimens of recurrent mucocutaneous HSV-2 lesions.19
Differences In Activity Against HIV and E. coli In CVL From Cases Compared With Controls
Prior studies have shown that CVL are frequently bactericidal for E. coli12,20–22 and display variable activity against HIV.12,20,21 CVL from controls exhibited variable activity against HIV with the majority (17/30) enhancing HIV infection ex vivo (Fig. 2A). The enhancing activity correlated significantly with IL-1α (0.68), MIP-1α (0.71), and RANTES (0.72). In contrast, CVL from cases showed less variable activity and was modestly inhibitory against HIV (median 27.5 vs. −54.5 on day 0, cases vs. controls, P = 0.002; 36.5 vs. −7 on day 7, P = 0.001; and 31 vs. 11, P = 0.07 on day 14) (Fig. 2B). The inhibitory activity in the cases correlated positively and significantly with HBD-2 (0.75, P = 0.013).
Conversely, the median bactericidal activity against E. coli was lower in cases compared with controls on day 0, increased to a level similar to that observed in controls on day 7, and decreased on day 14 (47.4 vs. 78.5, P = 0.07 on day 0, 64.4 vs. 67.6, P = 0.51 on day 7 and 52.7 vs. 67.1, P = 0.19 on day 14) (Fig. 1E). Among cases, the bactericidal activity correlated negatively with IL-8 (−0.6, P = 0.12), MIP-1β (−0.66, P = 0.07), RANTES (−0.54, P = 0.16), and IL-1ra (−0.755, P = 0.03), but not with any mediators among controls. These findings suggest that the mucosal responses that promote higher anti-HSV activity in cases are associated with reduced E. coli bactericidal activity.
This is the first study to examine the soluble mucosal immune environment during symptomatic genital herpes outbreaks and following ACV treatment. The findings suggest that the ex vivo anti-HSV activity of CVL is increased at the time of an outbreak compared with HSV-seronegative controls, although the difference did not reach statistical significance. The anti-HSV activity measured likely underestimates the local inhibitory activity, as CVL represents an ∼50-fold dilution of genital secretions.23,24 Possibly, the increased activity observed in cases reflects a local host response to prevent virus spreading to the upper genital tract. Indeed, although virus may be detected in the cervix by PCR, HSV DNA is more frequently isolated from the lower genital tract, and cervical disease is uncommon.16,25 In this study, only 5 of 10 participants had detectable CVL HSV DNA when presenting with external genital lesions.
The anti-HSV activity fell in cases during ACV treatment (day 7) to levels comparable to that observed in HSV-seronegative controls, and then rebounded on day 14. Concentrations of pro-inflammatory mediators followed a similar temporal pattern (Figs. 1B–D). To further explore the rebound in HSV inhibitory activity on day 14, we analyzed data from asymptomatic, HSV-2 seropositive subjects at a single time point (baseline) who were not being treated with antivirals (n = 16). These women had participated in Institutional Review Board–approved microbicide safety studies. The CVL anti-HSV activity in this asymptomatic cohort was similar to that observed on day 14 in the cases (median 47% vs. 69%, respectively; P = 0.38) and higher than that observed in HSV-2-seronegative controls (47% vs. 25%, respectively; P = 0.08). This suggests that the rebound observed on day 14 may reflect a return to the steady state in HSV-seropositive women, independent of recent lesions. The higher anti-HSV activity in the cases and asymptomatic HSV-2 seropositive women may represent a mucosal response to subclinical viral shedding, which was likely suppressed by ACV treatment. Larger studies with more frequent sampling in symptomatic and asymptomatic women are needed to determine whether there is an association between subclinical shedding and CVL inhibitory activity.
The anti-HSV activity correlated with several pro-inflammatory, antimicrobial proteins, and IgG, which is consistent with prior studies.10,11,26 Whether these mediators directly contribute to the CVL anti-HSV activity or reflect a biomarker of other unidentified antiviral factors will require fractionation and depletion studies. Possibly, HSV-specific antibodies, which were not evaluated previously reflecting the lack of established assays, contribute to the CVL inhibitory activity in cases. Efforts to specifically deplete CVL of immunoglobulin with Protein A were unsuccessful, as other proteins, including HNP1-3, were also lost. In ongoing studies, we are adapting a commercial ELISA (GenWay Biotech, San Diego, CA) designed to measure HSV-specific IgG in blood to measure antibodies in CVL. HSV-specific IgG was detected from 3 of 10 cases (day 0 samples), 3 of 14 asymptomatic HSV-2 seropositive subjects, and none of the controls. There was no significant difference in anti-HSV activity when comparing subjects with detectable to those without detectable CVL HSV-specific IgG (P = 0.67), suggesting that HSV-specific IgG contributes little to CVL inhibitory activity. Larger studies including measurements of mucosal HSV-specific IgG and IgA are needed.
Paradoxically, we observed that, compared to controls, CVL from cases were more likely to exhibit HIV inhibitory activity, although HSV recurrences have been associated with increased HIV shedding and an increased risk of HIV infection.4,27,28 Perhaps, the inflammatory response to HSV overcomes the modest protective effect of CVL against HIV. The inflammatory response may recruit T cells to the dermal–epidermal junction, which could serve as HIV targets if the virus traverses the keratinized skin barrier, perhaps weakened by HSV-induced disruption of the epithelial barrier.
Protease inhibitors may also provide antiviral and anti-inflammatory activity. SLPI was present at significantly lower concentrations in CVL from cases compared with controls on day 0. This observation is consistent with the in vitro finding that HSV immediate early proteins down-regulate SLPI expression in epithelial cells and keratinocytes.29 Whether the concentrations of other antiproteases were altered in CVL and how this contributes to CVL anti-HIV activity, and ultimately, to the risk of HIV infection, requires additional studies. A proteomic study found that antiproteases, including serpins and cystatins, were present at higher concentrations in CVL from HIV-highly exposed seronegative women compared with uninfected controls and correlated positively and significantly with pro-inflammatory cytokines.30 The authors speculated that antiproteases might control inflammatory responses and provide a more potent antiviral mucosal environment, although they did not measure anti-HIV activity. In this study, HBD-2 correlated positively and significantly with CVL anti-HIV activity, but only among cases. A recent study also found that HBD-2 correlated with CVL anti-HIV activity of CVL, but only among HIV-infected women, not among healthy controls.12
Conversely, while CVL anti-HSV and anti-HIV activity was increased in cases, the bactericidal activity against E. coli was reduced. These findings indicate that different molecules contribute to the activity against different pathogens. Moreover, the reduction in E. coli bactericidal activity during an outbreak is consistent with the epidemiological link between BV and HSV.31,32 Vaginal fluid from women with BV exhibited reduced inhibitory activity against E. coli, which was partially restored after metronidazole treatment.33 A substantial percentage of women with microbiota changes consistent with BV are asymptomatic by Amsel clinical criteria,34,35 and we did not assess vaginal microbiota populations in this study. We speculate that changes in vaginal bacteria, including an increase in E. coli colonization, loss of protective lactobacilli, and/or an increase in anaerobic species may have characterized the microenvironment in the cases.34,36
In summary, despite several limitations, including small sample size, lack of parallel samples from asymptomatic HSV-2 seropositive women, infrequent sampling for silent HSV reactivation, and lack of specimens just before lesion appearance (when HSV replication may be highest), the findings obtained indicate that genital outbreaks are associated with increases in pro-inflammatory mediators and greater CVL anti-HSV activity compared with HSV seronegative controls. We speculate that these mucosal responses may limit HSV spread and prevent viral ascension into the upper genital tract, but may also paradoxically increase HIV acquisition risk. While the concentrations of inflammatory proteins and anti-HSV activity fell during treatment, they returned to pretreatment levels following ACV cessation. The rebound to a more inflammatory mucosal environment may contribute to the clinical observation that HSV-2 seropositivity is a risk factor for HIV acquisition, independent of overt herpetic lesions.6,37–43 These findings underscore the need to further investigate subclinical shedding and its impact on mucosal immunity and HIV risk and to optimize strategies to suppress HSV reactivation.
The authors thank Grace Chow for clinical operations support, Lydia Soto-Torres and James Turpin for advice, Erin Diament, Anna Lee, Julie Petrie, and Tara Ford for assistance in recruiting subjects and Richard Henry, Momka Narliev, and Amy Fox in the Clinical Virology Laboratory at Montefiore Medical Center.
1. Roberts C. Genital herpes in young adults: changing sexual behaviours, epidemiology and management. Herpes. 2005;12:10–14.
2. Roberts CM, Pfister JR, Spear SJ. Increasing proportion of herpes simplex virus type 1 as a cause of genital herpes infection in college students. Sex Transm Dis. 2003;30:797–800.
3. Xu F, Sternberg MR, Kottiri BJ, et al.. Trends in herpes simplex virus type 1 and type 2 seroprevalence in the United States. JAMA. 2006;296:964–973.
4. Nagot N, Ouedraogo A, Foulongne V, et al.. Reduction of HIV-1 RNA levels with therapy to suppress herpes simplex virus. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:790–799.
5. Chen L, Jha P, Stirling B, et al.. Sexual risk factors for HIV infection in early and advanced HIV epidemics in sub-Saharan Africa: systematic overview of 68 epidemiological studies. PLoS One. 2007;2:e1001.
6. Freeman EE, Weiss HA, Glynn JR, et al.. Herpes simplex virus 2 infection increases HIV acquisition in men and women: systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. AIDS. 2006;20:73–83.
7. Zhu J, Hladik F, Woodward A, et al.. Persistence of HIV-1 receptor-positive cells after HSV-2 reactivation is a potential mechanism for increased HIV-1 acquisition. Nat Med. 2009;15:886–892.
8. Celum C, Wald A, Hughes J, et al.. Effect of aciclovir on HIV-1 acquisition in herpes simplex virus 2 seropositive women and men who have sex with men: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2008;371:2109–2119.
9. Celum C, Wald A, Lingappa JR, et al.. Acyclovir and transmission of HIV-1 from persons infected with HIV-1 and HSV-2. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:427–439.
10. John M, Keller MJ, Fam EH, et al.. Cervicovaginal secretions contribute to innate resistance to herpes simplex virus infection. J Infect Dis. 2005;192:1731–1740.
11. Shust GF, Cho S, Kim M, et al.. Female genital tract secretions inhibit herpes simplex virus infection: correlation with soluble mucosal immune mediators and impact of hormonal contraception. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2010;63:110–119.
12. Ghosh M, Fahey JV, Shen Z, et al.. Anti-HIV activity in cervical-vaginal secretions from HIV-positive and -negative women correlate with innate antimicrobial levels and IgG antibodies. PLoS One. 2010;5:e11366.
13. Wang W, Owen SM, Rudolph DL, et al.. Activity of alpha- and theta-defensins against primary isolates of HIV-1. J Immunol. 2004;173:515–520.
14. Hazrati E, Galen B, Lu W, et al.. Human alpha- and beta-defensins block multiple steps in herpes simplex virus infection. J Immunol. 2006;177:8658–8666.
15. Levinson P, Kaul R, Kimani J, et al.. Levels of innate immune factors in genital fluids: association of alpha defensins and LL-37 with genital infections and increased HIV acquisition. AIDS. 2009;23:309–317.
16. Tanton C, Weiss HA, LeGoff J, et al.. Patterns of herpes simplex virus shedding over 1 month and the impact of acyclovir and HIV in HSV-2-seropositive women in Tanzania. Sex Transm Infect. 2011;87:406–411.
17. Jerome KR, Huang ML, Wald A, et al.. Quantitative stability of DNA after extended storage of clinical specimens as determined by real-time PCR. J Clin Microbiol. 2002;40:2609–2611.
18. Keller MJ, Madan RP, Torres NM, et al.. A randomized trial to assess anti-HIV activity in female genital tract secretions and soluble mucosal immunity following application of 1% tenofovir gel. PLoS One. 2011;6:e16475.
19. Peng T, Zhu J, Klock A, et al.. Evasion of the mucosal innate immune system by herpes simplex virus type 2. J Virol. 2009;83:12559–12568.
20. Venkataraman N, Cole AL, Svoboda P, et al.. Cationic polypeptides are required for anti-HIV-1 activity of human vaginal fluid. J Immunol. 2005;175:7560–7567.
21. Keller MJ, Guzman E, Hazrati E, et al.. PRO 2000 elicits a decline in genital tract immune mediators without compromising intrinsic antimicrobial activity. AIDS. 2007;21:467–476.
22. Valore EV, Park CH, Igreti SL, et al.. Antimicrobial components of vaginal fluid. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;187:561–568.
23. Belec L, Meillet D, Levy M, et al.. Dilution assessment of cervicovaginal secretions obtained by vaginal washing for immunological assays. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 1995;2:57–61.
24. Mitchell C, Paul K, Agnew K, et al.. Estimating volume of cervicovaginal secretions in cervicovaginal lavage fluid collected for measurement of genital HIV-1 RNA levels in women. J Clin Microbiol. 2011;49:735–736.
25. Wald A, Zeh J, Selke S, et al.. Reactivation of genital herpes simplex virus type 2 infection in asymptomatic seropositive persons. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:844–850.
26. Madan RP, Carpenter C, Fiedler T, et al.. Altered biomarkers of mucosal immunity and reduced vaginal lactobacillus concentrations in sexually active female adolescents PLoS One. 2012;7:e40415. Published ahead of print July 10, 2012.
27. Nagot N, Ouedraogo A, Konate I, et al.. Roles of clinical and subclinical reactivated herpes simplex virus type 2 infection and human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1)-induced immunosuppression on genital and plasma HIV-1 levels. J Infect Dis. 2008;198:241–249.
28. Corey L, Wald A, Patel R, et al.. Once-daily valacyclovir to reduce the risk of transmission of genital herpes. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:11–20.
29. Fakioglu E, Wilson SS, Mesquita PM, et al.. Herpes simplex virus downregulates secretory leukocyte protease inhibitor: a novel immune evasion mechanism. J Virol. 2008;82:9337–9344.
30. Burgener A, Rahman S, Ahmad R, et al.. Comprehensive proteomic study identifies serpin and cystatin antiproteases as novel correlates of HIV-1 resistance in the cervicovaginal mucosa of female sex workers. J Proteome Res. 2011;10:5139–5149.
31. Nagot N, Ouedraogo A, Defer MC, et al.. Association between bacterial vaginosis and Herpes simplex virus type-2 infection: implications for HIV acquisition studies. Sex Transm Infect. 2007;83:365–368.
32. Cherpes TL, Melan MA, Kant JA, et al.. Genital tract shedding of herpes simplex virus type 2 in women: effects of hormonal contraception, bacterial vaginosis, and vaginal group B Streptococcus colonization. Clin Infect Dis. 2005;40:1422–1428.
33. Valore EV, Wiley DJ, Ganz T. Reversible deficiency of antimicrobial polypeptides in bacterial vaginosis. Infect Immun. 2006;74:5693–5702.
34. Fredricks DN, Fiedler TL, Thomas KK, et al.. Targeted PCR for detection of vaginal bacteria associated with bacterial vaginosis. J Clin Microbiol. 2007;45:3270–3276.
35. Marrazzo JM, Martin DH, Watts DH, et al.. Bacterial vaginosis: identifying research gaps proceedings of a workshop sponsored by DHHS/NIH/NIAID. Sex Transm Dis. 2010;37:732–744.
36. Gupta K, Hillier SL, Hooton TM, et al.. Effects of contraceptive method on the vaginal microbial flora: a prospective evaluation. J Infect Dis. 2000;181:595–601.
37. Abu-Raddad LJ, Magaret AS, Celum C, et al.. Genital herpes has played a more important role than any other sexually transmitted infection in driving HIV prevalence in Africa. PLoS One. 2008;3:e2230.
38. Corey L. Synergistic copathogens–HIV-1 and HSV-2. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:854–856.
39. Koelle DM, Wald A. Herpes simplex virus: the importance of asymptomatic shedding. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2000;45(suppl T3):1–8.
40. Mbopi-Keou FX, Gresenguet G, Mayaud P, et al.. Interactions between herpes simplex virus type 2 and human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection in African women: opportunities for intervention. J Infect Dis. 2000;182:1090–1096.
41. Mostad SB, Kreiss JK, Ryncarz AJ, et al.. Cervical shedding of herpes simplex virus in human immunodeficiency virus-infected women: effects of hormonal contraception, pregnancy, and vitamin A deficiency. J Infect Dis. 2000;181:58–63.
42. Mugo N, Dadabhai SS, Bunnell R, et al.. Prevalence of herpes simplex virus type 2 infection, human immunodeficiency virus/herpes simplex virus type 2 coinfection, and associated risk factors in a national, population-based survey in Kenya. Sex Transm Dis. 2011;38:1059–1066.
43. Reynolds SJ, Risbud AR, Shepherd ME, et al.. Recent herpes simplex virus type 2 infection and the risk of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 acquisition in India. J Infect Dis. 2003;187:1513–1521.
This article has been cited 1 time(s).
Journal of VirologyGriffithsin Protects Mice from Genital Herpes by Preventing Cell-to-Cell SpreadJournal of Virology
herpes simplex virus; soluble mucosal immunity; human immunodeficiency virus
© 2012 by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
What does "Remember me" mean?
By checking this box, you'll stay logged in until you logout. You'll get easier access to your articles, collections,
media, and all your other content, even if you close your browser or shut down your
To protect your most sensitive data and activities (like changing your password),
we'll ask you to re-enter your password when you access these services.
What if I'm on a computer that I share with others?
If you're using a public computer or you share this computer with others, we recommend
that you uncheck the "Remember me" box.
Highlight selected keywords in the article text.
Data is temporarily unavailable. Please try again soon.