Skip Navigation LinksHome > January/February 2011 - Volume 26 - Issue 1 > Making Connections After Brain Injury: Development and Eval...
Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation:
doi: 10.1097/HTR.0b013e3182048e98
Original Article

Making Connections After Brain Injury: Development and Evaluation of a Social Peer-Mentoring Program for Persons With Traumatic Brain Injury

Struchen, Margaret A. PhD; Davis, Lynne Cole PhD; Bogaards, Jay A. MA; Hudler-Hull, Terri MS; Clark, Allison N. PhD; Mazzei, Diana M. MA; Sander, Angelle M. PhD; Caroselli, Jerome S. PhD

Collapse Box

Abstract

Objective: To describe the development and implementation of a social peer-mentoring program for persons with traumaticbrain injury (TBI) and to explore whether this program yielded increased social functioning outcomes compared with wait-list (WL)controls.

Design: Pilot randomized controlled study.

Participants: Community-dwelling individuals with TBI(12 matched with social peer mentors and 18 completing the WL condition).

Intervention: Trained social peer mentors (SPMs)were matched to partners with TBI (peer partners (PP)) to foster skill-building in planning of social activities and improvingsocial communication abilities through phone contacts and joint participation in social events within the community over a 3-monthperiod.

Measures: Social Activity Interview, Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale, UCLA Loneliness Scale, Satisfaction with Life Scale, 6-Item Interpersonal Support Evaluation List (baseline and postmentoring); weekly social activity data(1-month baseline, continuously collected during 3-month mentoring or WL period); satisfaction survey.

Results: Both SPMand PP participants reported high satisfaction with the mentoring program. Statistically significant improvements in perceived socialsupport after mentoring were observed for the mentored group than for WL participants; however, an increase in depressive symptoms wasalso observed. While significant improvements in social activity level and social network size were not found, a trend toward increasedsatisfaction with social life was present for mentored participants.

Conclusions: Satisfaction ratings for the SPM programwere uniformly high and selected positive findings encourage further investigation of social mentoring as an intervention to effectimprovements in social integration. Small sample size and reduced “dosage” of mentor interactions were limitations of thispilot study. Benefits of and challenges to implementation of an SPM program are outlined.

© 2011 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.

Login

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.