Home Current Issue Previous Issues Published Ahead-of-Print Collections For Authors Journal Info
Skip Navigation LinksHome > January 2014 - Volume 22 - Issue 1 > Ceftaroline: Place in Therapy Compared to the Available Intr...
Infectious Diseases in Clinical Practice:
doi: 10.1097/IPC.0b013e3182948d1c
Review Articles

Ceftaroline: Place in Therapy Compared to the Available Intravenous Cephalosporins

Johnson, Steven W. PharmD*†; May, D. Byron PharmD*

Collapse Box

Abstract

Cephalosporins are widely used antibiotics throughout the world. However, with the availability of multiple agents in this class with varying spectrum of activity and clinical use, selecting the most appropriate cephalosporin can become convoluted. Ceftaroline, a new-generation cephalosporin recently approved in the United States for community-acquired bacterial pneumonia and acute bacterial skin and skin structure infection may further complicate this dilemma. Ceftaroline is easily distinguishable compared to the other intravenous cephalosporins given its activity against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) including multidrug-resistant MRSA. Unfortunately, its Food and Drug Administration–approved indications offer little benefit for the antimicrobial, given cheaper, oral, and more experienced antimicrobials for these indications exist. Ceftaroline may be more appealing in the treatment of infections that require broad-spectrum intravenous antibiotics empirically (eg, endocarditis, meningitis, and osteomyelitis), especially if MRSA is a concern. However, future studies are needed to evaluate its efficacy for these indications. Until these are completed, ceftaroline should be considered as an alternative for community-acquired bacterial pneumonia and acute bacterial skin and skin structure infection at this time.

Copyright © 2013 by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.