Skip Navigation LinksHome > January 2008 - Volume 16 - Issue 1 > The Effect of Infectious Diseases Consultation on the Use of...
Infectious Diseases in Clinical Practice:
doi: 10.1097/ipc.0b013e31815a5695
Original Articles

The Effect of Infectious Diseases Consultation on the Use of Vancomycin in Patients With 2 Positive Blood Cultures for Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci

Nazeri, Alireza MD*; Fakih, Mohamad G. MD, MPH†‡

Free Access
Article Outline
Collapse Box

Author Information

*Department of Medicine, and †Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, St John Hospital and Medical Center, Grosse Pointe Woods and ‡Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI.

This study was presented at the 43rd Annual Meeting of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, October 2005 (Abstract 409).

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Mohamad G. Fakih, MD, MPH, Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, St John Hospital and Medical Center, 19251 Mack Ave, Suite 340, Grosse Pointe Woods, MI 48236. E-mail: mohamad.fakih@stjohn.org.

Collapse Box

Abstract

We evaluated the use of antibiotics for 2 positive blood cultures (BCs) growing coagulase-negative staphylococci and the effect of a mandatory infectious diseases (ID) consultation for vancomycin use on antibiotic continuation. Of 113 patients admitted through the emergency department with 2 positive BCs for coagulase-negative staphylococci, 70 (62%) had systemic inflammatory response syndrome. The same organism was identified in both BCs in 103 patients (91%). Forty-five patients had prosthetic devices, with 93% being intravascular devices. Antibiotics were started in 67 patients (59%), of them 88% received vancomycin. Infectious diseases consult was sought in 74 cases (65%). The ID consultant recommended no antibiotics or discontinuation in 36 patients (49%). Infectious diseases consult continued antibiotics in 30 patients (88%) with prosthetic device, compared with 8 (20%) without prosthetic device (P < 0.001). We conclude that ID consultation may lead to a reduction in inappropriate utilization of vancomycin in the presence of a high prevalence of BC contamination.

Coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) are frequently isolated from blood cultures (BCs) of hospitalized patients.1 They have been associated with device infections, especially intravascular catheters2; however, predicting true infection with 1 positive BC of CoNS is difficult even in the presence of an intravascular device.3 Although physicians often consider 2 sets of BCs positive for CoNS as significant, the prediction of sepsis with 2 sets of positive BC was only 37% in 1 study.4

Blood cultures are frequently obtained in the emergency room setting as part of the workup for sepsis; in addition, they have been incorporated as quality indicators in guidelines.2,5 While the most effective intervention to reduce inappropriate antibiotic utilization is reducing contamination through compliance with aseptic procedures in obtaining the BC specimens, addressing the approach to positive BCs for CoNS by the treating physician may help reduce the inappropriate utilization of vancomycin. Multiple approaches have been described to differentiate true bacteremia from contamination of BCs6-12; however, little has been reported on the effect of the infectious diseases (ID) consultant on the utilization of vancomycin for positive BCs for CoNS.

At our facility, the use of vancomycin for more than 72 hours requires ID consultation. We wanted to evaluate the effect of ID consultation on the diagnosis of bacteremia in patients with 2 positive sets of BC for CoNS and antibiotic utilization, particularly vancomycin.

Back to Top | Article Outline

METHODS

The study was performed in a 608-bed teaching hospital with 112,000 annual emergency department visits. We reviewed all BCs drawn on the patients in the emergency department of our hospital from July 2003 to July 2004. Patients admitted to the hospital with 2 sets of positive BC for CoNS (at least 1 bottle positive per set, each set representing a separate blood draw) were included for evaluation. All data were collected through retrospective record review. Data included symptoms on admission (shortness of breath, chills, fever, mental status changes), signs (respiratory rate, heart rate, blood pressure, and temperature), white blood cell count, presence of a prosthetic device, systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), use of antibiotics for the positive BC, and ID recommendation. Systemic inflammatory response syndrome was defined as the presence of 2 or more of the following: temperature greater than 38°C or less than 36°C, heart rate greater than 90 beats per minute, respiratory rate greater than 20 breaths per minute or Paco2 less than 32 mm Hg, and white blood cell count more than 12,000/μL or less than 4000/μL or with more than 10% immature neutrophils. The time to positivity of each BC and the type of organism in both BCs were also collected.

We abstracted information on whether ID consultation was obtained, the recommendation on the continuation, and discontinuation or initiating vancomycin for the positive BCs. We obtained an institutional review board exemption before starting the study (study fits under quality improvement). Data analysis was performed using SPSS, version 12.0 (SPSS Inc, Chicago, Ill). A 2-tailed Student t test was used for continuous variables, and a 2-sided Fisher exact test was used for categorical variables. A P < 0.05 for a 2-sided test was considered statistically significant.

Back to Top | Article Outline

RESULTS

Patients Characteristics

Of 12,966 patients who had a BC drawn, 831 (6.4%) had at least 1 positive BC for CoNS. One hundred thirty patients (1.0%) had 2 positive BCs from which 113 records were available for review. The mean age was 63.4 years (SD, 18.2 years); 55 (48.7%) were males. The admitting diagnosis included fever (n = 7, 6.2%), sepsis (n = 11, 9.7%), pneumonia (n = 10, 8.8%), noninfectious respiratory or cardiac disease (n = 20, 17.7%), catheter related infection (n = 4, 3.5%), and other diagnoses (n = 61, 54%). Seventy (62%) met the criteria for SIRS on admission.

Back to Top | Article Outline
Antibiotic Use

The mean time to positivity for the first and second BC were 3.49 days (SD, 3.0 days) and 3.55 days (SD, 3.0 days), respectively (not statistically significant). The same species was identified in both BCs in 103 patients (91%). Antibiotics were started on 67 patients (59%), of them 37 (55%) had prosthetic devices and 46 (65.7%) met the SIRS criteria. Vancomycin was initiated in 59 (88%) of them. Blood cultures grew the same organism in 61 (91%) and different organism in 6 patients (9%). The 2 BCs grew the same species and had the same antibiogram in 44 patients (98%) with prosthetic device compared with 59 (87%) in those with no prosthetic device (P = 0.04).

Back to Top | Article Outline
Infectious Diseases Consultation

Infectious diseases consultation was sought in 74 patients (65%). Fifty-two (70.3%) of consults were obtained within the first 48 hours of admission; the remaining 22 consultations were obtained on days 3 to 7 of admission. Of them, 63 patients had antibiotics started (vancomycin intravenously, n = 57; < 0.001). In the presence of prosthetic devices, ID continued antibiotics in 30 patients (88.2%), compared with 8 (19.8%) without a prosthetic device (P < 0.001). Finally, ID repeated BC in 20 patients (27%) compared with 1 (2.6%) of those with no ID evaluation (P = 0.001). Table 1 summarizes the use of antibiotics for 2 positive BCs and ID recommendations if consulted.

Table 1
Table 1
Image Tools
Back to Top | Article Outline

DISCUSSION

The Centers for Disease Control have issued 12 steps to prevent antimicrobial resistance among hospitalized adults.13 These include infection prevention, effective diagnosis and treatment, transmission prevention, and wise utilization of antibiotics. They also encourage consulting ID for serious infections and stress the importance of treating infection and not contamination or colonization. Moreover, the Centers for Disease Control has also issued recommendations to reduce the risk for vancomycin resistance.14 Vancomycin is discouraged in the treatment of a single BC positive for CoNS if contamination is likely. We evaluated the effect of the ID consultation on antibiotic utilization for 2 positive BCs for CoNS. Infectious diseases consultation was associated with a reduction by half of inappropriate utilization of vancomycin in the presence of a high prevalence of BC contamination. Interestingly, the presence of a prosthetic device was a strong predictor of antibiotic prescribing for 2 positive BCs and ID continuation of antibiotics. In our study, we included patients who had 2 positive BCs for CoNS; it is likely that the effect of the ID consultants is more pronounced if we extrapolate to those patients with 1 positive BC.

Antibiotic stewardship is essential to reducing inappropriate antimicrobial use and hence reducing resistance. Antibiotic restriction, before approval, and computer-assisted programs have been used to promote appropriate antibiotic utilization15,16; however, many hospitals lack any antibiotic management program.17 Optimizing the use of vancomycin through mandatory ID consultation after 72 hours of initiation is effective and may reduce unnecessary antibiotic utilization.

Back to Top | Article Outline

REFERENCES

1. National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) System Report. Data summary from January 1992 through June 2004, issued October 2004. Am J Infect Control. 2004;32:470-485.

2. Mermel LA, Farr BM, Sheretz RJ, et al. Guidelines for the management of intravascular catheter-related infections. Clin Infect Dis. 2001;32: 1249-1272.

3. Tokars JI. Predictive value of blood cultures positive for coagulase-negative staphylococci: implications for patient care and health care quality assurance. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;39:333-341.

4. Mirrett S, Weinstein MP, Reimer LG, et al. Relevance of the number of positive bottles in determining clinical significance for coagulase-negative staphylococci in blood cultures. J Clin Microbiol. 2001;39: 3279-3281.

5. Mandell LA, Bartlett JG, Dowell SF, et al. Update of practice guidelines for the management of community-acquired pneumonia in immunocompetent adults. Clin Infect Dis. 2003;37:1405-1433.

6. Krause R, Haberl R, Wolfer A, et al. Molecular typing of coagulase-negative staphylococcal blood and skin culture isolates to differentiate between bacteremia and contamination. Eur J Microbiol Infect Dis. 2003;22:760-763.

7. Khatib R, Riederer KM, Clark JA, et al. Coagulase-negative staphylococci in multiple blood cultures: strain relatedness and determinants of same-strain bacteremia. J Clin Microbiol. 1995;33:816-820.

8. Beekman SE, Diekema DJ, Voern GV. Determining the clinical significance of coagulase-negative staphylococci isolated from blood cultures. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2005;26:559-566.

9. Kim SD, McDonald C, Jarvis WR, et al. Determining the significance of coagulase-negative staphylococci isolated from blood cultures at a community hospital: a role for species and strain identification. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2000;21:213-217.

10. Sharma M, Riederer K, Johnson LB, et al. Molecular analysis of coagulase-negative staphylococcus isolates from blood cultures: prevalence of genotypic variation and polyclonal bacteremia. Clin Infect Dis. 2001;33:1317-1323.

11. Seo SK, Venkataraman L, DeGirolami PC, et al. Molecular typing of coagulase-negative staphylococci from blood cultures does not correlate with clinical criteria for true bacteremia. Am J Med. 2000;109:697-704.

12. Garcia P, Benitez R, Lam M, et al. Coagulase-negative staphylococci: clinical, microbiological, and molecular features to predict true bacteremia. J Med Microbiol. 2004;53:67-72.

13. Centers for Disease Control. Fact sheet: 12 steps to prevent antimicrobial resistance among hospitalized adults. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/drugresistance/healthcare/ha/12steps_HA.htm. Accessed May 14, 2007.

14. Centers for Disease Control. Recommendations for preventing the spread of vancomycin resistance: recommendations of the hospital infection control practices advisory committee (HICPAC). MMWR. 1995;44(RR-12):1-13.

15. Fishman N. Antimicrobial stewardship. Am J Infect Control. 2006;34:S55-S63.

16. Carling P, Fung T, Killion A, et al. Favorable impact of multidisciplinary antibiotic management program conducted during 7 years. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2003;24:699-706.

17. Barlam TF, DiVall M. Antibiotic-stewardship practices at top academic centers throughout the United States and at hospitals throughout Massachusetts. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2006;27:695-703.

© 2008 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.