Institutional members access full text with Ovid®

Share this article on:

Placental Molar Disease: What are the Benefits and Barriers to the Adoption of a Comprehensive Diagnostic Service?

Kolomietz, Elena Ph.D.; Maire, Georges Ph.D.; Nanji, Shabin M.D.; Chang, Martin C. M.D., Ph.D.; Vlasschaert, Matthew BS.c., M.L.T.; Dodge, Jason M.D.; Colgan, Terence J. M.D.

International Journal of Gynecological Pathology: September 2015 - Volume 34 - Issue 5 - p 411–418
doi: 10.1097/PGP.0000000000000165
Pathology of the Corpus: Original Articles

The molecular cytogenetic analysis of specimens (genotyping) suspicious for hydatidiform mole (HM) significantly improves diagnostic accuracy over histopathology and immunohistochemical analysis alone, particularly in the classification of partial mole. However, the implementation of this advance in diagnostics has been slow. This study sought to identify the major benefit and potential barriers to the adoption of genotyping. A pilot Placental Molar Diagnostic (PMD) Service was established combining histopathology, p57 immunohistochemistry, and molecular genotyping analysis for both in-house and referred-in cases suspicious for HM or with a preliminary diagnosis of HM. A retrospective analysis of 117 cases received in the first 16 mo was conducted to identify the utility of the PMD Service and factors or barriers which precluded optimal results. A final diagnosis of HM was made in 73 cases (37 complete HMs and 36 partial HMs). The remaining 44 cases were hydropic abortuses. Three potential barriers were identified that could lead to less than optimal results from a PMD Service: prevalence of noninformative genotyping, lack of any available or appropriate paraffin blocks, and inappropriate deferral of genotyping. The major utility of this pilot PMD Service was to increase the specificity of a diagnosis of HM, and avoid unnecessary clinical follow-up in 37% of cases with an initial suspicion or diagnosis of HM. Measures can be undertaken to address potential barriers to the implementation of a comprehensive placental diagnostic platform. Underutilization of molecular genotyping in the diagnosis of HM likely leads to inappropriate management and “downstream” costs in a significant proportion of patients suspected of having HM.

Division of Diagnostic Medical Genetics (E.K.), Mount Sinai Hospital

Division of Diagnostic Medical Genetics (G.M.), Mount Sinai Hospital

Section of Gynecological Pathology (S.N., M.C.C.) and Division of Diagnostic Medical Genetics (M.V.), Mount Sinai Hospital

Division of Gynecologic Oncology (J.D.), Mount Sinai Hospital and University Health Network

Section of Gynecological Pathology (T.J.C.), Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada

E.K. and G.M. contributed equally.

This study received no extra-mural funding and was supported by the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital.

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Terence J. Colgan, MD, Section of Gynecological Pathology, Mount Sinai Hospital, Room 6-502, 600 University Avenue, Toronto, ON, Canada M5G 1X5. E-mail: tcolgan@mtsinai.on.ca.

©2015International Society of Gynecological Pathologists