Objectives: To examine recovery of attention from 3 to 6 months postinjury; to identify effects of injury severity and time since injury on performance; to explore whether complex attention skills (eg, shifting, divided attention, attentional control) are more vulnerable to traumatic brain injury (TBI), and slower to recover than simple attention skills (eg, attentional capacity, selective attention, sustained attention).
Design: Prospective longitudinal investigation.
Participants: A total of 205 school-aged children with TBI were divided into groups according to injury severity (mild = 63%, moderate = 27%, severe = 10%).
Setting: Emergency departments of 3 metropolitan children's hospitals across Australia.
Main Measures: Standardized clinical measures of both simple and complex attention were administered at 3 months and 6 months postinjury.
Results: Attention skills were vulnerable to the impact of TBI. More severe injury affected attention skills most negatively. Significant recovery was observed over time. There were few interaction effects, with severity groups exhibiting similar levels of recovery over the 6 months post-TBI. No differences in recovery trajectories were detected for simple and complex attention.
Conclusions: These findings have important clinical and educational implications, suggesting that children with TBI, and particularly those with more serious injuries, are most vulnerable to attention deficits in the acute stages postinjury. It is important that schools and families are aware of these limitations and structure expectations accordingly. For example, gradual return to school should be considered, and in the early stages of recovery, children should be provided with sufficient rest time, with reduced expectations for tasks such as homework.
Critical Care and Neuroscience, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute (Dr Anderson and Dr Eren), Department of Psychology, Royal Children's Hospital (Dr Anderson), Psychological Science, University of Melbourne (Dr Anderson and Dr Eren), and Psychological Medicine, Monash University (Mr Davern), Melbourne, Australia; and School of Psychology (Ms Dob) and School of Medicine (Dr Brocque and Messrs Iselin and Kenardy), University of Queensland, and Queensland Paediatric Rehabilitation Service, Royal Children's Hospital (Dr McKinlay), Brisbane, Australia.
Corresponding Author: Vicki Anderson, PhD, Department of Psychology, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia (firstname.lastname@example.org).
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.