The human umbilical cord normally develops with two arteries and one vein. Single umbilical artery is a condition of the umbilical cord in which one artery is missing and the prevalence ranges from 0.2% to 11%, depending on the population studied.1–5
Numerous maternal and fetal risk factors and characteristics associated with single umbilical artery have been reported, including sex, multiple births, ethnicity, older maternal age, multiparity, and smoking, as well as the presence of maternal medical and pregnancy complications, such as preexisting diabetes, hypertension, preeclampsia, and epilepsy. Also reported are associations with maternal drug use (such as vitamin A, phenytoin, and levothyroxine), substance abuse, seasonal variations in conception, and placental abnormalities.1,6–22
Chromosomal abnormalities and congenital malformations are increased in fetuses with single umbilical artery.1,2,5,7,8,12,23 Congenital malformations associated with single umbilical artery include neural tube and cardiac defects; respiratory, gastrointestinal, musculoskeletal, and genitourinary anomalies; and acardiac twinning.7,23–26 Among neonates with apparently isolated single umbilical artery, postnatally diagnosed congenital malformations are increased compared with the general population.27 Increased rates of placental, cord, and amniotic fluid abnormalities have been found to be associated with single umbilical artery, including placental structural abnormalities, previa, abruption, abnormal cord length, and hydramnios and oligohydramnios.1,13,14,17,22
Although the prognosis for fetuses with single umbilical artery is mainly related to associated fetal structural or chromosomal anomalies, there remains an increased frequency of intrauterine or intrapartum fetal deaths among fetuses with isolated single umbilical artery.1,28,29 The incidence of intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) has been reported to be increased among fetuses with single umbilical artery and may be present without other congenital anomalies.3,29 Another study found no increased rate of IUGR in anatomically normal single umbilical artery fetuses.30
Overall mortality rate for neonates with single umbilical artery is higher than that for neonates with three vessel cords, and this high mortality rate is attributable to several interrelated factors including prematurity, low birth weight, and associated lethal malformations and an increased incidence of structural malformations of the placenta.22,31 With isolated single umbilical artery, higher rates of stillbirth, IUGR, prematurity, and neonatal mortality have been reported when compared with those fetuses and neonates with three vessel cords, events that cannot be explained by aneuploidy or chromosomal abnormalities.3,14,17–19,26 Mode of delivery may be influenced by the presence of single umbilical artery, with a higher rate of cesarean delivery being reported for neonates with two vessel cords.32
The long-term consequences of isolated single umbilical artery have not been studied extensively, but there is some evidence to suggest that there are long-term sequelae as a result of this malformation.33–35 In a large collaborative study, most children were found to be healthy and developing normally in early childhood, which shows that the majority of children born with isolated single umbilical artery show normal cognitive and physical development.20 Some studies suggest that inguinal hernias may be more common in the single umbilical artery population.3,14,35
This study explores the risk factors for development of single umbilical artery as well as the relationship between single umbilical artery and pregnancy and neonatal outcomes using a large, population-based birth cohort over a 22-year period.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
This was a population-based retrospective cohort study of deliveries of residents of Nova Scotia, Canada, between 1980 and 2002. This study included all deliveries to residents of Nova Scotia, Canada, between 1988 and 2002 and all deliveries occurring in Halifax County between 1980 and 1987. All deliveries at 20 weeks of gestation or more or weighing 500 g or more were included in the study. Data for this study were obtained from the population-based Nova Scotia Atlee Perinatal Database. The Atlee Perinatal Database is administered by the Nova Scotia Reproductive Care Program and contains variables related to maternal characteristics, medical conditions, labor, and delivery, and neonatal outcomes on all births at 20 or more weeks of gestation, and weighing more than 500 g, born in the province of Nova Scotia, as well as for births to Nova Scotia residents who deliver in the province of New Brunswick. Follow-up information on death and cause of death in the first year after birth is included. Data for the Nova Scotia Atlee database are abstracted by trained coders from standardized clinical forms and hospital records. In addition to information abstracted from the prenatal and delivery admission records, information pertaining to all antepartum admissions during pregnancy is also recorded in the database.
For the purpose of this study, single umbilical artery was defined as the absence of either the left or right umbilical artery and the presence of an umbilical vein. For single umbilical artery to have been recorded as present in the Atlee Perinatal Database, notation of single umbilical artery had to be present in one of the following: birth record, pathology report, or neonatal physical examination. Single umbilical artery was confirmed through gross or histologic examination of the placenta, examination of the neonate, or autopsy. Therefore, a neonate who was not noted to have a single umbilical artery in these records was assumed to have three vessel cords.
Number of fetuses was defined as those carried through to delivery. For multiples, twin type was defined as dichorionic and monochorionic, in which monochorionic also included monoamniotic and conjoined twins. For twins and multiples, each fetus or neonate was analyzed separately in calculating the rate of single umbilical artery and outcomes.
Maternal characteristics including age, obstetric history, maternal medical conditions, and medications were examined as potential risk factors. Potential fetal factors examined as potential risk factors included phenotypic sex, number of fetuses carried to delivery, and twin type.
The relationship between single umbilical artery and the following outcomes was explored: maternal pregnancy complications, need for invasive testing, fetal anomalies and chromosomal abnormalities, placental abnormalities, amniotic fluid abnormalities, intrauterine growth restriction and small for gestational age, labor and delivery, perinatal mortality, prematurity, and neonatal outcomes. Maternal pregnancy complications included pregnancy induced hypertension, eclampsia, hyperemesis, premature rupture of membranes, and gestational diabetes. Placental abnormalities included abruption, previa, villamentous cord insertion, circumvallate, amnionodosum, succenturiate, marginal cord insertion, and other miscellaneous placental abnormalities. Abnormalities of amniotic fluid were defined as oligohydramnios and hydramnios. Invasive testing assessed rates of chorionic villous sampling and amniocentesis. The presence of multiple anomalies was defined as two or more major anomalies. Chromosomal abnormalities included any aberration in chromosomes including trisomies, tetraploidy, deletions, translocations, triploidy, sex chromosome abnormalities, p and q abnormalities, and ring abnormalities. Outcomes of labor and delivery included induction of labor, fetal distress, meconium, mode of delivery, method of delivery, fetal position at delivery, and cesarean delivery because of fetal distress. Perinatal mortality was defined to include fetal or neonatal death. Preterm birth was defined as birth before 34 weeks or birth before 37 weeks of gestation. IUGR was defined as a birth weight at the third percentile or less, and small for gestational age as the 10th percentile or less.36 Neonatal outcomes included 1-minute and 5-minute Apgar score, admission to special care nursery, arterial cord Ph, depression at birth (defined by neonate requiring intermittent positive pressure breathing), postasphyctic central nervous system depression, postasphyctic central nervous system excitation, postasphyctic increased intracranial pressure, postasphyctic central nervous system depression or excitation and related outcomes, intraventricular hemorrhage, and aspiration pneumonitis.
Initially, the rates of single umbilical artery and isolated single umbilical artery were calculated. For isolated single umbilical artery, those fetuses and neonates with chromosomal abnormalities and congenital anomalies were removed from the overall baseline single umbilical artery population. Fetuses and neonates with chromosomal abnormalities and congenital anomalies were also removed from the comparison group without single umbilical artery. For the risk factor analyses, unadjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for each potential risk factor. Multiple logistic regression was then used to determine the best-fit model for risk factors associated with single umbilical artery using a backward regression approach. Multiple logistic regression was then used to determine the best-fit model for risk factors for isolated single umbilical artery.
For the outcomes analyses, univariable analysis was used to calculate unadjusted ORs and 95% CIs expressing the relationship of single umbilical artery, isolated single umbilical artery, and each outcome. Adjusted ORs and 95% CIs were then calculated for those outcomes statistically significant in the univariable analysis. Potential confounders of the relationship between single umbilical artery and outcomes were identified for both groups using stepwise logistic regression of fetal and maternal risk factors for single umbilical artery, and those risk factors with P<.1 from the univariable analysis were included in the model as potential confounders. Potential confounding factors for single umbilical artery were entered into a logistic regression model with each outcome and with single umbilical artery and isolated single umbilical artery as the principal independent variables of interest. Potential confounders included multiple pregnancy, maternal antibodies, maternal drug use, neurologic illness, pulmonary disease, maternal prepregnancy diabetes, chronic hypertensive disease, and maternal smoking. Observations for women with more than one delivery during the study period may not be independent (eg, a pregnancy outcome for a woman may be more or less likely to occur because of her outcome from a previous delivery). To adjust for this nonindependence, general estimating equations were used.
To determine the final model for each outcome, the following process was used: The potential confounder with the highest P value was removed and the degree of change in the point estimate for single umbilical artery was evaluated. If removing the factor did not change the point estimate for single umbilical artery by greater than 5%, the factor was eliminated and the process repeated until the final model was established. All analysis was conducted with SAS 8.2 software. This study received approval from the Isaac Walton Killam Health Centre Research Ethics Board.
There were 203,240 fetuses and neonates available for analysis between 1980 and 2002 with 885 fetuses and neonates (0.44%) having single umbilical artery. For isolated single umbilical artery, there were 196,752 fetuses and neonates available for analysis with 725 (0.37%) having an isolated single umbilical artery. All fetuses or neonates had the number of cord vessels recorded.
For isolated single umbilical artery, in the univariable risk factor analysis, smoking, drug use, presence of maternal antibodies, neurologic disease, pulmonary disease, preexisting diabetes, and chronic hypertension were associated with an increased risk for single umbilical artery. For fetal risk factors, twins and higher order multiples were associated with an increased risk for single umbilical artery. Following the stepwise modeling procedure, four variables remained in the final adjusted model for single umbilical artery (Table 1). The factors in the final model for isolated single umbilical artery included smoking (OR 1.71, 95% CI 1.46–2.01), previous child with low birth weight (OR 1.56, 95% CI 1.10–2.21), preexisting maternal neurological disease (OR 2.75, 95% CI 1.55–4.88), and twins and higher multiples (OR 2.73, CI 1.88–3.97).
Adjusted ORs for each of the outcomes for fetuses and neonates affected by single umbilical artery indicate that this group has increased risk of adverse outcomes. Of note is that fetuses and neonates with a two-vessel cord had a 15.35-fold greater risk of being affected with a chromosomal abnormality (OR 15.35, CI 9.90–23.81) and a 6.77-fold risk of having one or more major congenital anomaly (OR 6.77, CI 5.69–8.06), and a further increased risk of 18.7 times of having two or more major anomalies (OR18.18, CI 14.66–22.55). The most common congenital anomalies in the single umbilical artery fetuses and neonates without chromosomal abnormalities were genitourinary (6.48%) followed by cardiovascular (6.25%) and musculoskeletal (5.44%).
Table 2 shows the adjusted ORs for each of the outcomes for fetuses and neonates affected by isolated single umbilical artery. Hydramnios (OR 2.80, CI 1.42–5.49) and placental abnormalities (OR 3.63, CI 3.01–4.39) were significantly higher in pregnancies affected by isolated single umbilical artery when compared with three-vessel cord pregnancies. With regard to invasive testing, pregnancies with fetuses with isolated single umbilical artery had higher rates of amniocentesis (OR 2.52, CI 1.82–3.51) compared with pregnancies with three-vessel cord fetuses. For maternal medical conditions of pregnancy, pregnancy-induced hypertension (OR 1.36, CI 1.09–1.70), premature rupture of membranes (OR 1.34, CI 1.12–1.62), and gestational diabetes (OR 1.90, CI 1.34–2.68) were all increased in women with pregnancies with isolated two-vessel cords when compared with three-vessel cord pregnancies.
With respect to intrauterine growth problems, fetuses and neonates with isolated single umbilical artery were more likely to experience growth restriction with an OR of 2.23 (CI 1.84–2.69) for the 10th percentile or less and an OR of 2.46 (CI 1.89–3.22) for the 3rd percentile or less, respectively, when compared with those with three-vessel cords. Rates of prematurity were also significantly higher for less than 37 weeks of gestation (OR 2.48, CI 1.91–3.23) and less than 34 weeks of gestation (OR 3.05, CI 2.05–4.53), respectively, for fetuses and neonates with isolated single umbilical artery. For outcomes of labor and delivery, fetuses and neonates with isolated single umbilical artery had increased rates of induction (OR 1.75, CI 1.35–2.27), cesarean delivery (OR 1.52, CI 1.33–1.74), and cesarean delivery for fetal distress (OR 3.22, CI 2.43–4.28).
For neonatal outcomes, after adjusting for multiples, both 1-minute (OR 1.87, CI 1.37–2.55) and 5-minute Apgar scores (OR 2.54, CI 1.66–3.88) were significantly lower for newborns with isolated single umbilical artery compared with those with three-vessel cords. There were significantly more isolated single umbilical artery neonates with depression at birth (OR 1.59, CI 1.21–2.10). Special care nursery admissions (OR 2.66, CI 2.23–3.18) were higher for neonates with isolated single umbilical artery. For perinatal mortality, after adjusting for multiple pregnancies, the odds ratios for fetal deaths (OR 3.50, CI 2.12–5.82), neonatal deaths (OR 2.21, CI 0.88–5.53), perinatal deaths (OR 3.11, CI 1.97–4.94), and deaths up to 1 year of age (OR 2.70, CI 1.22–5.94) were all higher in fetuses and neonates with isolated single umbilical artery.
The overall birth prevalence of single umbilical artery was 0.44%, and the birth prevalence of isolated single umbilical artery was 0.37%, which are both in keeping with previous reported rates.1–5 Our study found similar rates of chromosomal abnormalities and congenital anomalies as reported in earlier studies.1,2,5,7,8,12,23 For the development of single umbilical artery and isolated single umbilical artery, smoking was the only modifiable risk factor after adjustment. It is likely that the prevalence of smoking is higher among women who have spontaneous abortions (ie, delivery at less than 500 g) compared with women who deliver neonates weighing 500 g or more.37 A higher prevalence of smokers among the missing data (neonates born weighing less than 500 g) would likely have the effect of our OR estimate for smoking to be conservative. As well, it is important to recognize that the observed association between maternal smoking and single umbilical artery may not be causal and that further prospective studies, which capture early pregnancy losses, are necessary to fully understand the relationship between smoking and single umbilical artery.
The results of this study indicate that pregnancies affected by single umbilical artery have higher rates of adverse pregnancy outcome. An important component of this study is that it supports the existence of an increased risk of perinatal mortality for fetuses and neonates with isolated single umbilical artery.4,32 This study supports previous studies showing that isolated single umbilical artery is a risk factor for poor pregnancy outcome, and based on this finding, increased surveillance may be warranted for these pregnancies.4,23
It is unclear why fetuses and neonates with isolated single umbilical artery are at increased risk for poor perinatal and neonatal outcomes. This study and previous studies have shown an increased risk for placental abnormalities with isolated single umbilical artery that may further compound risk to the fetus.13,14 This does not necessarily explain the increased rates of poor postnatal outcomes that were also found in this study. It is possible that the underlying cause of single umbilical artery may also convey further risk to the fetus in the intrapartum and neonatal periods. With regard to an increased risk for poor perinatal and neonatal outcomes, consideration of the placental abnormality needs to be considered as a possible cause for, or contributing factor to, this increased risk.
A strength of this study is that infant deaths were followed until 1 year of age. Previous studies assessing outcomes in the isolated single umbilical artery population did not include infant deaths up to 1 year of age and therefore may not accurately reflect the true prognosis and outcomes in fetuses and neonates with isolated single umbilical artery.28,29 Important questions to be answered with regard isolated single umbilical artery are the long-term outcomes such as survival beyond 1 year and developmental outcome. This is a difficult question to answer with regard to isolated single umbilical artery owing to the lack of long-term follow-up.
One of the limitations of this study is that only pregnancies at 20 or more weeks of gestation and weighing 500 g or more are included in the Atlee perinatal database. Terminations for fetal anomalies at less than 20 weeks of gestation or fetuses weighing less than 500 g were not included in this study. In Nova Scotia, a Fetal Anomaly Database captures all fetuses and neonates who have defined abnormalities, including all terminations of pregnancy as well as live and still births. This database was started in 1992. Reviewing the Fetal Anomaly database, all fetuses terminated at less than an estimated 20 weeks of gestation with single umbilical artery had other associated anomalies or a chromosomal abnormality present. Therefore, the rate of isolated single umbilical artery in this study would not be affected by these terminations.
Although this is one of the largest studies assessing outcomes of single umbilical artery, the power of this study was limited for many of the outcomes studied as they are rare events, such as death up to 1 year of age and neonatal death. Compounding this limitation is that for some outcomes, such as cord artery pH and chorionic villous sampling, no data were recorded for a large proportion of the cohort, and therefore, analysis was not possible. The presence of single umbilical artery was determined by birth record, pathology report, or neonatal physical examination. Use of birth records and physical examination may underestimate the incidence of single umbilical artery. A previous study suggests that pathologic examination of the cord and placenta as well as gross examination after fixation increase the rate of detection for single umbilical artery.1
Our study supports previous studies on single umbilical artery that recommend further evaluation and consultation for pregnancies with suspected single umbilical artery.30,38 The Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada recommend a detailed review of fetal anatomy with single umbilical artery and follow-up assessment of fetal growth given clinical concerns.39 This study supports a targeted anatomic survey owing to the increased risk of chromosomal and congenital abnormalities. Prospective parents should be counseled with regard to the increased risk for poor perinatal outcome and that increased surveillance may be required. According to this study's findings, the risk of intrauterine growth restriction is increased, and repeated ultrasound examination with Doppler assessment and testing for fetal well-being may be necessary in later weeks of gestation. There is also an increased risk of preterm delivery with isolated single umbilical artery. Whether increased surveillance or cervical length assessment would be beneficial requires more study.
In summary, our study shows that single umbilical artery is a congenital abnormality of the umbilical artery associated with increased risk for poor perinatal outcomes, even in the absence of chromosomal abnormalities or major anomalies.
1.Heifetz SA. Single umbilical artery: a statistical analysis of 237 autopsy cases and review of the literature. Perspect Pediatr Pathol 1984;8:345–78.
2.Byrne J, Blanc WA. Malformations and chromosome anomalies in spontaneously aborted fetuses with single umbilical artery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985;151:340–2.
3.Prucka S, Clemens M, Craven C, McPherson E. Single umbilical artery: what does it mean for the fetus? A case-control analysis of pathologically ascertained cases. Genet Med 2004;6:54–7.
4.Martinez-Payo C, Gaitero A, Tamarit I, Garcia-Espantaleon M, Iglesias Goy E. Perinatal results following the prenatal ultrasound diagnosis of single umbilical artery. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2005;84:1068–74.
5.Csécsei K, Kovács T, Hinchliffe SA, Papp Z. Incidence and associations of single umbilical artery in prenatally diagnosed malformed, midtrimester fetuses: a review of 62 cases. Am J Med Genet 1992;43:524–30.
6.Blazer S, Sujov P, Escholi Z, Itai BH, Bronshtein M. Single umbilical artery–right or left? does it matter? Prenat Diag 1997;17:5–8.
7.Jauniaux E. The single umbilical artery umbilical cord: it is worth screening for antenatally? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1995;5:75–6.
8.Thummala MR, Raju TN, Langenberg P. Isolated single umbilical artery and the risk for congenital malformations: a meta-analysis. J Pediatr Surg 1998;33:580–5.
9.Froehlich LA, Fujikura T. Significance of a single umbilical artery: report from the collaborative study of cerebral palsy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1966;94:274–9.
10.Leung AK, Robson WL. Single umbilical artery: a report of 159 cases. Am J Dis Child 1989;143:108–11.
11.Papadatos C, Paschos A. Single umbilical artery and congenital malformations. Obstet Gynecol 1965;26:367–70.
12.Rinehart BK, Terrone DA, Taylor CW, Isler CM, Larmon JE, Roberts WE. Single umbilical artery is associated with an increased incidence of structural and chromosomal anomalies and growth restriction. Am J Perinatol 2000;17:229–32.
13.Bourne GL, Benirschke K. Absent umbilical artery: a review of 113 cases. Arch Dis Child 1960;35:534–43.
14.Froehlich LA, Fujikura T. Follow-up of infants with single umbilical artery. Pediatrics 1973;52:6–13.
15.Geipel A, Germer U, Welp T, Schwinger E, Gembruch U. Prenatal diagnosis of single umbilical artery: determination of the absent side, associated anomalies, Doppler findings and perinatal outcome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2000;15:114–7.
16.Benirschke K, Brown WH. A vascular anomaly of the umbilical cord: the absence of one umbilical artery in the umbilical cords of normal and abnormal fetuses. Obstet Gynecol 1955;6:399–404.
17.Fujikura T. Single umbilical artery and congenital malformations. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1964;88:829–30.
18.Lilja M. Infants with single umbilical artery studied in a national registry: general epidemiological characteristics. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 1991;5:27–36.
19.Bryan EM, Kohler HG. The missing umbilical artery: I. prospective study based on a maternity unit. Arch Dis Child 1974;49:844–52.
20.Bryan EM, Kohler HG. The missing umbilical artery. II. Paediatric follow-up. Arch Dis Child 1975;50:714–8.
21.Lilja M. Infants with single umbilical artery studied in a national registry. 3: a case control study of risk factors. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 1994;8:325–33.
22.Raio L, Ghezzi F, Di Naro E, Franchi M, Brühwiler H, Lüscher KP. Prenatal assessment of Wharton's jelly in umbilical cords with single artery. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1999;14:42–6.
23.Perri T, Cohen-Sacher B, Hod M, Berant M, Meizner I, Bar J. Risk factors for cardiac malformations detected by fetal echocardiography in a tertiary center. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2005;17:123–8.
24.Martínez-Frías ML, Bermejo E, Rodríguez-Pinilla E, Prieto D; ECEMC Working Group. Does single umbilical artery (SUA) predict any type of congenital defect? Clinical-epidemiological analysis of a large consecutive series of malformed infants. Am J Med Genet A 2008;146A:15–25.
25.Nyberg DA, Shepard T, Mack LA, Hirsch J, Luthy D, Fitzsimmons J. Significance of a single umbilical artery in fetuses with central nervous system malformations. J Ultrasound Med 1988;7:265–73.
26.Lilja M. Infants with single umbilical artery studied in a national registry. 2: survival and malformations in infants with single umbilical artery. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 1992;6:416–22.
27.Lee CN, Cheng WF, Lai HL, Cheng SP, Shih JC, Shyu MK, et al. Perinatal management and outcome of fetuses with single umbilical artery diagnosed prenatally. J Matern Fetal Investig 1998;8:156–9.
28.Catanzarite VA, Hendricks SK, Maida C, Westbrook C, Cousins L, Schrimmer D. Prenatal diagnosis of the two-vessel cord: implications for patient counselling and obstetric management. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1995;5:98–105.
29.Catanzarite VA. The clinical significance of a single umbilical artery as an isolated finding on prenatal ultrasound. Obstet Gynecol. 1995;86:155–6.
30.Predanic M, Perni SC, Friedman A, Chervenak FA, Chasen ST. Fetal growth assessment and neonatal birth weight in fetuses with an isolated single umbilical artery. Obstet Gynecol 2005;105:1093–7.
31.Schulman H, Winter D, Farmakides G, Ducey J, Guzman E, Coury A, et al. Pregnancy surveillance with Doppler velocimetry of uterine and umbilical arteries. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989;160:192–6.
32.Gornall AS, Kurinczuk JJ, Konje JC. Antenatal detection of single umbilical artery: does it matter? Prenat Diagn 2003;23:117–23.
33.Sepulveda W, Bower S, Flack N, Fisk NM. Discordant iliac and femoral artery flow velocity waveforms in fetuses with single umbilical artery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994;17:521–5.
34.Meyer WW, Lind J. Iliac arteries in children with a single umbilical artery: structure, calcifications, and early atherosclerotic lesions. Arch Dis Child 1974;49:671–9.
35.Nishimura K, Iwatsubo T. Clinical observations of children with a single umbilical artery. Teratology 1977;16(suppl):86.
36.Alexander GR, Himes JH, Kaufman RB, Mor J, Kogan M. A United States national reference for fetal growth. Obstet Gynecol 1996;87:163–8.
37.Shea AK, Steiner M. Cigarette smoking during pregnancy. Nicotine Tob Res 2008;10:267–78.
38.Budorick NE, Kelly TF, Dunn JA, Scioscia AL. The single umbilical artery in a high-risk patient population: what should be offered? J Ultrasound Med 2001;20:619–27.
39.Van den Hof MC, Wilson RD; Diagnostic Imaging Committee, Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada; Genetics Committee, Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada. Fetal soft markers in obstetric ultrasound. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2005;27:592–636.
© 2010 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Figure. No caption available.