Skip Navigation LinksHome > October 1997 - Volume 73 - Issue 4 > Relative Performance of Different Types of Passive Dosimeter...
Health Physics:
Papers: PDF Only

Relative Performance of Different Types of Passive Dosimeters Employing Solid State Nuclear Track Detectors.

Jamil, Khalid; Al-Ahmady, K. K.; Fazal-ur-Rehman, ; Ali, Safdar; Qureshi, A. A.; Kahn, H. A.

Collapse Box

Abstract

Radon and its progeny, known to be carcinogenic, are a matter of great concern in underground mines and energy conserved air-tight houses. Different shapes of dosimeters using solid state nuclear track detectors (SSNTDs) have been devised to measure radon concentrations in mines and dwellings. Sometimes intercomparison of results is required by various laboratories working with solid state nuclear track detector-based passive dosimeters. The present work includes the determination of various parameters for a set of dosimeters consisting of (1) box-type, (2) pen-type, (3) tube-type, (4) Karlsruhe Diffusion Chamber, and (5) bare-type dosimeters. In this research two types of plastics, allyl-diglycol-carbonate (C12H18O7) and cellulose nitrate (C6H8O8N2) known as CR-39 and CN-85, respectively, have been employed. The detection efficiency for alpha particles from radon and its progeny for CR-39 and CN-85 have been compared. All experiments have been carried out in a custom-designed exposure chamber connected to a radon source. The calibration factors, in terms of Bq m-3 per unit track density (1.0 cm-2) with respect to box-type dosimeter, have been determined for intercomparison and standardization of measured radon concentrations by a set of passive radon dosimeters used in various laboratories of the world.

(C)1997Health Physics Society

Login

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.