Share this article on:

Selection of Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) Vaccine Escape Mutants in HBV-Infected and HBV/HIV-Coinfected Patients Failing Antiretroviral Drugs With Anti-HBV Activity

Sheldon, Julie PhD*; Ramos, Belen MD*; Garcia-Samaniego, Javier MD, PhD†; Rios, Pilar PhD*; Bartholomeusz, Angeline PhD‡; Romero, Miriam MD, PhD†; Locarnini, Stephen MD, PhD‡; Zoulim, Fabien MD, PhD§∥¶; Soriano, Vincent MD, PhD*

JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes: 1 November 2007 - Volume 46 - Issue 3 - pp 279-282
doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e318154bd89
Brief Report: Basic Science

Background: Given the overlap between envelope and polymerase in the hepatitis B virus (HBV) genome, changes in antigenic sites of the HBV surface antigen may occur as a result of selection of drug-resistance mutations.

Methods: Serum HBV-DNA was isolated from 71 patients with chronic hepatitis B receiving anti-HBV drugs for longer than 12 months, 52 of whom were HIV-positive. The reverse transcriptase/envelope gene from each HBV isolate was amplified using a nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR) covering 720 bp (aa 48 to 288), which includes all known nucleos(t)ide analogue resistance mutations in HBV.

Results: All but 13 patients had received lamivudine. Of the rest, 10 HBV-monoinfected subjects had received adefovir and 3 HBV/HIV-coinfected patients had been treated with tenofovir. Only lamivudine-resistance-associated mutations produced changes in the HBV envelope antigenic sites. Lamivudine resistance mutations were more frequent in HBV genotype A than D (P = 0.014). Contrary to monoinfected individuals, HBV genotype A was the predominant genotype among HBV/HIV-coinfected patients. The triple-HBV mutant rtV173L + rtL180M + rtM204V, which has been shown to produce a diminished hepatitis B surface (HBs) antigen-antibody binding, was found in 3 individuals, all coinfected with HIV and HBV.

Conclusion: Circulation of HBV encoding envelope mutations with diminished HBs antigen-antibody binding as result of selection of drug-resistance mutations may occur, particularly in patients infected with HBV genotype A, the most prevalent genotype among HBV/HIV-coinfected patients. Such mutations might represent a public health concern because of the potential risk of transmission of HBV drug- and vaccine-resistant strains.

From the *Department of Infectious Diseases and †Hepatology Unit, CIBEREHD, Hospital Carlos III, Madrid, Spain; ‡Victorian Infectious Diseases Reference Laboratory, North Melbourne, Australia; §INSERM U871, ∥Université de Lyon 1, and ¶Hospices Civils, Hôtel Dieu, Service d'Hépatologie et Gastroentérologie, Lyon, France.

Received for publication April 20, 2007; accepted July 17, 2007.

Supported in part by grants from Fundación Investigación y Educación en SIDA (IES), Agencia Lain Entralgo, Red de Investigación en SIDA (RIS, ISCIII-RETIC RD06), the Spanish CIBER on Hepatitis, and the VIRGIL European Network of Excellence on Antiviral Drug Resistance (LSHM-CT-2004-503359).

Presented as an oral abstract at the 14th Retrovirus Conference, Los Angeles, CA, February 25-28, 2007.

All authors acknowledge no conflicts of interest with this work. This manuscript has not been submitted to any other journal, and all authors have been involved and have seen and approved its current version.

Correspondence to: Vincent Soriano, MD, PhD, Department of Infectious Diseases, Hospital Carlos III, Sinesio Delgado, 10 Madrid 28029, Spain (e-mail: vsoriano@dragonet.es).

The hepatitis B virus (HBV) genome consists of 4 overlapping genes that encode a number of complex and multifunctional proteins. Long-term antiviral therapy directed towards the HBV reverse transcriptase (RT) can lead to the selection of drug-resistant mutants, which over time become the dominant species. The HBV polymerase gene overlaps the envelope genes, including the S gene, which encodes for the hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) in a frame-shifted manner. The result is that drug-resistant mutants may affect the HBsAg's antigenicity. Likewise, mutations in the surface gene selected by HBV vaccination or hepatitis B immune globulins may also produce functional alterations in the viral polymerase.

Recently it has been shown that a triple-mutational pattern causing lamivudine (3TC) resistance (rtV173L + rtL180M + rtM204V) has enhanced HBV replication compared to rtL180M + rtM204V alone.1 This triple mutant causes 2 amino acid changes in the overlapping surface gene (sE164D + sI195M), reducing its anti-HBs binding to levels seen only with the vaccine escape mutant sG145R.2-4 On the other hand, another study has recently shown that patients treated with 3TC and apparently showing clearance of HBsAg actually continued to have detectable circulating plasma HBV-DNA. Subsequent genetic analyses demonstrated that the selection of an sP120A mutation in these patients was associated with the apparent HBsAg seroconversion.5 This mutation produced a reduced anti-HBs binding, which explained the failure to detect HBsAg.

The aim of this study was to identify any possible changes in the HBsAg protein that occur spontaneously or as a consequence of antiviral therapy in a relatively large cohort of chronic HBV-monoinfected and HBV/HIV-coinfected individuals.

Back to Top | Article Outline

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Serum samples from 19 HBV-monoinfected and 52 HBV/HIV-coinfected patients treated for at least 12 months with nucleos(t)ide analogues with anti-HBV activity attending Hospital Carlos III in Madrid, Spain, were identified. Biochemical and virologic characteristics were analyzed at baseline and during therapy. Serum HBV-DNA was quantified using COBAS Taqman (Roche, Barcelona, Spain), which has a lower limit of detection of 12 IU/mL. DNA extraction was carried out using the Qiagen DNA blood kit (Qiagen, Mannheim, Germany) following manufacturer's instructions.

A 720 bp DNA fragment of the RT/envelope gene from HBV was amplified using a nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR), as previously described,6 then sequenced and analyzed for selected mutational patterns in both the RT and the overlapping envelope gene. The sequences from each isolate were compared with all known HBV genotypes (A to H) using the Megalign software (DNAStar, Madison, WI).

Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using the SPSS v13.0 software (SPSS, Chicago, IL), including as variables HBV genotype, HIV coinfection, and treatment with 3TC. Differences were considered significant when P values were <0.05.

Back to Top | Article Outline

RESULTS

Of the 19 HBV-monoinfected patients, 9 were treated with 3TC plus adefovir (ADV) and the remaining 10 with ADV alone. Of 52 HBV/HIV-coinfected patients, 40 were treated with tenofovir (TDF) plus 3TC. All of them also received either a protease inhibitor (n = 24), a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (n = 13), another nucleoside analogue (n = 2) or a combination of them (n = 12); 1 patient was additionally treated with enfuvirtide. The distribution of HBV genotypes was as follows: genotype A, 44; genotype D, 23; genotype E, 2; and others, 2. Overall, 41 (58%) patients were positive for HBV e antigen (HBeAg). Other baseline characteristics are shown in Table 1.

Back to Top | Article Outline

HBV Reverse Transcriptase Mutations

Sequences from 16 patients could be analyzed before commencing treatment. In all 16, wild-type virus was observed. 3TC resistance-associated mutations were observed in 3 of 9 3TC-treated, HBV-monoinfected individuals; all 3 patients were treated with 3TC monotherapy at the time of selection (mean treatment duration, 37 months). 3TC-resistance-associated mutations were also seen in 28 of 49 3TC- or emtricitabine (FTC)-treated HBV/HIV-coinfected patients (mean treatment duration, 35 months). Three patients in the coinfected group selected the triple mutation rtV173L + rtL180M + rtM204V. All 3 patients had been treated with 3TC for an extended time period (64, 72, and 77 months) compared to the mean (35 months). Other patterns of HBV resistance-associated mutations observed are shown in Table 2.

Of the 19 HBV-monoinfected patients treated with ADV, 2 harbored the rtN236T mutant and 5 harbored viruses with changes rtQ215S, rtI233V, and rtS213T + rtV214P, all of which have been associated occasionally with ADV resistance in HBV.7-9 Virus in 3 patients treated with TDF developed the A194T mutation,6 and in 2 of them this change appeared along with 3TC-resistance-associated mutations (Table 2), a pattern that has been demonstrated to produce TDF resistance in HBV.5

Back to Top | Article Outline

HBV Envelope Mutations

The 3 patients who harbored the triple HBV polymerase mutant rtV173L + rtL180M + rtM204V demonstrated characteristic changes in the envelope gene, such as sE164D + sI195M, which have recently been demonstrated to produce reduced anti-HBs binding.2,3

In addition, 4 patients had other envelope changes found in the “a” determinant region (aa 90 to 160). These mutations included sP120T, sM133I, and sD144E, all of which have been previously shown to represent potential vaccine or hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIg) escape mutations (Table 2), although none of our patients presented detectable surface antigen antibodies (anti-HBs) nor were they transplant patients receiving HBIg. Only 1 patient harboring the sP120T mutant selected this mutation during therapy (12 months of treatment with ADV); the remaining 3 had the mutants at baseline. In this series of patients, none were found to harbor HBV with sG145R or sP120A, which have been associated with vaccine escape mutations.5,10

Most 3TC-resistance-associated mutations produced changes in the envelope C-terminal hydrophilic region. In 3 patients, a premature stop codon was observed. In contrast, none of the mutations conferring resistance to ADV or TDF resulted in changes detrimental for the 2 antigenic loops of the envelope protein.

In a multivariate analysis, C-terminal mutations selected with 3TC treatment were significantly more frequent in HBV genotype A compared to D (28 of 39 versus 3 of 16; P = 0.001), whereas immune-selected “a” determinant vaccine escape mutants were more frequently associated with genotype D than A (4 of 23 versus 0 of 44; P = 0.011), as shown in Table 3. Finally, no association could be found between HBeAg status and RT or S gene mutations.

Back to Top | Article Outline

DISCUSSION

Vaccine/HBIg-escape mutations sP120T and sG145R, in combination with 3TC-resistance-associated mutations, are often seen in HBV-monoinfected patients following 3TC or HBIg treatment and have been shown to increase viral replication in vitro in the presence of 3TC therapy.3,11 Although in our study we did not detect sG145R, 2 patients carried HBV mutants with the sP120T change (1 in combination with rtL180M + rtM204I). A number of other HBVs with mutations associated with reduced anti-HBs binding have also been recently described, including changes sM133I and sD144E,9 which in our study population appeared more frequently in HBV-monoinfected patients with genotype D.

In contrast, 3TC-resistance-associated mutations rtV173L, rtM204V/I, and rtV207I may simultaneously alter the S gene, causing critical antigenic changes in the C terminal region of HBsAg, as a result of producing mutations sE164D, sI195M, sW196S/L/stop, and sM198I or sW199stop, respectively.10 At least 1 study has shown that an HBV mutant containing rtV173L + rtL180M + rtM204V has reduced HBs antigen-antibody binding.12 We found this same pattern of mutations in 3 of our isolates. Interestingly, this HBV drug-resistance mutation profile was detected only in HBV/HIV-coinfected patients.1

Other 3TC-resistance-associated mutations may cause premature stop codons in the S gene, resulting in impaired secretion of HBsAg.13 Three of our patients had HBV with premature stop codons in the S antigen. Genotypic analyses demonstrated that mutations in the HBV surface antigen selected by 3TC therapy developed more significantly in HBV genotype A compared to genotype D (P = 0.001). Interestingly, whereas genotype D was more prevalent among HBV-monoinfected subjects, genotype A was the predominant variant among HBV/HIV-coinfected individuals, as described in other European cohorts of coinfected patients.14

In summary, our results suggest that HBV genotyping and polymerase gene sequencing may be helpful to appropriately manage patients undergoing antiviral therapy for chronic hepatitis B. This may be particularly helpful in patients coinfected with HIV, because most of them carry HBV genotype A, which is more prone to select the lamivudine-resistant triple mutant, which may cause vaccine escape and diagnostic problems.15 The circulation of HBV encoding envelope mutations selected by antiviral agents requires further investigation to determine whether they may be transmitted and therefore represent a public health concern. This issue may be of particular relevance in populations where genotype A is predominant.

Back to Top | Article Outline

REFERENCES

1. Delaney W, Yang H, Westland C, et al. The hepatitis B virus polymerase mutation rtV173L is selected during lamivudine therapy and enhances viral replication in vitro. J Virol. 2003;77:11,833-11,841.
2. Matthews G, Bartholomeusz A, Locarnini S, et al. Characteristics of drug resistant HBV in an international collaborative study of HIV-HBV-infected individuals on extended lamivudine therapy. AIDS. 2006;20:863-870.
3. Torresi J, Earnest-Silveira L, Civitico G, et al. Restoration of replication phenotype of lamivudine-resistant hepatitis B virus mutants by compensatory changes in the “fingers” subdomain of the viral polymerase selected as a consequence of mutations in the overlapping S gene. Virology. 2002;299:88-99.
4. Villet S, Pichoud C, Villeneuve J, et al. Selection of a multiple drug-resistant hepatitis B virus strain in a liver-transplanted patient. Gastroenterology. 2006;131:1253-1261.
5. Hsu C, Yeh C, Chang M, et al. Identification of a hepatitis B virus S gene mutant in lamivudine-treated patients experiencing HBsAg seroclearance. Gastroenterology. 2007;132:543-550.
6. Sheldon J, Camino N, Rodes B, et al. Selection of hepatitis B virus polymerase mutations in HIV-coinfected patients treated with tenofovir. Antivir Ther. 2005;10:727-734.
7. Schildgen O, Sirma H, Funk A, et al. Variant of hepatitis B virus with primary resistance to adefovir. N Engl J Med. 2006;354:1807-1812.
8. Schildgen O, Schewe C, Vogel M, et al. Successful therapy of hepatitis B with tenofovir in HIV-infected patients failing previous adefovir and lamivudine treatment. AIDS. 2004;18:2325-2327.
9. Bartholomeusz A, Locarnini SA. Antiviral drug resistance: clinical consequences and molecular aspects. Semin Liver Dis. 2006;26:162-170.
10. Torresi J. The virological and clinical significance of mutations in the overlapping envelope and polymerase genes of hepatitis B virus. J Clin Virol. 2002;25:97-106.
11. Bock C, Tillmann H, Torresi J, et al. Selection of hepatitis B virus polymerase mutants with enhanced replication by lamivudine treatment after liver transplantation. Gastroenterology. 2002;122:264-273.
12. Torresi J, Earnest-Silveira L, Deliyannis G, et al. Reduced antigenicity of the hepatitis B virus HBsAg protein arising as a consequence of sequence changes in the overlapping polymerase gene that are selected by lamivudine therapy. Virology. 2002;293:305-313.
13. Sheldon J, Rodes B, Zoulim F, et al. Mutations affecting the replication capacity of the hepatitis B virus. J Viral Hepat. 2006;13:427-434.
14. Lacombe K, Massari V, Girard P, et al. Major role of hepatitis B genotypes in liver fibrosis during coinfection with HIV. AIDS. 2006;20:419-427.
15. Thio CL, Locarnini S. Treatment of HIV/HBV coinfection: clinical and virologic issues. AIDS Rev. 2007;9:40-53.
Keywords:

hepatitis B; HIV; coinfection; vaccine escape; drug resistance; lamivudine

© 2007 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.