Obstetrics & Gynecology:
Inactivated Influenza Vaccine During Pregnancy and Risks for Adverse Obstetric Events
Kharbanda, Elyse Olshen MD, MPH; Vazquez-Benitez, Gabriela PhD; Lipkind, Heather MD, MPH; Naleway, Allison PhD; Lee, Grace MD, MPH; Nordin, James D. MD, MPH; for the Vaccine Safety Datalink Team
Health Partners Institute for Education and Research, Minneapolis, Minnesota; the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut; the Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, Oregon; and the Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute & Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Corresponding author: Elyse Olshen Kharbanda, MD, MPH, Health Partners Institute for Education and Research, PO Box 1524, MS 21111R, Minneapolis, MN 55425; e-mail: Elyse.O.Kharbanda@HealthPartners.com.
Supported by a subcontract with America's Health Insurance Plans under contract 200-2002-00732 from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
The authors thank Beth Molitor, MBA, Leslie Kuckler, MPH, Rachel Gold, PhD, MPH, Karen Riedlinger, MPH, and Samantha Kurosky, MPH, for assistance with data collection. These contributors were all supported by a subcontract with America's Health Insurance Plans under contract 200-2002-00732 from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Financial Disclosure Dr. Naleway has received research funding from GlaxoSmithKline. The other authors did not report any potential conflicts of interest.
OBJECTIVE: To compare risks for adverse obstetric events between females who did and did not receive trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine during pregnancy.
METHOD: This retrospective, observational cohort study was conducted at seven Vaccine Safety Datalink sites. Pregnancies were identified from administrative and claims data using a validated algorithm. Females vaccinated while pregnant from 2002 to 2009 were matched one-to-two with replacement to unvaccinated pregnant females. Using a generalized estimating equation method with a Poisson distribution and log link, we evaluated the association of trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine with 13 outcomes. Given our large sample size and multiple comparisons (19 contrasts), a cutoff for significance of P<.005 was selected a priori.
RESULTS: Our cohort included 74,292 vaccinated females matched on age, site, and pregnancy start date with 144,597 unvaccinated females. We did not observe increased risks within 42 days of vaccination for hyperemesis, chronic hypertension, gestational hypertension, gestational diabetes, proteinuria, or urinary tract infection. Using a risk window from vaccination through pregnancy end, we did not observe increased risks after vaccination for proteinuria, urinary tract infection, gestational hypertension, preeclampsia or eclampsia, chorioamnionitis, puerperal infection, venous complications, pulmonary embolism, or peripartum cardiomyopathy. A reduced risk for gestational diabetes after vaccination was detected (adjusted hazard rate ratio 0.88, 95% confidence interval 0.83–0.93), likely as a result of healthy vaccine bias or earlier detection among vaccinees.
CONCLUSION: In this large cohort, influenza vaccination during pregnancy was not associated with increased risks for medically attended adverse obstetric events.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II
The influenza vaccine is strongly recommended for pregnant women during all trimesters of pregnancy.1,2 Pregnant women have been targeted for vaccination to prevent illness in mothers and their offspring.3 Recent studies have highlighted the effect of maternal vaccination in preventing severe influenza infections in pregnant women and newborns.4,5
Despite the demonstrated beneficial effects of vaccination, influenza vaccine coverage among pregnant women remains low. In the 2010–2011 influenza season, only half of pregnant women reported receiving an influenza vaccine.6 Fears regarding the safety of influenza vaccine during pregnancy remain a persistent barrier to vaccine uptake.7–9 Prior studies have not suggested any association between trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine and maternal or fetal adverse events.4,10–13 However, only a few previous studies have specifically examined the effect of vaccination on pregnancy complications such as preeclampsia or gestational diabetes.12,14–17 These outcomes are of importance for the health of women during pregnancy and beyond. In addition, these and other obstetric outcomes also result in increased risk for adverse birth outcomes.
In prior work, we reported that influenza vaccination during pregnancy was not associated with potential vaccine-related acute adverse events, including allergic and local reactions, thrombocytopenia, seizures, and other acute neurologic events.18 In the current study we expand on this research using our previously described multisite observational cohort to compare risks for adverse obstetric events between females who did and did not receive trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine during pregnancy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
This retrospective, observational cohort study was conducted within the Vaccine Safety Datalink. The Vaccine Safety Datalink is a collaborative effort between the Immunization Safety Office of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and managed care organizations to monitor vaccine safety within the United States and includes data on approximately 3% of the U.S. population.19 A detailed description of how the cohort used in this study was assembled has been previously presented.18
Briefly, data for these analyses came from seven Vaccine Safety Datalink sites (Group Health Cooperative, HealthPartners, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, and Marshfield Clinic Research Foundation). Pregnant women with continuous enrollment in one of the participating Vaccine Safety Datalink sites were identified using a validated algorithm adapted for use in the Vaccine Safety Datalink by Naleway and colleagues.20 The algorithm uses claims, electronic medical record, and birth certificate data to identify pregnancy episodes. Pregnancy outcomes, including live births, stillbirths, and spontaneous abortions, were identified by International Classifications of Diseases, 9th Revision (ICD-9) codes, linkage with birth certificates, or both. Gestational age at pregnancy outcome and pregnancy start dates were estimated from ICD-9 codes, birth certificates (for pregnancies ending in live birth), and timing of routine prenatal procedures (eg, nuchal translucency screening). Receipt of trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine was identified through claims and site-based vaccine registries. Timing for receipt of trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine was classified by gestational week and trimester.
Exclusions from the cohort included multiple gestations, ectopic pregnancies, gestational trophoblastic disease, therapeutic abortions, and pregnancies in which the outcome could not be determined from available claims and birth certificate data. Females who received other vaccines while pregnant and females with no outpatient medical visits recorded in our data during pregnancy were also excluded. In addition, females vaccinated during their first or second week of gestation or within 1 week of the end of their pregnancy were excluded. To avoid misclassification of postpartum vaccines, females receiving trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine within 1 week of the end of their pregnancy were also excluded.
After applying these inclusion and exclusion criteria, all pregnant females aged 14–49 years who received trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine from June 1, 2002, to July 31, 2009, were matched one-to-two with replacement to females not vaccinated during pregnancy using a variable optimal matching algorithm.21 Match variables included maternal age at pregnancy outcome, estimated pregnancy start date, and site. Unexposed females were assigned an index date that was equal to their trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine-exposed match's gestational age at vaccination.
Adverse obstetric events are defined as new, prespecified, medically attended pregnancy-related comorbidities or pregnancy complications. For the current analyses, background risks for specific obstetric outcomes vary by gestational week of pregnancy. For example, by definition, preeclampsia has an onset of 20 weeks of gestation or later. However, first-trimester exposures that affect placentation may predispose women to be at increased risk for preeclampsia. Thus, as described subsequently, to evaluate potential risks associated with vaccination, each obstetric event required attention to both the exposure window and timing of vaccination and the expected timeframe for diagnosis.
All potential adverse obstetric events were identified from ICD-9 codes recorded in maternal electronic health data occurring at inpatient, outpatient, or emergency department visits. An adverse obstetric event was defined as the onset of a new, medically attended pregnancy-related comorbidity or pregnancy complication. To reduce the likelihood of including pre-existing conditions, events occurring on the day of vaccination (day 0) were used only if diagnosed at an inpatient or emergency department visit. Specific outcomes and windows were selected a priori based on the demonstrated postvaccination inflammatory response,22 prior vaccine safety studies,12,23 and pathophysiology of the obstetric event.24 In addition, outcomes of high severity and public health importance were evaluated. Obstetric events included: hyperemesis, chronic hypertension, gestational hypertension, mild preeclampsia, severe preeclampsia or eclampsia, gestational diabetes, proteinuria, urinary tract infection, chorioamnionitis, puerperal infections, venous complications of pregnancy, pulmonary embolus, and peripartum cardiomyopathy. Events were only included if they represented new diagnoses. Strategies to identify and exclude pre-existing conditions were applied. (see Appendix 1, available online at http://links.lww.com/AOG/A413).
The timing for vaccination exposures and risk windows were selected for each obstetric event accounting for the temporal nature of the reproductive process (see Appendix 2, available online at http://links.lww.com/AOG/A414). For outcomes with onset early in pregnancy, only first-trimester vaccination and a 42-day risk window could be used. For events occurring late in pregnancy or postpartum, a 42-day risk window would miss a majority of outcomes and rates would be inversely related to preterm delivery rates.25 Thus, these analyses focused on vaccination occurring at 20 weeks of gestation or later and a risk window from vaccination or index date through the end of pregnancy or the peripartum period was used. For venous complications of pregnancy, pulmonary embolism, and peripartum cardiomyopathy, risk windows were extended to include the period from vaccination or index date through 30 days postpartum. For preeclampsia or eclampsia, in which disease onset is late in pregnancy but risks may be associated with placentation,24 only end of pregnancy windows were evaluated, but vaccine exposures throughout pregnancy were studied. For other outcomes occurring at 20 weeks of gestation or later that were not immediate causes for delivery, exposures at 20 weeks of gestation or later with both 42-day and end of pregnancy windows were studied. Finally, for outcomes occurring throughout pregnancy, all exposures were included and both 42-day and end of pregnancy risk windows were evaluated (see Appendix 2, http://links.lww.com/AOG/A414).
Data on pre-existing conditions, including pulmonary disease, hypertension, diabetes, heart disease, neurologic or rheumatologic conditions, and hypercoagulability, were abstracted from automated claims data starting 6 months before the last menstrual period through the vaccination or index date. Similarly, data on pregnancy complications occurring before vaccination, including hemorrhage in early pregnancy, gestational hypertension, hyperemesis gravidarum, gestational diabetes, proteinuria, and obesity complicating pregnancy, were abstracted from automated claims data from the last menstrual period through the vaccination or index date. Additional outcome-specific risk factors were also identified through ICD-9 codes. Some conditions were both outcomes and risk factors. For example, proteinuria was classified as an outcome if its onset was after the vaccination or index date but it was a risk factor for preeclampsia and eclampsia if its onset was before the vaccination or index date.
To assess covariates, hospitalizations, emergency department visits, and outpatient and urgent care visits before vaccination or index date were recorded. In the absence of socioeconomic variables at the individual level, we used socioeconomic proxies at the census tract level defined for each female as the percent of families within their Census tract with incomes below 150% of the federal poverty level.26 Missing census data were imputed using the expectation maximization algorithm.27
Chi square and median two-sample tests were used to compare baseline characteristics between vaccinated and unvaccinated populations. We report 42-day incidence rates in our exposed and unexposed cohorts per 1,000 pregnancies for these adverse obstetric events: hyperemesis gravidarum, chronic hypertension, gestational hypertension, gestational diabetes, proteinuria, and urinary tract infection. Using the generalized estimating equation method to account for the matching effect with a Poisson distribution and log link, we evaluated the association of trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine exposure with 42-day adverse obstetric events. We first created crude models and then adjusted for demographic and outcome-specific risk factors. Incidence rate ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) are presented for adjusted models.
Similarly, we report incidence rates per 1,000 pregnancies after vaccine or index date for these outcomes: gestational hypertension, mild preeclampsia, severe preeclampsia or eclampsia, gestational diabetes, proteinuria, urinary tract infection, chorioamnionitis, puerperal infection, venous complications, pulmonary embolus, and peripartum cardiomyopathy. Rates were calculated using the generalized estimating equation method to account for the matching effect with a Poisson distribution and log link. Time to the end of the pregnancy was incorporated as an offset in the Poisson models. This accounted for differences in gestational duration because spontaneous abortions, stillbirths, and live births were all included in the study cohort. Hazard rate ratios with 95% CIs are presented for adjusted models based on Cox regression models.
Most of the adverse obstetric events under investigation (individual or groups of ICD-9 codes) were expected to occur during pregnancy with a background prevalence of at least 1–10 per 1,000 pregnancies (see Appendix 2, http://links.lww.com/AOG/A414); 42-day incident rates for these conditions would be expected to be lower and vary based on the timing in pregnancy of the 42-day window. Given our large sample size and multiple comparisons (13 outcomes with a total of 19 contrasts), a conservative cutoff for significance of P<.005 was selected a priori.28 With an estimated 74,000 females exposed to trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine while pregnant, and an α of 0.005, our analyses had power of 80% to detect an incidence rate ratio of 1.1 for outcomes with an incidence rate of 10 per 1,000 pregnancies and a rate ratio of 1.04 for outcomes with an incidence rate of 100 per 1,000 pregnancies. Venous complications of pregnancy, pulmonary embolus, and peripartum cardiomyopathy were all expected to be rare events with background incidence of less than 1 per 1,000 pregnancies. For these outcomes, we had 80% power to detect a hazard rate ratio of 1.4. For analyses restricted to females vaccinated at 20 weeks of gestation or greater or females vaccinated in their first trimester, our power was reduced. All analyses were done using SAS 9.2. This study was approved by the institutional review boards from all participating sites.
A total of 807,563 pregnancies occurring between 2002 and 2009 were identified. After applying exclusions, 407,745 pregnancies remained in the study cohort and were eligible for matching. Our final cohort was comprised of 74,292 trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine-exposed pregnancies matched on age, site, and estimated pregnancy start date with 144,597 unvaccinated pregnancies (Fig. 1).
Flow of participants...Image Tools
Pregnant females ranged in age from 14–49 years (mean age 30.8±5.6 years). Females received influenza vaccine throughout pregnancy, including 21,107 (28.4%) in their first trimester, 32,847 (44.2%) in their second, and 20,338 (27.4%) in their third. Compared with unvaccinated females, preexisting conditions including hypertension and other heart disease, diabetes, and pulmonary and rheumatologic conditions were all significantly more common among vaccinated females (Table 1). Similarly, baseline pregnancy complications, including gestational hypertension and gestational diabetes, occurred more frequently among vaccinated females. However, vaccinated females were slightly less likely than unvaccinated females to be hospitalized before their vaccination or index date (5.4% compared with 5.7%). Outpatient medical visits were more frequent among trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine-exposed women both before vaccination (5.1 encounters compared with 4.6 encounters) and after vaccination (7.6 encounters compared with 6.8 encounters). Among pregnancies ending in a live birth, for both vaccinated and unvaccinated groups, mean gestational age at delivery was 39.0 weeks (Table 1).
Using a 42-day window, risks for eight adverse obstetric events were compared between vaccinated and unvaccinated females. Based on a predetermined cutoff for significance of P<.005, we did not observe increased risks for the new onset of hyperemesis, chronic hypertension, gestational hypertension, gestational diabetes, proteinuria, or urinary tract infection within 42 days after influenza vaccination. We did note a statistically significant reduced risk for the diagnosis of gestational diabetes (adjusted relative risk 0.89, 95% CI 0.82–0.96; P=.004) (Table 2).
Using a risk window from vaccination or index date through the end of pregnancy, we compared risks for 11 potential adverse obstetric events between trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine-vaccinated and unvaccinated pregnant females. Based on predetermined levels for significance, we did not observe increased risks for the new onset of gestational hypertension, proteinuria, urinary tract infection, puerperal infections, venous complications, pulmonary embolus, or peripartum cardiomyopathy after vaccination. For mild preeclampsia and severe preeclampsia or eclampsia, no increased risks after first-trimester vaccination or vaccination in any trimester were observed. Similar to analyses using a 42-day window, when using an end of pregnancy window, we found a statistically significant reduced risk for gestational diabetes after influenza vaccination (adjusted hazard rate ratio 0.88, 95% CI 0.83–0.92; P<.001). In addition, we observed a statistically nonsignificant increased risk for chorioamnionitis after vaccination (adjusted hazard rate ratio 1.08, 95% CI 1.01–1.14; P=.01) (Table 3).
Among unexposed females, obstetric events occurred at or near their expected background rates (see Appendix 2, http://links.lww.com/AOG/A414). The most common 42-day obstetric event was gestational diabetes, which occurred at a rate of 25.7 per 1,000 unexposed pregnancies. The remaining 42-day outcome rates ranged from 0.7 to 22.3 per 1,000 pregnancies. Rates for obstetric events among unexposed women occurring after the index date through the end of pregnancy or postpartum ranged from 0.17 per 1,000 pregnant women for pulmonary embolus to 57.1 per 1,000 pregnant females for gestational diabetes.
In this large, multisite, observational study, using both 42-day and end of pregnancy risk windows, no concerning risks for adverse obstetric events after influenza vaccination were identified. This study provides needed data for providers and expectant mothers on the safety of influenza vaccine during pregnancy. This study was unique because we focused on pregnancy-related comorbidities that directly affect maternal health such as gestational diabetes, preeclampsia, and puerperal infections. Although pregnant women report fears that the influenza vaccine will adversely affect their health,7–9 few studies to date have specifically studied these maternal outcomes.12,14,16
One strength of this study was our large sample of more than 70,000 females vaccinated during pregnancy, including more than 20,000 vaccinated during their first trimester. To our knowledge, only one prior study has examined vaccination and risks for adverse obstetric events for a nonadjuvanted influenza vaccine in a U.S.-based cohort. In 2005, Munoz and colleagues12 compared risks for preeclampsia, gestational diabetes, and other maternal health outcomes between 225 vaccinated and 826 unvaccinated women. More recently, several groups have presented data from European and South American cohorts, including risks for gestational diabetes and preeclampsia for nearly 30,000 women who received an adjuvanted H1N1 vaccine during pregnancy.14–17 These studies did not detect any risks for adverse obstetric events. Our large sample allowed us to provide additional data on outcomes that these previous studies may have been underpowered to address, including specific risks after first-trimester vaccination.
An additional strength of the current analyses was our ability to compare rates for medically attended events between vaccinated and unvaccinated females. In the United States and abroad, passive reporting systems have been used to demonstrate the safety of trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine administered during pregnancy.13,29,30 However, these systems are prone to underreporting and lack a suitable denominator. For example, Moro and colleagues13 noted that between 1990 and 2009, only one case of gestational diabetes after trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine in had been reported to the U.S.-based Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System. In contrast, we reported more than 868 new cases of gestational diabetes occurring within 42 days of trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine. Although our rate may seem high, we also found 1,908 matched unexposed females were newly diagnosed with gestational diabetes in this same 42-day interval.
It is reassuring that we did not detect any safety signals after trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine vaccination. Nevertheless, our findings on chorioamnionitis merit further discussion. Chorioamnionitis is estimated to affect between 1% and 4% of births and is a major risk for premature delivery, cerebral palsy, and sepsis in newborns.31 In our unexposed population, the rate for chorioamnionitis was 39 per 1,000 pregnancies, within the upper range of the estimated background prevalence. Among trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine-exposed females in our cohort, the rate for chorioamnionitis was 42.9 per 1,000 pregnancies. After adjustments, the adjusted hazard rate ratio was 1.08 (95% CI 1.02–1.15; P=.01). A potential mechanism for an increased risk for chorioamnionitis after vaccination would be the measurable vaccine-induced inflammatory response.22 However, we doubt that our results represent a true association. First, the rate ratio we report was not statistically significant based on our predetermined cutoff of P<.005. Because our study included 19 comparisons, there was approximately a one in six chance that at least one outcome may be expected to reach a P value of .01. More importantly, if vaccination were a true cause for chorioamnionitis, we would expect new diagnoses to occur in close proximity to vaccination. In our cohort, the average time between trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine and onset of chorioamnionitis was 71 days (data available on request). In addition, as a result of data availability, we were not able to fully adjust our models for important chorioamnionitis risk factors, including prolonged rupture of membranes, nulliparity, number of vaginal examinations, and the presence of genital tract pathogens.
We found a reduced risk for gestational diabetes after influenza vaccination. This finding most likely reflects residual unmeasured confounders and healthy vaccinee bias, observed frequently in nonpregnant populations.32 For example, vaccinated females may be more likely than those unvaccinated to engage in other healthy behaviors placing them at lower risk for diabetes. Compared with unvaccinated females, those vaccinated during pregnancy had more medical encounters both before and after vaccination, possibly reflecting increased health-seeking behaviors. In addition, vaccinated women had more medical encounters before their vaccination or index date and thus may have been more likely to have their gestational diabetes detected before vaccination. On the other hand, influenza infection is a risk for ketoacidosis in diabetics33 and antecedent infections are a commonly reported trigger for the onset of type 1 diabetes. Further studies should explore whether influenza infection may result in increased risk for gestational diabetes and whether vaccination could reduce this risk.
Limitations to this observational study should be noted. As previously described,18 factors that were outside the scope of this study but could affect the outcomes of interest such as smoking status or weight gain during pregnancy may have differed between vaccinated and unvaccinated females. Second, as detailed in our prior related study,18 it is possible that females vaccinated at pharmacies or at their workplace were misclassified as unvaccinated, potentially biasing our results. In our study, these vaccinations would only be captured if a patient informed their health care provider who then manually entered this into the electronic medical record. Finally, like with any study using electronic health data, misclassification of outcomes was also possible. However, it is reassuring that for many outcomes, the rates observed in unvaccinated women were consistent with published background rates.
The current study expands the existing literature regarding the safety of influenza vaccination during pregnancy. Findings from our research support the current Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices and American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists recommendations for the administration of influenza vaccine during pregnancy.
1. Influenza vaccination during pregnancy. Committee Opinion No. 468. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol 2010;116:1006–7.
2. Harper SA, Fukuda K, Uyeki TM, Cox NJ, Bridges CB; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). Prevention and control of influenza: recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) [published erratum appears in MMWR Recomm Rep 2004;53:743]. MMWR Recomm Rep 2004;53:1–40.
3. Rasmussen SA, Jamieson DJ. Influenza and pregnancy in the United States: before, during, and after 2009 H1N1. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2012;55:487–97.
4. Zaman K, Roy E, Arifeen SE, Rahman M, Ragib R, Wilson E, et al.. Effectiveness of maternal influenza immunization in mothers and infants. N Engl J Med 2008;359:1555–64.
5. Håberg SE, Trogstad L, Gunnes N, Wilcox AJ, Gjessing HK, Samuelsen SO, et al.. Risk of fetal death after pandemic influenza virus infection or vaccination. N Engl J Med 2013;368:333–40.
6. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Influenza vaccination coverage among pregnant women—United States, 2010–11 influenza season. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2011;60:1078–82.
7. Fisher BM, Scott J, Hart J, Winn VD, Gibbs RS, Lynch AM. Behaviors and perceptions regarding seasonal and H1N1 influenza vaccination during pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011;204:S107–11.
8. Steelfisher GK, Blendon RJ, Bekheit MM, Mitchell EW, Williams J, Lubell K, et al.. Novel pandemic A (H1N1) influenza vaccination among pregnant women: motivators and barriers. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011;204:S116–23.
9. Kharbanda EO, Vargas CY, Castano PM, Lara M, Andres R, Stockwell MS. Exploring pregnant women's views on influenza vaccination and educational text messages. Prev Med 2011;52:75–7.
10. Sumaya CV, Gibbs RS. Immunization of pregnant women with influenza A/New Jersey/76 virus vaccine: reactogenicity and immunogenicity in mother and infant. J Infect Dis 1979;140:141–6.
11. Tavares F, Nazareth I, Monegal JS, Kolte I, Verstraeten T, Bauchau V. Pregnancy and safety outcomes in women vaccinated with an AS03-adjuvanted split virion H1N1 (2009) pandemic influenza vaccine during pregnancy: a prospective cohort study. Vaccine 2011;29:6358–65.
12. Munoz FM, Greisinger AJ, Wehmanen OA, Mouzoon ME, Hoyle JC, Smith FA, et al.. Safety of influenza vaccination during pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005;192:1098–106.
13. Moro PL, Broder K, Zheteyeva Y, Walton K, Rohan P, Sutherland A, et al.. Adverse events in pregnant women following administration of trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine and live attenuated influenza vaccine in the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, 1990–2009. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011;204:146.e1–7.
14. Oppermann M, Fritzsche J, Weber-Schoendorfer C, Keller-Stanislawski B, Allignol A, Meister R, et al.. A(H1N1)v2009: a controlled observational prospective cohort study on vaccine safety in pregnancy. Vaccine 2012;30:4445–52.
15. Heikkinen T, Young J, van Beek E, Franke H, Verstraeten T, Weil JG, et al.. Safety of MF59-adjuvanted A/H1N1 influenza vaccine in pregnancy: a comparative cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012;207:177.e1–8.
16. Rubinstein F, Micone P, Bonotti A, Wainer V, Schwarcz A, Augustovski F, et al.. Influenza A/H1N1 MF59 adjuvanted vaccine in pregnant women and adverse perinatal outcomes: multicentre study. BMJ 2013;346:f393.
17. Kallen B, Olausson PO. Vaccination against H1N1 influenza with Pandemrix(®) during pregnancy and delivery outcome: a Swedish register study. BJOG 2012;119:1583–90.
18. Nordin JD, Kharbanda EO, Benitez GV, Nichol K, Lipkind H, Naleway A, et al.. Maternal safety of trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine in pregnant women. Obstet Gynecol 2013;121:519–25.
19. Baggs J, Gee J, Lewis E, Fowler G, Benson P, Lieu T, et al.. The Vaccine Safety Datalink: a model for monitoring immunization safety. Pediatrics 2011;127:S45–53.
20. Naleway AL, Gold R, Kurosky S, Riedlinger K, Henninger ML, Nordin JD, et al.. Identifying pregnancy episodes, outcomes, and mother-infant pairs in the Vaccine Safety Datalink. Vaccine 2013;31:2898–903.
21. Bergstralh EJ, Kosanke JL, Jacobsen SJ. Software for optimal matching in observational studies. Epidemiology 1996;7:331–2.
22. Christian LM, Iams JD, Porter K, Glaser R. Inflammatory responses to trivalent influenza virus vaccine among pregnant women. Vaccine 2011;29:8982–7.
23. Gee J, Naleway A, Shui I, Baggs J, Yin R, Li R, et al.. Monitoring the safety of quadrivalent human papillomavirus vaccine: findings from the Vaccine Safety Datalink. Vaccine 2011;29:8279–84.
24. Steegers EA, von Dadelszen P, Duvekot JJ, Pijnenborg R. Pre-eclampsia. Lancet 2010;376:631–44.
25. Savitz DA, Hertz-Picciotto I, Poole C, Olshan AF. Epidemiologic measures of the course and outcome of pregnancy. Epidemiol Rev 2002;24:91–101.
26. Minnesota Population Center. National historical geographic information system: version 2.0. Minneapolis (MN): University of Minnesota; 2011. Available at: http://www.nhgis.org/
. Retrieved July 9, 2013.
27. Little R, Rubin DB. Statistical analysis with missing data. 2nd ed. New York (NY): John Wiley; 2002.
28. Kharbanda E, Vazquez-Benitez G, Shi WX, Lipkind H, Naleway A, Molitor B, et al.. Assessing the safety of influenza immunization during pregnancy: the vaccine safety datalink. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012 207:S47–51.
29. Moro PL, Broder K, Zheteyeva Y, Revzina N, Tepper N, Kissin D, et al.. Adverse events following administration to pregnant women of influenza A (H1N1) 2009 monovalent vaccine reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011;205:473.e1–9.
30. Huang WT, Chen WC, Teng HJ, Huang WI, Huang YW, Hsu CW, et al.. Adverse events following pandemic A (H1N1) 2009 monovalent vaccines in pregnant women—Taiwan, November 2009–August 2010. PLoS One 2011;6:e23049.
31. Martinelli P, Sarno L, Maruotti GM, Paludetto R. Chorioamnionitis and prematurity a critical review. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2012;25 (Suppl 4):29–31.
32. Wilson RD, Johnson JA, Wyatt P, Allen V, Gagnon A, Langlois S, et al.. Pre-conceptional vitamin/folic acid supplementation 2007: the use of folic acid in combination with a multivitamin supplement for the prevention of neural tube defects and other congenital anomalies. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2007;29:1003–26.
33. Bouter KP, Diepersloot RJ, van Romunde LK, Uitslager R, Masurel N, Hoekstra JB, et al.. Effect of epidemic influenza on ketoacidosis, pneumonia and death in diabetes mellitus: a hospital register survey of 1976–1979 in The Netherlands. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 1991;12:61–8.
Figure. No available...Image Tools
Supplemental Digital Content
© 2013 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.
What does "Remember me" mean?
By checking this box, you'll stay logged in until you logout. You'll get easier access to your articles, collections,
media, and all your other content, even if you close your browser or shut down your
To protect your most sensitive data and activities (like changing your password),
we'll ask you to re-enter your password when you access these services.
What if I'm on a computer that I share with others?
If you're using a public computer or you share this computer with others, we recommend
that you uncheck the "Remember me" box.
Looking for ABOG articles? Visit our ABOG MOC II collection. The selected Green Journal articles are free from October through December
ACOG MEMBER SUBSCRIPTION ACCESS
If you are an ACOG Fellow and have not logged in or registered to Obstetrics & Gynecology, please follow these step-by-step instructions to access journal content with your member subscription.
Data is temporarily unavailable. Please try again soon.
Readers Of this Article Also Read