Obstetrics & Gynecology:
Near-Miss Maternal Mortality: Cardiac Dysfunction as the Principal Cause of Obstetric Intensive Care Unit Admissions
Small, Maria J. MD, MPH; James, Andra H. MD, MPH; Kershaw, Trace PhD; Thames, Betty BS; Gunatilake, Ravi MD; Brown, Haywood MD
From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina; and Yale University School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut.
Corresponding author: Maria J. Small, MD, MPH, Box 3967 DUMC, Durham, NC 27710; e-mail: email@example.com.
Financial Disclosure The authors did not report any potential conflicts of interest.
OBJECTIVE: Evaluation of “near-miss” maternal mortality is a robust surveillance method to assess the quality of obstetric care and determinants of poor maternal outcome. To evaluate near-miss maternal mortality, we examined patient characteristics and maternal and neonatal outcomes for an obstetric population admitted to intensive care units (ICUs) in a tertiary care center.
METHODS: Pregnant and postpartum patients admitted to Duke University Medical Center ICUs from January 2005 to April 2011 were enrolled. Demographic, diagnostic, and outcome data were abstracted from the medical records for analysis.
RESULTS: A total of 86 women were included in the study. No participants were included more than once. The mean maternal age (±standard deviation) was 29.8±7.2 years. When racial and ethnic differences were examined, African American women were more likely to be admitted to the ICU. Significant ethnic differences in body mass index (BMI) were noted with African American women (mean BMI 35) and Hispanic women (mean BMI 36) having significantly higher BMIs than white women (mean BMI 28). The majority of patients (87%) were admitted postpartum. The mean length of stay was 10 days. The leading reason for admission to the ICUs was maternal cardiac disease (36%) followed by complications from hemorrhage (29%), sepsis (9%), and hypertensive disorders (9%). No significant racial or ethnic differences in maternal medical comorbidities or neonatal outcome were noted.
CONCLUSION: In this obstetric population, the leading reason for ICU admissions was cardiac disease. The increasing prevalence of advanced maternal age, congenital heart disease, obesity, diabetes, and hypertension among women who are of childbearing age may be contributing factors.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III
Audits of maternal mortality are important measures of the quality of obstetric care.1,2 This event, however, is rare in wealthy nations.3,4 Measures of “near-miss” maternal mortalities, a more common occurrence, may provide more meaningful information regarding determinants of severe obstetric morbidity as well as trends in management and outcome.5,6 Near-miss maternal mortalities represent events that would have resulted in a maternal death during pregnancy and childbirth if not for significant medical intervention.7 Unfortunately, definitions of near-miss maternal mortality vary across institutions and among nations.8–10 Despite these variations in definitions, a commonly accepted measure of near-miss maternal mortality is intensive care unit (ICU) admission.6,11–15
Obstetric ICU admissions are rare with rates of 0.5–7.6 per 1,000 births.11 Most retrospective, observational studies demonstrate ICU near-miss morbidities that parallel known causes of maternal mortality: hemorrhage, sepsis, and maternal hypertensive disease. Demographic changes in the U.S. obstetric population, with increasing rates of cesarean delivery, obesity, and advanced maternal age, may lead to higher maternal morbidity and affect changes in obstetric ICU admissions.
Many social and economic factors are associated with severe maternal morbidity and mortality. African American women demonstrate a fourfold higher maternal mortality ratio than white women in the United States.16 Analyses of near-miss maternal morbidity are varied; however, maternal race and ethnicity are associated with disparities in outcome.17 Studies from Europe, Australia, and New Zealand demonstrate higher rates of obstetric ICU admissions and maternal deaths for immigrant and nonwhite populations.14,18–20 Similarly, in the United States, when race and ethnicity are specified, many authors describe higher percentages of African American obstetric admissions to ICUs than expected based on population demographics.21,22 Few studies analyze obstetric ICU admission diagnoses and determinants of potential disparities by race and ethnicity.
The primary objective of this study was to examine the demographic, medical, and pregnancy-related variables associated with maternal ICU admissions and near-miss maternal morbidities. A secondary objective was to determine the pregnancy outcomes of women experiencing near-miss mortalities to learn more about the interventions necessary to avert a maternal death.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Pregnant and postpartum patients admitted to Duke University Medical Center's surgical, medical, cardiac, pulmonary, and neurology ICUs from January 2005 to April 2011 were included in the study. The labor and delivery unit at our institution is a high-dependency center where most severe maternal morbidities, including eclampsia, postpartum hemorrhage, and pulmonary embolism, are managed. However, women requiring prolonged ventilator support, in unstable condition, or both, predelivery or postpartum, are transferred from labor and delivery to the ICUs.
A trained study coordinator identified and approached all obstetric patients admitted to the ICUs and offered inclusion in our obstetric ICU registry. Enrolled women agreed to participate either directly or indirectly through consent granted by family members or designated proxies. Maternal demographic data recorded included age, parity, body mass index (BMI, calculated as weight (kg)/[height (m)]2), race and ethnicity, primary language, insurance status, employment status, marital status, city and county of origin, and receipt of prenatal care.
Clinical data obtained from review of maternal records and bedside observation included primary indication for ICU admission, antepartum, postpartum, or both status at the time of ICU admission, comorbid medical conditions, therapeutic interventions such as blood transfusion or intubation, and length of ICU and hospital stay. Neonatal outcomes such as birth weight, neonatal ICU admission, length of hospital stay, and survival also were recorded.
Investigators (A.J. and M.S.) reviewed all records and verified the primary admission diagnoses leading to ICU stay, because some patients had multiple, concomitant severe comorbidities. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS. Differences between racial groups were tested for significance with the chi-square test and analysis of variance for categorical and continuous variables, respectively. The 95% confidence intervals were calculated with P set at <.05. The Duke University School of Medicine institutional review board approved this study.
During the study period, 19,575 births occurred. There were five maternal deaths: two resulted from metastatic cancer, two secondary to cystic fibrosis, and one the result of sepsis. Ninety-four obstetric patients—five per 1,000 deliveries—were admitted to ICUs. Eight declined participation in the study. Eighty-six patients were included in this analysis.
Table 1 shows a comparison of demographic characteristics by race and ethnicity. African American women comprised the largest population admitted to the ICU (45%). Significant differences were found by race and ethnicity in the following variables: parity, BMI, and marital and insurance status. African American (mean 35) and Hispanic women (mean 36) had significantly higher BMIs than white women (mean 28). African American and Hispanic women were also more likely to have Medicaid or no insurance and were more likely to be unmarried and multiparous. No significant differences in admission diagnosis, maternal medical comorbidities, or neonatal outcome were noted based on maternal race and ethnicity or maternal BMI (data not shown). The majority (87%) of patients transferred to the ICUs were admitted postpartum (Table 2).
Table 3 demonstrates the principal cause for ICU admission. The leading admission diagnosis for pregnant and postpartum women was maternal cardiac disease (36%). Maternal hemorrhage (both obstetric and nonobstetric) was the second leading reason for admission (29%). Hypertensive disease accounted for 9% of ICU admissions. Of note, the overall rate postpartum hemorrhage previously reported at our institution is 5.4%, whereas preeclampsia and eclampsia complicate approximately 7–10% of all pregnancies.23
The majority of cardiac conditions prompting ICU admission resulted from cardiomyopathy. Acute complications associated with peripartum cardiomyopathy comprised the majority of this group. Congenital heart disease is the underlying etiology for many of these valvular lesions and cardiomyopathies. Congenitally acquired conditions were the second leading cause of maternal cardiac ICU admissions (Table 4).
The majority of women admitted to ICUs had known, severe cardiac disease with complications or developed acute cardiac events during pregnancy. The hemodynamic shifts associated with labor, delivery, and the puerperium place women with known cardiac disease at higher risk for maternal mortality. Intensive care management potentially averts maternal death.24
Cardiomyopathy is the leading cause of maternal mortality in North Carolina.25 Aggressive identification and management of patients with known or suspected cardiomyopathy are associated with reduced maternal mortality in our population.24 An additional contributor to maternal ICU admissions for cardiac conditions is related to the fact that our facility is a tertiary care referral center for women with congenital heart disease. Women with critical cardiac conditions, requiring advanced interventions, can be effectively managed using a multidisciplinary approach.
Similar to other studies, African American women comprised the majority of patients admitted to the ICUs.21,22 These findings are consistent with the literature both in the U.S. and in European populations. In The Netherlands, ethnic minorities were more likely to experience near-miss maternal deaths.14,26 In the U.K. confidential inquiries into maternal mortality, similar increases in maternal mortality were identified among immigrants and ethnic minorities.2 Previous work from our institution demonstrated ethnic differences in maternal mortality and morbidity with African American women demonstrating higher rates of chronic disease and maternal mortality but Hispanic women demonstrating higher rates of near-miss maternal mortality.17 The reasons for these differences are multifactorial and likely the result of socioeconomic factors (eg, language barriers, medical knowledge, quality of care) as well as medical comorbidities.26,27
Maternal obesity is an established risk factor for severe obstetric morbidity and mortality. Unfortunately, most studies of obstetric ICU admissions do not include measures of maternal weight or BMI; therefore, it is difficult to compare across populations or assess differences over time. In the U.K. Confidential Enquiry into Maternal and Child Health, overweight and obesity were associated with approximately 50% of maternal deaths.2 Sixty-one percent of maternal cardiac deaths were associated with overweight and obesity.2 Disparities in maternal obesity for African American and Hispanic women were observed in our study; however, these differences in BMI did not affect other maternal medical comorbidities or outcomes.
Cardiovascular disease in pregnancy is on the rise globally as a leading cause of maternal morbidity and mortality.2,28–31 The role of race and ethnicity as an independent contributor to these outcomes is not clear. In a national population-based sample, James et al28 demonstrate an increase in myocardial infarction rates for African American women; however, in multivariable models adjusting for risk factors such as smoking status, diabetes mellitus, obesity, and physical inactivity, race was not found to be an independent predictor of myocardial infarction.
The limitations of this study are the small sample size. The size, however, is comparable to other single-center reports in the literature. Intensive care unit admissions are not cumbersome to identify and track as a measure of obstetric morbidity; however, criteria for ICU admission does vary across institutions. Although the small sample may limit rigorous evaluation of the factors contributing to disparities in severe adverse outcomes, the multiethnic nature of our population does allow for assessment of racial and ethnic differences in ICU admissions. The prospective study design is unique because there are few such studies in the literature.8,32–34
In general, ICU admissions represent approximately one-third of severe obstetric morbidities.15 Mahutte et al13recommend using unplanned ICU admissions as quality assessment indicators for obstetric care. They suggest maternal morbidities are separate from and different from maternal mortalities. We observed a similar finding. In our population, 40% of maternal deaths resulted from metastatic cancer and none occurred in the context of the most common causes of maternal ICU admission: cardiac conditions, hemorrhage, or preeclampsia. As a tertiary care center, our facility has a similar numbers of transfers (23%) from outside hospitals.13,35 Assessment of these severe morbidities may allow for evaluation of adequate obstetric care. Such an analysis can enable health care providers and institutions to assess performance according to established standards or protocols.8,13,36 Regular scrutiny of ICU admissions is a valuable and manageable means of surveillance for near-miss maternal mortality.
1. Cantwell R, Clutton-Brock T, Cooper G, Dawson A, Drife J, Garrod D, et al.. Saving Mothers' Lives: reviewing maternal deaths to make motherhood safer: 2006–2008. The Eighth report of the Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths in the United Kingdom. BJOG 2011;118(suppl 1):1–203.
2. Lewis G. Saving Mothers' Lives: reviewing maternal deaths to make motherhood safer—2006–2008. The Eighth Report of the Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths in the United Kingdom. BJOG 2011;118(Suppl 1):1–203.
3. Ronsmans C, Graham WJ. Maternal mortality: who, when, where, and why. Lancet 2006;368:1189–200.
4. Hogan MC, Foreman KJ, Naghavi M, Ahn SY, Wang M, Makela SM, et al.. Maternal mortality for 181 countries, 1980–2008: a systematic analysis of progress towards Millennium Development Goal 5. Lancet 2010;375:1609–23.
5. Pattinson RC, Buchmann E, Mantel G, Schoon M, Rees H. Can enquiries into severe acute maternal morbidity act as a surrogate for maternal death enquiries? BJOG 2003;110:889–93.
6. Mantel GD, Buchmann E, Rees H, Pattinson RC. Severe acute maternal morbidity: a pilot study of a definition for a near-miss. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1998;105:985–90.
7. Say L, Pattinson R, Gülmezoglu A. WHO systematic review of maternal morbidity and mortality: the prevalence of severe acute maternal morbidity (near miss). Reprod Health 2004;1:3.
8. Brace V, Penney G, Hall M. Quantifying severe maternal morbidity: a Scottish population study. BJOG 2004;111:481–4.
9. Say L, Souza JP, Pattinson RC; WHO working group on Maternal Mortality and Morbidity classifications. Maternal near miss—towards a standard tool for monitoring quality of maternal health care. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2009;23:287–96.
10. Fillipi V, Brugha R, Browne E, Gohou V, Bacci A, DeBrouwere V, et al.. Obstetric audit in resource-poor settings: lessons from a multi-country project auditing ‘near miss’ obstetrical emergencies Health Policy Plan 2004;19:57–66.
11. Baskett TF. Epidemiology of obstetric critical care. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2008;22:763–74.
12. van Dillen J, Mesman JA, Zwart JJ, Bloemenkamp KW, van Roosmalen J. Introducing maternal morbidity audit in the Netherlands. BJOG 2010;117:416–21.
13. Mahutte NG, Murphy-Kaulbeck L, Le Q, Solomon J, Benjamin A, Boyd ME. Obstetric admissions to the intensive care unit. Obstet Gynecol 1999;94:263–6.
14. van Roosmalen J, Schuitemaker NW, Brand R, van Dongen PW, Bennebroek Gravenhorst J. Substandard care in immigrant versus indigenous maternal deaths in The Netherlands. BJOG 2002;109:212–3.
15. Zwart JJ, Richters JM, Ory F, de Vries JI, Bloemenkamp KW, van Roosmalen J. Severe maternal morbidity during pregnancy, delivery and pueperium in the Netherlands: a nationwide population-based study of 371,000 pregnancies. BJOG 2008;115:842–50.
16. Tucker MJ, Berg CJ, Callaghan WM, Hsia J. The black–white disparity in pregnancy-related mortality from 5 conditions: differences in prevalence and case-fatality rates. Am J Public Health 2007;97:247–51.
17. Brown H, Small M, Taylor Y, Chireau M, Howard DL. Near miss maternal mortality in a multiethnic population. Ann Epidemiol 2011;21:73–7.
18. Keizer JL, Zwart JJ, Meerman RH, Harinck BI, Feuth HD, van Roosmalen J. Obstetric intensive care admissions: a 12-year review in a tertiary care centre. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2006;128:152–6.
19. Lawton BA, Wilson LF, Dinsdale RA, Rose SB, Brown SA, Tait T, et al.. Audit of severe acute maternal morbidity describing reasons for transfer and potential preventability of admissions to ICU. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2010;50:346–51.
20. Sullivan EA, Ford J, Chambers G, Slaytor EK. Maternal mortality in Australia, 1973–1996. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2004;44:452–7; discussion 377.
21. Afessa B, Green B, Delke I, Koch K. Systemic inflammatory response syndrome, organ failure, and outcome in critically ill obstetric patients treated in an ICU. Chest 2001;120:1271–7.
22. Panchal S, Arria AM, Harris AP. Intensive care utilization during hospital admission for delivery: prevalence, risk factors, and outcomes in a statewide population. Anesthesiology 2000;92:1537–44.
23. James AH, Paglia MJ, Gernsheimer T, Grotegut C, Thames B. Blood component therapy in postpartum hemorrhage. Transfusion 2009;49:2430–3.
24. Say L. Importance of accurate information on causes of maternal deaths for informing health care programmes. Indian J Med Res 2010;132:123–4.
25. Berg CJ, Harper MA, Atkinson SM, Bell EA, Brown HL, Hage ML, et al.. Preventability of pregnancy-related deaths: results of a state-wide review. Obstet Gynecol 2005;106:1228–34.
26. Philibert M, Deneux-Tharaux C, Bouvier-Colle MH. Can excess maternal mortality among women of foreign nationality be explained by suboptimal obstetric care? BJOG 2008;115:1411–8.
27. Spong CY, Iams J, Goldenberg R, Hauck FR, Willinger M. Disparities in perinatal medicine: preterm birth, stillbirth, and infant mortality. Obstet Gynecol 2011;117:948–55.
28. James AH, Jamison MG, Biswas MS, Brancazio LR, Swamy GK, Myers ER. Acute myocardial infarction in pregnancy: a United States population-based study. Circulation 2006;113:1564–71.
29. Sui SC, Sermer M, Colman JM, Alvarez AN, Mercier LA, Morton BC, et al.; Cardiac Disease in Pregnancy (CARPREG) Investigators. Prospective multicenter study of pregnancy outcome in women with heart disease. Circulation 2001;104:515–21.
30. Kuklina EV, Tong X, Bansil P, George MG, Callaghan WM. Trends in pregnancy hospitalizations that included a stroke in the United States from 1994 to 2007: reasons for Concern? Stroke 2011;42:2564–70.
31. Berg C, Callaghan W, Syverson C, Henderson Z. Pregnancy-related mortality in the United States, 1998 to 2005. Obstet Gynecol 2010;116:1302–9.
32. Vasquez DN, Estenssoro E, Canalies HS, Reina R, Saenz MG, Das Neves AV, et al.. Clinical characteristics and outcomes of obstetric patients requiring ICU admission. Chest 2007;131:718–24.
33. Zwart JJ, Dupuis JR, Richters A, Ory F, van Roosmalen J. Obstetric intensive care unit admission: a 2-year nationwide population based cohort study. Intensive Care Med 2010;36:256–63.
34. Muench MV, Baschat AA, Malinow AM, Mighty HE. Analysis of disease in the obstetric intensive care unit at a university referral center: a 24-month review of prospective data. J Reprod Med 2008;53:914–20.
35. Kilpatrick S, Matthay M. Obstetric patients requiring critical care: a five-year review. Chest 1992;101:1407–12.
36. Pollock W, Rose L, Dennis C. Pregnant and postpartum admissions to the intensive care unit: a systematic review. Intensive Care Med 2010;36:1465–74.
This article has been cited 1 time(s).
Reproductive Biomedicine OnlineDo assisted-reproduction twin pregnancies require additional antenatal care?Reproductive Biomedicine Online
© 2012 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.
What does "Remember me" mean?
By checking this box, you'll stay logged in until you logout. You'll get easier access to your articles, collections,
media, and all your other content, even if you close your browser or shut down your
To protect your most sensitive data and activities (like changing your password),
we'll ask you to re-enter your password when you access these services.
What if I'm on a computer that I share with others?
If you're using a public computer or you share this computer with others, we recommend
that you uncheck the "Remember me" box.
Looking for ABOG articles? Visit our ABOG MOC II collection. The selected Green Journal articles are free through the end of the calendar year.
ACOG MEMBER SUBSCRIPTION ACCESS
If you are an ACOG Fellow and have not logged in or registered to Obstetrics & Gynecology, please follow these step-by-step instructions to access journal content with your member subscription.
Data is temporarily unavailable. Please try again soon.
Readers Of this Article Also Read