Obstetrics & Gynecology:
Structural Capillary Rarefaction and the Onset of Preeclampsia
Nama, Vivek MRCOG; Manyonda, Isaac T. PhD, MRCOG; Onwude, Joseph MSc, FRCOG; Antonios, Tarek F. FRCP, FESC
From the Blood Pressure Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences, St George's, University of London, London, United Kingdom; the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, St George's Hospital National Health Service Trust, London; and Springfield Hospital, Lawn Lane, Chelmsford, United Kingdom.
Funded by the British Heart Foundation (Grant BHF PG/05/129/19885).
This study was presented in part at the American Heart Association meeting, November 12–15, 2010, Chicago, Illinois, and at the European Council of Cardiovascular Research meeting, October 8–10, 2010, Nice, France.
Corresponding author: Vivek Nama, MRCOG, St George's, University of London, Cranmer Terrace, London SW17 0RE, UK; e-mail: email@example.com.
Financial Disclosure The authors did not report any potential conflicts of interest.
OBJECTIVE: To estimate if reduced capillary density (ie, capillary rarefaction) precedes the onset of preeclampsia and if it could play a role in its pathogenesis. Capillary rarefaction is a consistent finding in essential hypertension.
METHODS: In this longitudinal cohort study, we recruited 322 consecutive white women, of whom 305 women completed the study. We used intravital video microscopy to measure basal (ie, functional) and maximal (ie, structural) skin capillary densities according to a well-validated protocol and measured plasma angiogenic and antiangiogenic factors. Women were studied at five consecutive predetermined visits.
RESULTS: Preeclampsia occurred in 16 women (mean onset at 35.6±4.8 weeks of gestation), 272 women had normal pregnancies, eight had hypertension, and nine pregnancies were complicated by intrauterine growth restriction. In women with a normal pregnancy, significant reduction in maximal capillary density occurred at 27–32 weeks but had resolved by the puerperium. In contrast, in women who later developed preeclampsia, structural rarefaction was greater and occurred earlier at 20–24 weeks of gestation and persisted into the puerperium. We also found that the change in soluble Endoglin from 11–16 weeks of gestation to 27–32 weeks of gestation was significantly correlated with the change in structural capillary density.
CONCLUSION: Significant structural capillary rarefaction precedes the onset of preeclampsia and could play a role in its pathogenesis.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II
Preeclampsia complicates 3–7% of all pregnancies worldwide and is a major cause of maternal, fetal, and neonatal mortality and morbidity. This multisystem disorder is characterized by the onset of hypertension and proteinuria in the second half of pregnancy.1 Women who develop preeclampsia are at increased risk of hypertension, cardiovascular mortality, and stroke in later life.2 Several cardiovascular risk factors have been identified with increased risk of preeclampsia such as essential hypertension, obesity, and diabetes mellitus. The mechanism(s) by which these disorders are associated with preeclampsia are not fully understood, but impaired tissue perfusion and microcirculatory abnormalities have been implicated in the pathogenesis.3 We have previously reported that women who developed preeclampsia had reduction in the density of capillaries (ie, rarefaction) at the time of diagnosis when compared with women with normal pregnancy and healthy nonpregnant control participants.4
We therefore explored whether capillary rarefaction precedes the onset of preeclampsia and could play a role in its pathogenesis. We prospectively studied changes in functional and structural capillary densities from early pregnancy until 15 weeks postpartum. We also studied changes in angiogenic and antiangiogenic factors including vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptor 2, soluble Endoglin, and soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase 1, because there is increasing evidence for a possible role for antiangiogenic factors in the pathogenesis of preeclampsia5 and the induction of capillary rarefaction and hypertension.6
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The study was performed at St George's Hospital, London, and was approved by the Wandsworth Research Ethics Committee. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants. We recruited 322 consecutive white women with singleton pregnancies at 11–16 weeks of gestation. Women with multifetal pregnancies, pre-existing medical disorders (other than essential hypertension), or who were on medication (other than vitamins or folic acid supplementation) were excluded. At entry to the study, 298 women were normotensive, 13 had had previous preeclampsia, and 11 had a history of mild untreated essential hypertension. During the study, 17 women were lost to follow-up or their pregnancies terminated because of severe fetal anomaly and were excluded (Table 1). Participants were studied at five predetermined consecutive visits: 11–16 weeks, 20–24 weeks, 27–32 weeks, 34–38 weeks, and 5–15 weeks postpartum. Gestational age was determined by ultrasonography dating in the first trimester. Preeclampsia was defined as new onset of raised blood pressure greater than 140/90 mm Hg on two separate occasions at least 4 hours apart accompanied by proteinuria defined as 300 mg or greater per 24 hours or urinary protein:creatinine ratio greater than 30 mg/mmol, or 2+ or greater on urine dipstick.7 For individuals with pre-existing hypertension, preeclampsia was defined as new-onset proteinuria of 300 mg or greater per 24 hours or urinary protein and creatinine ratio greater than 30 mg/mmol, or 2+ or greater on urine dipstick.
Blood pressure was measured in the same arm throughout the study using the semiautomated digital oscillometric device Omron HEM907. Three sitting and two standing blood pressure measurements were obtained at 1-minute intervals using appropriate cuff size.
Skin capillary density was measured according to a standardized technique as described previously.8–10 The skin of the dorsum of the middle phalanx of the left hand was examined. Four microscopic fields (0.66 mm2 each) centered on an ink spot were studied to reduce selection bias. These four fields were recorded continuously for 5 minutes each to permit detection of intermittently perfused capillaries. Microscopic images were obtained using the CapiScope system CAM1, and the number of capillaries was counted manually online using computer software.4 Basal capillary density represents the number of capillaries that are “open” or “functioning” at the time of measurement and was calculated as the mean of the four microscopic fields. It is suggested that capillaries, especially in the skin, work on a “rota system,” ie, some are perfused, whereas others are shut down. This would seem likely for the skin where the blood supply far exceeds the nutrient requirements of the tissue. Thus, the maximal capillary density, also referred to as the “structural” or “anatomical” capillary density, is comprised of the functioning capillaries plus those capillaries that “open up.” We have previously shown that venous congestion allows visualization of the maximal number of skin capillaries during intravital video microscopy, exceeding that seen with postocclusive reactive hyperemia.8 In the present study, we determined maximal capillary density by applying a miniature blood pressure cuff to the base of the left middle finger and inflating the cuff and maintaining the pressure at 60 mm Hg for 2 minutes. The capillaries were counted in one of the four microscopic fields chosen at random.8
In a subgroup of 31 women with normal pregnancy outcome and seven patients with preeclampsia, we measured the levels of VEGF receptor 2, soluble Endoglin, and soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase 1 at 11–16 weeks, 27–32 weeks, and 34–38 weeks of gestation using commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kits. We used the DVR100B kits for soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase measurement, DVR200 kits for VEGF receptor 2 measurement, and DNDG00 kits for s-Endoglin. Blood was collected in 5-mL plain tubes, centrifuged at 2,000 rpm at 4°C, and serum was separated and stored at −80°C in 500-μL aliquots until the time of analysis. All assays were performed in duplicate by a single investigator (V.N.).
One-way analysis of variance was performed for comparisons among groups at baseline and when significant differences were found, the Bonferroni correction was carried out to examine where the significance lay. For the longitudinal changes in the measured variables including data on systolic and diastolic blood pressure, basal and maximal capillary density, angiogenic, and antiangiogenic factors, we used analysis of variance for repeated measures (general linear model) with the Bonferroni adjustment for multiple comparisons within participants. For these variables, each measurement at 20–24 weeks, 27–32 weeks, 34–38 weeks, and 5–15 weeks postpartum was paired with measurements at baseline (11–16 weeks). We used independent samples t test to compare measurements “between participants.” Correlations between changes in angiogenic and antiangiogenic factors and changes in capillary density were made with Pearson's correlation. Statistical significance was declared when the P value was <.05. All statistical analysis was carried out using IBM SPSS 19.
Table 1 shows the baseline characteristics, at entry to the study, of the 305 women who completed the study. At the end of pregnancy, 272 women had a normal pregnancy, 16 developed preeclampsia, eight had hypertension (either essential or gestational), and nine pregnancies were complicated by intrauterine growth restriction without preeclampsia or hypertension. Table 2 shows the baseline characteristics of study individuals according to their pregnancy outcomes. Of the 13 women with a history of previous preeclampsia, four (30.8%) developed preeclampsia in the current pregnancy and of the 10 women with hypertension, three (30%) developed preeclampsia. At the baseline visit (11–16 weeks), both systolic and diastolic blood pressure were significantly higher, albeit within the normal range, in women who later on developed preeclampsia compared with women with normal pregnancy (106/62±9/9 mm Hg compared with 113/68±12/11 mm Hg, P=.002 and P=.035, respectively). As mentioned earlier, three of the women who later developed preeclampsia had a history of mild untreated hypertension and four had a history of previous preeclampsia. Table 3 shows longitudinal changes in systolic and diastolic blood pressure, basal capillary density, maximal capillary density, and angiogenic and antiangiogenic factors in normal pregnancy and in women who developed preeclampsia from the first trimester through four planned visits to 5–15 weeks postpartum.
There was a significant progressive increase in both systolic and diastolic blood pressure in normal pregnancy (P=.001 and P<.001, respectively). Compared with baseline, there was a nonsignificant increase in diastolic blood pressure at 20–24 weeks and 27–32 weeks of gestation. However, the subsequent changes were significant at 34–38 weeks (P<.001) and at 5–15 weeks postpartum (P<.001) (Table 3; Fig. 1A and B).
Compared with baseline at 11–16 weeks of gestation, the increase in systolic and diastolic blood pressure was nonsignificant at all visits in women who developed preeclampsia (Table 3; Fig. 1A and B). It is important to stress here that the blood pressure changes analyzed are those taken at the fixed predetermined visits (27–32 weeks and 34–38 weeks of gestation), which do not reflect the higher readings when preeclampsia was actually diagnosed, because then these women did not attend for their designated visits. This introduces the problem of missing data and analysis of blood pressure taken either before the onset of preeclampsia, or in the puerperium when the blood pressure had normalized. This explains the apparent lack of a significant rise in systolic and diastolic blood pressure in a group of women who nevertheless developed preeclampsia.
Compared with the baseline visit at 11–16 weeks of gestation, the earliest statistically significant fall in mean basal capillary density occurred at 34–38 weeks of gestation (P=.009). At the postpartum visit, the changes were not statistically significant. The earliest statistically significant decrease in maximal capillary density occurred at 34–38 weeks of gestation (P=.017). At the 5–15 weeks postpartum visit, the mean decrease was not statistically significant. (Table 3; Fig. 2A and B).
The mean onset of preeclampsia was at 35.6±4.8 weeks of gestation (range. 27.0–41.5 weeks). The changes in basal capillary density were not significant throughout pregnancy or in the postpartum visit. However, when compared with the baseline visit, there was a significant reduction in maximal capillary density (ie, structural rarefaction) at the 20- to 24-week visit (mean change 7.0 capillaries per field; 95% confidence interval −12.6 to −1.4; P=.015), 7–21 weeks before the onset of preeclampsia. There was further significant rarefaction at 27–32 weeks of gestation (P=.009) and at 34–38 weeks of gestation (P<.001) (Fig. 2B). In contrast to normal pregnancy, significant reduction in maximal capillary density persisted in the postpartum visit.
The changes in basal capillary density in women who went on to develop preeclampsia were not significant compared with women who had a normal pregnancy. We could not rule out the possibility that we have not seen significant differences because of the small number of participants with preeclampsia. However, maximal capillary density was significantly lower at 27–32 weeks of gestation (P=.003), at 34–38 weeks of gestation (P=.03), and at the postpartum visit (P=.02).
In normal pregnancy, serum VEGF receptor 2 levels increased significantly at 27–32 weeks of gestation (P=.02) and then reduced at 34–38 weeks of gestation but remained significantly higher compared with the first visit (P=.04). In preeclampsia, the increases from baseline in VEGF receptor 2 levels at 27–32 weeks of gestation and at 34–38 weeks of gestation were not statistically significant (Table 3).
The increase from baseline in serum fms-like tyrosine kinase 1 at 27–32 weeks and 34–38 weeks of gestation was not significant when compared with the first visit in normal pregnancy and in women who developed preeclampsia. In normal pregnancy, serum soluble Endoglin did not change significantly from baseline to 27–32 weeks of gestation but increased significantly at 34–38 weeks of gestation (P=.04). The changes in soluble Endoglin in pre-eclamptic pregnancies were not significant. Again we could not rule out the possibility that we have not seen significant differences at other visits because of the small number of participants who developed preeclampsia. There was no significant difference in VEGF receptor 2, fms-like tyrosine kinase 1, and soluble Endoglin levels between the two groups at 11–16 weeks and 27–32 weeks of gestation. At 34–38 weeks of gestation, VEGF receptor 2 levels were significantly lower (P=.05), whereas fms-like tyrosine kinase 1 and soluble Endoglin levels were significantly higher (P<.001 and P=.004, respectively) in women who went on to develop preeclampsia. The change in soluble Endoglin from 11–16 weeks to 27–32 weeks of gestation was significantly related with the change in maximal capillary density in the same period (Pearson correlation coefficient −0.45, P=.02), indicating that the higher the increase in soluble Endoglin, the greater the loss of structural capillary density. There was no correlation between levels of fms-like tyrosine kinase 1 or VEGF receptor 2 and other capillary measurements (P=.154 and P=.108, respectively).
This study shows that significant structural capillary rarefaction precedes the onset of preeclampsia. Women who went on to develop preeclampsia had a significant (P=.015) 9% reduction in their structural capillary density by 20–24 weeks of gestation, which progressed to 17% by 27–32 weeks of gestation and reached a nadir of 20% by 34–38 weeks of gestation. Our observations suggest that the earlier and more pronounced capillary rarefaction may play a role in the pathophysiology of preeclampsia. Our findings therefore not only corroborate our previous report that capillary rarefaction is associated with preeclampsia,4 but have advanced our knowledge in establishing the temporal relationship that structural capillary rarefaction precedes preeclampsia. These findings further support the concept of widespread maternal microcirculatory abnormalities that precede the onset of preeclampsia.11 We further substantiate previous studies which suggest that preeclampsia is an exaggerated antiangiogenic state12 with the structural capillary rarefaction and the resultant loss of endothelial surface and reduction of nitric oxide.13
Although the pathophysiological basis of preeclampsia remains uncertain, the consistent histopathologic lesion is defective and inadequate cytotrophoblastic invasion of spiral arterioles.14 In response to the hypoxia exaggerated by capillary rarefaction, the placenta secretes soluble factors into the maternal vasculature, which in turn induce widespread endothelial dysfunction and the clinical features of preeclampsia.15 One of the factors thought to be important is the naturally occurring antiangiogenic molecule soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1, also known as soluble VEGF receptor 1,16 which has been shown to be produced in large amounts by placental trophoblasts in preeclampsia17 and released into the maternal circulation.18,19 It acts as a potent antiangiogenic molecule by binding circulating VEGF and placental growth factor.20 Increased antiangiogenic activity in response to placental ischemia may seem contradictory, because teleologically one would expect increased angiogenic activity not least because VEGF, a proangiogenic molecule, is also upregulated by hypoxia.21 Cytotrophoblasts, in contrast to endothelial cells, respond in opposite ways to hypoxia in terms of angiogenic balance because they induce excess production of fms-like tyrosine kinase 1 and a deficiency of VEGF.17 However, the situation is undoubtedly complex and other factors may well play a role too. For instance, we have previously reported that placental catecholamine release is increased in preeclampsia,22 and we postulated that in response to hypoxia, the placenta releases a signal (catecholamine) recognizable by the maternal vasculature to raise blood pressure and improve perfusion of the fetoplacental unit and that what starts as a physiological response becomes pathologic because the rise in blood pressure fails to correct the hypoxia.22
An additional remarkable finding in our study was that although the reduction in capillary density recovered to baseline levels within the puerperium in women who remained normotensive, in those who developed preeclampsia, there was no resolution of the capillary rarefaction. This observation appears to be consistent with the reports of long-term risk of endothelial dysfunction, hypertension, and cardiovascular disease in women who develop preeclampsia23,24 and the observations that capillary rarefaction is a hallmark of essential hypertension.25,26 The strong familial predisposition to preeclampsia, essential hypertension, and atherosclerosis suggests that there may be common risk factors, pathways, or both for these disorders.27 The mechanisms and consequences of microvascular rarefaction are not fully understood but could possibly increase peripheral vascular resistance either directly through the reduction of the total cross-sectional area of the terminal vasculature or indirectly through inducing renal ischemia and stimulation of the renin–angiotensin system. Microvascular rarefaction is not confined to the skin but is a widespread phenomenon affecting several tissues in hypertensive individuals including the myocardium, the kidneys, and the brain.10,28,29 In support for a possible role of microvascular rarefaction in increasing blood pressure is the current realization that angiogenesis inhibitor drugs induce hypertension in a significant proportion of patients and this increase in blood pressure can be related to or even be explained by capillary rarefaction and alteration in endothelial function in the whole systemic vascular network.30 More recently it has been shown in preclinical studies that these drugs can cause a preeclampsia-like syndrome further supporting a role for the capillary microcirculation in the pathogenesis of this syndrome.31
We acknowledge the limitations of our study that include the relatively small number of women who developed preeclampsia and the fewer numbers of observations as a prospective study progresses. However, the small number of women who developed preeclampsia represented 4% of our study population, a reflection of the prevalence of preeclampsia (3–7%) in populations worldwide. A longitudinal study design overcomes the issue of small numbers because the variability between individuals, which would require large numbers to compensate in a cross-sectional study, is minimized by repeated measurements in a given individual. In addition, this longitudinal study design is arguably the only effective way of examining temporal relationships in observational studies.
In conclusion, significant structural capillary rarefaction precedes the onset of preeclampsia and may therefore play a role in the pathogenesis of this disease. Our results substantiate the concept of widespread maternal microcirculatory abnormalities that precede the onset of preeclampsia.
1. Sibai B, Dekker G, Kupferminc M. Pre-eclampsia. Lancet 2005;365:785–99.
2. Bellamy L, Casas JP, Hingorani AD, Williams DJ. Pre-eclampsia and risk of cardiovascular disease and cancer in later life: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2007;335:974.
3. Levy BI, Schiffrin EL, Mourad JJ, Agostini D, Vicaut E, Safar ME, et al.. Impaired tissue perfusion: a pathology common to hypertension, obesity, and diabetes mellitus. Circulation 2008;118:968–76.
4. Hasan KM, Manyonda IT, Ng FS, Singer DR, Antonios TF. Skin capillary density changes in normal pregnancy and pre-eclampsia. J Hypertens 2002;20:2439–43.
5. Levine RJ, Lam C, Qian C, Yu KF, Maynard SE, Sachs BP, et al.. Soluble endoglin and other circulating antiangiogenic factors in preeclampsia. N Engl J Med 2006;355:992–1005.
6. Mourad JJ, Levy BI. Mechanisms of antiangiogenic-induced arterial hypertension. Curr Hypertens Rep 2011;13:289–93.
7. Diagnosis and management of preeclampsia and eclampsia. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 33. January 2002. American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology. Obstet Gynecol 2002;99:159–67.
8. Antonios TF, Rattray FE, Singer DR, Markandu ND, Mortimer PS, MacGregor GA. Maximization of skin capillaries during intravital video-microscopy in essential hypertension: comparison between venous congestion, reactive hyperaemia and core heat load tests. Clin Sci (Lond) 1999;97:523–8.
9. Antonios TFT, Singer DR, Markandu ND, Mortimer PS, MacGregor GA. Structural skin capillary rarefaction in essential hypertension. Hypertension 1999;33:998–1001.
10. Antonios TF, Kaski JC, Hasan KM, Brown SJ, Singer DR. Rarefaction of skin capillaries in patients with anginal chest pain and normal coronary arteriograms. Eur Heart J 2001;22:1144–8.
11. Granger JP, Alexander BT, Llinas MT, Bennett WA, Khalil RA. Pathophysiology of preeclampsia: linking placental ischemia/hypoxia with microvascular dysfunction. Microcirculation 2002;9:147–60.
12. Maynard SE, Min JY, Merchan J, Lim KH, Li J, Mondal S, et al.. Excess placental soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase 1 (sFlt1) may contribute to endothelial dysfunction, hypertension, and proteinuria in preeclampsia. J Clin Invest 2003;111:649–58.
13. Lowe DT. Nitric oxide dysfunction in the pathophysiology of preeclampsia. Nitric Oxide 2000;4:441–58.
14. Brosens IA, Robertson WB, Dixon HG. The role of the spiral arteries in the pathogenesis of preeclampsia. Obstet Gynecol Annu 1972;1:177–91.
15. Gilbert JS, Ryan MJ, LaMarca BB, Sedeek M, Murphy SR, Granger JP. Pathophysiology of hypertension during preeclampsia: linking placental ischemia with endothelial dysfunction. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2008;294:H541–50.
16. Chaiworapongsa T, Romero R, Espinoza J, Bujold E, Mee Kim Y, Goncalves LF, et al.. Evidence supporting a role for blockade of the vascular endothelial growth factor system in the pathophysiology of preeclampsia. Young Investigator Award. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004;190:1541–7.
17. Nagamatsu T, Fujii T, Kusumi M, Zou L, Yamashita T, Osuga Y, et al.. Cytotrophoblasts up-regulate soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 expression under reduced oxygen: an implication for the placental vascular development and the pathophysiology of preeclampsia. Endocrinology 2004;145:4838–45.
18. Banks RE, Forbes MA, Searles J, Pappin D, Canas B, Rahman D, et al.. Evidence for the existence of a novel pregnancy-associated soluble variant of the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor, Flt-1. Mol Hum Reprod 1998;4:377–86.
19. Clark DE, Smith SK, He Y, Day KA, Licence DR, Corps AN, et al.. A vascular endothelial growth factor antagonist is produced by the human placenta and released into the maternal circulation. Biol Reprod 1998;59:1540–8.
20. Levine RJ, Maynard SE, Qian C, Lim KH, England LJ, Yu KF, et al.. Circulating angiogenic factors and the risk of preeclampsia. N Engl J Med 2004;350:672–83.
21. Forsythe JA, Jiang BH, Iyer NV, Agani F, Leung SW, Koos RD, et al.. Activation of vascular endothelial growth factor gene transcription by hypoxia-inducible factor 1. Mol Cell Biol 1996;16:4604–13.
22. Manyonda IT, Slater DM, Fenske C, Hole D, Choy MY, Wilson C. A role for noradrenaline in pre-eclampsia: towards a unifying hypothesis for the pathophysiology. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1998;105:641–8.
23. Wilson BJ, Watson MS, Prescott GJ, Sunderland S, Campbell DM, Hannaford P, et al.. Hypertensive diseases of pregnancy and risk of hypertension and stroke in later life: results from cohort study. BMJ 2003;326:845.
24. Melchiorre K, Sutherland GR, Liberati M, Thilaganathan B. Preeclampsia is associated with persistent postpartum cardiovascular impairment. Hypertension 2011;58:709–15.
25. Levy BI, Ambrosio G, Pries AR, Struijker-Boudier HA. Microcirculation in hypertension: a new target for treatment? Circulation 2001;104:735–40.
26. Antonios TF, Rattray FM, Singer DR, Markandu ND, Mortimer PS, MacGregor GA. Rarefaction of skin capillaries in normotensive offspring of individuals with essential hypertension. Heart 2003;89:175–8.
27. Roberts JM, Cooper DW. Pathogenesis and genetics of pre-eclampsia. Lancet 2001;357:53–6.
28. Antonios TFT, MacGregor GA. Generalized microvascular disease in essential hypertension: evidence from studies of cutaneous microcirculation. In: Levy BI, Struijker Boudier HA, editors. Role of micro and macrocirculation in target organ damage in diabetes and hypertension. Oxford (UK): Wiley-Blackwell; 2009. p. 54–67.
29. Keller G, Zimmer G, Mall G, Ritz E, Amann K. Nephron number in patients with primary hypertension. N Engl J Med 2003;348:101–8.
30. Steeghs N, Gelderblom H, Roodt JO, Christensen O, Rajagopalan P, Hovens M, et al.. Hypertension and rarefaction during treatment with telatinib, a small molecule angiogenesis inhibitor. Clin Cancer Res 2008;14:3470–6.
31. Kappers MH, Smedts FM, Horn T, van Esch JH, Sleijfer S, Leijten F, et al.. The vascular endothelial growth factor receptor inhibitor sunitinib causes a preeclampsia-like syndrome with activation of the endothelin system. Hypertension 2011;58: 295–302.
© 2012 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
What does "Remember me" mean?
By checking this box, you'll stay logged in until you logout. You'll get easier access to your articles, collections,
media, and all your other content, even if you close your browser or shut down your
To protect your most sensitive data and activities (like changing your password),
we'll ask you to re-enter your password when you access these services.
What if I'm on a computer that I share with others?
If you're using a public computer or you share this computer with others, we recommend
that you uncheck the "Remember me" box.
Looking for ABOG articles? Visit our ABOG MOC II collection. The selected Green Journal articles are free through the end of the calendar year.
ACOG MEMBER SUBSCRIPTION ACCESS
If you are an ACOG Fellow and have not logged in or registered to Obstetrics & Gynecology, please follow these step-by-step instructions to access journal content with your member subscription.
Readers Of this Article Also Read