Skip Navigation LinksHome > June 2014 - Volume 24 - Issue 5 > Treatment Failure in Endometrial Carcinoma
International Journal of Gynecological Cancer:
doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000131
Uterine Cancer

Treatment Failure in Endometrial Carcinoma

Huang, Huei-Jean MD, MPH*†; Tang, Yun-Hsin MD*†; Chou, Hung-Hsueh MD*†; Yang, Lan-Yan PhD†‡; Chao, Angel MD, PhD*†; Huang, Yi-Ting MD†§; Lin, Gigin MD, PhD†∥; Liu, Feng-Yuan MD†¶; Chang, Ting-Chang MD, MPH*†; Lai, Chyong-Huey MD*†

Supplemental Author Material
Collapse Box

Abstract

Objective

Our aim was to investigate the outcomes and prognostic factors after treatment failure of endometrial cancer.

Methods

A total of 923 endometrial cancer patients were treated between 2000 and 2010, of which 109 experienced treatment failure. Treatment failure was defined as relapse after complete removal of all cancerous lesions or persistent/progressive disease despite treatment. Variables including clinicopathological features at initial treatment, type of primary treatment, failure pattern, salvage treatment, and outcomes were analyzed. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were compared with log-rank test. Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to identify significant prognostic factors.

Results

Eighteen cases with persistent/progressive disease died shortly from primary diagnosis (1–23 months). The remaining 91 patients had recurrences in vagina only (8.8%), pelvis (3.3%), distant (63.7%), and combined pelvic-distant sites (24.2%). Median time to recurrence was 13.3 months (3.2–97.2 months). The median follow-up after recurrence of survivors was 60.5 months (10.6–121.7 months). The median survival after recurrence (SAR) was 20.3 months (1.9–121.7 months) with 5-year SAR rate of 32.4%. By multivariate analysis, initial stage II to IV (hazards ratio [HR], 3.41; 1.53–7.60; P = 0.003), type II histology (HR, 2.50; 1.28–4.90; P = 0.008), positive peritoneal cytology (HR, 2.23; 1.07–4.68; P = 0.033), and recurrence at multiple sites (HR, 2.51; 1.30–4.84; P = 0.006) were significantly associated with poor SAR. The 5-year SAR rates in patients with solitary vaginal, nodal/liver, or pulmonary/bony recurrence were 83.3%, 50.5%, and 24.2%, respectively. Ten cases with resectable or irradiatable recurrence at multiple sites or multiple relapses attained SAR greater than 5 years after multimodality salvage therapy.

Conclusions

Initial stage II to IV, type 2 histology, positive cytology, and recurrence at multiple sites were significant poor prognostic factors. Curative intent salvage therapy remains a viable option for cases with resectable or irradiatable multiple recurrences and solitary distant metastasis.

Copyright © 2014 by IGCS and ESGO

Login

Article Tools

Share

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.

Connect With Us

Twitter
twitter.com/IJGConline

For additional oncology content, visit LWW Oncology Journals on Facebook.