Mayer, Kenneth H. MD*,†,‡; Ducharme, Robert BA†; Zaller, Nickolas D. PhD†; Chan, Philip A. MD†; Case, Patricia ScD, MPH*; Abbott, David BS§; Rodriguez, Irma I. MS†; Cavanaugh, Timothy MD‖
*The Fenway Institute, Boston, MA
†The Miriam Hospital, Providence, RI
‡Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
§AIDS Project Rhode Island, Providence, RI
‖Private Practice, Pawtucket, RI
Correspondence to: Kenneth H. Mayer, MD, The Fenway Institute, 1340 Boylston Street, Boston, MA 02115 (e-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org).
This research has been facilitated by the infrastructure and resources provided by the Lifespan/Tufts/Brown Center for AIDS Research, an NIH funded program #P30 AI42853; and grants from the Rhode Island Department of Health and the Massachusetts Department of Public Health.
Presented as “Mayer K. H., Ducharme R, Abbott D, Cavanaugh T. HIV and Sexually Transmitted Infection (STD) Screening in a Providence Bathhouse: Opportunities for Education, Prevention and Improving Men's Health” at the 2007 National HIV Prevention Conference, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, December 2–5, 2007, Atlanta, GA.
The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Received April 27, 2011
Accepted September 13, 2011
Recent data from many parts of the United States suggest that HIV and other sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) are increasing significantly among men who have sex with men (MSM).1,2 Secular trends are particularly pronounced in New England, where the majority of the syphilis cases in recent years in Rhode Island and Massachusetts have been among MSM.3,4 Moreover, 50% of the individuals with new diagnoses of syphilis were also coinfected with HIV. The coprevalence of HIV and STD epidemics among MSM potentiate the transmission of each other,5,6 creating a syndemic that poses challenges for medical providers and public health officials.
Since the earliest days of the AIDS epidemic, bathhouses have been implicated in the transmission of HIV in major metropolitan areas.7,8 Although more recent studies suggest specific social media found on the Internet, including sexually oriented web sites for MSM, have played increasingly prominent roles as venues for individuals to meet,9 bathhouses continue to provide environments where HIV and STD risk behavior may occur.10–12 Moreover, unlike Internet-based sites, bathhouses afford a physical venue where HIV and STD testing and counseling can be performed.13 With the advent of HIV rapid testing, these venues offer the ability to efficiently and effectively provide hard-to-reach at-risk individuals with relevant health information during their bathhouse visit.14
Over the past decades, health educators and public health officials have created HIV testing services in bathhouses around the United States and overseas.8,11–15 In 2000, a group of health educators, clinicians, and community activists collaborated to offer Hepatitis A and B vaccinations to interested patrons of the largest bathhouse in New England. By 2004, this health collaborative began to offer HIV rapid testing. Over subsequent years, additional services have been introduced, including testing urine for gonorrhea and Chlamydia, and serologic testing for syphilis and Hepatitis C. Since the project's inception, more than 1000 MSM have been tested and/or vaccinated.
The purpose of the current report is to describe the demographics, risk practices, and risk perceptions of the male clients of the bathhouse who availed themselves of HIV/STD testing services. The information gleaned in this study could help in the development of venue-based interventions that can further reduce the spread of HIV and STDs among MSM.
Participants were offered services during 3-hour sessions held 2–4 times a month, starting in 2004. A dedicated 3-room space was developed for HIV and STD counseling, testing, and confidential delivery of results. The site included the equipment and supplies necessary to perform phlebotomy and basic laboratory activities and rapid HIV testing. A protocol was developed and approved by the institutional review board of Brown's academic medical center (Lifespan), which included a self-administered questionnaire which asked participants about sexual health, behavioral risk, and interest in having health services provided in the bathhouse setting. The instrument used for the behavioral and demographic assessment was adapted from the Project EXPLORE assessment tool.16 The survey and subsequent counseling were administered by trained study personnel. Participants completing the survey were compensated with a $10 gift certificate. Men who approached bathhouse staff were able to obtain testing services without participating in the study to optimize the likelihood that bathhouse clients would be more likely to undergo testing for HIV and/or STD. All individuals who underwent testing received pretest and posttest counseling. Contact information was obtained to be able to provide test results to individuals after they left the bathhouse.
Participants were offered HIV rapid testing using whole blood. OraQuick, Unigold, or Clearview HIV rapid tests were all used at different points in the study; selection depended on which test kit was available at time of testing. Blood specimens were saved from all participants who underwent HIV rapid testing, and reactive specimens were confirmed by Western Blot analysis. All individuals who consented to phlebotomy were also offered the opportunity to have serological testing for syphilis performed, using the RPR test, with reactive tests confirmed by fluorescent treponemal antibody absorbed test. In August 2005, urine screening for gonorrhea and Chlamydia were added to the protocol using the Aptima nucleic acid amplification test. In 2007, screening for hepatitis C antibodies was also offered. All diagnostic testing, except for rapid HIV testing, was performed at the Rhode Island Department of Health Laboratory.
Risk reduction counseling was delivered to all men seeking testing16 regardless of study participation using “a Stages of Change” client-centered model,17 and appropriate referrals were made at the time of their bathhouse visit. Participants were subsequently contacted by phone, or seen in person, within a week to review test results and to assess whether referrals to linkage services were needed.
Descriptive and summary statistics were generated for all of the men who presented for testing services at the bathhouse during the study period, regardless of survey participation. For the subset of men who agreed to participate in the behavioral risk assessment study, logistic regression models were fitted for 2 outcomes as follows: unprotected anal sex (self-report) and HIV/syphilis seropositivity. Participants were asked if they engaged in unprotected anal or oral sex during the last 2 months, regardless of the venue where it occurred.
Perceived HIV risk was self-reported. Participants were asked to rate their perceived HIV risk as follows: (1) not high at all; (2) not really high; (3) somewhat high; and (4) very high. For purposes of the multivariate analyses, we dichotomized perceived HIV risk as (1) somewhat high or very high (high) compared with (2) not high at all or not really high (low, referent). With respect to partner type, participants were given a choice regarding specific types of relationships. These included the following: “committed;” “monogamous with a man; committed, monogamous with a woman”; “married to a woman”; “sex with one man”; “sex with one woman; sex with both men and women”; “none are primary partner”; “sex with man I love”; “sex with a woman I love”; “single”; and “none of the above.” In multivariate analyses, specific partner types were only included in the models if they were statistically significant in bivariate analyses. Demographic and behavioral variables were correlated with each outcome. Likelihood ratio tests were used to compare models to 1 that included all independent variables presumed to be associated with unprotected anal sex or HIV/syphilis seropositivity. We determined a priori that race, age, and number of sex partners would be included in all final models due to the strong potential for these variables to confound observed associations. Results were reported as odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals. All analyses were performed using STATA 11 (College Station, TX) statistical software.
Bathhouse HIV and STD Testing
Between June 2004 and November 2010, 1155 men presented for HIV and/or other testing services at the bathhouse. Of these men, 513 men (44%) consented to participate in a behavioral risk assessment study; the rest requested testing services only. Individuals were offered a menu of possible tests, and some declined because of having previously been diagnosed with an infection (eg, HIV), and others deferred specific tests because of recent testing elsewhere or their perception that they were not at risk for the infection. Almost none of the men (99%) presented with symptoms as a reason for testing.
One thousand sixty-three men were tested for HIV, with a prevalence of 2.3%; 850 were tested for syphilis, with a prevalence of 2.0%; 889 men were tested for genitourinary gonorrhea or chlamydia, with respective prevalence of 0.1% and 1.3%, respectively; and 185 men were tested for hepatitis C antibodies, with a prevalence of 2.2%. Their age range was (range: 18–72), with 54.6% being between the ages 31 and 50 (Table 1). Men come from multiple states, with the largest number residing in Massachusetts (49.5%) and Rhode Island (40.2%). A majority of the men were white (81.6%) and had attended high school and/or had additional education (80.4%) (Table 1).
Study Population and Behavioral Assessment
Among the 513 men who completed the behavioral assessment, the majority (51.9%) did not have a primary partner and had sex only with other MSM. Among the others, 13.3% reported sex with both men and women and did not have a primary partner; 8.8% of men had a primary female partner, and 4.5% of them were married to women. In addition, 22% of the men indicated that they had a primary male partner. Thirty-one percent of the men had engaged in both unprotected anal and oral intercourse in the 2 months before HIV testing; 15.2% had engaged in unprotected anal intercourse but not unprotected oral intercourse; and 20.2% had engaged in unprotected oral intercourse but not unprotected anal intercourse (Table 2). The participants were asked whether they thought that their behavior increased their risk of HIV infection. Although men who engaged in the least risky practices (no unprotected oral or anal activities) were most likely to consider their behaviors to not be associated with risk, two-thirds (65.4%) of men who engaged in both unprotected oral and anal sex thought that their risk of acquiring HIV was not high; and 75.6% of the men who engaged in unprotected anal, but not oral, activity believed that their risk for HIV infection was not high (Table 2).
Participants were asked where they met sexual partners. The most common responses, besides the bathhouse, included bars and nightclubs (30.6%); adult book stores (29.6%); Internet sex sites (36.3%); and public cruising areas (22.8%). Other less common venues included gyms, friendship networks, and other social organizations. Although only 12.1% of the men reported that they had unprotected sex although high on drugs or alcohol, 75.0% of those who did indicated that these episodes were associated with unprotected intercourse. More than one-quarter (26.7%) of the men indicated that they had had sex with an HIV-infected partner at least once in their lives.
Multivariate analyses indicated that men who engaged in unprotected anal intercourse tended to be more likely to have had sex with HIV-infected partners; to have had sex although under the influence of drugs; to have found partners on the Internet; and to have a primary male partner (Table 3). They did not differ from the other men in terms of their demographics or their self-perceived HIV risk. Men who were newly diagnosed with HIV or syphilis tended to be older than 30 years. These men were also more likely to have had sex with an HIV-infected partner; have had prior STD diagnoses; and to have met partners on the Internet (Table 4). Men with syphilis or HIV did not differ from other MSM by race, number of partners, or frequency of anal sex, and were less likely to report meeting sexual partners in the bathhouse.
Of the 24 men who were newly diagnosed with HIV infection, all but 1 was successfully linked to care. For 10.5% of the sample, their bathhouse test was their first HIV test, and 1 of the 109 first-time HIV testers was found to be infected. Although 80.1% of the men reported that they had a primary care provider, 40.5% indicated that they would either not be comfortable being tested for HIV by their providers and/or they would not be comfortable sharing HIV or STD test results with their providers. All but 1 of the study participants (0.2%) indicated satisfaction with receiving HIV testing results the same day in the bathhouse.
This study demonstrated that HIV and STD testing in a bathhouse environment was feasible and acceptable, leading to the diagnosis of new HIV and STD infections. This approach has been found to be a successful way to screen high-risk MSM populations in other cities across the United States.13–15,18 The HIV prevalence among 1063 MSM tested was 2.3%, which is higher than any other voluntary counseling/testing site in New England. In addition, the ability to screen for other STDs allowed for the detection of a substantial number of individuals with syphilis and urethral chlamydia and hepatitis C.
One of the unique features of the MSM who tested was their wide geographic dispersion. Rhode Island hosts the only 2 bathhouses in New England; and thus, individuals who were interested in meeting partners in this setting had no other local choices. In addition, the study underscored the mobile nature of at-risk MSM, with participants being seen from 9 non–New England states and the District of Columbia. These individuals reported behaviors that put them at increased risk for HIV and STDs, suggesting the need for a regional approach to understand the social and sexual networks of MSM who meet sexual partners in these venues.
This study also found that many men who sought services in the bathhouse had female partners, thus, this venue might be only 1 of a few places where these individuals could receive health information and could be educated about ways in which they could most optimally protect their partners. With the demonstration of the efficacy of antiretroviral chemoprophylaxis,19 bathhouses may provide an optimal setting to educate at-risk MSM about the benefits and risks of this approach. Spielberg et al20 found that MSM who patronized Seattle bathhouses were amenable to receiving education and counseling in those venues. The current study also found that the riskiest men met partners on the Internet and other venues, but it is possible that health education accessed on line could be reinforced by venue-based health educators who could offer on-site testing. Many participants also reported having unprotected sex although under the influence of alcohol and/or other drugs, suggesting the need to develop interventions that address the interaction of substance and sexual activity.
Only a minority of the men tested in the bathhouse indicated that they had a primary care physician and would be comfortable being tested for HIV and syphilis by their provider, a finding noted previously among New England MSM.21 These data suggest the need for increased primary care provider training to enhance cultural awareness, so that at-risk MSM patients become more comfortable in discussing their risks in primary health care settings,22 so they can avail themselves of testing services. However, in the meantime, the scaling-up of testing in venues that high-risk men frequent, such as bathhouses, may be able to further arrest the spread of HIV and STDs among MSM.
One of the limitations of this study stemmed from the ability of the men to choose to be tested without answering the demographic and behavioral questionnaire, to avoid creating impediments to testing when it was offered. Since less than 50% of the men tested chose to provide additional demographic and behavioral information, the findings in this study may under represent the true prevalence of HIV and STDs at the bathhouse. Furthermore, the behavioral assessment of study participants is likely to be a conservative estimate of the complete bathhouse population because individuals who did not want to think about their risks would be more likely to avoid testing. Future interventions in this setting will need to focus on the optimal ways to reach men who have not been tested in this or other settings.
Public funding for HIV and STD programs has often been categorical, with grants to individual state health Departments to focus on either HIV or specific STDs. The findings from this study suggest the need for a regional and a more comprehensive approach to decrease HIV and STD prevalence and incidence among New England MSM. The funding for this project was quite limited, resulting in testing being available only 6–12 hours per month, so it is hoped that these data will encourage public health authorities to increase support for this kind of work, so that HIV and STD testing services can be offered in these venues more frequently in hopes of decreasing HIV and STD transmission in this population.
The study team would like to acknowledge the assistance of Lola Wright in the preparation of the article; Irma Rodriguez for assistance in the development of laboratory protocols; and the Lifespan/Tufts/Brown Center for AIDS Research, and NIH-funded program (#P30 AI42853) for support of study staff and participant expenses. The study team also wants to express appreciation to Drs. Timothy Flanigan, Lynn Taylor, Jennifer Mitty, and Teresa Celada for their service as an independent Data Monitoring and Safety Board.
1. Wolitski RJ, Fenton KA. Sexual health, HIV, and sexually transmitted infections among gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men in the United States. AIDS Behav. 2011;15(suppl 1):S9–S17.
2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). HIV prevalence estimates—United States, 2006. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2008;57:1073–1076.
4. Gosciminski M. Primary, Secondary, and Early Latent Syphilis Surveillance, 2006–2010. Providence, RI: Rhode Island Department of Health; 2011.
5. Kalichman SC, Pellowski J, Turner C. Prevalence of sexually transmitted co-infections in people living with HIV/AIDS: systematic review with implications for using HIV treatments for prevention. Sex Transm Infect. 2011;87:183–190.
6. Mayer KH, Carballo-Dieguez A. Homosexual and bisexual behavior in men in relation to STDs and HIV infectionIn: Holmes KK, Sparling PF, Stamm WE, et al., eds. Sexually Transmitted Diseases. 4th ed. New York, NY: McGraw Hill Medical; 2008:203–218.
7. Bayer R. Private Acts, Social Consequences: AIDS and the Politics of Public Health. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press; 1991.
8. Berube A. The history of the gay bathhouses. Coming Up! 1984:15–19.
9. Rosenberger JG, Reece M, Novak DS, et al.. The internet as a valuable tool for promoting a new framework for sexual health among gay men and other men who have sex with men. AIDS Behav. 2011;15(suppl 1):S88–S90.
10. Van Beneden CA, O'Brien K, Modesitt S, et al.. Sexual behaviors in an urban bathhouse 15 years into the HIV epidemic. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2002;30:522–526.
11. Binson D, Pollack LM, Blair J, et al.. HIV transmission risk at a gay bathhouse. J Sex Res. 2010;47:580–588.
12. Faissol DM, Swann JL, Kolodziejski B, et al.. The role of bathhouses and sex clubs in HIV transmission: findings from a mathematic model. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2007;44:386–394.
13. Woods WJ, Binson DK, Mayne TJ, et al.. HIV/sexually transmitted disease education and prevention in US bathhouse and sex club environments. AIDS. 2000;14:625–626.
14. Daskalakis D, Silvera R, Bernstein K, et al.. Implementation of HIV testing at 2 New York City bathhouses: from pilot to clinical service. Clin Infect Dis. 2009;48:1609–1616.
15. Huebner DM, Binson D, Woods WJ, et al.. Bathhouse-based voluntary counseling and testing is feasible and shows preliminary evidence of effectiveness. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2006;43:239–246.
16. Koblin B, Chesney M, Coates T, et al.. Effects of a behavioural intervention to reduce acquisition of HIV infection among men who have sex with men: the EXPLORE randomized controlled study. Lancet. 2004;364:41–50.
17. Harlow LL, Prochaska JO, Redding CA, et al.. Stages of condom use in a high HIV-risk sample. Psychol Health. 1999;14:143–157.
18. Bingham TA, Secura GM, Behel SK, et al.. HIV risk factors reported by two samples of male bathhouse attendees in Los Angeles, California, 2001–2002. Sex Transm Dis. 2008;35:631–636.
19. Grant RM, Lama JR, Anderson PL, et al.. Preexposure chemoprophylaxis for HIV prevention in men who have sex with men. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:2587–2599.
20. Spielberg F, Branson BM, Goldbaum GM, et al.. Choosing HIV counseling and testing strategies for outreach settings: a randomized trial. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2005;38:348–355.
21. Mimiaga MJ, Reisner SL, Bland S, et al.. Health system and personal barriers resulting in decreased utilization of HIV and STD testing services among at-risk black men who have sex with men in Massachusetts. AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2009;23:825–835.
22. Makadon HJ, Mayer K, Potter J, Goldhammer H. The Fenway Guide to Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender Health. 1st ed. Philadelphia, PA: ACP Press; 2008.
© 2012 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.