JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes:
Epidemiology and Social Science
Bacterial Vaginosis and Vaginal Yeast, But Not Vaginal Cleansing, Increase HIV-1 Acquisition in African Women
van de Wijgert, Janneke H H M PhD, MPH*; Morrison, Charles S PhD, MPH†; Cornelisse, Peter G A MSc‡; Munjoma, Marshall DMLS, MPH§; Moncada, Jeanne MT∥; Awio, Peter DMLS¶; Wang, Jing MA, MSc‡; Van der Pol, Barbara PhD, MPH#; Chipato, Tsungai MB ChB, FRCOG§; Salata, Robert A MD**; Padian, Nancy S PhD, MPH∥
From the *Academic Medical Center, Center for Poverty-Related Communicable Diseases, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; †Family Health International (FHI), Research Triangle Park, NC; ‡Statistical Center for HIV/AIDS Research and Prevention, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; §University of Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe; ∥University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; ¶Joint Clinical Research Center, Kampala, Uganda; #Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; and **Case Western University, Cleveland, OH.
P. G. A. Cornelisse is currently affiliated with Merck Serono International S.A., Geneva, Switzerland.
Received for publication October 10, 2007; accepted March 14, 2008.
None of the authors have a commercial or other association that might pose a conflict of interest.
Financial support for this study provided by the US National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, through a contract with FHI (contract N01-HD-0-3310).
Preliminary data from this study were presented at the 16th Meeting of the Society for Sexually Transmitted Disease Research, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, July 10-13, 2005, and the 15th International AIDS Conference, Bangkok, Thailand, July 11-16, 2004.
The content of this publication does not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the US Department of Health and Human Services or FHI, nor does mention of trade names, commercial products, or organizations imply endorsement by the US Government.
Correspondence to: Janneke van de Wijgert, PhD, MPH, Academic Medical Center, Center for Poverty-Related Communicable Diseases, Meibergdreef 9 T0-120, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands (e-mail: email@example.com).
Objective: To evaluate interrelationships between bacterial vaginosis (BV), vaginal yeast, vaginal practices (cleansing and drying/tightening), mucosal inflammation, and HIV acquisition.
Methods: A multicenter, prospective, observational cohort study was conducted, enrolling 4531 HIV-negative women aged 18 to 35 years attending family planning clinics in Zimbabwe and Uganda. Participants were tested for HIV and reproductive tract infections and were interviewed about vaginal practices every 3 months for 15 to 24 months. BV was measured by Gram stain Nugent scoring, vaginal yeast by wet mount, and mucosal inflammation by white blood cells on Gram stain.
Results: HIV incidence was 4.12 and 1.53 per 100 woman-years of follow-up in Zimbabwe and Uganda, respectively (a total of 213 incident infections). Women with BV or vaginal yeast were more likely to acquire HIV, especially if the condition was present at the same visit as the new HIV infection and the visit preceding it (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.50, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.68 to 3.72 and HR = 2.97, 95% CI: 1.67 to 5.28 for BV and yeast, respectively). These relationships did not seem to be mediated by mucosal inflammation. Vaginal drying/tightening was associated with HIV acquisition in univariate (HR = 1.49, 95% CI: 1.03 to 2.15) but not multivariate models. Vaginal cleansing was not associated with HIV acquisition.
Conclusions: BV and yeast may contribute more to the HIV epidemic than previously thought.
Approximately 60% of all infections in sub-Saharan Africa occur among women.1 Although the probability of male-to-female HIV transmission during vaginal intercourse under normal circumstances is considered low, cofactors may substantially increase acquisition risk.2 These cofactors include, among others, reproductive tract infections (RTIs) and possibly “traditional” vaginal practices for hygiene, sexual satisfaction, pregnancy, and disease prevention.
Many studies have shown that sexually transmitted infections (STIs) facilitate HIV transmission.3-5 The evidence for vaginal infections that are not necessarily sexually transmitted (eg, bacterial vaginosis [BV], candidiasis) as cofactors in HIV transmission is less clear but is mounting.6-9 Many of the studies showing a link between BV and HIV were cross-sectional, however, making it difficult to draw conclusions about a temporal relation. Few prospective studies have investigated BV or candidiasis as a risk factor for HIV, and these showed positive associations.7-9 The prevalence of vaginal infections, particularly BV, is high in many countries. For example, 20% to 50% of women of reproductive age are affected in Zimbabwe.10 Therefore, even a small increased HIV risk per individual may have a large impact at the population level.
Vaginal practices are widespread throughout the world, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa.11 They include cleansing the vagina with water, soap, antiseptic solutions, or household cleaning products (usually using a finger or piece of cloth); wiping the vagina to remove vaginal fluids; and inserting herbal or nonherbal preparations to constrict or tighten the vagina. Vaginal practices have been suggested as risk factors that may increase women's vulnerability to HIV.6 Most studies in Africa have documented prevalences of vaginal practices of 30% to 50%, with higher levels usually shown among sex workers.6 Nevertheless, there is little epidemiologic evidence to support a temporal association between vaginal practices and HIV acquisition. Of studies including data on HIV, most were cross-sectional, several were inadequately powered, and few adjusted for potential confounding variables.6 In 2006, results of 2 large prospective studies were published, and they showed conflicting results.12,13
Some of the proposed mechanisms by which BV and vaginal yeast could increase HIV acquisition are by changing the cervicovaginal epithelial integrity and/or permeability and by causing inflammation and/or immune activation in the female genital tract.14,15 BV was initially considered a noninflammatory disorder because of a lack of polymorphonuclear cells in the vaginal discharge and a lack of signs of inflammation in the vaginal epithelium. Recent evidence suggests that BV may induce less visible inflammatory markers, however, such as various cytokines.14 Candidiasis is known to cause vaginal irritation, inflammation, and immune activation.15 Vaginal practices could alter the vaginal flora or could have a direct effect on the cervicovaginal mucosa.6 Data on vaginal practices disrupting the vaginal flora are not conclusive (because of a possible reverse temporality [ie, the presence of a vaginal infection could prompt vaginal cleansing]) but are supported by epidemiologic findings from Europe and the United States showing associations between douching and incident and prevalent BV.6 The possibility that vaginal practices may disrupt the cervicovaginal epithelium has been investigated in 3 small studies, 2 of which observed epithelial damage that was repaired within 2 to 7 days.6 Thus far, no studies of vaginal practices and HIV have included markers of genital inflammation and/or immune activation.
We hypothesized that BV, vaginal yeast, vaginal practices, and mucosal inflammation may be associated with each other and with HIV acquisition. These hypotheses were evaluated within a large prospective cohort study of women in Zimbabwe and Uganda, of which the primary objective was to evaluate the relation between hormonal contraception and HIV acquisition. Our study is the first to focus on the interrelationships between several vaginal factors that may increase women's risk of HIV acquisition and to include a marker of mucosal inflammation.
The study was conducted between November 1999 and January 2004. Women were recruited from family planning and general health care services at 4 sites in Harare and Chitungwiza (Zimbabwe) and 3 sites in Kampala (Uganda). Participants were aged 18 to 35 years, were HIV-negative, were sexually active, were not pregnant, and had not injected drugs or had a blood transfusion in the prior 3 months. Women were ineligible if they had a hysterectomy, had used an intrauterine device, or had a spontaneous or induced abortion in the previous month. Each site attempted to enroll equal numbers of women into 3 contraceptive groups: combined oral contraceptive (COC; low-dose pills containing 30 μg of ethinylestradiol and 150 μg of levonorgestrel), depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA; 150 mg administered every 12 weeks), or no hormonal method. Women must have been using the method for at least 3 months and intending to continue use for an additional year. The study was approved by ethical review committees of collaborating institutions in the United States, Uganda, and Zimbabwe. All women provided written informed consent before participating in the study.
Study procedures have been reported elsewhere.16 Briefly, at screening, consenting women were counseled and tested for HIV, syphilis, and herpes simplex virus type 2 (HSV-2). Women returned within 15 days for their test results and possible enrollment. At enrollment, eligible women were interviewed in their local language about demographics, sexual and contraceptive behavior, and reproductive health. Questions about vaginal practices included: “In the last 3 months, did you ever use anything to dry or tighten your vagina for sex?” and “In the last 3 months, did you ever use anything to clean the inside of your vagina, for instance, when you're bathing?” If they answered positively, respondents were prompted about the types of products and liquids used and about the frequency of the practice in a typical month. Women were counseled on HIV risk reduction and contraception and received condoms and contraceptives free of charge. A standardized physical and pelvic examination was conducted, and specimens were collected to test for various RTIs. Follow-up visits were conducted every 12 weeks for 15 to 24 months. Follow-up procedures were similar to those at enrollment and included testing for HIV, HSV-2, and other RTIs; women were tested for syphilis biannually.
Vaginal infections were treated on-site, whereas women diagnosed with Chlamydia, gonorrhea, or syphilis were recalled for treatment if they had not already been treated based on symptoms. Chlamydia was usually treated with doxycycline (100 mg twice daily for 7 days), although azithromycin (1 g) was also used occasionally in Uganda; pregnant women received erythromycin (500 mg 4 times daily for 7 days). Gonorrhea was treated with intramuscular kanamycin (2 g) or norfloxacin (800 mg) in Zimbabwe and with ciprofloxacin (400 mg) in Uganda. Trichomoniasis was treated with metronidazole (2 g) in both countries. BV was also treated with metronidazole but using different doses: 400 mg 3 times daily for 7 days in Zimbabwe and 2 g once, 200 mg 3 times per day for 7 days, or 400 mg 2 times per day for 7 days in Uganda. Candidiasis was treated with a single application of clotrimazole or gynodaktarin cream per day for 3 to 7 days in Zimbabwe and with clotrimazole pessaries (100 mg for 3 to 7 days) or oral nystatin (100,000 U once or twice daily for 14 days) in Uganda.
On-site wet mount microscopy was used to diagnose yeast and trichomoniasis. Yeast was defined as yeast hyphae or buds seen on wet mount (including but not limited to Candida albicans; yeast species were not differentiated) regardless of clinical signs and symptoms. In addition, vaginal smears were air-dried and stored for Gram staining and subsequent Nugent scoring (with BV defined as a Nugent score of 7 to 10) and identification of white blood cells (WBCs) as a marker for mucosal inflammation (scored as 0, 1 to 5, or 5+ WBCs per high-power field).17 Microscopists in each country were trained and had their reading validated before large-scale reading. Batches of 25 to 100 Gram-stained slides from each country were shipped to the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) Chlamydia/Virology Research Laboratory regularly throughout the slide-reading period for external quality control; in almost all cases, discrepancies in Nugent score categories between local and UCSF microscopists remained <20% in both countries. Vaginal pH was measured by wetting a pH strip with vaginal fluid.
HIV diagnosis was based on serology using an enzyme immunoassay (EIA) with confirmation by at least 1 rapid test and a positive Western blot test. Timing of HIV infection was determined by testing stored dried blood spot samples by HIV DNA polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using Amplicor v1.5 (Roche Diagnostics, Branchburg, NJ). After serologic confirmation of infection, the previous visit specimens were tested serially until a negative HIV DNA PCR result was obtained. The HIV infection visit was defined as the earliest HIV DNA PCR-positive visit. HSV-2 serology was performed by an EIA (Focus Diagnostics, Cypress, CA). Syphilis was diagnosed by rapid plasma reagin (RPR) testing with Treponema pallidum hemagglutination test (TPHA)/Treponema pallidum particle agglutination (TPPA) assay confirmation (Serodia, Fujirebo, Tokyo, Japan). Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis were identified by Amplicor PCR (Roche Diagnostics, Branchburg, NJ).
Analyses were conducted for the 2 countries combined and for each country separately. When results are shown for the 2 countries combined, the results for each country were similar unless specifically stated otherwise. Analyses with incident HIV as the endpoint included participants with at least 1 follow-up visit with valid HIV results. Comparisons of baseline characteristics among groups were assessed using χ2 tests. Predictors of BV, yeast, and vaginal practices at baseline were determined by backward stepwise logistic regression with P > 0.05 as the significance level for removal from the model. The start date of an incident infection was defined as the date the first positive specimen was collected or the clinician observed the finding. Any persistent positive results were excluded from the model. Generalized estimating equation (GEE) models were used to model prevalence over time, and stepwise Cox proportional hazards regression analysis (with P > 0.05 as the significance level for removal from the model) was used to model incidence. Temporal relationships between BV, yeast, vaginal practices, and HIV were assessed by determining if the effect measures changed if not only infections at the same visit as the HIV seroconversion were included (current visit) but infections at the visit before that (previous visit) or a combination of visits (previous or current visit and previous and current visit). Potential confounding factors were selected a priori. All analyses were controlled for country (if multiple countries were included in model) and hormonal contraception (taking method switches during the study into account). Analyses were not controlled for treatment because of collinearity with the presence of infections.
A total of 2296 women in Zimbabwe and 2235 women in Uganda were enrolled in the study. The 24-month retention rate was 88% in Zimbabwe and 96% in Uganda. Mean follow-up was 21.9 months; median time between study visits was 81 days. The Ugandan cohort included a higher proportion of women who engaged in risk behaviors or had partners who engaged in risk behaviors (Table 1). Two thirds of women in Zimbabwe (66%) and Uganda (69%) reported vaginal practices at baseline. The most common practice was vaginal cleansing with water (63% and 68%, respectively) or with water and soap (11% and 45%, respectively), using a finger (57% and 64%, respectively) or a piece of cloth (7% and 5%, respectively). Vaginal drying or tightening was common in Zimbabwe only (12%). Women in Zimbabwe cleansed an average of once per day, and women in Uganda cleansed an average of 1.7 times per day.
HIV prevalence at screening and HIV incidence during the study were 38% and 4.1 per 100 woman-years (wy) in Zimbabwe and 16% and 1.5 per 100 wy in Uganda (see Table 1; Table 2). For HSV-2, baseline prevalence and incidence were 53% and 8.6 per 100 wy for Zimbabwe and 50% and 10.6 per 100 wy for Uganda. The prevalence of BV was high at enrollment and at all follow-up visits, ranging from 19% to 29% based on Nugent scoring for both countries combined, with only minor differences between countries (data not shown). Yeast and WBCs were also commonly seen at baseline and during follow-up (see Tables 1, 2). Nonviral STIs were found in 10% of Zimbabwean women and 8% of Ugandan women at baseline; incidence rates for individual nonviral STIs are shown in Table 2.
In this study, strong negative associations were found between BV and yeast, and positive associations were found between yeast and WBCs (Table 3). BV was not consistently associated with WBCs. BV was associated with a high vaginal pH, and yeast was associated with a low vaginal pH. At baseline, WBCs were also positively associated with clinician-observed vaginal inflammation (odds ratio [OR] = 1.99, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.25 to 3.18), with clinician-observed mucopurulent cervicitis (OR = 2.87, 95% CI: 1.15 to 7.15), and with trichomonads on wet mount (OR = 2.03, 95% CI: 1.43 to 2.89) and were negatively associated with the presence of any asymptomatic vaginal or cervical infection (OR = 0.60, 95% CI: 0.41 to 0.87), defined as having N. gonorrhoeae, C. trachomatis, Trichomonas vaginalis, BV and/or yeast but not reporting any genital symptoms.
In univariate Cox models using data from both countries, vaginal practices (any practice in the past 3 months) were associated with a decreased incidence of yeast (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.93, 95% CI: 0.84 to 1.02) and WBCs (HR = 0.93, 95% CI: 0.88 to 0.98), but they were not associated with BV. Vaginal drying or tightening (in the past 3 months) was associated with increased incidence of BV (HR = 1.19, 95% CI: 1.07 to 1.32) and yeast (HR = 1.44, 95% CI: 1.28 to 1.63) and decreased incidence of WBCs (HR = 0.81, 95% CI: 0.74 to 0.88). None of these associations persisted in the multivariate models, however.
In multivariate GEE and Cox models using data from both countries, other statistically significant predictors for BV included lack of hormonal contraception (COC and DMPA use were negatively associated with BV prevalence and incidence), older age, younger age at first sex, current breast-feeding, lack of condom use, any STI history, the woman's own risk behavior, and the primary partner's risk behavior (data not shown). Predictors for yeast included lack of hormonal contraception, higher parity, currently pregnant, currently breast-feeding, lack of condom use, and any STI history (data not shown).
BV was independently associated with HIV incidence (HR = 1.67, 95% CI: 1.24 to 2.26; Table 4). When the Gram stain Nugent score was considered categorically, scores of 7 to 10 (BV) and 4 to 6 (intermediate flora) compared with a score of 0 to 3 were significantly associated with HIV acquisition (HR = 2.29, 95% CI: 1.61 to 3.27 and HR = 2.16, 95% CI: 1.48 to 3.16, respectively). Vaginal yeast was associated with HIV acquisition in Zimbabwe (HR = 1.68, 95% CI: 1.07 to 2.66) but not in Uganda. Vaginal pH was associated with HIV incidence in univariate models (HR = 1.65, 95% CI: 1.30 to 2.10) but dropped out of the multivariate model, probably because of its strong associations with BV and yeast. Neither WBCs on Gram stain nor vaginal practices were associated with HIV acquisition. Vaginal drying and/or tightening was significantly associated with HIV acquisition in the univariate model (HR = 1.49, 95% CI: 1.03 to 2.15), however. In addition to these predictors of interest, the HIV incidence model in Table 4 includes several other risk factors for HIV incidence as described in the table and footnotes. HSV-2 and nonviral STIs were the strongest independent risk factors for HIV incidence. Trichomoniasis (diagnosed by wet mount) was included in the composite nonviral STI variable but was not entered in the model as a separate covariate because it was not associated with HIV incidence in this study.
We also considered the association between BV and HIV among some important subgroups. For example, among women who also had vaginal yeast, the multivariate HR for BV was 2.18 (95% CI: 0.95 to 5.00), whereas among women without vaginal yeast, the multivariate HR for BV was 1.70 (95% CI: 1.23 to 2.34). For women with vaginal yeast only (and not BV), the multivariate HR was 1.50 (95% CI: 0.92 to 2.45). The association between BV and HIV did not change according to contraceptive use group (P value for interaction = 0.64).
A temporal relation between BV and HIV incidence and between vaginal yeast and HIV incidence was found (Table 5). Both associations were stronger when the condition was present at the same visit as the new HIV infection and the visit preceding it. This temporal relation was especially noteworthy for vaginal yeast.
In this study, BV and vaginal yeast were independently associated with HIV acquisition; vaginal cleansing, vaginal pH, and the presence of WBCs were not. Vaginal practices were associated with altered vaginal flora in univariate but not multivariate models and were not associated with the presence of WBCs.
The finding that women with BV or yeast are more likely to acquire HIV is in agreement with 4 other studies that investigated the temporal relation between BV and HIV and between yeast and HIV, prospectively,7-9,18 and 2 nested case-control studies comparing women who seroconverted with those who did not.19,20 Our results are more likely generalizable, however, because the other studies comprised special population groups (antenatal/postnatal women in Malawi, sex workers attending an STI clinic in Kenya, discordant couples in Zambia, and women aged 35 to 65 years participating in a cervical cancer screening program) or had high loss to follow-up.
A strong negative association between BV and yeast was found. This has been found in other studies as well.21 BV, yeast, and vaginal pH were each associated with HIV incidence in univariate models, but vaginal pH dropped out of the final multivariate model, probably because of its strong associations with BV and yeast. These data suggest that the vaginal environment represents a continuum with normal flora (dominated by lactobacilli) and a normal vaginal pH (ranging from 3.8 to 4.5) as the ideal state and BV (accompanied by high vaginal pH) and yeast (low vaginal pH) as 2 separate unhealthy conditions that do not often overlap. Each of these unhealthy conditions may increase women's risk of HIV acquisition.
The relation between altered vaginal flora and HIV did not seem to be mediated by mucosal inflammation as defined by the presence of WBCs. Although yeast was associated with the presence of WBCs (as opposed to BV, which was not), WBCs were not associated with HIV acquisition. No other potentially relevant inflammatory markers, such as proinflammatory cytokines, were assessed in this study. It is therefore possible that inflammatory processes and/or immune activation plays a role, because the presence of WBCs on Gram stain is only a crude measure of mucosal inflammation. Recent evidence suggests that BV indeed induces various cytokines, and yeasts are known to cause immune activation.14,15 It is also possible that BV and yeast lead to changes in epithelial integrity and/or permeability, including changes that are not visible to the naked eye during pelvic examinations. Both of these hypotheses need to be investigated further.
In our study, vaginal practices (cleansing as well as drying and tightening combined) were not associated with HIV incidence. Some evidence for vaginal drying and tightening practices increasing the risk of HIV acquisition was found, however. This effect disappeared in multivariate models, possibly because only 12% of women in Zimbabwe and hardly any women in Uganda reported engaging in these practices. Two other longitudinal studies have investigated the relation between vaginal practices and HIV. McClelland and colleagues12 found an increased risk of HIV acquisition for vaginal washing among 1270 Kenyan female sex workers participating in a 10-year open cohort study (adjusted HR for washing with water alone = 2.64, 95% CI: 1.00 to 6.97 and adjusted HR for washing with water and soap = 3.84, 95% CI: 1.51 to 9.77). In contrast, Meyer and colleagues13 found no association between vaginal practices and incident HIV (HR = 1.04, 95% CI: 0.65 to 1.68) among 3570 women aged 35 to 65 years participating in a cervical cancer screening trial in Cape Town, South Africa. Our results are in agreement with those from the Cape Town study but not with those from the Mombasa study. In a previous communication in response to the Mombasa study report, we hypothesized that several important differences between the study cohorts might explain the difference in findings.22 The Kenyan sex workers were exposed to HIV at a higher level (incidence was 7.7 per 100 person-years as opposed to 2.8 per 100 person-years in our study), almost universally engaged in vaginal washing with most using soaps (as opposed to a substantial number of women in our study using nothing or just water), and cleansed an average of 3 times per day (as opposed to 1 to 1.7 times per day in Zimbabwe and Uganda).23
Vaginal practices were associated with altered vaginal flora in univariate models but not in multivariate models. The published literature is by no means conclusive about the association between vaginal practices and altered vaginal flora in sub-Saharan Africa, but studies from Europe and the United States consistently show associations between douching and BV.6 It seems likely that the relationships between less abrasive practices (eg, washing with water) and more abrasive practices (eg, douching/use of antiseptic solutions, household or laundry soaps, use of traditional drying/tightening substances) and vaginal flora are substantially different and that the frequency of the practices could also play an important role. Some evidence for this was found in our data, with vaginal drying and tightening practices consistently showing stronger associations with altered vaginal flora than vaginal cleansing practices. Taken together, the data suggest that future studies or interventions related to vaginal practices should take the diversity of practices into account.
A few limitations of our study should be noted. Although we adjusted our analyses for several underlying risk behaviors of the woman herself and her main partner, residual confounding cannot be ruled out because we did not have complete risk-taking and exposure information for entire sexual networks and data on risk behaviors are not always reliable. Two thirds of the women in this study used hormonal contraception as determined by the study design, which is higher than in the general population. Yeast was diagnosed by wet mount microscopy and not by culture. Visible yeast on microscopy is likely to represent symptomatic candidiasis, however, whereas a positive culture also represents asymptomatic colonization.15 Furthermore, external quality control was done on Gram stain microscopy but not on wet mount microscopy. This may explain why the relation between yeast and HIV was stronger in Zimbabwe than in Uganda (Gram stains and wet mounts were read by the same quality-controlled microscopists in Zimbabwe but not in Uganda) and why trichomoniasis was not associated with HIV incidence in this analysis. Subsequent PCR testing on a subset of specimens revealed that wet mount diagnosis of trichomoniasis was not sensitive.24 Residual confounding by trichomoniasis of the relation between BV, yeast, and HIV may therefore have been present.
Given the high prevalence of BV and yeast in many countries with generalized HIV epidemics (eg, 29.2% and 14.7%, respectively, in Zimbabwe at baseline), a modest increase in the relative risk of HIV transmission could lead to a substantial attributable risk of HIV infection. Controlling BV and yeast should therefore be a public health priority in these countries. Studies have shown that treatment of vaginal infections leads to a reduction of genital shedding of HIV.25 Nevertheless, the sole experimental study to treat BV for HIV prevention found that mass treatment with a single dose of metronidazole led to a modest reduction in community-based BV prevalence in the intervention arm but had no effect on HIV incidence.26 Targeted screening for BV may not be feasible because of lack of clarity about who should be screened and technical, logistic, and financial constraints.27 Furthermore, clinical management results for BV are often poor, which could be attributable to the fact that early recurrences after treatment are common, the drug of choice (clindamycin) is often not available in developing countries, and the less expensive alternative (metronidazole) is often not prescribed when pregnancy is suspected.27 Interventions aimed at controlling BV and yeast, although posing challenges, could be an important HIV prevention strategy, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa, where most HIV infections among women occur.
The authors thank the microscopists in Zimbabwe and Uganda: Travor Nyamurera, Molly Ziki, Morgan Gapara, Oliver Machamire, Monalisa Jangano, Jabulani Mushanyu, Erasmus Mhizha, Adolf Bhunu, John Bosco Odipio, and Joel Emuto. They also thank Barbra Richardson, the late Joanne Luoto, Anne Rinaldi, Carol Antone, Susan Brandzel, the late Francis Mmiro, Roy Mugerwa, Courtney Walker, Sandra Rwambuya, Henry Bakka, Megan Dunbar, Joelle Brown, Angela Muchini, Magda Mwale, Prisca Nyamapfeni, and all other members of the Hormonal Contraception and the Risk of HIV Acquisition (HC-HIV) study team. Last but not least, the authors thank the study participants.
1. UNAIDS. Report on the Global AIDS Epidemic, 2006
. Geneva, Switzerland: UNAIDS; 2006.
2. Gray RH, Wawer MJ, Brookmeyer R, et al, and the Rakai Project Team. Probability of HIV-1 transmission per coital act in monogamous, heterosexual HIV-1 discordant couples in Rakai, Uganda. Lancet
3. Fleming DT, Wasserheit JN. From epidemiological synergy to public health policy and practice: the contribution of other sexually transmitted diseases to sexual transmission of HIV infection. Sex Transm Infect
4. Freeman EE, Weiss HA, Glynn GR, et al. Herpes simplex type 2 infection increases HIV acquisition in men and women: systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. AIDS
5. McClelland RS, Sangaré L, Hassan WM, et al. Infection with Trichomonas vaginalis
increases the risk of HIV-1 acquisition. J Infect Dis
6. Myer L, Kuhn L, Stein ZA, et al. Intravaginal practices, bacterial vaginosis, and women's susceptibility to HIV infection: epidemiological evidence and biological mechanisms. Lancet Infect Dis
7. Kapiga SH, Lyamuya EF, Lwihula GK, et al. The incidence of HIV infection among women using family planning methods in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. AIDS
8. Taha TE, Hoover DR, Dallabetta GA, et al. Bacterial vaginosis and disturbances of vaginal flora: association with increased acquisition of HIV. AIDS
9. Martin HL, Richardson BA, Nyange PM, et al. Vaginal lactobacilli, microbial flora, and risk of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 and sexually transmitted disease acquisition. J Infect Dis
10. van de Wijgert J, Mason P, Gwanzura L, et al. The effect of intravaginal practices on the vaginal flora of Zimbabwean women. J Infect Dis
11. Braunstein S, van de Wijgert J. Preferences and practices related to vaginal lubrication: implications for microbicide acceptability and clinical testing. J Womens Health
12. McClelland RS, Lavreys L, Hassan WM, et al. Vaginal washing and increased risk of HIV-1 acquisition among African women: a 10-year prospective study. AIDS
13. Meyer L, Denny L, de Souza M, et al. Distinguishing the temporal association between women's intravaginal practices and risk of human immunodeficiency virus infection: a prospective study of South African women. Am J Epidemiol
14. Schwebke JR, Weiss HL. Interrelationships of bacterial vaginosis and cervical inflammation. Sex Transm Dis
15. Morse SA, Ballard RC, Holmes KK, et al. Atlas of Sexually Transmitted Diseases and AIDS
. 3rd ed. Mosby; St. Louis, MO, 2003.
16. Morrison CS, Richardson BA, Mmiro F, et al, for the Hormonal Contraception and the Risk of HIV Acquisition (HC-HIV) Study Group. Hormonal contraception and the risk of HIV acquisition. AIDS
17. Nugent RP, Krohn MA, Hillier SL. Reliability of diagnosing bacterial vaginosis is improved by a standardized method of Gram stain interpretation. J Clin Microbiol
18. Martin HL, Nyange PM, Richardson BA, et al. Hormonal contraception, sexually transmitted diseases, and risk of heterosexual transmission of human immunodeficiency virus type 1. J Infect Dis
19. Hester RA, Kennedy SB. Candida infection as a risk factor for HIV transmission. J Womens Health
20. Myer L, Denny L, Telerant R, et al. Bacterial vaginosis and susceptibility to HIV infection in South African women: a nested case-control study. J Infect Dis
21. Moodley P, Connolly C, Sturm WA. Interrelationships among human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection, bacterial vaginosis, trichomoniasis, and the presence of yeasts. J Infect Dis
22. van de Wijgert J, Morrison C, Salata R, et al. Is vaginal washing associated with increased risk of HIV-1 acquisition? AIDS
23. McClelland RS, Ndinya-Achola JO, Baeten JM. Reply to: “Is vaginal washing associated with increased risk of HIV-1 acquisition?” AIDS
24. Van Der Pol B, Kwok C, Pierre-Louis B, et al. Trichomonas vaginalis
is a risk factor for HIV acquisition in African women. J Infect Dis
25. Wang CC, McClelland RS, Reilly M, et al. The effect of treatment of vaginal infections on shedding of human immunodeficiency virus type 1. J Infect Dis
26. Wawer MJ, Sewankambo NK, Serwadda D, et al. Control of sexually transmitted diseases for AIDS prevention in Uganda: a randomised community trial. Lancet
27. Mayaud P. Tackling bacterial vaginosis in developing countries. Lancet
Africa; bacterial vaginosis; candidiasis; heterosexual transmission; HIV-1; vaginal practices
© 2008 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.
What does "Remember me" mean?
By checking this box, you'll stay logged in until you logout. You'll get easier access to your articles, collections,
media, and all your other content, even if you close your browser or shut down your
To protect your most sensitive data and activities (like changing your password),
we'll ask you to re-enter your password when you access these services.
What if I'm on a computer that I share with others?
If you're using a public computer or you share this computer with others, we recommend
that you uncheck the "Remember me" box.
Highlight selected keywords in the article text.
Data is temporarily unavailable. Please try again soon.