Institutional members access full text with Ovid®

Origins of the physician assistant movement in the United States

Cawley, James F. MPH, PA‐C; Cawthon, Elisabeth PhD; Hooker, Roderick S. PhD, MBA, PA

Journal of the American Academy of Physician Assistants: December 2012 - Volume 25 - Issue 12 - p 36–40, 42
Special Article

The 1960s saw a rethinking of health care delivery in the United States. The physician assistant (PA) emerged from that reconceptualization, along with the nurse midwife (CNM) and the nurse practitioner (NP). The PA, CNM, and NP were the product of demand for greater health care access, especially for the nation's poorer citizens. All three groups benefited from federal activism in health workforce policy. The PA had one characteristic not shared with the new nursing professionals: a connection in the public's mind with returning Vietnam War veterans.

Several energetic trailblazersnotably eugene Stead, Richard Smith, E. Harvey Estes, and Henry Silver‐conceived and promoted their particular versions of the PA. The boosters of this new health professions movement worked through existing medical education programs and federal health care initiatives. Their efforts, sometimes informed by models of nonphysician health care abroad, received critical support from private philanthropy. Then, in 1969, the American medical Association (AMA) rather unexpectedly gave its official approval to the concept of the PA.

As optimistic as the originators of the PA movement were, even they did not anticipate the critical role PAs would play in health care delivery well into the new century. US physician assistants also continue to influence medical providers in other areas of the world.

This paper re‐examines the history of the physician assistant movement at the 50th anniversary of the concept. The authors use archival sources, policy analyses, interviews with principal figures, and secondary historical literature to explain the establishment of the PA movement in the 1960s and analyze its continuing influence.

James Cawley is a professor in the department of Prevention and community Health, School of Public Health and Health Services; and a professor of physician assistant studies, School of medicine and Health Sciences, The George Washington University, Washington, DC. Elisabeth Cawthon is an associate professor of history at the University of Texas at Arlington. Roderick Hooker is an adjunct professor in the department of Prevention and community Health, School of Public Health and Health Services, The George Washington University. The authors read portions of this paper at the Southern Association for the History of Science and medicine in Atlanta, GA, march 2, 2012.

No relationships to disclose.

Acknowledgement: We are grateful to the Society for the Preservation of Physician Assistant History for making its valuable archives available for this project. Special thanks goes to reginald carter, ruth ballweg, Tom Pimme, Alfred Sadler, and others who provided insight, material and advice. The PA History Society is supported by NCCPA, PAEA, ARC‐PA, and AAPA: http://www.pahx.org.

© 2012 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.
You currently do not have access to this article

To access this article:

Note: If your society membership provides full-access, you may need to login on your society website