Skip Navigation LinksHome > May 2011 - Volume 100 - Issue 5 > COMPARISON OF TWO DIFFERENT TYPES OF LIF:MG,CU,P THERMOLUMIN...
Health Physics:
doi: 10.1097/HP.0b013e3182092732
Operational Topic

COMPARISON OF TWO DIFFERENT TYPES OF LIF:MG,CU,P THERMOLUMINESCENT DOSIMETERS FOR DETECTION OF BETA RAYS (BETA-TLDS) FROM 90SR/90Y, 85KR AND 147PM SOURCES

Grassi, Elisa; Sghedoni, Roberto; Piccagli, Vando; Fioroni, Federica; Borasi, Giovanni; Iori, Mauro*

Collapse Box

Abstract

Targeted radionuclide therapies in nuclear medicine departments increasingly depend on using unsealed beta radiation sources in the labeling of peptides and antibodies. Monitoring doses received by the fingers and hands during these procedures is best accomplished with TLD dosimeters that can be located at the fingertips. The present study examines the response of two TLD dosimeters (MCP-Ns and GR200A) to 90Sr/90Y, 85Kr, and 147Pm. The dosimeters were supplied by two different services, and all irradiations were performed at the PTB Institute in Germany. Each dosimetry service evaluated the dosimeters without knowledge that they had been purposefully irradiated. The accuracy and precision of the dosimeters were evaluated as a function of delivered dose, energy of beta particles and angular incidence. The results are compared to performance measures recommended by the IEC. Both dosimeter types displayed significant energy dependence. Angular dependence was moderate. Accuracy and precision as a function of dose (linearity) differed between the two systems, with the MCP-Ns being noticeably better than the GR200A. The superior precision makes the MCP-Ns much more useful for extremity dose measurements. The differences between these two dosimeter systems reinforce the need to evaluate a dosimeter carefully before using it in the daily work routine.

©2011Health Physics Society

Login

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.