Skip Navigation LinksHome > August 15, 2011 - Volume 57 - Issue > The Impact of Human T-Cell Lymphotropic Virus I Infection on...
JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes:
doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e31821e9a1e
Supplement Article

The Impact of Human T-Cell Lymphotropic Virus I Infection on Clinical and Immunologic Outcomes in Patients Coinfected With HIV and Hepatitis C Virus

Bahia, Fabianna MD, PhD*†; Novais, Vinicius MD†; Evans, Jennifer MS‡; Le Marchand, Chloe MS‡; Netto, Eduardo MD, PhD†; Page, Kimberly PhD, MPH‡; Brites, Carlos MD, PhD†

Free Access
Article Outline
Collapse Box

Author Information

From the Centro Estadual de Diagnostico, Assistencia e Pesquisa em HIV/AIDS (CEDAP), Salvador, Bahia, Brazil; †Hospital Universitario Professor Edgard Santos da Universidade Federal da Bahia (HUPES-UFBA), Salvador, Bahia, Brazil; and the ‡Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, and Global Health Sciences, University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, CA.

The authors have no funding or conflicts of interest to disclose.

Correspondence to: Fabianna Bahia, MD, PhD, Rua Augusto Viana S/N. Complexo Hospitalar Professor Edgard Santos, 6 andar, LAPI, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Canela, Salvador-Bahia, CEP 40.110-060 Brazil (e-mail:

Collapse Box


Background: HIV, hepatitis C (HCV), and human T-cell lymphotropic virus I (HTLV-1) are associated with high global burdens of disease, notably in resource-poor locales. They share similar routes of transmission and cause chronic infections with associated morbidity. We performed a cross-sectional study to assess the impact of HTLV-1 infection on clinical outcomes in HIV/HCV-coinfected patients.

Methods: We enrolled 102 (72.3%) with HIV/HCV coinfection (Group 1) and 39 (27.7%) triply infected with HIV, HCV, and HTLV-1 (Group 2). We reviewed medical records of two groups of patients followed in two outpatients services in Salvador, Brazil. We collected and compared demographic, behavioral-related information, immunologic, virologic, and histologic parameters for HIV-1 and HCV infection.

Results: Demographics, virologic, and immunologic characteristics were similar in the two groups; a higher proportion of triply infected patients (Group 2) reported any history of injection drug use compared with dually infected (Group 1) patients (75% vs 45.8%; P = 0.003). No differences were seen between groups in HIV clinical outcomes (CD4 count and viral load). Alanine aminotransferase levels were significantly higher in HIV/HCV-coinfected patients (P = 0.045). Liver fibrosis damage based on Metavir scores was similar between groups (0.97) but was worse with lower CD4 cell count (under 200 cells/mm3) (P = 0.01).

Conclusions: HIV/HTLV-1 and HIV/HCV coinfections may worsen clinical related outcomes, but virologic and immunologic outcomes were similar in both groups. Hepatic measures were worse in patients with more severe immunosuppression.

Back to Top | Article Outline


HIV, hepatitis C virus (HCV) and human T-cell lymphotropic virus type 1 (HTLV-1) are viruses that share similar routes of transmission, including parenteral, sexual, and vertical (mother-to-child), although differences do exist with respect to infectivity with each virus. HCV is most efficiently transmitted through percutaneous exposures to infected blood and much less efficiently transmitted by mucosal exposures.1 The dominant modes of transmission of HTLV-1 in endemic areas like Brazil are from mother to child in breast milk and sexual transmission in adults, but parenteral transmission is not uncommon among injection drug users (IDUs) in this same area. Similarly, HIV transmission, like HTLV-1, occurs through vertical, sexual, and parenteral exposures and coinfection with these other viruses is not uncommon. Populations at high risk of acquiring viral infections sexually or parenterally are likely to have a high prevalence of coinfection with these three viruses.2,3 HCV affects over 140 million people worldwide, is a major cause of chronic liver disease and cirrhosis, and the leading indication for liver transplantation in the United States.1,4,5 Mortality in association with HCV infection has increased in the last 10 years, rising from 1.09 to 2.57 deaths per 100,000 persons.6 Among HIV-infected patients, HCV infection is common, ranging from 15% to 70%,1 and coinfection has emerged as a major cause of morbidity and mortality in HIV-infected patients.7,8 HIV infection is associated with a higher rate of HCV persistence after acute infection,3 severe liver disease,9 and increased HCV viral load and accelerated fibrosis.10,11 Additionally, HIV/HCV-coinfected patients have poorer sustained viral response (SVR) rates to interferon-based therapies compared with HCV-monoinfected individuals.12

HTLV-1 and HTLV-2 are retroviruses that infect T lymphocytes and can cause immunologic abnormalities.13 HTLV-1 is endemic in a number of geographic areas such as Japan, Central Africa, the Caribbean, and some Latin America regions, particularly in Brazil.14,15 In Brazil, there is a wide geographic diversity in the prevalence of HTLV infection with prevalence ranging from 0.4% to 1.8%.16 The state of Bahia, in the northeast of the country, is considered the epicenter of HTLV-1 infection, and the city of Salvador, its capital, has the highest reported prevalence in general population.2,17 In Brazil and elsewhere, HCV infection is also common in HTLV-1- and 2-infected individuals, principally among IDUs.18-20 The influence of HTLV-1 and -2 on HCV infection or HIV/HCV coinfection is not well studied, and its pathogenesis is not well understood. In one study among IDUs, HCV viral load was increased in HIV/HTLV-2-infected patients compared with HCV-monoinfected patients.21 A longitudinal study demonstrated accelerated HCV disease progression and hepatocarcinogenesis among HCV/HTLV-1-coinfected patients,22 and, like with HIV, SVR after interferon therapy was lower in patients coinfected with HTLV-1 and HCV, suggesting that HTLV-1 infection inhibits the elimination of HCV.23

HIV and HTLV-1 coinfection has been found in Bahia with worse morbidity and survival. A recent review concluded that HIV/HTLV-1-coinfected patients have higher CD4 cell counts compared with HIV-monoinfected patients, although little is known about the overall clinical implications of this.2 Infection with all three viruses, HIV, HCV, and HTLV-1/2, has been documented in the southern and southeastern areas of Brazil. HIV and HTLV-1/2 coinfection is more frequent in IDUs and is associated with HCV infection, as HCV seropositivity is independently associated with HTLV and HIV coinfection.18,24 HCV infection in HIV-1-infected patients also is associated with seropositivity for anti-HTLV ½.25

Few studies have described clinical characteristics in a population triply coinfected with HIV, HCV, and HTLV-1. Little is known about disease progression and clinical outcomes in these individuals or how these infections may each contribute to changes in the natural history of subsequent disease. Because Salvador has the highest prevalence of HTLV-1 in Brazil, it offers a unique opportunity to study these co-occurring infections. The primary aim of this study was to describe whether HTLV-1 infection modified the clinical outcomes in HIV/HCV-coinfected patients.

Back to Top | Article Outline


Study Population

We conducted a study comparing two groups patients with data collected retrospectively from outpatient services of two HIV/AIDS care facilities in Salvador, Brazil. Group 1 consisted of patients coinfected with HIV and HCV and Group 2 of patients triply infected with HIV, HCV, and HTLV-1. Inclusion criteria for both groups were age older than 18 years and serologically confirmed HIV and HCV and/or HTLV-1. Both patient groups were recruited from either of two institutions, the Centro Estadual de Diagnostico, Assistencia e Pesquisa em HIV/Aids (CEDAP), a state center for HIV and AIDS care and research, and the Hospital Universitario Professor Edgard Santos da Universidade Federal da Bahia (HUPES-UFBA), a large hospital affiliated with the Federal University of Bahia. CEDAP has an outpatient population of approximately 8000 HIV-1-infected patients. HUPES-UFBA offers both inpatient and outpatient care; the infectious disease and hepatology units see approximately 1000 patients per month.

We used convenience sampling to recruit patients as they presented for care at the facilities. Physicians and nurses referred patients to investigators, who reviewed medical records (informed consent was waived by the Research Ethics Committee) and with written consent obtained blood samples for immunologic testing (not being reported on in this analysis).

Back to Top | Article Outline
Data Collection

We collected demographic, medical, and some behavioral-related information from patient records and entered it into a database. Data included age, sex, self-reported history of IDU, and sexual behaviors. Men who reported any sex with men were classified as MSM. We recorded CD4 cell count and HIV viral load before and after initiation of antiretroviral treatment (ART); the pre-ART levels were the last ones before ART initiation and the post-ART measures the most recently available. We also compared liver biopsy results (Metavir histologic score26), liver function test results, including alanine transaminase (ALT) and aspartate transaminase, HCV genotype, and whether response to HCV therapy was sustained (SVR) or not.

Back to Top | Article Outline
Laboratory Tests

Laboratory test results were all obtained from medical records. The majority of laboratory testing was conducted in laboratories at the respective clinic or hospital where patients were seen. In brief, testing was done as follows. HIV status was determined using two enzyme immunoassays (HIV-1 QT, Bio Manguinhos, Rapid Check HIV 1 &2) and confirmed by Western blot (Genelabs, Singapore) and HIV viral load using bDNA kits (Versant HIV-bDNA 3.0 Assay; Siemens, Berkeley, CA). CD4 cell count was determined by flow cytometry (FACSCalibur; Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA). HTLV-1 was tested by enzyme immunoassay (different manufacturers) and confirmed using Western blot (Genelabs). HCV antibody (anti-HCV) was tested for using enzyme immunoassay (different manufacturers); HCV viral load was measured by quantitative polymerase chain reaction with a lower limit of detection of 600 UI/mL (log = 2.78) and an upper limit of 850,000 UI/mL (log = 5.93). SVR was determined by qualitative HCV RNA testing (HCV Amplicor 2.0; Roche Diagnostics, Pleasanton, CA) with sensitivity of 50 UI/ml (120 cp/mL), the lower limit of detection; and HCV genotyping was determined by line probe assay. We classified patients as having SVR to therapy if HCV polymerase chain reaction was undetectable 24 weeks after the completion of HCV therapy We recorded data from liver fibrosis for all patients who underwent percutaneous liver biopsy and used the Metavir histologic score system to determine degree of liver damage. We categorized liver fibrosis in two groups: mild fibrosis F0 and F1 and moderate or advanced fibrosis F2, F3, and F4.

Back to Top | Article Outline
Ethical Review

The study protocol was reviewed and approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Secretary of Health of the State of Bahia (Comite de Etica em Pesquisa da Secretaria de Saude do Estado da Bahia [CEP-SESAB]).

Back to Top | Article Outline
Statistical Analysis

Analyses are cross-sectional. The principal outcomes of interest were markers of clinical and immune response to HIV and HCV, including HIV viral load, CD4 count, HCV viral load, ALT, aspartate transaminase, and fibrosis score. We calculated prevalence and 95% confidence intervals based on binomial distributions. Summary statistics included frequency tables for categorical variables and medians and interquartile ranges (IQRs) for continuous variables. Patients with missing data were excluded from analyses for those factors in which data were missing. We categorized some continuous variables such as age and CD4 count for contingency table analyses. We conducted bivariate analyses examining associations between groups using the chi-square test of association or Fisher exact test where expected cell size was fewer than five and calculated odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals. To further examine associations in subgroups of interest, in particular between CD4 count and liver fibrosis stage, we conducted stratified analyses. We conducted all analyses using STATA Version 9 (Stata Corp, College Station, TX).

Back to Top | Article Outline


Patient Characteristics

A total of 141 subjects were enrolled in the study: 102 (72.3%) with HIV/HCV coinfection (Group 1) and 39 (27.7%) triply infected with HIV, HCV, and HTLV-1 (Group 2). The median age of patients was 46 years (IQR, 42-50) overall, 46 years (IQR, 40-50) in Group 1 and 47.5 years (IQR, 42.8-51.0) in Group 2. Table 1 shows selected demographic and behavioral risk characteristics of both groups. The majority (66%) of patients were male, reported being heterosexual (79.5%), and just over half (54%) had a history of IDU. There were no significant differences between groups with respect to age, sex, or sexual behavior, but the proportion reporting any history of IDU was significantly higher in patients infected with HIV/HCV/HTLV-1 (75%) compared with coinfected with HIV/HCV (46%). Clinical data were available on all patients, but nine patients were missing data on self-reported exposures (IDU and sexual exposure).

Table 1
Table 1
Image Tools
Back to Top | Article Outline
Clinical Characteristics

Table 2 shows HIV and HCV clinical, immunologic, virologic, and histopathologic outcomes in the two groups of patients. Of the 141 patients, 91% (n = 93) of those with HIV/HCV coinfection and 87% (n = 34) with triple infection had initiated ART (P = 0.48). No significant differences were seen between measures of HIV viral load and CD4 cell count pre-ART and post-ART between the groups. Pre-ART, 44% of patients had CD4 cell counts above 350 cells/mm3 (42% and 50% in Groups 1 and 2, respectively) and the median HIV viral load was also comparable. Declines in HIV viral load (to less than 1.69 log10) and increases in CD4 cell count (209 CD4 cells/mm3 and 137 cells/mm3 in Groups 1 and 2, respectively) were seen in both groups (P < 0.01 for pre- vs post-ART measures), indicating that both groups responded similarly to ART therapy. The magnitude of the decline in viral load and increase in CD4 did not differ by group (P = 0.63 and P = 0.54, respectively).

Table 2
Table 2
Image Tools

There were no differences between groups with respect to HCV viral load or the distribution of HCV genotype (Table 2). Median ALT was significantly (P = 0.05) higher among the HIV/HCV-coinfected group (71 IU/mL; IQR, 39-107) than the HIV/HCV/HTLV-1 triply infected group (48 IU/mL; IQR, 33-90). Of the 58 (41%) patients who received interferon-based therapy, 13 (32%) of HIV/HCV-coinfected and four (44%) of triply infected patients achieved SVR. Overall, 73 (52%) underwent percutaneous liver biopsy; METAVIR histologic scores were similar between groups. However, when fibrosis stage was examined by CD4 cell count stratifying by group (1 and 2), patients with CD4 cell count lower than 200 cells/mm3 had significantly higher fibrosis scores (Mantel-Haenszel P = 0.01); however, no difference was found between Groups 1 and 2 (P value for homogeneity of odds ratio between groups = 0.97) (Table 3).

Table 3
Table 3
Image Tools
Back to Top | Article Outline


In this comparison of HIV/HCV- and HIV/HCV/HTLV-1-infected patients, the principal findings were that both groups demonstrated similar HIV-related outcomes (CD4 count and HIV viral load), but those with HTLV-1 infection demonstrated differences with respect to hepatic-related outcomes, especially in association with more severe HIV-related immunosuppression (CD4 count). Our study found that a significantly higher proportion of patients in both groups with low CD4 cell count (200 cells/mm3 or less) have greater liver fibrosis damage compared with patients with higher CD4- cell count (greater than 200 cells/mm3). Fibrosis levels were higher among those with CD4 cell counts 200 and lower (P = 0.01) and did not differ by HIV/HCV versus HIV/HCV/HTLV-1 status (P = 0.97). Other evidence of hepatic differences between groups was higher ALT levels in HIV/HCV-coinfected patients compared with HIV/HCV/HTLV-1 triply infected ones; however, ALT was not correlated to HCV RNA viral load or degree of liver fibrosis. This is not unusual, because studies have reported that more than 10% of patients HIV/HCV coinfected show persistently normal ALT even with advanced liver fibrosis.27,28 In contrast to our results, another study did find higher HCV viremia in HIV/HCV/HTLV-2-infected patients compared with HIV/HCV-coinfected patients.21

There are some conflicting data about immunologic response to ART in patients infected by HIV and HCV. Some authors have found that the CD4 cell increase is smaller after ART in persons with HIV/HCV coinfection, suggesting that HCV may blunt immune recovery, but other studies have failed to confirm this observation.3 In this study, both groups of patients demonstrated similar beneficial responses to ART with significant decreases in HIV viral load and increases in CD4 cell counts after ART initiation. Several reports have demonstrated that coinfection by HTLV-1 or HTLV-2 and HIV increases CD4+ cells count, although it does not seem to result in a better immune response. In addition, some published works showed no significant impact of HTLV-2 infection on HIV disease, but this is not true when the involved virus is HTLV-1.17 These distinct biologic behaviors can promote a different impact on triply infected patients and could explain the different outcomes observed in studies on HTLV-1 coinfection in comparison with others that evaluated coinfection by HTLV-2.21-23

The histologic results from the patient groups compared here confirm the need for careful assessment of liver fibrosis in coinfected patients, especially those presenting with lower CD4+ cells count. Although we found no overall differences in liver fibrosis between the groups, immunosuppression, as measured by CD4 cell count, was associated with worse fibrosis scores as found by others.9 However, the tendency for the HIV/HCV-infected group with advanced immunosuppression to have more fibrosis than the triply infected group is of interest and deserves more study. Because of the relative small size of our population and some missing data, our findings are limited. Some studies have demonstrated that HIV/HCV-coinfected patients9,10,29 and HCV/HTLV-coinfected patients22,23 have more severe liver disease than patients with HCV monoinfection. Data from our study suggest that patients triply infected have low liver fibrosis with higher CD4 cell count. These data should encourage early screening for HTLV-1 infection in patients coinfected by HIV and or HCV, because earlier treatment for HIV and HCV may prevent development of liver fibrosis and potentially achieve better results with chronic hepatitis C therapy.

Our study involved the two major services of AIDS care in Bahia, Brazil, which provide care for approximately 80% of all HIV-infected patients in the state in an area with high HTLV-1 and HCV prevalence. However, there are some limitations to this study. The study data were from clinical chart review, and there are no protocols to standardize the clinical visits between the two institutions. As a result, there are missing data in our sample. Missing data may also be associated with the timeframe in which patients were seen and potentially with socioeconomic status. Bias may also have resulted as a result of numerous potential temporal effects that the cross-sectional analysis cannot address, including by patient (time from infection, time to outcome, and between data points, for instance laboratory and clinical outcome data), and clinical, for example, diagnostic and treatment criteria that may have varied over time. Patients diagnosed earlier with HIV may have been less likely to be diagnosed or treated for HCV infection, and those with fewer resources may also have been less likely to access these services. A larger sample size would facilitate better analysis of these potential effects. As a result, our findings may not be representative of all patients with these co- or triple infections. As protocols for HIV and HCV treatment become more standardized in Brazil, new studies will be needed to further assess outcomes in patients co- and triple infection. Another limitation was that no information about alcohol use was collected. Alcohol exposure could contribute to differences seen in hepatic outcomes or conversely explain why differences were not seen with other outcomes. If alcohol use were differential between groups, these effects could potentially be more complex. Despite these limitations, this study provides new information in an area with where little is known.

Overall, our results suggest that among patients with HIV and HCV coinfection, patients who also have HTLV-1 infection have better outcomes with respect to HCV than their dually infected counterparts. Future research should follow patients for a longer period of time to better delineate the natural history of triple infection. Immunologic studies will also contribute to better understanding of the interactions among these three viruses.

Back to Top | Article Outline


The authors thank the University of California, San Francisco, Center for Aids Prevention Studies, US National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH), P30 MH062246; the International Traineeships in AIDS Prevention Studies, US NIMH, R25MH064712; and the Fogarty International Center's International, Operational and Health Services Research Training Award, Brazilian Scientists Program (D43 TW005799).

Back to Top | Article Outline


1. Alter MJ. Epidemiology of viral hepatitis and HIV co-infection. J Hepatol. 2006;44(suppl):S6-S9.

2. Brites C, Sampalo J, Oliveira A. HIV/human T-cell lymphotropic virus coinfection revisited: impact on AIDS progression. AIDS Rev. 2009;11:8-16.

3. Sulkowski MS, Thomas DL. Hepatitis C in the HIV-infected person. Ann Intern Med. 2003;138:197-207.

4. Shepard CW, Finelli L, Alter MJ. Global epidemiology of hepatitis C virus infection. Lancet Infect Dis. 2005;5:558-567.

5. Seeff LB. Natural history of chronic hepatitis C. Hepatology. 2002;36(suppl 1):S35-S46.

6. Wise M, Bialek S, Finelli L, et al. Changing trends in hepatitis C-related mortality in the United States, 1995-2004. Hepatology. 2008;47:1128-1135.

7. Sulkowski MS, Mast EE, Seeff LB, et al. Hepatitis C virus infection as an opportunistic disease in persons infected with human immunodeficiency virus. Clin Infect Dis. 2000;30(suppl 1):S77-S84.

8. Tedaldi E, Peters L, Neuhaus J, et al. Opportunistic disease and mortality in patients coinfected with hepatitis B or C virus in the strategic management of antiretroviral therapy (SMART) study. Clin Infect Dis. 2008;47:1468-1475.

9. Graham CS, Baden LR, Yu E, et al. Influence of human immunodeficiency virus infection on the course of hepatitis C virus infection: a meta-analysis. Clin Infect Dis. 2001;33:562-569.

10. Benhamou Y, Bochet M, Di Martino V, et al. Liver fibrosis progression in human immunodeficiency virus and hepatitis C virus coinfected patients. The Multivirc Group. Hepatology. 1999;30:1054-1058.

11. Kim AY, Chung RT. Coinfection with HIV-1 and HCV--a one-two punch. Gastroenterology. 2009;137:795-814.

12. Sulkowski MS, Felizarta F, Smith C, et al. Daily versus thrice-weekly interferon alfa-2b plus ribavirin for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C in HIV-infected persons: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2004;35:464-472.

13. Gallo RC. Human retroviruses after 20 years: a perspective from the past and prospects for their future control. Immunol Rev. 2002;185:236-265.

14. Edlich RF, Arnette JA, Williams FM. Global epidemic of human T-cell lymphotropic virus type-I (HTLV-I). J Emerg Med. 2000;18:109-119.

15. Bangham CR. HTLV-1 infections. J Clin Pathol. 2000;53:581-586.

16. Galvao-Castro B, Loures L, Rodriques LG, et al. Distribution of human T-lymphotropic virus type I among blood donors: a nationwide Brazilian study. Transfusion. 1997;37:242-243.

17. Dourado I, Alcantara LC, Barreto ML, et al. HTLV-I in the general population of Salvador, Brazil: a city with African ethnic and sociodemographic characteristics. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2003;34:527-531.

18. Morimoto HK, Caterino-De-Araujo A, Morimoto AA, et al. Seroprevalence and risk factors for human T cell lymphotropic virus type 1 and 2 infection in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients attending AIDS referral center health units in Londrina and other communities in Parana, Brazil. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2005;21:256-262.

19. Milagres FA, Duarte MI, Viso AT, et al. Hepatitis C virus and human T-lymphotropic virus coinfection: epidemiological, clinical, laboratory and histopathological features. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2009;42:363-368.

20. Zunt JR, Tapia K, Thiede H, et al. HTLV-2 infection in injection drug users in King County, Washington. Scand J Infect Dis. 2006;38:654-663.

21. Hisada M, Chatterjee N, Zhang M, et al. Increased hepatitis C virus load among injection drug users infected with human immunodeficiency virus and human T lymphotropic virus type II. J Infect Dis. 2003;188:891-897.

22. Boschi-Pinto C, Stuver S, Okayama A, et al. A follow-up study of morbidity and mortality associated with hepatitis C virus infection and its interaction with human T lymphotropic virus type I in Miyazaki, Japan. J Infect Dis. 2000;181:35-41.

23. Kishihara Y, Furusyo N, Kashiwagi K, et al. Human T lymphotropic virus type 1 infection influences hepatitis C virus clearance. J Infect Dis. 2001;184:1114-1119.

24. Segurado AC, Braga P, Etzel A, et al. Hepatitis C virus coinfection in a cohort of HIV-infected individuals from Santos, Brazil: seroprevalence and associated factors. AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2004;18:135-143.

25. Reiche EM, Bonametti AM, Morimoto HK, et al. Epidemiological, immunological and virological characteristics, and disease progression of HIV-1/HCV-co-infected patients from a southern Brazilian population. Int J Mol Med. 2008;21:387-395.

26. Bedossa P, Poynard T. An algorithm for the grading of activity in chronic hepatitis C. The METAVIR Cooperative Study Group. Hepatology. 1996;24:289-293.

27. Maida I, Soriano V, Barreiro P, et al. Liver fibrosis stage and HCV genotype distribution in HIV-HCV coinfected patients with persistently normal transaminases. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2007;23:801-804.

28. Martin-Carbonero L, de Ledinghen V, Moreno A, et al. Liver fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C and persistently normal liver enzymes: influence of HIV infection. J Viral Hepat. 2009;16:790-795.

29. Di Martino V, Rufat P, Boyer N, et al. The influence of human immunodeficiency virus coinfection on chronic hepatitis C in injection drug users: a long-term retrospective cohort study. Hepatology. 2001;34:1193-1199.

Cited By:

This article has been cited 1 time(s).

Reciprocal functional pseudotyping of HIV-1 and HTLV-1 viral genomes by the heterologous counterpart envelope proteins
Klase, Z; Jeang, KT
Virology, 443(1): 106-112.
Back to Top | Article Outline

HIV-1 and HCV coinfection; HIV-1; HCV; and HTLV-1 triple infection

© 2011 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.


Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.