Skip Navigation LinksHome > June 2013 - Volume 22 - Issue 3 > Comparison Between Unsintered Hydroxyapatite/Poly-l-Lactic A...
Implant Dentistry:
doi: 10.1097/ID.0b013e31828336be
Basic and Clinical Research

Comparison Between Unsintered Hydroxyapatite/Poly-l-Lactic Acid Mesh and Titanium Mesh in Bone Regeneration of Rabbit Mandible

Moroi, Akinori DDS*; Ueki, Koichiro DDS, PhD; Okabe, Katsuhiko DDS, PhD; Marukawa, Kohei DDS, PhD§; Sotobori, Megumi DDS*; Mukozawa, Aya DDS*; Miyazakia, Mao DDS*

Collapse Box

Abstract

Purpose:

The purpose of this study was to compare the bone regenerative capability of using unsintered hydroxyapatite/poly-l-lactic acid (uHA/PLLA) mesh and titanium mesh.

Materials and Methods:

Adult male white rabbits (n = 24) were divided into 2 groups. After incising along the mandible, 3 × 5 mm bone defects were made in both sides and covered by an uHA/PLLA mesh (n = 12) or a titanium mesh (n = 12) on the right side but no mesh on the left side (n = 12). The rabbits were sacrificed at 1, 2, and 4 weeks postoperatively, and formalin-fixed specimens were embedded in acrylic resin. The specimens were stained with hematoxylin and eosin. For immunohistochemical analysis, the specimens were treated with BMP-2.

Results:

The titanium group and uHA/PLLA group were significantly larger than the control group regarding the bone area ratio postoperatively at 2 and 4 weeks. However, there were no significant differences between the uHA/PLLA group and titanium group regarding the BMP-2.

Conclusions:

This study suggested that the uHA/PLLA mesh could increase new bone formation more than the absence of a mesh in bone defects. However, there was no significant difference between uHA/PLLA mesh and the titanium mesh in bone augmentation.

Copyright © 2013 by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Login

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.