JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes:
Effect of Persistent Moderate Viremia on Disease Progression During HIV Therapy
Raffanti, Stephen P MD*†; Fusco, Jennifer S BS‡; Sherrill, Beth H MS§; Hansen, Nellie I MPH§; Justice, Amy C MD, PhD∥¶; D’Aquila, Richard MD†; Mangialardi, Wendy J MD*†; Fusco, Gregory P MD, MPH‡
From the *Comprehensive Care Center, Nashville, TN; †Division of Infectious Diseases, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN; ‡GlaxoSmithKline, Research Triangle Park, NC; §Research Triangle Institute, Research Triangle Park, NC; ∥Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA; and ¶Veteran’s Administration Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, PA.
Received for publication January 7, 2004;
accepted June 9, 2004.
for the Collaborations in HIV Outcomes Research/United States Project
Supported by a grant from GlaxoSmithKline.
Reprints: Stephen P. Raffanti, Comprehensive Care Center, 345 24th Avenue North, Suite 103, Nashville, TN 37203 (e-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org).
Objective: Although highly active antiretroviral therapy has been shown to lower plasma HIV-1 RNA in HIV infection, many patients do not reach the target goal of undetectable viremia. We evaluated whether risk of clinical progression varies by level of viral suppression achieved.
Design: Patients in the Collaborations in HIV Outcomes Research/United States cohort who maintained stable HIV-1 RNA levels of either <400, 400 to 20,000, or >20,000 copies/mL during a run-in period of at least 6 months were studied. Baseline was the first day after this period.
Methods: Proportional hazards models were used to quantify the relation between baseline HIV-1 RNA levels and risk of a new AIDS-defining diagnosis or death after adjusting for CD4 count, age, gender, ethnicity, study site, prior AIDS-defining diagnosis, and antiretroviral therapy history.
Results: Patients (N = 3010) were followed for up to 4.3 years after the 6-month run-in period, with 343 deaths or AIDS-defining diagnoses reported. The risk of a new AIDS-defining diagnosis or death was not significantly different in the 400 to 20,000– and <400-copies/mL groups (6% vs. 7%, hazard ratio [HR] = 1.0, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.7–1.4; P = 0.9) but was significantly higher in the >20,000-copies/mL group (26%, HR = 3.3, 95% CI: 2.5–4.4; P < 0.001 vs. the <400-copies/mL group). Median CD4 count changes during the first year of follow-up showed increases of 75 and 13 cells/mm3 for the <400- and 400 to 20,000–copies/mL groups, respectively, whereas the >20,000-copies/mL group had a decrease of 23 cells/mm3.
Conclusions: Patients who maintained baseline HIV-1 RNA levels of 400 to 20,000 copies/mL for at least 6 months preserved immunologic status and were no more likely to die or develop a new AIDS-defining diagnosis in the time frame studied than those with baseline levels <400 copies/mL. Patients with HIV-1 RNA levels >20,000 copies/mL at baseline had greater clinical and immunologic deterioration. These data suggest that maintenance of moderate viremia may confer clinical benefit not seen when viremia exceeds 20,000 copies/mL, and this should be taken into account when considering the risks and benefits of continuing failing therapy.
Effective treatment of HIV infection is closely correlated with degree of viral suppression. Highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) has been shown to improve clinical outcomes in patients infected with HIV greatly, with decreased morbidity and mortality reported for successfully treated patients.1–3 Although viral replication is thought to continue at extremely low levels in many successfully treated patients, the ultimate goal of therapy is still to suppress viral replication to below detectable levels.4,5 Suppression of plasma HIV-1 RNA levels to less than 50 copies/mL has been associated with a more durable response to therapy.6–8 Unfortunately, maximal suppression is not possible in all patients, with response rates varying from 30% to 80% in treatment-experienced patients.1,2,9 Many patients show treatment-related decreases in baseline HIV-1 levels that do not reach undetectable levels.10,11 Although such a partial response to HAART may reflect the maximal suppression now possible for many patients, limited data are available concerning the clinical outcome of partial suppression of viremia as compared with achieving greater suppression with sustained plasma HIV-1 RNA levels of <400 copies/mL.
This study was designed to evaluate the clinical course of HIV-infected patients in the Collaborations in HIV Outcomes Research/United States (CHORUS) cohort who maintained detectable plasma HIV-1 RNA levels for at least 6 months and to compare the clinical outcomes in these patients with those of patients suppressed to undetectable plasma HIV-1 RNA levels (<400 copies/mL).
The CHORUS project is an ongoing observational database designed to follow longitudinal clinical outcomes in a large cohort of HIV-infected patients. As previously described,12 the CHORUS project was established in 1996 and has enrolled more than 5700 participants at 4 community-based clinical sites in the United States (Comprehensive Care Center, Nashville, TN; Liberty Medical Group, New York, NY; Pacific Horizon Medical Group, San Francisco, CA; and Pacific Oaks Medical Group, Los Angeles, CA). Patients are enrolled as part of their routine clinical care, and treatment decisions follow the community standard of care. All data elements (demographic, clinical, and laboratory) are retrieved from an electronic medical records system and transferred via a secure connection to an independent data aggregation facility. Confidentiality is maintained by using only aggregated nonidentifiable patient data. All patients provided institutional review board–approved informed consent before enrollment into the CHORUS project. An independent advisory board consisting of physicians and researchers from the participating sites, members of the HIV community, academic experts, and sponsor representatives oversees the CHORUS project and all data analyses.
Patients were eligible for study if their plasma HIV-1 RNA level remained in the same virologic category as determined by at least 2 consecutive HIV-1 RNA polymerase chain reaction (PCR) measurements taken over a minimum period of 6 months. During this run-in period, eligible patients had to have at least 1 CD4 cell count and no new AIDS-defining illnesses. Patients were assigned to 1 of 3 groups based on their plasma HIV-1 RNA levels: <400, 400 to 20,000, and >20,000 copies/mL. If a subject had more than 1 period of sustained plasma HIV-1 RNA level, the latest period was used for analysis. Baseline was defined as the first day after the end of 6 months in the sustained plasma HIV-1 RNA level period, and this was also the beginning of the follow-up period for monitoring clinical and laboratory outcomes. All HIV-1 RNA PCR values were obtained between August 1996 and July 2001 and were transformed to the log10 scale for analysis. All HIV-1 RNA PCR values reported as undetectable or <400 copies/mL were set to 399 copies/mL for analysis. Laboratory determinations and diagnosis of new AIDS-defining conditions were performed as part of routine clinical care according to the discretion of the HIV care providers. All follow-up laboratory tests were included without regard to the number of tests per patient. Laboratory determinations were performed at licensed commercial laboratories.
Demographic and baseline characteristics as well as changes in CD4 count and HIV-1 RNA level from baseline to last follow-up and number of antiretroviral regimen changes during follow-up were compared across the virologic groups. Comparisons were made between the 400 to 20,000–copies/mL and <400-copies/mL groups and between the >20,000-copies/mL and <400-copies/mL groups only, with statistical significance determined by the Fisher exact test or χ2 tests for categoric variables and by Wilcoxon tests for continuous variables.
The primary outcome was death or development of a new AIDS-defining diagnosis during the follow-up period. Unadjusted comparisons of this outcome across the virologic groups were made using χ2 tests. Adjusted comparisons were made using proportional hazards regression models, which included continuous variables for age and CD4 count and indicators for gender, ethnicity (white/other), study site, AIDS diagnosis before baseline, antiretroviral therapy (ART) before baseline, baseline protease inhibitor (PI) use, nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) use, nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) use, virologic category, and terms for the interaction of CD4 count with virologic category. Hazard ratios (HRs) were generated to compare virologic groups at varying levels of baseline CD4 cell count. First, the model was run with patients followed in their baseline virologic category regardless of later changes. Second, the model was rerun with the data censored when a patient changed virologic category. Sensitivity analyses were conducted using different cut-off points for plasma HIV-1 RNA levels as follows: (1) <400, 400 to 5000, and >5000 copies/mL, (2) <400, 400 to 10,000, and >10,000 copies/mL, and (3) <400, 400 to 5000, 5000 to 20,000, 20,000 to 50,000, and >50,000 copies/mL. Analyses were completed using SAS, version 8.2.
As of July 5, 2001, data were available for 5574 patients. Of these, 3010 met entry criteria and were included in the analysis. Compared with the rest of the CHORUS population, patients in the analysis cohort had lower CD4 counts and higher plasma HIV-1 RNA levels at study consent as well as significantly greater exposure to ART (data not shown). Table 1 shows baseline (day 1 after the 6-month run-in period) characteristics for the 3 virologic groups. In the >20,000-copies/mL category, half the patients had a baseline viral load >82,000 (median log10 RNA = 4.9). Compared with those in the <400-copies/mL group, patients in the >20,000-copies/mL category were more likely to be nonwhite, have a lower CD4 count, and have a prior diagnosis of AIDS. Patients in the middle and high virologic groups had significantly less prior exposure to NRTIs and PIs but greater prior exposure to NNRTIs.
Frequency of Clinical Events
Patients were followed up to 4.3 years, with a median of 3 years in the <400-copies/mL group (N = 1299) and approximately 2 years in the 400 to 20,000–copies/mL group (N = 989) and the >20,000-copies/mL group (N = 722; Table 2). Overall, 343 patients were diagnosed with new AIDS-defining conditions or died. The incidence of events was similar in the 400 to 20,000– and <400-copies/mL groups (6% vs. 7%; P = 0.5) but was significantly higher in the >20,000-copies/mL group (26%; P = 0.001 compared with the <400-copies/mL group).
A detailed review of deaths was performed using a methodology developed and currently employed by the CHORUS project.13 Deaths occurred in 2% of patients in the <400- and 400 to 20,000–copies/mL groups (P = 0.8 compared with the <400-copies/mL group) groups and in 9% of the >20,000-copies/mL group (P < 0.001 compared with the <400-copies/mL group). Comorbid (non-AIDS) conditions were determined to be the immediate cause for 77% of deaths in the <400-copies/mL group and 83% of deaths in the 400 to 20,000–copies/mL group. Comorbid conditions were the immediate cause for only 44% of deaths among patients in the >20,000-copies/mL group, whereas 56% of deaths were attributed to AIDS-defining diagnoses.
After adjusting for demographic variables, prior AIDS diagnosis, prior ART use, study site, baseline CD4 cell count, and baseline ART use, no statistically significant difference in the risk of events was detected between patients in the 400 to 20,000– and <400-copies/mL groups (overall HR = 1.0, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.7–1.4; P = 0.9). There was no indication of any significant difference in this relation for patients with varying baseline CD4 counts (Table 3). In contrast, compared with patients in the <400-copies/mL group, those in the >20,000-copies/mL group were at increased risk of a new AIDS-defining diagnosis or death (overall HR = 3.3, 95% CI: 2.5–4.4; P < 0.001). This risk varied depending on baseline CD4 count, with estimated HRs ranging from 1.7 to 5.6 for patients with baseline counts of ≤500 cells/mm3. No significant difference was detected for patients with baseline CD4 cell counts ≥600 cells/mm3.
The analysis was repeated using follow-up information only, with patients remaining in their original virologic category. Follow-up time was reduced to between 8 and 11 months in each virologic group, and 144 events occurred. Again, no significant difference was detected in the risk of a new AIDS-defining diagnosis or death for patients in the 400 to 20,000–copies/mL group compared with those in the <400-copies/mL group (P = 0.1). A significant difference remained between the >20,000- and <400-copies/mL groups depending on baseline CD4 count. Patients with HIV-1 RNA levels of >20,000 copies/mL and baseline CD4 counts of 300 cells/mm3 or less were significantly more likely to have an event, but no difference was found for those with higher baseline CD4 counts (data not shown).
Changes in CD4/HIV-1 RNA Levels, Treatment Regimens, and Virologic Categories
The number of antiretroviral regimen changes, defined as a change in any single drug, was comparable in the <400- and 400 to 20,000–copies/mL groups but higher in the >20,000-copies/mL group (see Table 2). A significantly higher percentage of patients in the >20,000-copies/mL group discontinued ART for 3 or more months during follow-up. Median CD4 counts increased 21% between baseline and last follow-up in the <400-copies/mL and 3% in the 400 to 20,000–copies/mL groups and decreased (−13%) in the >20,000-copies/mL group. Median log10 HIV-1 RNA levels showed no change in the <400-copies/mL group, increased slightly in the <400 to 20,000–copies/mL group, and decreased slightly in the >20,000-copies/mL group. During the first year of follow-up, median CD4 counts increased by 75 and 13 cells/mm3 in the <400- and 400 to 20,000–groups and decreased by 23 cells/mm3 in the >20,000-copies/mL group. During this same period, median log10 HIV-1 RNA level showed no change in the <400-copies/mL group, increased 0.06 in the 400 to 20,000–copies/mL group, and decreased 0.06 in the 20,000-copies/mL group.
During the follow-up period, some patients had a change in viral categories (Table 4). In all 3 viral groups, most patients remained in their baseline viral categories. A small percentage of patients in the <400-copies/mL group showed an increase in viremia, whereas some patients in the >20,000-copies/mL group became aviremic. In the 400 to 20,000–copies/mL group, an equal percentage of patients improved or showed deterioration in their viremic status.
Sensitivity analyses were performed using 3 alternative HIV-1 RNA level stratifications (Table 5). Compared with patients in the <400-copies/mL group, those in the highest virologic groups were consistently at significantly higher risk for a new AIDS-defining diagnosis or death. The increased risk associated with a baseline HIV-1 RNA of >50,000 copies/mL (HR = 3.7, 95% CI: 2.7–5.1) but not with 20,000 to 50,000 copies/mL (HR = 1.6, 95% CI: 0.8–3.0) suggests that clinical progression is most likely with high-level virologic failure.
Since effective therapy for HIV became available in the late 1990s, various studies have linked successful clinical outcomes with virologic and immunologic markers. Cohort studies have demonstrated a marked decrease in morbidity and mortality in patients receiving effective therapy,3,14,15 and initial clinical trials have reported virologic response rates of 70% to 90% in treatment-naive patients receiving HAART.2,16,17 In subsequent studies, virologic response was correlated with baseline HIV-1 RNA levels, baseline CD4 cell counts, prior treatment status, and individual components of treatment regimens.18–23 As experience with new antiretroviral agents accumulates, however, it has become apparent that the target goal of undetectable viremia is not always possible.10,24 Heavily treatment-experienced patients have rates of attaining undetectable levels of HIV-1 RNA that are much lower than those reported for treatment-naive patients.25–27 Even cohorts of treatment-naive patients show significant rates of virologic failure.11 Patient tolerability and adherence, development of drug-resistant strains, and long-term toxicities have all become key issues in the determination of the best treatment option and may limit the number of effective drug regimens for an individual patient.28–36
The present study demonstrates that patients who maintained an HIV-1 RNA plasma level between 400 and 20,000 copies/mL over a 6-month baseline period had no significantly higher risk for clinical disease progression over a 3-year period than patients with an HIV-1 RNA level <400 copies/mL during the baseline period. Patients with baseline HIV-1 RNA plasma levels exceeding 20,000 copies/mL had a significantly increased risk for disease progression at baseline CD4 cell counts of 500 cells/mm3 or less. CD4 cell counts increased between baseline and last follow-up in the <400-copies/mL group and to a lesser extent in the 400 to 20,000–copies/mL group but decreased among patients with >20,000 copies/mL at baseline.
Few data are available on the clinical outcomes of patients who maintain detectable virus. Plasma viremia was first associated with survival in untreated patients, with a significantly decreased 10-year survival in patients whose baseline viremia was in the highest quartile.18 Subsequently, levels of plasma viremia became accepted as surrogate markers for therapeutic response, and the goal of ART became an undetectable level of plasma HIV in treated patients. More recent studies have examined surrogate markers and disease progression in patients who are either failing or discontinuing therapy. Ledergerber and colleagues10 compared disease progression in patients who initiated HAART and never achieved undetectable viremia, patients who achieved undetectable levels, and patients who had viral rebound after achieving undetectable plasma viremia. An increased risk of clinical progression was found only in patients who had never reached undetectable levels, although the risk of clinical progression was less than that previously reported for patients receiving mono- and dual-drug therapy. In another study,37 a similar cohort was analyzed to evaluate the association of prior nadir CD4 count with disease progression. Patients with baseline CD4 cell counts less than 50 cells/mm3 had an increased risk of clinical progression, as did patients with higher CD4 cell counts, who had substantially lower nadir CD4 counts. Stratification by viral load was not performed. A short-term study38 examined the clinical outcomes of patients initiating HAART based on their 6-month virologic and immunologic responses. Patients not responding virologically and immunologically and those patients with only a virologic response had significantly higher risk for clinical progression compared with complete responders. Immunologic response in the absence of virologic response was not associated with an increased risk for clinical progression.
Deeks and colleagues39 have examined the immunologic course of patients who have developed detectable plasma viremia after initiating HAART. Sustained elevations in CD4 counts were reported in patients who failed to achieve and maintain an undetectable plasma viral load while receiving PI-based therapy. An analysis of extended follow-up data40 showed that CD4 cell counts do decrease in patients failing therapy but only after an extended period. The median time to return to pretherapy CD4 cell counts was 3 years in failing patients, which is in good agreement with the preservation of immunologic status reported in the 400 to 20,000–HIV-1 RNA copies/mL group described in the current study. Several other more recent reports41–46 have linked disease progression with baseline CD4 cell count and viral load, latest cell CD4 count, age, injection drug use, previous diagnosis of AIDS, hemoglobin level, body mass index, adherence with prophylactic medications, and intensity of treatment.
This large observational study demonstrates the utility of efforts directed at controlling HIV-1 plasma viremia in patients who may not attain undetectable levels. Despite the complex issues and factors involved in determining virologic response in patient populations, experienced HIV providers at 4 large outpatient treatment centers were able to delay disease progression in patients who, for whatever reason, could not achieve or maintain maximal viral suppression. Immunologic response was closely tied to clinical failure in the most highly viremic patients but not among patients who maintained HIV-1 RNA levels below 20,000 copies/mL. Analysis of causes of death confirmed what has been suggested by other mortality studies: patients on effective antiretroviral regimens are more likely to die of non–AIDS-related causes than patients who are not receiving suppressive therapy. Again, a difference was seen only in patients who had high levels of persistent viremia, who were more likely to die of AIDS-related than non–AIDS-related causes.
Although this study was not limited to only patients receiving ART, most patients did receive treatment during the study period. The observation that nonmaximal suppressive therapy resulted in a clinically and immunologically stable disease state similar to maximal suppressive therapy over a 2- to 3-year period highlights 2 important issues to consider. First, the effect seen in this study could be a result of reduced virulence caused by altered replicative capacity or viral fitness. The fact that standard-of-care treatment practices resulted in stable disease in all but the most highly viremic patients suggests that maintaining selective pressure results in decreased viral fitness, immunologic stability, and increased survival. Second, the immunologically and clinically stable disease state in the 2 groups that maintained a plasma HIV-1 RNA level below 20,000 copies/mL suggests that the definition of failure may need to be reconsidered to include the immune status and a stepwise consideration of the plasma HIV-1 RNA level. When the 400 to 20,000–copies/mL group was compared with the <400-copies/mL group, there was a trend but no statistically significant difference between the groups at all CD4 strata. When this same comparison was made between the >20,000- and <400-copies/mL groups, however, a statistically significant difference was seen at CD4 strata of 500 cells/mm3 and below, with a 70% increase in risk of clinical events observed at 500 cells/mm3. The stratification of viral load and CD4 count seems to identify patients at the highest risk for disease progression accurately.
Strengths of this study include the large number of patients per exposure arm, the number of events, and a 2- to 3-year follow-up period. The success of current management of HIV patients may mean that more follow-up is needed to identify long-term consequences of persistent viremia, however, and the CHORUS project will be able to update these findings. Patients with persistent viremia who are maintained on ART may accumulate mutations associated with antiretroviral drug resistance, thereby limiting future treatment options. Plasma HIV-1 RNA levels and CD4 cell counts before the start of the baseline period were not included in this analysis. The change from pretreatment plasma HIV-1 RNA levels may be a significant predictor of time to immunologic and, subsequently, clinical progression.40 Because patients were not randomized to different arms, selection bias may have occurred, with more complicated and effective regimens given to patients perceived as more likely to be adherent. Patients with extremely high levels of viremia could have been identified as less than ideal candidates for treatment and received less effective therapies. Nevertheless, we found that patients with the highest levels of baseline viremia were treated with a greater number of antiretroviral regimens when compared with patients in the other 2 categories. Known differences between the groups that could have influenced progression rates, including baseline CD4 count and antiretroviral exposure, were taken into account in the analysis. As with all observational studies, however, the possibility remains that unknown and uncontrolled factors influenced the results. Finally, the public health impact of patients with persistently elevated levels of plasma HIV-1 was not evaluated. Such patients may represent a population at increased risk of transmission compared with patients maintaining undetectable viremia.
This study provides important information that can be used when a patient and a clinician are attempting to determine the best strategic course of treatment of HIV. Although persistent viremia may promote the development of clinically significant resistance mutations,36,47–49 a treatment regimen that only provides partial virologic suppression may still offer immunologic and clinical benefits. The decision about when to switch drug regimens may thus vary depending on immunologic status, prior treatment experience, and remaining drug options. This study did not examine whether drug-resistant virus with decreased replication capacity contributed to the findings. Further study of this issue as well as when to switch therapy in treatment-experienced patients is needed.
The authors acknowledge the contributions of Shehnaz Gangjee for manuscript preparation, Rukmini Balu and Laura Wesolowski for proofreading, and, most importantly, the CHORUS project patients and caregivers for sharing their medical information.
Collaborations in HIV Outcomes Research/United States Sites
Comprehensive Care Center, Nashville, TN: Stephen Raffanti, MD, Wendy Mangialardi, MD, and Asghar Kheshti
Liberty Medical Group, New York, NY: Douglas Dieterich, MD, James Braun, DO, and Debbie Goldman
Pacific Horizon Medical Group, San Francisco, CA: Stephen Becker, MD, Lawrence Goldyn, MD, and Michael Ballesteros
Pacific Oaks Medical Group, Beverly Hills, CA: Anthony Scarsella, MD, and John Burdick
1. Hammer SM, Squires KE, Hughes MD, et al. A controlled trial of two nucleoside analogues plus indinavir in persons with human immunodeficiency virus infection and CD4 cell counts of 200 per cubic millimeter or less. N Engl J Med. 1997;337:725–753.
2. Gulick RM, Mellors JW, Havlir D, et al. Treatment with indinavir, zidovudine, and lamivudine in adults with human immunodeficiency virus infection and prior antiretroviral therapy. N Engl J Med. 1997;337:734–739.
3. Palella FJ Jr, Delaney KM, Moorman AC, et al. Declining morbidity and mortality among patients with advanced human immunodeficiency virus infection. N Engl J Med. 1998;338:853–860.
4. Panel on Clinical Practices for Treatment of HIV Infection. Guidelines for the use of antiretroviral agents in HIV-infected adults and adolescents. National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, Department of Health and Human Services; 2002. Available at: http://www.hivatis.org.
5. Carpenter CCJ, Cooper DA, Fischl MA, et al. Antiretroviral therapy in adults: updated recommendations of the International AIDS Society-USA Panel. JAMA. 2000;283:381–390.
6. Raboud JM, Montaner JS, Conway B, et al. Suppression of plasma viral load below 20 copies/mL is needed to achieve long-term virologic suppression. AIDS. 1998;12:1619–1624.
7. Powderly WG, Saag MS, Chapman S, et al. Predictors of optimal virological response to potent antiretroviral therapy. AIDS. 1999;13:1873–1880.
8. Kempf DJ, Rode RA, Xu Y, et al. The duration of viral suppression during protease inhibitor therapy for HIV-1 infection is predicted by plasma HIV-1 RNA at the nadir. AIDS. 1998;12:F9–F14.
9. Bartlett JA, DeMasi R, Quinn J, et al. Overview of the effectiveness of triple combination therapy in antiretroviral-naïve HIV-1 infected adults. AIDS. 2001;15:1369–1377.
10. Ledergerber B, Egger M, Opravil M, et al. Clinical progression and virological failure on highly active antiretroviral therapy in HIV-1 patients: a prospective cohort study. Lancet. 1999;353:863–868.
11. Deeks SG, Hecht FM, Swanson M, et al. HIV RNA and CD4 cell count response to protease inhibitor therapy in an urban AIDS clinic: response to both initial and salvage therapy. AIDS. 1999;13(Suppl):F35–F43.
12. Becker SL, Raffanti SR, Hansen NI, et al. Zidovudine and stavudine sequencing in HIV treatment planning: findings from the CHORUS HIV cohort. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2001;26:72–81.
13. Fusco GP, Justice AC, Becker SL, et al. Strategies for obtaining consistent diagnoses for cause of death in an HIV observational cohort study. Presented at the XIV International AIDS Conference, Barcelona, July 7–12, 2002.
14. Hogg RS, Heath KV, Yip B, et al. Improved survival among HIV-infected individuals following initiation of antiretroviral therapy. JAMA. 1998;279:450–454.
15. Moore RD, Chaisson RE. Natural history of HIV infection in the era of combination antiretroviral therapy. AIDS. 1999;13:1933–1942.
16. Markowitz M, Cao Y, Hurley A, et al. Triple therapy with AZT, 3TC in combination with nelfinavir mesylate in 12 antiretroviral naïve subjects chronically infected with HIV. In: Program and Abstracts of the XI International Conferences on AIDS. Vancouver; 1996.
17. Mathez D, Bagnarelli P, Gorin I, et al. Reductions in viral load and increases in T-lymphocytes in treatment naïve patients with advanced HIV infection, treated with ritonavir, zidovudine, and zalcitabine therapy. Antivir Ther. 1997;2:175–183.
18. Mellors JW, Munoz A, Giorgi JV, et al. Plasma viral load and CD4+ lymphocytes as prognostic markers of HIV-1 infection. Ann Intern Med. 1997;126:946–954.
19. Katzenstein DA, Hammer SM, Hughes MD, et al. The relation of virologic and immunologic markers to clinical outcomes after nucleoside therapy in HIV-infected adults with 200 to 500 CD4 cells per cubic milliliter. N Engl J Med. 1996;335:1091–1098.
20. O’Brien WA, Hartigan PM, Daar ES, et al. Changes in plasma HIV RNA levels and CD4+ lymphocyte counts predict both response to antiretroviral therapy and therapeutic failure. Ann Intern Med. 1997;126:939–945.
21. Rhone SA, Hogg RS, Yip B, et al. Do dual nucleoside regimens have a role in an era of plasma viral load-driven antiretroviral therapy? J Infect Dis. 1998;178:662–668.
22. Hammer SM, Katzenstein DA, Collier AC, et al. A trial comparing nucleoside monotherapy with combination therapy in HIV-infected adults with CD4 cell counts from 200–500 per cubic millimeter. N Engl J Med. 1996;335:1081–1090.
23. Saravolatz LD, Winslow DL, Collins G, et al. Zidovudine alone or in combination with didanosine or zalcitabine in HIV-infected patients with the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome or fewer than 200 CD4 cells per cubic millimeter. N Engl J Med. 1996;335:1099–1106.
24. Lucas G, Chaisson RE, Moore RD. Highly active antiretroviral therapy in a large urban clinic: risk factors for virologic failure and adverse drug reactions. Ann Intern Med. 1999;131:81–87.
25. Girard PM, Guiguet M, Bollens D, et al. Long-term outcome and treatment modifications in a prospective cohort of human immunodeficiency virus type 1-infected patients on triple-drug antiretroviral regimens. Triest Cohort Investigators. Clin Infect Dis. 2000;31:987–994.
26. Wit FW. Dutch HIV-treating physicians. Experience with nevirapine in previously treated HIV-1-infected individuals. Antivir Ther. 2000;5:257–266.
27. Yamashita TE, Phair JP, Munoz A, et al. Immunologic and virologic response to highly active antiretroviral therapy in the Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study. AIDS. 2001;15:735–746.
28. Bangsberg DR, Hecht FM, Charlebois ED, et al. Adherence to protease inhibitors, HIV-1 viral load, and development of drug resistance in an indigent population. AIDS. 2000;14:357–366.
29. Paterson DL, Swindells S, Mohr J, et al. Adherence to protease inhibitor therapy and outcomes in patients with HIV infection. Ann Intern Med. 2000;133:21–30.
30. Chesney MA, Morin M, Sherr L. Adherence to HIV combination therapy. Soc Sci Med. 2000;50:1599–1605.
31. Carr A, Samaras K, Burton S, et al. A syndrome of peripheral lipodystrophy, hyperlipidemia and insulin resistance in patients receiving HIV protease inhibitors. AIDS. 1998;12(Suppl):F51–F58.
32. Saint-Marc T, Partisani M, Poizot-Martin I, et al. A syndrome of peripheral fat wasting (lipodystrophy) in patients receiving long-term nucleoside analogue therapy. AIDS. 1999;13:1659–1667.
33. Miller KD, Cameron M, Wood LV, et al. Lactic acidosis and hepatic steatosis associated with use of stavudine: report of four cases. Ann Intern Med. 2000;133:192–196.
34. Carr A, Cooper DA. Adverse effects of antiretroviral therapy. Lancet. 2000;356:1423–1430.
35. Montaner JSG, Harrigan PR, Jahnke N, et al. Multiple drug rescue therapy for HIV-infected individuals with prior virologic failure to multiple regimens. AIDS. 2001;15:61–69.
36. Parkin NT, Deeks SG, Wrin MT, et al. Loss of antiretroviral drug susceptibility at low viral load during early virological failure in treatment-experienced patients. AIDS. 2000;14:2877–2887.
37. Miller V, Mocroft A, Reiss P, et al. Relations among CD4 lymphocyte count nadir, antiretroviral therapy and HIV-1 disease progression: results from the EuroSIDA Study. Ann Intern Med. 1999;130:570–577.
38. Grabar S, Le Moing V, Goujard C, et al. Clinical outcome of patients with HIV-1 infection according to immunologic and virologic response after 6 months of highly active antiretroviral therapy. Ann Intern Med. 2000;133:401–411.
39. Deeks SG, Barbour JD, Martin JN, et al. Sustained CD4+ T cell response after virologic failure of protease inhibitor-based regimens in patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection. J Infect Dis. 2000;181:946–953.
40. Deeks SG, Barbour JD, Grant RM, et al. Duration and predictors of CD4 T-cell gains in patients who continue combination therapy despite detectable plasma viremia. AIDS. 2002;16:201–207.
41. Deeks SG. Determinants of virological response to antiretroviral therapy: implications for long-term strategies. Clin Infect Dis. 2000;30(Suppl 2):S177–S184.
42. Miller V, Phillips AN, Clotet B, et al. Association of virus load, CD4 cell count, and treatment with clinical progression in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients with very low CD4 cell counts. J Infect Dis. 2002;186:189–197.
43. Sterling TR, Chaisson RE, Moore RD. HIV-1 RNA, CD4 T-lymphocytes, and clinical response to highly active antiretroviral therapy. AIDS. 2001;15:2251–2257.
44. Cohn SE, Kamman E, Williams P, et al. Association of adherence to mycobacterium avium complex prophylaxis and antiretroviral therapy with clinical outcomes in acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. Clin Infect Dis. 2002;34:1129–1136.
45. Babiker AG, Peto T, Porter K, et al. Age as a determinant of survival in HIV infection. J Clin Epidemiol. 2001;54(Suppl 1):S16–S21.
46. Malvy E, Thiebaut R, Marimoutou C, et al. Groupe d’Epidemiologie Clinique du Sida en Aquitaine: weight loss and body mass index as predictors of HIV disease progression to AIDS in adults. Aquitaine cohort, France, 1985–1997. J Am Coll Nutr. 2001;20:609–615.
47. Condra JH, Schleif WA, Blahy OM, et al. In vivo emergence of HIV-1 variants resistant to multiple protease inhibitors. Nature. 1995;374:569–571.
48. Condra JH, Holder DJ, Schleif WA, et al. Genetic correlates of in vivo viral resistance to indinavir, a human immunodeficiency virus type 1 protease inhibitor. J Virol. 1996;70:8270–8276.
49. Shafer RW, Winters MA, Palmer S, et al. Multiple concurrent reverse transcriptase and protease mutations and multidrug resistance of HIV-1 isolates from heavily treated patients. Ann Intern Med. 1998;128:906–911.
This article has been cited 32 time(s).
AIDS Research and Human RetrovirusesRisk Factors for Short-Term Virologic Outcomes Among HIV-Infected Patients Undergoing Regimen Switch of Combination Antiretroviral TherapyAIDS Research and Human Retroviruses
Antiviral TherapyClinical significance of transient HIV type-1 viraemia and treatment interruptions during suppressive antiretroviral treatmentAntiviral Therapy
Structured treatment interruption in HIV-infected patients failing on multidrug therapy: is there a future for this strategy?
British Medical Journal
Highly active antiretroviral therapy
British Medical Journal, 330():
A comparison of three highly active antiretroviral treatment strategies consisting of non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, protease inhibitors, or both in the presence of nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors as initial therapy (CPCRA 058 FIRST Study): a long-term randomised trial
Current Hiv Research
Lability of antiretroviral drug resistance mutations - Correlates with immunological and virological responses
Current Hiv Research, 5(4):
Evolutionary ApplicationsWhy is HIV not vector-borne?Evolutionary Applications
Hiv Clinical Trials
Bacterial infections in adult HIV-Infected patients
Hiv Clinical Trials, 6(4):
Therapeutic strategies in HIV infection
Medicina Clinica, 124():
Journal of Medical VirologyImpact of drug resistance genotypes on CD4+counts and plasma viremia in heavily antiretroviral-experienced HIV-infected patientsJournal of Medical Virology
Hiv Clinical TrialsPredictors of AIDS-defining events among advanced naive patients after HAARTHiv Clinical Trials
Hiv Clinical Trials
Salvage therapy with ritonavir-boosted amprenavir/fosamprenavir: Virological and immunological response in two years follow-up
Hiv Clinical Trials, 6(2):
A randomized study of antiviral medication switch at lower- versus higher-switch thresholds: AIDS Clinical Trials Group Study A5115
Antiviral Therapy, 12(4):
AIDS Patient Care and StdsPotential for new antiretrovirals to address unmet needs in the management of HIV-1 infectionAIDS Patient Care and Stds
Journal of Infectious Diseases
Absolute count and percentage of CD4(+) lymphocytes are independent predictors of disease progression in HIV-infected persons initiating highly active antiretroviral therapy
Journal of Infectious Diseases, 195(3):
Predictors of clinical progression among HIV-1-positive patients starting HAART with CD4+ T-cell counts >= 200 cells/mm(3)
Antiviral Therapy, 12(6):
Hiv MedicineHistory of viral suppression on combination antiretroviral therapy as a predictor of virological failure after a treatment change*Hiv Medicine
Journal of Translational MedicineViral load responses to HAART is an independent predictor of a new AIDS event in late stage HIV infected patients: prospective cohort studyJournal of Translational Medicine
Clinical Infectious Diseases
Effect of maintaining highly active antiretroviral therapy on AIDS events among patients with late-stage HIV infection and inadequate response to therapy
Clinical Infectious Diseases, 42(6):
Journal of Infectious Diseases
HIV-1 load quantitation: A 17-year perspective
Journal of Infectious Diseases, 194():
British HIV Association (BHIVA) guidelines for the treatment of HIV-infected adults with antiretroviral therapy (2006)
Hiv Medicine, 7(8):
Response to Waters et al 'Successful use of genotypic resistance testing in HIV-1-infected individuals with detectable viraemia between 50 and 1000 copies/ml'
Hiv MedicineBritish HIV Association guidelines for the treatment of HIV-1-infected adults with antiretroviral therapy 2008Hiv Medicine
AIDS Research and Human RetrovirusesDelaying a Treatment Switch in Antiretroviral-Treated HIV Type 1-Infected Patients with Detectable Drug-Resistant Viremia Does Not Have a Profound Effect on Immune Parameters: AIDS Clinical Trials Group Study A5115AIDS Research and Human Retroviruses
Clinical Infectious DiseasesLong-term immunologic and virologic responses in patients with highly resistant HIV infection who are treated with an incompletely suppressive Antiretroviral regimenClinical Infectious Diseases
JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency SyndromesEvolution of HIV Resistance Mutations in Patients Maintained on a Stable Treatment Regimen After Virologic FailureJAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes
JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency SyndromesSurvival of HIV-1 Infected Multidrug-Resistant Patients Recycling Enfuvirtide After a Previous FailureJAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes
Collaborations in HIV Outcomes Research/United States; HIV disease progression; HIV viremia; plasma HIV-1 RNA
© 2004 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.
Highlight selected keywords in the article text.