There is an error in “Prepregnancy Body Mass Index and Gestational Age-Dependent Changes in Lipid Levels During Pregnancy” by A. Vahratian, V. K. Misra, S. Trudeau, and D. P. Misra (Obstet Gynecol 2010;116:107–13). The column headings in Table 1 on page 110, “Normal Weight (n=58)” and “Overweight and Obese (n=84),” are incorrect. The correct column headings are “Normal Weight (n=84)” and “Overweight and Obese (n=58).” The authors regret this error.
In “Staples Compared With Subcuticular Suture for Skin Closure After Cesarean Delivery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis” by M. G. Tuuli, R. M. Rampersad, J. F. Carbone, D. Stamilio, G. A. Macones, and A. O. Odibo (Obstet Gynecol 2011;117:682–90), there is an error in reference 6. The correct reference is “Cromi A, Ghezzi F, Gottardi A, Cherubino M, Uccella S, Valdatta L. Cosmetic outcomes of various skin closure methods following cesarean delivery: a randomized trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010;203:36.e1–8.” The authors regret this error.
In the April 2011 issue, the Letter to the Editor by J. T. Parer and T. L. King (Obstet Gynecol 2011;117:986) was published with an incorrect title: “Electronic Fetal Monitoring as a Public Health Screening Program: The Arithmetic of Failure to the Editor.” The correct title is: “Electronic Fetal Monitoring as a Public Health Screening Program: The Arithmetic of Failure.” The Editorial Office regrets this error.
The response to the letter to the editor, “Electronic Fetal Monitoring as a Public Health Screening Program: The Arithmetic of Failure” by D. A. Grimes and J. F. Peipert (Obstet Gynecol 2011;117:986–7) contains an error in the second sentence. An extra character (“2”) was mistakenly inserted in “fetal.” This error occurred during production.