This study found that in the 2006 sample of NSP Survey respondents, older heroin users were not preferentially recruited relative to younger methamphetamine users. NSP clients who reported their last drug injected as methamphetamine were, in fact, more likely to complete the Survey at first NSP visit during Survey week than were heroin injectors. NSP clients who last injected methadone/buprenorphine/buprenorphine-nalaxone combination were most likely to participate in the Survey at first visit, followed by those who last injected morphine. Cocaine injectors were the least likely of all NSP clients to participate. Although these results cannot preclude the possibility that heroin users were preferentially recruited to the Survey in previous years, these data clearly indicate that this was not the case in 2006.
Although some NSP sites may have increased their efforts to recruit younger nonopiate users in 2006, this possibility is not consistent with findings that IDUs aged 35 years or older were more likely than their younger counterparts to participate. It is, of course, important that older IDUs are not overrepresented in surveillance research, because duration of injecting, which is highly correlated with chronologic age,10,27,28 is strongly associated with HCV seropositivity.29-32 Thus, HCV prevalence could be overestimated if older IDUs are preferentially recruited. Higher background prevalence may be associated with a “ceiling” effect, leading to difficulty in detecting trends over time in prevalence estimates. Conversely, a range of research, including prospective cohort studies of HCV incidence, suggest that new initiates to injecting may be particularly vulnerable to HCV infection and that the risk of seroconversion declines with age and duration of injecting.33-38
Compared with men, women were more likely to participate in the 2006 survey. This pattern was documented in the original NSP Survey implementation research8 and is likely to have been the case throughout the existence of the Survey. Research in other areas has also indicated that women are more likely to comply with requests to participate in health-related research,39 a pattern that may be explained by the generally more relational, expressive, and communal nature of women than men40 and the demands of conventional gender roles, in which women are perceived as more compliant and responsive to the needs of others than are men (compare articles by Crawford and Unger41 and Deutsch42). The potential that women may be preferentially recruited into surveillance studies suggests that recruitment strategies to target men, and stratification of main outcomes by gender in future analyses, may usefully be considered.
This study failed to support the hypothesis that the Australian NSP Survey continually accesses an ageing cohort of repeat participants who unduly influence the results. The proportion of repeat participants has remained relatively low and stable during the past 5 years, at approximately 20% of all Survey respondents. Although the median age of Australian NSP Survey participants has increased annually since 2002, the findings presented here indicate that this has occurred across all Australian NSP Survey participants rather than being confined to repeat participants, suggesting that the average age of NSP clients may have also increased over this period. This is consistent with other research, which has identified an increase in the median age of regular heroin users and a possible reduction in initiation to heroin injecting.43 It has been suggested that younger less entrenched heroin users may have dropped out of the heroin market altogether after Australia's 2001 heroin shortage.26 Indeed, since the heroin shortage, the size of the overall population of IDUs in Australia is estimated to have decreased.44,45
Increased use of drugs by means of noninjecting routes of administration (eg, smoking of crystalline methamphetamine46) may further explain this increase in the average age of Australian IDUs, which has also been detected by the Illicit Drug Reporting System (IDRS), Australia's strategic early warning system.47,48 This annual survey has also observed an increase in the average age of samples of IDUs recruited from a range of sites across Australia, from 30.1 years in 2002 to 34.1 years in 2005.49 Indeed, recent comparisons demonstrate striking similarities between the 2006 NSP Survey (N = 1961) and IDRS (N = 914) samples,50 with equivalent mean ages (34.8 vs. 34.5 years); proportions of men (65% vs. 64%), heterosexuals (82% vs. 86%), Indigenous Australians (10% vs. 13%), and participants with a history of incarceration (48% vs. 51%); daily or more frequent injection (47% vs. 46%); and an injecting career of 3 or more years (91% vs. 98%). Similar to the present study, Judd et al6 observed increasing median age among participants recruited for their serial cross-sectional point prevalence HIV surveys from community-based and treatment settings in Greater London but argued this was unlikely to be attributable to an ageing cohort because they observed a similar trend among opiate injectors presenting to treatment services in North London during the same period.
A limitation of this study, and the NSP Survey itself, is the lack of information that is collected from NSP clients who decline to participate, particularly in terms of their risk behaviors. Although the Survey is designed to place as few demands as possible on respondents, who are not reimbursed for their participation, it does involve providing a capillary blood sample and answering a series of questions relating to illicit and socially stigmatized activities; only approximately one third to one half of clients who attend NSPs during Survey week agree to participate.11 Nonetheless, the addition to Response Sheets (which collect information on all clients during Survey week, including nonrespondents) in 2006 of “drug last injected” was a significant improvement on the procedure in previous years, allowing a better delineation of population parameters and, consequently, a greater capacity to address issues around sample representativeness.
Notwithstanding some (inevitable) bias, large and broad cross-sectional samples of IDUs are recruited each year through this system. Our results thus indicate that, at least in the context of relatively widespread, legal, publicly funded NSPs, such as exist in the United Kingdom, Europe, and, more recently, Canada, such sites can facilitate indispensable surveillance. As demonstrated by our data and elsewhere,6 ageing cohorts need not be interpreted as artifacts of specific methodologies; serial cross-sectional studies can, in fact, detect such phenomena. This study also illustrates the need to consider the issue of gender closely in surveillance with IDUs. Although women are understood to be oversampled in health studies in general, the disproportion of women among IDUs adds to the complexity of assessing the representation of women in research with this population.
These results demonstrate that the concern regarding the Australian NSP Survey preferentially recruiting heroin injectors relative to methamphetamine injectors was not warranted, at least in 2006, when, in fact, methamphetamine injectors were more likely than heroin injectors to complete the Survey. The results also indicate that most participants in the Survey are new to the survey each year and that repeat participants are unlikely to exert an undue influence on the Survey's results. The annual increase in age of NSP Survey participants is not attributable to the increasing age of repeat participants but likely reflects the increasing age of the broader NSP population and, when considered in the light of data drawn from other illicit drug surveillance systems, probably the population of IDUs as a whole. Our findings suggest that inferences derived from the results of these Surveys can reasonably be applied to the population of NSP clients, although because older female pharmaceutic injectors may be overrepresented among NSP Survey participants, recruitment strategies to target specific subpopulations (younger men) and stratification of main outcomes by age and gender in future analyses may usefully be considered. Nonetheless, although the extent to which NSP Survey results can be generalized to Australia's population of IDUs as a whole cannot be ascertained, given the “partially hidden” nature of illicit drug injectors,3 we conceive of the NSP Survey samples in the same manner in which Hope et al4 described their samples of IDUs recruited from drug treatment and nontreatment community settings: a “sample (that) is likely to be as representative a sample of injectors as it is practical to obtain.”
1. Teutsch SM, Churchill RE. Principles and Practices of Public Health Surveillance
. New York: Oxford University Press; 1994.
2. Schwartländer B, Ghys PD, Pisani E, et al. HIV surveillance in hard-to-reach populations. AIDS
. 2001;15(Suppl 3):S1-S3.
3. Des Jarlais DC, Dehne K, Casabona J. HIV surveillance among injecting drug users. AIDS
. 2001;15(Suppl 3):S13-S22.
4. Hope VD, Judd A, Hickman M, et al. HIV prevalence among injecting drug users in England and Wales 1990 to 2003: evidence for increased transmission in recent years. AIDS
5. van Ameijden EJC, Coutinho RA. Maximum impact of HIV prevention measures targeted at injecting drug users. AIDS
6. Judd A, Hunter GM, Maconochie N, et al. HIV prevalence and risk behaviour among female injecting drug users in London, 1990 to 1996. AIDS
7. Des Jarlais DC, Friedman SR, Sotheran JL, et al. Continuity and change within an HIV epidemic: injecting drug users in New York City, 1984 through 1992. JAMA
8. MacDonald M. Monitoring HIV and HCV infection among injecting drug users: the Australian approach [doctoral thesis]. Sydney, Australia: Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales; 2001.
9. MacDonald M, Wodak AD, Ali R, et al on behalf of the Collaboration of Australian Needle Exchanges. HIV prevalence and risk behaviour in needle exchange attenders: a national study. Med J Aust
10. MacDonald M, Wodak AD, Dolan KA, et al, for the Collaboration of Australian NSPs. Hepatitis C virus antibody prevalence among injecting drug users at selected needle and syringe programs in Australia, 1995-1997. Med J Aust
11. National Centre in HIV Epidemiology and Clinical Research. Australian NSP Survey National Data Report 2002-2006
. Sydney, Australia: National Centre in HIV Epidemiology and Clinical Research, University of New South Wales; 2007.
12. Aitken CK, Kerger M, Crofts N. Peer-delivered hepatitis C testing and counselling: a means of improving the health of injecting drug users. Drug Alcohol Rev
13. Day CA, Ross J, Dietze P, et al. Initiation to heroin injecting among heroin users in Sydney, Australia. Harm Reduct J
14. Day C, Conroy E, Lowe J, et al. Patterns of drug use and associated harms among rural injecting drug users: comparisons with metropolitan injecting drug users. Aust J Rural Health
15. Day C, Dolan K. Correlates of hepatitis C testing among heroin users in Sydney. Health Promot J Austr
16. Dore GJ, Thomas DL. Management and treatment of injection drug users with hepatitis C (HCV) infection and HCV/human immunodeficiency virus coinfection. Semin Liver Dis
17. Thein H-H, Denoe M, van Beek I, et al. Injecting behaviour of injecting drug users at needle and syringe programmes and pharmacies in Australia. Int J Drug Policy
18. Lilienfeld AM, Lilienfeld DE. Foundations of Epidemiology
. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 1980.
19. Bruneau J, Lamothe F, Franco E, et al. High rate of HIV infection among injection drug users participating in needle exchange programs in Montreal: results of a cohort study. Am J Epidemiol
20. Hagan H, McGough JP, Thiede H, et al. Volunteer bias in nonrandomized evaluations of the efficacy of needle-exchange programs. J Urban Health
21. Schechter MT, Strathdee SA, Cornelisse PGA, et al. Do needle exchange programmes increase the spread of HIV among injection drug users? An investigation of the Vancouver outbreak. AIDS
22. Cao W, Treloar C. Comparison of needle and syringe programme clients and non-clients from a high drug-using area in Sydney, New South Wales. Drug Alcohol Rev
23. Bryant J, Treloar C. Risk practices and other characteristics of injecting drug users who obtain injecting equipment from pharmacies and personal networks. Int J Drug Policy
24. Health Outcomes International Pty Ltd, in association with the National Centre in HIV Epidemiology and Clinical Research and Drummond M. Return on Investment in Needle and Syringe Programs in Australia Report
. Canberra, Australia: Commonwealth Department of Health and Ageing; 2002.
25. Topp L, Day C, Degenhardt L. Changes in patterns of drug injection concurrent with a sustained reduction in the availability of heroin in Australia. Drug Alcohol Depend
26. Degenhardt L, Day C, Conroy E, et al. Age differentials in the impacts of reduced heroin: effects of a “heroin shortage” in NSW, Australia. Drug Alcohol Depend
27. Samuel MC, Doherty PM, Bulterys M, et al. Association between heroin use, needle sharing and tattoos received in prison with hepatitis B and C positivity among street-recruited injecting drug users in New Mexico, USA. Epidemiol Infect
28. Thorpe LE, Ouellet LJ, Levy JR, et al. Hepatitis C virus infection: prevalence, risk factors, and prevention opportunities among young injection drug users in Chicago, 1997-1999. J Infect Dis
29. Cook PA, McVeigh J, Syed Q, et al. Predictors of hepatitis B and C infection in injecting drug users both in and out of drug treatment. Addiction
30. Crofts N, Jolley D, Kaldor JM, et al. Epidemiology of hepatitis C virus infection among injecting drug users in Australia. J Epidemiol Community Health
31. Judd A, Hutchison S, Wadd S, et al. Prevalence of, and risk factors for, hepatitis C virus infection among recent initiates to injecting in London and Glasgow: cross sectional analysis. J Viral Hepat
32. Maher L, Chant K, Jalaludin B, et al. Risk behaviours and antibody hepatitis B and C prevalence among injecting drug users in south-western Sydney, Australia. J Gastroenterol Hepatol
33. Garfein RS, Vlahov D, Galai N, et al. Viral infections in short-term injection drug users: the prevalence of hepatitis C, hepatitis B, human immunodeficiency, and human T-lymphotropic viruses. Am J Public Health
34. Hagan H, Thiede H, Des Jarlais DC. Hepatitis C virus infection among injection drug users: survival analysis of time to seroconversion. Epidemiol
35. Hahn JA, Page-Shafer K, Lum P, et al. Hepatitis C virus seroconversion among young injection drug users: relationships and risks. J Infect Dis
36. Judd A, Hickman M, Jones S, et al. Incidence of hepatitis C virus and HIV among new injecting drug users in London: prospective cohort study. BMJ
37. Maher L, Jalaludin B, Chant KG, et al. Incidence and risk factors for hepatitis C seroconversion in injecting drug users in Australia. Addiction
38. Maher L, Li J, Jalaludin B, et al. High hepatitis C incidence in new injecting drug users: a policy failure? Aust N Z J Public Health
39. Jacobsen BK, Thelle DS. The Tromso Heart Study: responders and non-responders to a health questionnaire, do they differ? Scand J Soc Med
40. Prince-Gibson E, Schwartz SH. Value priorities and gender. Soc Psychol Q
41. Crawford M, Unger R. Women and Gender: a Feminist Psychology
. 3rd ed. Boston: McGraw-Hill; 2000.
42. Deutsch FM. Undoing gender. Gend Soc
43. Day C, Degenhardt L, Hall W. Changes in the initiation of heroin use after a reduction in heroin supply. Drug Alcohol Rev
44. Razali K, Thein H-H, Bell J, et al. Modelling the hepatitis C epidemic in Australia. Drug Alcohol Depend
45. Day C, Degenhardt L, Gilmour C, et al. Effects of reduction in heroin supply on injecting drug use: analysis of data from needle and syringe programmes. BMJ
46. McKetin R, Kelly E, McLaren J. The relationship between crystalline methamphetamine use and methamphetamine dependence. Drug Alcohol Depend
47. Hando J, Darke S, O'Brien S, et al. The development of an early warning system to detect trends in illicit drug use in Australia: the Illicit Drug Reporting System. Addict Res
48. Topp L, McKetin R. Supporting evidence-based policy-making: a case study of the IDRS. Bull Narc
49. Stafford J, Degenhardt L, Black E, et al. Australian Drug Trends 2005: Findings of the Illicit Drug Reporting System
. NDARC Monograph No. 59. Sydney, Australia: National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre; 2006.
50. Fetherston J, Topp L, Black E, et al. Blood Borne Virus Surveillance Among Sentinel Samples of Injecting Drug Users
. IDRS Drug Trends Bulletin, December 2007. Sydney, Australia: National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, University of New South Wales. Available at: http://ndarc.med.unsw.edu.au/NDARCWeb.nsf/page/IDRS%20Bulletins
. Accessed December 21, 2007.
51. Guydish J, Bucardo J, Young M, et al. Evaluating needle exchange: are there negative effects? AIDS
52. van Ameijden EJC, Coutinho RA. Large declines in injecting drug use in Amsterdam, 1986-1998: explanatory mechanisms and determinants of injecting transitions. J Epidemiol Community Health
53. Applied Economics Pty Ltd. Economic Evaluation of Hepatitis C in Australia
. Report prepared for the Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing. Sydney, Australia: Applied Economics Pty Ltd; 2005.
54. Day C, Degenhardt L, Gilmour S, et al. The impact of changes to heroin supply on blood-borne virus notifications and injecting related harms in New South Wales, Australia. BMC Public Health
Collaboration of Australian Needle and Syringe Programs: Directions Australian Capital Territory (ACT); AIDS Council of NSW (Sydney and Hunter); Albury Base Hospital and Albury Community Health Center, Albury; First Step Program, Port Kembla; Health ConneXions, Harm Reduction Program, Liverpool; Hunter NSP Services, Royal Newcastle Hospital, Newcastle; Indo-Chinese Outreach Network (ICON), Bankstown, Cabramatta, and Liverpool; Kirketon Road Center and K2, Kings Cross; NSW Users and AIDS Association (NUAA), Surry Hills; Northern Rivers Area Health Service, Ballina, Byron Bay, Lismore, Murwillumbah, Nimbin, and Tweed Heads; Resource and Education Program for IDUs, Redfern and Canterbury; Responsive User Services in Health (RUSH), Manly, Ryde, and St. Leonard's; St. George NSP, Kogarah; Southcourt Primary Care NSP, Nepean; Sydney Sexual Health Center, Sydney; Sydney West Area Health Service HIV/Hepatitis C Prevention Service, Auburn, Blacktown, Merrylands, Mt. Druitt, and Parramatta; Northern Territory AIDS Council, Alice Springs, Darwin, and Palmerston; Biala Community Alcohol and Drug Services, Brisbane; Cairns Base Hospital NSP, Cairns; Cairns Youthlink, Cairns; Logan Youth Heath Services, Logan; Mackay Sexual Health Services, Mackay; Queensland Injectors Health Network (QUIHN), Brisbane, Gold Coast, and Sunshine Coast; Kobi House, Toowoomba; West Moreton Sexual Health Service, Ipswich; Drug and Alcohol Services South Australia, Adelaide; Hindmarsh Center, Hindmarsh; Nunkuwarrin Yunti Community Health Center, Adelaide; South Australia Voice for Intravenous Education (SAVIVE); AIDS Council South Australia, Norwood; Parks Community Health Service, Adelaide; Port Adelaide Community Health Service, Port Adelaide; Noarlunga Community Health Service, Adelaide; Northern Metropolitan Community Health Service NSP and Shopfront, Salisbury; Devonport Community Health Center, Devonport; Launceston Sexual Health, Launceston; Tasmanian Council on AIDS, Hepatitis and Related Diseases (TasCAHRD), Hobart and Glenorchy; The Link Youth Health Service, Hobart; Health Works, Footscray; Melbourne Inner Needle Exchange, Collingwood; South East Alcohol and Drug Service, Dandenong; St. Kilda NSP; Southern Hepatitis/HIV/AIDS Resource and Prevention Service (SHARPS), Melbourne; WA AIDS Council Mobile Exchange, Perth; Western Australia Substance Users Association (WASUA), Northbridge and Bunbury.