Skip Navigation LinksHome > July 2014 - Volume 24 - Issue 6 > Patient Preferences for Side Effects Associated With Cervica...
International Journal of Gynecological Cancer:
doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000149
Cervical Cancer

Patient Preferences for Side Effects Associated With Cervical Cancer Treatment

Sun, Charlotte DrPH*; Brown, Alaina J. MD*; Jhingran, Anuja MD; Frumovitz, Michael MD, MPH*; Ramondetta, Lois MD*; Bodurka, Diane C. MD*

Collapse Box


Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess patient preferences regarding side effects associated with cervical cancer treatment.

Methods/Materials: The visual analog scale (VAS) and modified standard gamble (SG) were used to elicit preferences of women with no evidence of disease after primary treatment of cervical cancer. Higher scores on VAS and SG indicated more favorable ratings for a given health state. Health states (HS) included vaginal shortening, diarrhea, dietary changes, menopause, moderate nausea/vomiting, rectal bleeding, sexual dysfunction, and urinary self-catheterization. Descriptive statistics, Kruskal-Wallis, Mann-Whitney U, and Wilcoxon signed-ranks tests and correlation coefficients were used for statistical analysis.

Results: Seventy-eight patients participated in the study. Median age was 44.1 years (range, 24.9–67.8 years). Median time since treatment completion was 31.2 months (range, 1.0–113.3 months). The HSs rated as most favorable by VAS were also rated as most favorable by SG. Increasing age was associated with higher VAS scores for menopause and vaginal shortening (P = 0.04 and 0.036). African Americans had higher VAS scores for dietary changes (P = 0.05), sexual dysfunction (P = 0.028), and diarrhea (P = 0.05) when compared with Hispanic and non-Hispanic white patients. Women receiving radiation had more favorable VAS scores for menopause compared with women undergoing radical hysterectomy (P = 0.05). Women receiving chemotherapy rated urinary self-catheterization less favorably by VAS score compared with those not receiving chemotherapy (P = 0.045).

Conclusions: Multiple demographic and clinical factors influence the severity of treatment-related adverse effects perceived by women surviving cervical cancer. A better understanding of factors influencing patient preferences regarding treatment side effects will allow providers to formulate care better tailored to the individual desires of each patient.

© 2014 by the International Gynecologic Cancer Society and the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology.


Article Tools


Article Level Metrics

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.

Connect With Us


For additional oncology content, visit LWW Oncology Journals on Facebook.