Share this article on:

Changes in Lipids and Lipoprotein Particle Concentrations After Interruption of Antiretroviral Therapy

Lampe, Fiona C PhD*; Duprez, Daniel A PhD†; Kuller, Lewis H MD‡; Tracy, Russell PhD§; Otvos, James PhD‖; Stroes, Erik PhD¶; Cooper, David A MD#; Hoy, Jennifer MBBS**; Paton, Nick I MD††; Friis-Møller, Nina PhD‡‡; Neuhaus, Jacquie MS†; Liappis, Angelike P MD§§; Phillips, Andrew N PhD* ; for the INSIGHT SMART Study Group

JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes: 1 July 2010 - Volume 54 - Issue 3 - pp 275-284
doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e3181d32158
Clinical Science

Background: The effect of interruption of antiretroviral therapy (ART) on lipoprotein particle subclasses has not been studied. We examined short-term changes in lipids and lipoprotein particles among 332 HIV-infected individuals randomized to interrupt or continue ART in the “Strategies for Management of Antiretroviral Therapy” trial.

Methods: Lipids and lipoprotein particles measured by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy were compared between randomized groups at month 1; associations with inflammatory and coagulation markers (high sensitivity C-reactive protein; interleukin 6; amyloid A; amyloid P; D-dimer; prothrombin fragment 1 + 2) were assessed.

Results: Compared with continuation of ART, treatment interruption resulted in substantial declines in total, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, and triglyceride, at month 1 but had little net effect on total/HDL cholesterol ratio [baseline-adjusted mean difference [95% confidence interval (CI)] interruption versus continuation arms: −0.10 (−0.59 to 0.38); P = 0.67]. ART interruption resulted in declines in total, large, and medium very low density lipoprotein (VLDL) particle concentrations (VLDL-p) and total and medium HDL-p. However, there was no change in small HDL-p [baseline-adjusted percentage difference between arms: −4.6% (−13.1%, +5.1% ); P = 0.35], small LDL-p [−5.0% (−16.9%, +8.6%); P = 0.45], or other LDL-p subclasses. Changes in lipid parameters on ART interruption did not differ according to baseline ART class (protease inhibitor versus nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor) but were negatively associated both with changes in HIV viral load and with changes in inflammatory and coagulation markers, particularly D-dimer.

Conclusions: These results suggest that ART interruption does not favorably influence overall lipid profile: there was little net effect on total/HDL cholesterol ratio, and no change in small LDL-p or small HDL-p, the lipoprotein particle subclasses most consistently linked to coronary risk. Short-term declines in lipid parameters after ART interruption were not associated with class of ART and may be linked to increases in viral replication, inflammation and coagulation.

From the *Research Department of Infection and Population Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom; †Departments of Medicine and Biostatistics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; ‡Department of Epidemiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA; §Department of Pathology, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT; Liposcience, Inc, Raleigh, NC; ¶Department of Vascular Medicine, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, Netherlands; #National Centre in HIV Epidemiology and Clinical Research, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia; **Department of Medicine, The Alfred Hospital, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia; ††Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit, London, United Kingdom; ‡‡Department of International Health, Immunology and Microbiology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; and §§Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Washington, DC.

Received for publication June 4, 2009; accepted September 9, 2009.

Supported by NIAID, NIH grants U01AI042170 and U01AI46362.

F.C.L. had full access to all of the data in the study and takes responsibility for the data analysis.

Clinical identifier: NCT00027352.

Correspondence to: Fiona C. Lampe, PhD, Research Department of Infection and Population Health, University College London Medical School, Royal Free Campus, Rowland Hill Street, London NW3 2PF, United Kingdom (e-mail:

There is substantial evidence that HIV infection impacts on blood lipids, but the interplay between infection, treatment, and changes in various lipid parameters is complex. Seroconversion itself is associated with reductions in total cholesterol (TC), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-c) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c),1,2 although initiation of multidrug antiretroviral therapy (ART) usually results in increases in lipids.3-7 Protease inhibitors tend to induce greater increases in TC, LDL-c, and triglyceride (TG) than nonnucleoside reveries transcriptase inhibitors,4,5 whereas the latter class has been linked to increases in HDL-c.6,7 Protease inhibitor-induced cholesterol changes at least partly explain the increased coronary heart disease risk observed in treated compared with untreated HIV-infected people.8

The extent to which lipid increases reverse when ART is stopped, and the rapidity with which any such changes take place is uncertain. In the “Strategies for Management of Antiretroviral Therapy” (SMART) randomized trial,9 compared with the ART continuation “viral suppression (VS)” strategy, the ART interruption “drug conservation (DC)” strategy resulted in a net increase in the TC/HDL-c ratio at year 1,10 due to a decline in both TC and HDL-c after treatment interruption. This has been suggested as a potential factor contributing to the raised cardiovascular disease risk that was associated with the interruption strategy.10 However, lipid changes at year 1 may not capture acute or short-term changes and may be substantially influenced by the fact that almost 40% of patients in the DC arm had resumed ART by this point.10 Furthermore, consideration of conventional lipid measures alone may be inadequate. There is evidence that lipoprotein particle size and density are related to atherogenicity,11-16 with predominance of small LDL particles believed to be particularly implicated in coronary risk in the general population. However, much less is known regarding the effect of ART on lipoprotein particles, and no previous studies have investigated changes in lipoprotein particles after ART interruption. In addition, the extent to which changes in lipid parameters after ART interruption are influenced by class of ART and/or linked to acute changes in systemic inflammation is uncertain.

In the SMART trial, lipoprotein particle subclasses and several inflammatory and coagulation markers were measured at baseline and month 1 in a subset of patients,17 providing a unique opportunity to investigate these issues within a randomized study. We assess: (1) the pattern of change in usual lipids in DC and VS arms over 8 months post randomization; (2) DC versus VS differences in lipids and lipoprotein particle subclasses at month one; (3) the effect of baseline demographic and treatment factors on DC versus VS differences in lipid parameters at month 1; (4) the associations of changes in lipid parameters with changes in inflammatory and coagulation markers and HIV plasma viral load.

Back to Top | Article Outline


The methods and results of the SMART trial have been published.9 In brief, 5472 HIV-infected patients with CD4 cell count >350 cells per cubic millimeter (4591 of whom were on ART at trial entry) were randomized to 1 of 2 strategies. The VS strategy aimed to achieve maximal suppression of HIV viral load by continuous ART use. The DC strategy entailed interruption (or deferral) of ART until the CD4 cell count fell to <250 cells per cubic millimeter, at which time ART was (re)started until the CD4 cell count rose to >350 cells per cubic millimeter. On confirmation of CD4 cell count >350 cells per cubic millimeter, ART was interrupted again and resumed at CD4 cell count <250 cells per cubic millimeter. The DC strategy aimed to achieve maximal viral load suppression during periods of ART use. The trial was approved by the institutional review board at each site, and all participants gave written informed consent. Enrolment was stopped on January 11, 2006, due to poorer outcome in the DC arm. The hazard ratio (95% CI) for the primary endpoint (opportunistic disease or death) in the DC compared to VS group was 2.6 (1.9, 3.7).9

Usual lipids (TC, LDL-c, HDL-c, TG) were measured on serum at baseline and on plasma at months 1, 2, 4, and 8 by Quest Diagnostics, Inc.(Madison, NJ) using standard enzymatic methods. LDL-c was directly measured. Samples were not required to be fasting. HIV plasma viral load was measured at baseline, months 1, 2, and every 2 months thereafter for 12 months. All samples were obtained before the SMART protocol change on January 11, 2006, and laboratory analysis was performed blind to treatment arm.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Biomarker Sub-Study

A subgroup of 499 patients (249 from the DC arm; 250 from the VS arm) was selected randomly from SMART patients enrolled in the United States who were free of cardiovascular disease at entry and who had consented to storage of blood specimens for research purposes. Inflammatory and coagulation markers and lipoprotein particle subclasses were measured on plasma at baseline and month 1.17 Four inflammatory markers [high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP), interleukin 6 (IL-6), amyloid A, amyloid P], and 2 coagulation markers [D-dimer and prothrombin fragment 1 + 2 (F1.2)] were measured by the Laboratory for Clinical Biochemistry Research, University of Vermont. Lipoprotein subclasses were measured using nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy at Liposcience Inc. (Raleigh, NC), and categorized according to particle diameter as large (60-200 nm), medium (35-60 nm), and small (27-35 nm) very-low-density lipoprotein (VLDL), intermediare-density lipoprotein (IDL) (23-27 nm) and large (21.3-23.0 nm) and small (18.3-21.2) LDL; large (8.8-13.0 nm), medium (8.2-8.8 nm), and small (7.3-8.2 nm) HDL.18 For each subclass, particle concentrations (μmol/L for HDL and nmol/L for other measures) were determined and are denoted by ‘p’ (eg, Large VLDP p). Mean particle size was also determined for VLDL, LDL, and HDL particles. Reproducibility of the NMR technique, determined from replicate analysis of plasma pools, is indicated by the following coefficients of variation: <2% for VLDL size and <0.5% for LDL and HDL size, <10% for VLDL sublasses, <4% for total LDL-p, <8% for large and small LDL subclasses, and <5% for large and small HDL subclasses, with higher variation (<30%) for medium HDL and IDL (the latter due to their typically low concentrations).

The present analysis is based on 332 patients in the substudy who had measurements of usual lipids and lipoprotein particle subclasses at baseline and month 1 and who were taking ART at entry to SMART. The SMART study, including the consent for stored specimens, was approved by the institutional review board or ethics committee of each clinical site and the University of Minnesota, which served as the statistical and data management centre.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Statistical Methods

Values of TG and all lipoprotein particle measures were log transformed (base e) to normalize distributions and stabilize variance. For lipoprotein particle concentrations, values below the lower limit of detection were replaced with “minimum values” specified by the laboratory (see footnote to Table 3). Analysis of covariance was used to compare lipid parameters between DC and VS arms at month 1, adjusting for baseline values. For log-transformed parameters, percentage differences between DC and VS arms can be obtained by exponentiating the difference in means. Unpaired t tests were used to assess baseline differences in lipid parameters according to the following demographic and baseline treatment factors: gender, age group, ethnicity, type of ART (protease inhibitor or nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor regimen; subjects taking both or neither class were excluded), and use of lipid-lowering drugs. Tests of interaction were used to assess whether DC versus VS differences in lipid parameters at month 1 varied according to these factors. Interaction tests were carried out only for those lipid parameters found to differ significantly between randomized arms in the analysis of covariance. Pearson correlation coefficients (r) were used to assess associations of lipids with inflammatory and coagulation markers and viral load in the DC arm, using changes from baseline to month 1.

Back to Top | Article Outline


Baseline Characteristics

Table 1 shows characteristics of the 332 patients who had measurements of lipids and lipoprotein particle concentrations and who were taking ART at entry to SMART. Approximately 70% of patients were male, and almost half were of black ethnicity. Baseline ART regimen included a protease inhibitor, nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor, both of these classes, and neither class for 39.5%, 43.4%, 6.9%, and 10.2% of subjects, respectively. Median CD4 cell count was 581 cells per cubic millimeter and approximately 70% of subjects had viral load ≤400 copies per milliliter. About one fifth of patients were taking lipid-lowering drugs. Mean lipid values were 195.5 mg/dL for TC, 110.4 mg/dL for LDL-c, 43.7 mg/dL for HDL-c, 5.26 for TC/HDL-c ratio, and 5.17 loge mg/dL for TG. The distribution of baseline characteristics was similar in the DC and VS arms (Tables 1 and 2).

Back to Top | Article Outline

Changes Over Time in Lipids

In the DC arm, the cumulative numbers of patients resuming ART were 1 (0.6%), 20 (12.8%), 40 (25.6%), and 61 (39.1%) by months 1, 2, 4, and 8, respectively. Figure 1 shows lipid changes over the first 8 months. Changes in lipids after interruption of ART were rapid. In the DC arm, TC, LDL-c, HDL-c, and TG fell substantially by month 1, with some further decline subsequently. Maximum declines were observed at month 1 for LDL-c, month 2 for TC and HDL-c, and month 4 for TG. There was little change over time in the TC/HDL-c ratio. In the VS arm, changes in lipids were smaller: moderate declines occurred in TC, LDL-c, and HDL-c, with little change in TC/HDL-c ratio and TG. At month 1, declines in TC, LDL-C, HDL-C, and TG were significantly greater in the DC compared with VS arm (Table 2): estimated DC versus VS mean differences (mg/dL) adjusted for baseline (95% CI) were −21.2 (−28.4 to −14.0) for TC, −7.1 (−12.5 to −1.7) for LDL-c, −3.4 (−5.0 to −1.7) for HDL-c; and the percentage difference (95% CI) for TG was -17.6% (−24.9% to −8.4%) (P ≤ 0.01 for all). There was no significant difference in TC/HDL-c ratio [DC versus VS difference: −0.10 (95% CI: −0.59 to 0.38), P = 0.67].

Back to Top | Article Outline

Changes in Lipoprotein Particle Subclasses

Table 3 shows baseline values and changes at month 1 in lipoprotein particle subclasses. Compared with the VS arm, there were declines in total VLDL-p and in VLDL subclasses in the DC arm at month 1; differences were significant for total, large, and medium VLDL-p (P ≤ 0.01). The percentage difference (95% CI) for DC versus VS was -19.4% (−26.7% to −11.4%) for total VLDL-p, −27.3% (−44.3% to −5.1%) for large VLDL-p, and -28.7% (−39.6% to −15.9%) for medium VLDL-p. There were no significant differences between arms in total LDL-p [percentage difference (95% CI): −3.8% (−8.6%, to +1.3%)], small LDL-p [−5.0% (−16.5% to +8.6%)], or other LDL-p subclasses. Total HDL-p and medium HDL-p declined in the DC arm relative to the VS arm [percentage differences (95% CI): −9.6% (−13.5% to −5.6%) for total and -39.9% (−59.3% to −11.3%) for medium HDL-p; P ≤ 0.01]. There was no significant difference between arms for small HDL-p, (−4.6% [−13.4% to +5.1%] P = 0.35), or for large HDL-p, VLDL-p, LDL-p, or HDL-p size.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Baseline and Changes in Lipids and Lipoprotein Particle Subclasses According to Demographic and Treatment Factors

Baseline lipids varied according to several demographic and treatment factors. Among the 332 subjects overall, mean HDL-c was lower among men (41.7 mg/dL) than women (48.2 mg/dL); TG levels were higher among men than women (5.24 versus 5.01 log mg/dL), and among subjects aged ≥45 years compared with <45 years (5.28 versus 5.05 log mg/dL); LDL-c was higher among white subjects compared with others (115.5 versus 107.6 mg/dL). Subjects taking nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-based treatment had higher HDL-c than those taking protease inhibitor-based treatment (46.4 versus 40.8 mg/dL). Compared with others, subjects taking lipid-lowering drugs had considerably higher TC (218.8 and 189.4 mg/dL for subjects on and off lipid-lowering drugs, respectively), LDL-c (120.3 and 107.8 mg/dL) and TG (5.51 and 5.08 log mg/dL; P < 0.05 for all two sample t-tests).

Table 4 shows baseline-adjusted DC versus VS differences in lipids at month 1, according to demographic and treatment factors. The declines in TC, LDL-c, and HDL-c in the DC arm relative to the VS arm tended to be greater among men compared with women, among older compared with younger subjects, and among white subjects compared with those of other ethnicity. Among the subgroup of 275 subjects taking either a protease inhibitor-based or nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-based ART regimen, there was no evidence that changes in lipids varied according to class of ART. However, changes in TC and LDL-c in the DC versus VS arm were much greater in subjects taking lipid-lowering drugs at baseline compared with those not taking these drugs. For TC, the baseline-adjusted DC versus VS differences in means (mg/dL) were -32.7 and −15.8 for subjects who were and were not taking lipid-lowering drugs, respectively; the corresponding differences in means for LDL-c were -18.0 and -3.6 (P < 0.05 for both interactions). Interaction tests were also performed for the following lipid particle measures: total, large, and medium VLDL-p and total and medium HDL-p, as significant differences between arms at month 1 had been found for these parameters. No significant interactions of randomized group with demographic factors, class of ART or lipid-lowering drug use were found (P > 0.05; data not shown).

Back to Top | Article Outline

Association of Changes in Lipids and Lipid Particle Subclasses With Changes in Inflammatory Markers, Coagulation Markers, and Viral Load After ART Interruption

Table 5 shows the association between 1-month changes in lipids and 1-month changes in inflammatory and coagulation markers and viral load, in the DC arm only. The strongest associations were with D-dimer and viral load: changes in TC, LDL-c, and HDL-c were negatively correlated with changes in D-dimer and viral load (r = −0.40 to r = −0.24). In other words, after ART interruption, decreases in lipids were associated with increases in viral load and D-dimer. Weak to moderate negative associations were apparent between changes in TC, LDL-c, and HDL-c and changes in IL-6 and amyloid A. There were similar negative associations with lipoprotein particles in the DC arm: change in large VLDL-p was negatively associated with change in viral load (r = −0.25); change in total LDL-p was negatively associated with changes in amyloid A (r = −0.24) and viral load (r = −0.21); change in total HDL-p was negatively associated with change in D-dimer (r = −0.41), F1.2 (r = −0.26), amyloid A (r = −0.37), hsCRP (r = −0.31), IL-6 (r = −0.41), and viral load (r = −0.34); change in small HDL-p was negatively associated with change in amyloid A (r = −0.23) and IL-6 (r = −0.30).

Back to Top | Article Outline


We examined the effect of ART interruption on lipids and lipoprotein particle subclasses in a randomized comparison with subjects remaining on ART. ART interruption resulted in rapid and substantial declines in TC, LDL-c, HDL-c, and TG, but had little net effect on the TC/HDL-c ratio. There were no significant changes in LDL-p subclasses. There were declines in total, large, and medium VLDL-p and total and medium HDL-p, but no change in small HDL-p.

The major strengths of this study are the randomized nature of the comparison and the comprehensive ascertainment of lipid parameters. We focused on 1-month changes, which were not diluted by DC patients resuming ART. There are some limitations. Baseline TC, HDL-c, LDL-c, and TG were measured in serum, with subsequent measurements in plasma. Previous studies suggest that serum lipid values tend to be consistently higher than plasma values by about 2%-3% for TC and 3%-5% for TG.19,20 There is less evidence of a consistent serum/plasma difference for HDL-c. Therefore, in our study, declines in usual lipids from baseline to month 1 will tend to be slightly overestimated. Serum/plasma differences probably contribute to the declines in TC, LDL-c, and HDL-c observed at month 1 in the VS arm, although they do not seem to fully explain the declines (mean values declined by 6%-11%, Table 1). Our primary analysis involving comparisons between randomized groups should be unaffected by serum/plasma differences. Nonfasting lipid measurement may result in increased variability of TG and some underestimation of TG changes and associations with other factors but should have minimal impact on the other lipid measures.19

Previous randomized21-25 and nonrandomized studies26-31 have assessed changes in conventional lipids during a single ART interruption or during a strategy of repeated interruptions. Most were small (<50 individuals interrupting ART),21,22,26,27,29-31 some only reported on defined lipid abnormalities,27,29 few considered HDL-c,25,26,31 and none considered lipoprotein particle subclasses. Most previous studies suggested declines compared with baseline (of varying magnitudes) in TC21,22,24,25,27 (and/or LDL-c24,27) and TG21,22,27 during ART interruption. Of 3 studies measuring HDL-c,25,26,31 only 1 found a significant decline on treatment interruption,31 but all were relatively small. Two of 4 trials failed to show significant differences in any lipid measure between interruption and continuation arms.22,23 The comparison between studies is complicated by their different interruption/resumption strategies, the differing time points for lipid endpoints and the ART status of patients at this time. Changes in conventional lipids at year 1 in the SMART trial have been reported previously,10 but 40% of DC subjects had resumed ART. The present results show that mean lipids declines were substantially greater at month 1 than year 1 (19%, 110%, and 130% greater for TC, LDL-c, and HDL-c, respectively among DC subjects on ART at baseline.) This is in part due to attenuation of lipid changes over time as patients resumed ART, but it also demonstrates that lipid changes were rapid, with much of the decline occurring within the first month.

It is believed that information on lipoprotein particle subclasses measured by NMR may improve CHD risk assessment compared with standard lipid measures alone. Findings from non-HIV studies are inconclusive, but there is evidence that number of LDL particles, total LDL-p, small LDL-p, and smaller LDL size are positively associated with CHD,11-16 in some cases independently of chemically measured LDL-c.12-14,16 In addition, several studies have found an inverse association between small HDL-p and CHD.13,15 There is very little information from HIV-infected individuals. In cross-sectional analysis of the Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study, men on ART were judged to have an “atherogenic lipoprotein profile”: higher small LDL-p and total VLDL-p and lower large LDL-p and total HDL-p compared with HIV-negative men.32 In contrast, HIV-positive ART-naive men had lower small LDL-p compared with HIV-negative men. The declines on treatment interruption observed in this present study in total VLDL-p and HDL-p would be consistent with results from Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study and with reversal of lipid changes induced by ART. However, although we observed a clear decline in chemically measured LDL-c in DC compared with VS arms, the difference between arms in NMR total LDL-p was not significant, and there were no differences in LDL-p subclasses. The association between lipoprotein particle subclasses and cardiovascular risk has recently been assessed in a nested case-control study within SMART; this analysis found that, of the NMR measures, small and large HDL-p had the strongest (inverse) associated with cardiovascular events.33 Overall, the short-term changes in lipid parameters associated with interruption of ART in this analysis suggest little net effect on coronary risk. The reduction in LDL-c was offset by the decline in HDL-c; in addition, small LDL-p and small HDL-p, the NMR subclasses most consistently linked with CHD risk, did not differ between DC and VS arms.

We did not find greater reductions in TC and LDL-c in those stopping protease inhibitors or greater reductions in HDL-c among those stopping nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, as might be expected.3-7 As drugs within each class differ in their effect on different lipid fractions,3-7,34,35 this may be due to variations in specific drugs used, variations in duration of use, or differences in the nucleoside component of the regimen. Lipid changes on ART interruption tended to be greater among subgroups with higher baseline lipid levels (men, older subjects, white subjects and particularly those taking lipid-lowering drugs); differences were somewhat attenuated when assessed in terms of percentage change, using analysis on the log scale (data not shown). The considerably greater declines in TC and LDL-c among subjects on lipid-lowering drugs compared with other subjects may also be due to interactions between ART and lipid-lowering agents.36 DC versus VS differences in lipids and lipoprotein particle subclasses were similar after exclusion of subjects taking lipid-lowering drugs at baseline (data not shown).

HIV replication is associated with endothelial dysfunction and activation of inflammatory and coagulation pathways37,38 In the SMART trial, interruption of ART resulted in substantial increases in IL-6 and D-dimer at month 1.17 These present results show that, in the DC arm, greater increases in D-dimer, IL-6, and amyloid A were associated with greater declines in TC, LDL-c, and HDL-c, although there was no association with hsCRP. These correlations were strongest for D-dimer. Similar moderate negative associations were observed between changes in viral load and changes in TC, LDL-c, and HDL-c. Changes in various NMR lipid measures (particularly total and small HDL-p) were also negatively associated with changes in viral load and some inflammatory and coagulation markers. The associations with viral load were the most consistent. The pattern of rapid changes in lipids was similar to that observed for viral load: the percentage of subjects with viral load ≤400 copies per milliliter fell from 72% at baseline to 6% at 2 months in the DC arm overall.9 These results suggest that lipid declines may be closely linked to the sudden increase in viral replication and perhaps associated activation and inflammation, on interruption of ART. Possibly it is these acute changes, rather than the specific antiretrovirals used, that are the dominating factors in determining short-term lipid changes when treatment is stopped.

Structured or CD4-guided treatment interruption strategies were once considered as a means of reducing toxicity associated with long-term ART-in particular, reversing drug-induced increases in TC. The SMART trial showed that CD4-guided treatment interruption resulted in increased risk of AIDS and severe non-AIDS morbidity. This assessment of short-term changes in lipids and lipoprotein particle concentrations among subjects on ART at baseline suggests that although TC changes associated with ART use seem to be rapidly reversed on treatment interruption, the overall lipid profile is not favorably influenced. Short-term changes in lipid parameters were not associated with class of ART and may be linked to increases in viral replication, inflammation, and coagulation.

Back to Top | Article Outline


We would like to acknowledge the SMART participants, the SMART study team (N Engl J Med. 2006;355:2294-2295 for list of investigators) and the INSIGHT Executive Committee.

Back to Top | Article Outline


1. Riddler SA, Smit E, Cole SR, et al. Impact of HIV infection and HAART on serum lipids in men. JAMA. 2003;289:2978-2982.
2. Oh J, Hegele RA. HIV-associated dyslipidaemia: pathogenesis and treatment. Lancet Infect Dis. 2007;7:786-796.
3. Fontas E, Van Leth F, Sabin CA, et al. For the DAD Study Group. Lipid profiles in HIV-infected patients receiving combination antiretroviral therapy: are different antiretroviral drugs associated with different lipid profiles ? J Infect Dis. 2004;189:1056-1074.
4. Young J, Weber R, Rickenbach M, et al, and the Swiss HIV Cohort Study. Lipid profiles for antiretroviral-naïve patients starting PI- and NNRTI-based therapy in the Swiss HIV Cohort Study. Antiv Ther. 2005;10:585-591.
5. Asztalos BF, Schaefer EJ, Horvath KV, et al. Protease inhibitor based HAART, HDL, and CHD risk in HIV infected patients. Atherosclerosis. 2006;184:72-77.
6. van der Valk M, Kastelein JJ, Murphy RL, et al, on Behalf of the Atlantic Study Team. Nevirapine-containing antiretroviral therapy in HIV-1 infected patients results in an anti-atherogenic lipid profile. AIDS. 2001;15:2407-2414.
7. van Leth F, Phanuphak P, Stroes E, et al. Nevirapine and efavirenz elicit different changes in lipid profiles in antiretroviral therapy naïve patients infected with HIV-1. PLOS Med. 2004;1:e19.
8. The DAD Study Group. Class of antiretroviral drugs and the risk of myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:1723-1735.
9. The Strategies for Management of Antiretroviral Therapy (SMART) Study Group. CD4+ count-guided interruption of antiretroviral treatment. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:2283-2296.
10. Phillips AN, Carr A, Neuhaus J, et al. Interruption of antiretroviral therapy and risk of cardiovascular disease in persons with HIV-1 infection: exploratory analyses from the SMART trial. Antivir Ther. 2008;13:177-187
11. Gardner CD, Fortmann SP, Krauss RM. Association of small low-density lipoprotein particles with the incidence of coronary artery disease in men and women. JAMA. 1996;276:875-881.
12. Kuller L, Arnold A, Tracy R, et al. Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy of lipoproteins and risk of coronary heart disease in the cardiovascular health study. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2002;22:1175-1180.
13. Rosenson RS, Otvos JD, Freedman DS. Relations of lipoprotein subclass levels and low-density lipoprotein size to progression of coronary artery disease in the Pravastatin Limitation of Atherosclerosis in the Coronary Arteries (PLAC-1) trial. Am J Cardiol. 2002;90:89-94.
14. Blake GJ, Otvos JD, Rifai N, et al. Low-density lipoprotein particle concentration and size as determined by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy as predictors of cardiovascular disease in women. Circulation. 2002;106:1930-1937.
15. Otvos JD, Collins D, Freedman DS, et al. Low-density lipoprotein and high-density lipoprotein particle subclasses predict coronary events and are favorably changed by gemfibrozil therapy in the Veterans Affairs High-Density Lipoprotein Intervention Trial. Circulation. 2006;113:1556-1563.
16. Mora S, Szklo M, Otvos JD, et al. LDL particle subclasses, LSL particle size and carotid atherosclerosis in the Multi-Ethc Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) Atherosclerosis. 2007;192:211-217.
17. Kuller LH, Tracy R, Belloso W, et al, For the SMART Study Group. Inflammatory and coagulation biomarkers and mortality in patients with HIV infection. PLoS Med. 2008;5:e203, doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0050203.
18. Jeyarajah EJ, Cromwell WC, Otvos JD. Lipoprotein particle analysis by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Clin Lab Med. 2006;26:847-870.
19. Folsom AR, Kuba K, Leupker RV, et al. Lipid concentrations in serum and EDTA-treated plasma from fasting and nonfasting normal persons, with particular regard to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Clin Chem. 1983;29:505-508.
20. Beheshti I, Wessels LM, Eckfeldt JH. EDTA-plasma vs serum differences in cholesterol, high-denisty-lipoprotein cholesterol and triglyceride as measured by several methods. Clin Chem. 1994;40:2088-2092.
21. Dybul M, Nies-Kraske E, Daucher M, et al. Long-cycle structured intermittent versus continuous highly active antiretroviral therapy for the treatment of chronic infection with human immunodeficiency virus: effects on drug toxicity and on immunologic and virologic parameters. J Infect Dis. 2003;188:388-396.
22. Maggiolo F, Ripamonti D, Gregis G, et al. Effect of prolonged discontinuation of successful antiretroviral therapy on CD4 T cells: a controlled prospective trial. AIDS. 2004;18:439-446.
23. Danel C, Moh R, Minga A, et al, For the Trivacan ANRS 1269 trial group. CD4-guided structured antiretroviral treatment interruption strategy in HIV-infected adults in west Africa (Trivacan ANRS 1269 trial): a randomised trial. Lancet. 2006;367:1982-1989.
24. Ananworanich J, Gayet-Ageron A, Le Braz M, et al, and Staccato Study Group; Swiss HIV Cohort Study. CD4-guided scheduled treatment interruptions compared with continuous therapy for patients infected with HIV-1: results of the Staccato randomised trial. Lancet. 2006;368:459-465.
25. Maserati R, Foli A, Tomasoni L, et al. Effects of structured treatment interruptions on metabolic, anthropometric, immunologic and quality of life outcomes in HIV-positive adults on HAART. Curr HIV Res. 2007;5:337-343.
26. Hatano H, Miller KD, Yoder CP, et al. Metabolic and anthropometric consequences of interruption of highly active antiretroviral therapy. AIDS. 2000;14:1953-1942.
27. Dybul M, Chun TW, Yoder C, et al. Short-cycle structured intermittent treatment of chronic HIV infection with highly active antiretroviral therapy: effects on virologic, immunologic and toxicity parameters. Proc Nat Acad Sci. 2001;98:15161-15166.
28. Tarwater PM, Parish M, Gallant JE. Prolonged treatment interruption after immunologic response to highly active antiretroviral therapy. Clin Infect Dis. 2003;37:1541-1548.
29. Dybul M, Nies-Kraske E, Dewar R, et al. A proof-of-concept study of short-cycle intermittent antiretroviral therapy with a once-daily regimen of didanosine, lamivudine, and efavirenz for the treatment of chronic HIV infection. J Infect Dis. 2004:189:1974-1982.
30. Jacobs B, Neil N, Aboulafia, DM. Retrospective analysis of suspending HAART in selected patients with controlled HIV replication. AIDS Pat Care. 2005;19:429-438.
31. Tebas P, Henry WK, Matining R, et al. Metabolic and immune activation effects of treatment interruption in chronic HIV-1 infection: implications for cardiovascular risk. PLoS One. 2008;3:e2021.
32. Riddler SA, Xiuhong L, Otvos J, et al. Antiretroviral therapy is associated with an atherogenic lipoprotein phenotype among HIV-1-infected men in the Multicentre AIDS Cohort Study. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2008:48:281-288.
33. Duprez DA, Kuller LH, Tracy R, et al. Lipoprotein particle subclasses, cardiovascular disease and HIV infection. Atherosclerosis. 2009;207:524-529.
34. Gallant JE, Staszewski S, Pozniak AL, et al, For the 903 Study Group. Efficacy and safety of tenofovir DF vs stavudine in combination therapy in antiretroviral patients. A 3-year randomised trial. JAMA. 2004;292:191-201.
35. Squires K, Lazzarin A, Gatell JM, et al. Comparison of once-daily atazanavir with efavirenz, each in combinayoin with fixed-dose zidvudine and lamivudine, as initial therapy for patients infected with HIV. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2004;36:1011-1019.
36. Fichtenbaum CJ, Gerber JG, Rosenkranz SL, et al, and NIAID AIDS Clinical Trials Group. Pharmacokinetic interactions between protease inhibitors and statins in HIV seronegative volunteers: ACTG Study A5047. AIDS. 2002;16:569-577.
37. Zangerle R, Sarcletti M, Gallati H, et al. Decreased plasma concentrations of HDL cholesterol in HIV-infected individuals are associated with immune activation. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 1994;7:1149-1156.
38. de Larranga GF, Petroni A, Deluchi G, et al. Viral load and disease progression as responsibe for endothelial activation and/or injury in human immunodeficiency virus-1-infected patients. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis. 2003;14:15-18.

antiretroviral therapy interruption; coagulation markers; inflammatory markers; lipids; lipoprotein particle subclasses

© 2010 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.