Investigative Radiology

Skip Navigation LinksHome > April 2014 - Volume 49 - Issue 4 > Intraindividual Comparison of Diagnostic Performance in Pati...
Investigative Radiology:
doi: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000014
Original Articles

Intraindividual Comparison of Diagnostic Performance in Patients With Hepatic Metastasis of Full-Dose Standard and Half-Dose Iterative Reconstructions With Dual-Source Abdominal Computed Tomography

Park, Mina MD*; Chung, Yong Eun MD, PhD*; Lee, Hye Sun MS; Choi, Jin-Young MD, PhD*; Park, Mi-Suk MD, PhD*; Kim, Myeong-Jin MD, PhD*; Kim, Ki Whang MD, PhD*

Collapse Box


Objectives: The objectives of the study were to evaluate the image quality and diagnostic performance of sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction (SAFIRE) for detecting hepatic metastasis and to estimate the potential radiation dose reduction at abdominal computed tomography (CT).

Materials and Methods: Fifty-nine consecutive patients (mean age, 59.2 years; range, 42-81 years) who had hepatic metastasis and who underwent dual-source abdominal CT were enrolled in this study. The image noise of the liver was compared between full-dose filtered back projection images (FD-FBP) and simulated half-dose images, which used only single-source projection data, and reconstructed with different strengths of SAFIRE (HD-SAFIRE1-5) by 1-way analysis of variance with Bonferroni correction. The diagnostic performance for hepatic metastasis was compared by logistic regression with the weighted least squares method and noninferiority test between the FD-FBP images and the half-dose sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction (HD-SAFIRE) images.

Results: As the SAFIRE strength increased, image noise decreased (P < 0.001). The images of HD-SAFIRE2 showed similar image noise for liver parenchyma (13.4 Hounsfield unit [HU]), signal-to-noise ratio for liver parenchyma (9.2), and lesion-to-liver contrast-to-noise ratio (4.5), compared with the FD-FBP images (12.6 HU, P = 0.668; 9.6, P > 0.999; and 4.5, P > 0.999, respectively). The diagnostic accuracy for hepatic metastasis with the HD-SAFIRE2 images (87.5%) was not different from that of the FD-FBP images (87.5%, P > 0.999). The diagnostic performance of the HD-SAFIRE2 images was also noninferior to that of the FD-FBP images (95% confidence interval lower limit difference [−9.16%] excluding the −10% clinical noninferiority limit). The mean (SD) volume CT dose index of FD-FBP was 11.26 (2.66) mGy, and the mean (SD) radiation dose equivalent associated with HD-SAFIRE was estimated to be 5.63 (1.33) mGy.

Conclusions: By applying SAFIRE2, the radiation dose could be reduced by up to 50% compared with the standard-of-care abdominal CT protocol without increasing image noise and without deteriorating diagnostic performance for the detection of hepatic metastasis.

© 2014 by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins


Article Tools


Article Level Metrics

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.