Obstetrics & Gynecology:
Sleep Disturbances in Pregnancy
Facco, Francesca L. MD; Kramer, Jamie MD; Ho, Kim H. BS; Zee, Phyllis C. MD; Grobman, William A. MD, MBA
From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Department of Neurology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois; and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, New York Presbyterian Hospital-Cornell Medical Center, New York, New York.
Corresponding author: Francesca Facco, MD, Northwestern University, Prentice Women’s Hospital, 250 East Superior Street, Suite 05–2175, Chicago, IL 60611; e-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org.
Financial Disclosure: The authors did not report any potential conflicts of interest.
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the prevalence and patterns of sleep disturbances during pregnancy among healthy nulliparous women.
METHODS: This was a prospective, cohort study of healthy nulliparous women, recruited between 6 and 20 weeks of gestation, who completed a baseline sleep survey at enrollment with follow-up in the third trimester. The survey was composed of the following validated sleep questionnaires: Berlin Questionnaire for Sleep Disordered Breathing, Epworth Sleepiness Scale, National Institutes of Health/International Restless Legs Syndrome Question Set, Women’s Health Initiative Insomnia Rating Scale, and the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index. Differences in sleep characteristics between the baseline and third trimester were compared using the paired t test or McNemar test for continuous or categorical data, respectively.
RESULTS: One hundred eighty-nine women completed both baseline and follow-up sleep surveys. The mean gestational age was 13.8 (±3.8) and 30.0 (±2.2) weeks at the first and second surveys, respectively. Compared with the baseline assessment, mean sleep duration was significantly shorter (7.4 [±1.2] hours compared with 7.0 [±1.3] hours, P<.001), and the proportion of patients who reported frequent snoring (at least three nights per week) was significantly greater (11% compared with 16.4%, P=.03) in the third trimester. The percentage of patients who met diagnostic criteria for restless leg syndrome increased from 17.5% at recruitment to 31.2% in the third trimester (P=.001). Overall poor sleep quality, as defined by a Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index score greater than 5, became significantly more common as pregnancy progressed (39.0% compared with 53.5%, P=.001).
CONCLUSION: Sleep disturbances are prevalent among healthy nulliparous women and increase significantly during pregnancy.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II
Several investigators have reported associations between sleep disturbances and hypertension, coronary artery disease, diabetes, and depression.1,2 Most of these associations have been established in the middle-aged and elderly populations. Recent investigations have studied younger individuals, and these studies have also demonstrated a link between sleep disorders and adverse health outcomes.3–5 However, these studies have not included pregnant women, and there has been little assessment as to whether sleep abnormalities are also associated with adverse health consequences during pregnancy.
The possibility that sleep abnormalities are associated with pregnancy complications is biologically plausible. First, pregnancy has been linked to alterations in sleep.6–8 Insomnia, snoring, and restless legs syndrome are reported commonly by pregnant women.6–8 Second, outcomes that have been linked to poor sleep in the nonpregnant population, such as hypertension, diabetes, and depression, have correlates in pregnancy (eg, gestational diabetes, gestational hypertension, postpartum depression). The first step in evaluating the contribution of sleep disturbances to obstetric complications is to fully understand the prevalence and patterns of sleep disturbances during pregnancy. Prior reports on sleep and pregnancy have provided some useful but limited information.9–16 Several studies have focused only on specific sleep disturbances (eg, snoring),9,12,14–16 and most have evaluated a very heterogeneous population and did not exclude women with preexisting medical conditions. Also, few studies have evaluated changes in sleep disturbances across pregnancy.10,11,13–15 These patterns of change may be of particular relevance to health outcomes given that many pregnancy complications do not manifest until the latter half of pregnancy; only those sleep abnormalities that are persistent or increase substantially may be associated with differences in outcomes. Correspondingly, the objective of this study was to estimate the prevalence of sleep disturbances among healthy nulliparous women and to quantify changes in sleep during pregnancy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
This study was a prospective observational study conducted at Northwestern Memorial Hospital. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Northwestern University. Patients were recruited in the outpatient setting from among women who received care at Northwestern-affiliated practices. These practices serve women who have both government-based and private health insurance. Women were approached for participation if they were nulliparous and had a singleton gestation. Because other morbidities could contribute to or be associated with sleep abnormalities, women with particular medical conditions were excluded. These conditions included chronic hypertension, heart disease, chronic lung disease, pregestational diabetes, chronic renal disease, and autoimmune disease (excluding treated hypothyroidism). Women who were eligible and agreed to participate provided informed consent.
The population was derived as a convenience sample, and participants were recruited over a 16-month period from February 2007 to June 2008. Study participants were asked to complete a sleep questionnaire in early pregnancy (6–20 weeks) and then again in the third trimester (28–40 weeks). This questionnaire included demographic information such as maternal age, ethnoracial status, prepregnancy weight, employment status, and work schedule. As detailed below, the questionnaire also contained items from several validated sleep surveys in an effort to obtain a comprehensive assessment of the participant’s sleep characteristics.
The sleep questionnaire was self-administered and composed of five validated sleep surveys: the Berlin Questionnaire for Sleep-Disordered Breathing, the Epworth Sleepiness Scale, the National Institutes of Health/International Restless Legs Syndrome Question Set, the Women’s Health Initiative Insomnia Rating Scale, and the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index. The Berlin Questionnaire consists of questions related to the risk of having sleep-disordered breathing (ie, sleep apnea).17 This questionnaire was used to assess snoring and nocturnal apnea symptoms. Frequent snoring was defined as snoring three or more nights per week. The Epworth Sleepiness Scale was used to determine the level of daytime sleepiness. Epworth Sleepiness Scale scores range from 0–24. Excessive daytime sleepiness was defined as a total score of 10 or more.18 The National Institutes of Health/International Restless Legs Syndrome Question Set is composed of four questions aimed at providing a diagnosis of restless legs syndrome and assessing symptom frequency.19 The Women’s Health Initiative Insomnia Rating Scale is a five-item survey assessing perceived insomnia symptoms.20 Scores range from 0–20, with scores greater than or equal to 9 indicating clinically significant insomnia.20,21 The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index is a self-rated questionnaire that assesses sleep quality and disturbances over a 1-month time interval. Nineteen individual items generate seven component scores for subjective sleep quality, sleep latency, sleep duration, habitual sleep efficiency, sleep disturbances, use of sleeping medication, and daytime dysfunction. The sum of the scores for these seven components yields one global score. Global Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index scores range from 0–21; an overall score greater than 5 indicates poor sleep quality.22 The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index questions were also used to assess average sleep duration. Participants who reported sleeping on average less than 7 hours per night were considered to have short sleep duration.
To assess overall changes between the baseline and third-trimester surveys, participants were classified as having “stable,” “improved,” or “worsening” sleep. For example, if an individual reported frequent snoring at the time of the initial survey and still reported this symptom in the third trimester, they were classified as stable regarding frequent snoring. Similarly, if a participant did not complain of frequent snoring at either time point, they were also classified as stable. If an individual’s snoring resolved in the third trimester, they were categorized as improved. In contrast, if they reported a new onset of frequent snoring in the third trimester, they were categorized as worsening.
The prevalence of different sleep disorders was estimated using descriptive analyses. Differences in sleep characteristics between the baseline and third trimester were compared using the paired t test or McNemar test for continuous or categorical data, respectively. Associations were explored between sleep patterns and patient characteristics through the use of the t test for continuous variables and the χ2 test for categorical variables. Multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate the independent association of these patient characteristics with the probability of sleep disturbances. All tests were two-tailed and a value of P<.05 was considered statistically significant. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 17.0 statistical software (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL).
Accounting for the paired design, and assuming the prevalence of any one sleep disturbance to be 15% at baseline,1 we calculated that 180 participants would be needed to detect a 2.5-fold change in any sleep parameter across pregnancy, with an α=.05 and a power of at least 80%. On the assumption of a 10% rate of loss to follow-up, we established a target sample size of 200.
Of the 224 eligible women who were approached, 202 (90%) agreed to participate and completed the baseline survey. One hundred eighty-nine of these women participated in the third-trimester survey as well. The mean gestational age was 13.8 (±3.8) and 30.0 (±2.2) weeks at the first and second surveys, respectively. Demographic characteristics of the study population are provided in Table 1. As illustrated by these data, the population was socioeconomically diverse. A majority of women worked at least part-time, largely during the day. Of note, most women who worked during early pregnancy continued to work through the third trimester.
Baseline sleep survey results for the entire cohort are shown in the top row of Table 2. In early pregnancy, sleep disturbances were relatively common. At the time of the first survey, 11% reported frequent snoring, 17.5% met criteria for restless legs syndrome, and short sleep duration was reported by 26% of participants. Nearly 40% of women reported poor overall sleep quality (Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index score more than 5). The prevalence of sleep disturbances by different patient characteristics is also presented in Table 2. Logistic regression models of the likelihood of sleep disturbances at baseline were used to estimate the simultaneous effects of age, ethnoracial status, body mass index (BMI), and employment status (Table 3). Obesity (BMI 30 or higher) and African-American ethnoracial status were associated with frequent snoring. Short sleep duration was more common among employed participants. Age older than 35 years as well as African-American and Hispanic ethnoracial status were associated with poor overall sleep quality (Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index score more than 5).
In the third trimester, the percentage of patients reporting significant sleep disturbances increased (Table 4). Regarding sleep-disordered breathing symptoms (eg, snoring, nocturnal apneas, and daytime sleepiness), the increase in frequent snoring was particularly marked (11.1% to 16.4%, P=.03). Throughout pregnancy, witnessed nocturnal apneas were reported infrequently (2/189 and 4/189 at baseline and the third trimester, respectively). Excessive daytime sleepiness (Epworth Sleepiness Scale score 10 or higher) was common among women at both time points, with no significant changes as pregnancy progressed. The percentage of women whose test results were positive for restless legs syndrome increased significantly from 17.5% to 31.2% (P=.001). At the time of the initial survey, 15.2% of restless legs syndrome–positive patients reported severe symptoms (symptom frequency 5 d/wk or more), which increased to 27.1% in the third trimester. Notably, the percentage of women reporting a short sleep duration increased from 26.2% to 39.9% (P=.001), and the percentage of participants reporting poor overall sleep quality (Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index score more than 5) increased from 39.0% to 53.5% (P=.001).
Sleep trends (ie, stable, improved, or worsening) for each sleep measure are shown in Table 5. We used a logistic regression model to estimate which patient characteristics were associated with worsening sleep. Worsening (ie, new-onset) short sleep duration was the only sleep measure to be associated with demographic characteristics. Younger individuals (younger than 24 years) were less likely to report a new onset of short sleep duration (odds ratio [OR] 0.2, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.06–0.99). In contrast, obese and Hispanic women were more likely to report new-onset short sleep duration in the third trimester (OR 2.4, 95% CI 1.00–5.96; and OR 2.9, 95% CI 1.02–9.47, respectively).
The results of this study indicate that sleep disturbances are prevalent among healthy nulliparous women and increase significantly during pregnancy. This is one of a small number of studies that have comprehensively evaluated sleep across pregnancy. Of the few studies that have examined this issue, most have reported similar trends. Pien et al observed an 11.4% increase in sleep-disordered breathing symptoms during pregnancy.14 Hedman et al reported that sleep duration decreases in the third trimester, whereas frequent snoring, restless legs, and nightly awakenings all increase significantly.10
Our study also assessed the relationships between age, BMI, ethnoracial status, employment status, and sleep in pregnancy. Age, obesity and ethnoracial origin have been associated with poor sleep in nonpregnant cohorts.23–26 We found similar associations in this healthy pregnant population. Additionally, we found a relationship between sleep and employment status. Women who worked were more likely to report short sleep duration, pointing to the fact that environmental factors can significantly affect sleep patterns. Certain environmental factors, such as work schedule, are potentially modifiable, and addressing these issues could lead to interventions that improve sleep during pregnancy.
Of particular interest are our findings regarding short sleep duration and sleep-disordered breathing during pregnancy. During the third trimester, nearly 40% of participants reported sleeping on average less than 7 hours per night, and more than 16% percent reported frequent snoring. Outside of pregnancy, short sleep duration and sleep-disordered breathing have been linked to obesity, diabetes, hypertension, and coronary heart disease.5,27–33 Research has found that short sleep duration and sleep-disordered breathing are associated with elevated levels of proinflammatory cytokines and oxidative stress markers. It is thought that the enhanced inflammatory and oxidative stress response caused by these sleep disorders promotes endothelial damage and metabolic derangements, which ultimately lead to conditions such as hypertension and non–insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus.34–37 Given the frequency of short sleep duration and sleep-disordered breathing symptoms during pregnancy, and the evidence implicating inflammation and oxidative stress as key factors in the pathogenesis of obstetric complications, principally preterm birth and preeclampsia,38–40 it is certainly biologically plausible that short sleep duration and sleep-disordered breathing during pregnancy may contribute to adverse pregnancy outcomes. At present, few studies have addressed this possibility. There are some limited data, principally from retrospective cohorts and case–control studies, suggesting an association between sleep-disordered breathing and preeclampsia.9,41,42 Further studies (above all, prospective investigations) are needed to explore and understand the impact of sleep disorders on obstetric outcomes.
The main strength of this study is its prospective design with serial questionnaires that permitted the assessment of sleep trends across pregnancy. In addition, the study population was limited to healthy nulliparous women. By choosing to limit our population in this way, we minimized or eliminated certain potential confounding factors, principally sleep disturbances caused by child care and medical conditions. The principal limitation of this study is that it only assessed subjective sleep symptoms. As such, our results provide an estimate of sleep disturbance during pregnancy that ideally would be confirmed by further studies using objective measures of sleep duration and quality. In addition, although the questions/surveys we used have been validated outside of pregnancy, they have not been specifically studied in pregnant women. There are no sleep questionnaires that have been validated in pregnant women. Another limitation is that we were not able to collect prepregnancy sleep data. Ideally, a study of sleep trends in pregnancy would include surveys before pregnancy to compare prepregnancy sleep to both early and later pregnancy patterns. Hedman et al attempted to address this by asking pregnant women to report on their sleep patterns during the 3 months before pregnancy.10 The validity of such retrospective reporting is unclear.
In summary, we found that sleep disturbances are common and increased in a cohort of young and healthy nulliparous women followed prospectively during pregnancy. Demographic factors, particularly ethnoracial status and BMI, are associated with baseline sleep complaints and sleep deterioration. Clinicians should be encouraged to discuss sleep concerns with their pregnant patients, as complaints are common and certainly may impact quality of life. However, further investigations are needed to determine whether poor sleep may be associated with obstetric complications and whether assessment and treatment of sleep disorders during pregnancy can improve outcomes.
1. Foley D, Ancoli-Israel S, Britz P, Walsh J. Sleep disturbances and chronic disease in older adults: results of the 2003 National Sleep Foundation Sleep in America Survey. J Psychosom Res 2004;56:497–502.
2. Zee PC, Turek FW. Sleep and health: everywhere and in both directions. Arch Intern Med 2006;166:1686–8.
3. Hasler G, Buysse DJ, Klaghofer R, Gamma A, Ajdacic V, Eich D, et al. The association between short sleep duration and obesity in young adults: a 13-year prospective study. Sleep 2004;27:661–6.
4. Steptoe A, Peacey V, Wardle J. Sleep duration and health in young adults. Arch Intern Med 2006;166:1689–92.
5. Hall MH, Muldoon MF, Jennings JR, Buysse DJ, Flory JD, Manuck SB. Self-reported sleep duration is associated with the metabolic syndrome in midlife adults. Sleep 2008;31:635–43.
6. Pien GW, Schwab RJ. Sleep disorders during pregnancy. Sleep 2004;27:1405–17.
7. Sahota PK, Jain SS, Dhand R. Sleep disorders in pregnancy. Curr Opin Pulm Med 2003;9:477–83.
8. Santiago JR, Nolledo MS, Kinzler W, Santiago TV. Sleep and sleep disorders in pregnancy. Ann Intern Med 2001;134:396–408.
9. Franklin KA, Holmgren PA, Jonsson F, Poromaa N, Stenlund H, Svanborg E. Snoring, pregnancy-induced hypertension, and growth retardation of the fetus. Chest 2000;117:137–41.
10. Hedman C, Pohjasvaara T, Tolonen U, Suhonen-Malm AS, Myllyla VV. Effects of pregnancy on mothers’ sleep. Sleep Med 2002;3:37–42.
11. Leung PL, Hui DS, Leung TN, Yuen PM, Lau TK. Sleep disturbances in Chinese pregnant women. BJOG 2005;112:1568–71.
12. Loube DI, Poceta JS, Morales MC, Peacock MD, Mitler MM. Self-reported snoring in pregnancy: association with fetal outcome. Chest 1996;109:885–9.
13. Mindell JA, Jacobson BJ. Sleep disturbances during pregnancy. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 2000;29:590–7.
14. Pien GW, Fife D, Pack AI, Nkwuo JE, Schwab RJ. Changes in symptoms of sleep-disordered breathing during pregnancy. Sleep 2005;28:1299–305.
15. Signal TL, Gander PH, Sangalli MR, Travier N, Firestone RT, Tuohy JF. Sleep duration and quality in healthy nulliparous and multiparous women across pregnancy and post-partum. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2007;47:16–22.
16. Tunc T, Karadag YS, Dogulu F, Inan LE. Predisposing factors of restless legs syndrome in pregnancy. Mov Disord 2007;22:627–31.
17. Netzer NC, Stoohs RA, Netzer CM, Clark K, Strohl KP. Using the Berlin Questionnaire to identify patients at risk for the sleep apnea syndrome. Ann Intern Med 1999;131:485–91.
18. Johns MW. A new method for measuring daytime sleepiness: the Epworth sleepiness scale. Sleep 1991;14:540–5.
19. Allen RP, Picchietti D, Hening WA, Trenkwalder C, Walters AS, Montplaisi J. Restless legs syndrome: diagnostic criteria, special considerations, and epidemiology. A report from the restless legs syndrome diagnosis and epidemiology workshop at the National Institutes of Health. Sleep Med 2003;4:101–19.
20. Levine DW, Dailey ME, Rockhill B, Tipping D, Naughton MJ, Shumaker SA. Validation of the Women’s Health Initiative Insomnia Rating Scale in a multicenter controlled clinical trial. Psychosom Med 2005;67:98–104.
21. Levine DW, Kaplan RM, Kripke DF, Bowen DJ, Naughton MJ, Shumaker SA. Factor structure and measurement invariance of the Women’s Health Initiative Insomnia Rating Scale. Psychol Assess 2003;15:123–36.
22. Buysse DJ, Reynolds CF III, Monk TH, Berman SR, Kupfer DJ. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index: a new instrument for psychiatric practice and research. Psychiatry Res 1989;28:193–213.
23. Rao MN, Blackwell T, Redline S, Stefanick ML, Ancoli-Israel S, Stone KL. Association between sleep architecture and measures of body composition. Sleep 2009;32:483–90.
24. Hall MH, Matthews KA, Kravitz HM, Gold EB, Buysse DJ, Bromberger JT, et al. Race and financial strain are independent correlates of sleep in midlife women: the SWAN sleep study. Sleep 2009;32:73–82.
25. Lauderdale DS, Knutson KL, Yan LL, Rathouz PJ, Hulley SB, Sidney S, et al. Objectively measured sleep characteristics among early-middle-aged adults: the CARDIA study. Am J Epidemiol 2006;164:5–16.
26. Sahlin C, Franklin KA, Stenlund H, Lindberg E. Sleep in women: normal values for sleep stages and position and the effect of age, obesity, sleep apnea, smoking, alcohol and hypertension. Sleep Med 2009;10:1025–30.
27. Al Lawati NM, Patel SR, Ayas NT. Epidemiology, risk factors, and consequences of obstructive sleep apnea and short sleep duration. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 2009;51:285–93.
28. Ayas NT, White DP, Al-Delaimy WK, Manson JE, Stampfer MJ, Speizer FE, et al. A prospective study of self-reported sleep duration and incident diabetes in women. Diabetes Care 2003;26:380–4.
29. Ayas NT, White DP, Manson JE, Stampfer MJ, Speizer FE, Malhotra A, et al. A prospective study of sleep duration and coronary heart disease in women. Arch Intern Med 2003;163:205–9.
30. Cappuccio FP, Taggart FM, Kandala NB, Currie A, Peile E, Stranges S, et al. Meta-analysis of short sleep duration and obesity in children and adults. Sleep 2008;31:619–26.
31. Gottlieb DJ, Redline S, Nieto FJ, Baldwin CM, Newman AB, Resnick HE, et al. Association of usual sleep duration with hypertension: the Sleep Heart Health Study. Sleep 2006;29:1009–14.
32. Newman AB, Nieto FJ, Guidry U, Lind BK, Redline S, Pickering TG, et al. Relation of sleep-disordered breathing to cardiovascular disease risk factors: the Sleep Heart Health Study. Am J Epidemiol 2001;154:50–9.
33. Peppard PE, Young T, Palta M, Skatrud J. Prospective study of the association between sleep-disordered breathing and hypertension. N Engl J Med 2000;342:1378–84.
34. Jelic S, Le Jemtel TH. Inflammation, oxidative stress, and the vascular endothelium in obstructive sleep apnea. Trends Cardiovasc Med 2008;18:253–60.
35. Mullington JM, Haack M, Toth M, Serrador JM, Meier-Ewert HK. Cardiovascular, inflammatory, and metabolic consequences of sleep deprivation. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 2009;51:294–302.
36. van Leeuwen WM, Lehto M, Karisola P, Lindholm H, Luukkonen R, Sallinen M, et al. Sleep restriction increases the risk of developing cardiovascular diseases by augmenting proinflammatory responses through IL-17 and CRP. PLoS One 2009;4:e4589.
37. Zamarron C, Garcia Paz V, Riveiro A. Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome is a systemic disease: current evidence. Eur J Intern Med 2008;19:390–8.
38. Bernardi F, Guolo F, Bortolin T, Petronilho F, Dal-Pizzol F. Oxidative stress and inflammatory markers in normal pregnancy and preeclampsia. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2008;34:948–51.
39. Challis JR, Lockwood CJ, Myatt L, Norman JE, Strauss JF III, Petraglia F. Inflammation and pregnancy. Reprod Sci 2009;16:206–15.
40. Hubel CA. Oxidative stress in the pathogenesis of preeclampsia. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 1999;222:222–35.
41. Koken G, Sahin FK, Cosar E, Saylan F, Yilmaz N, Altuntas I, et al. Oxidative stress markers in pregnant women who snore and fetal outcome: a case control study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2007;86:1317–21.
42. Perez-Chada D, Videla AJ, O’Flaherty ME, Majul C, Catalini AM, Caballer CA, et al. Snoring, witnessed sleep apnoeas and pregnancy-induced hypertension. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2007;86:788–92.
© 2010 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.
What does "Remember me" mean?
By checking this box, you'll stay logged in until you logout. You'll get easier access to your articles, collections,
media, and all your other content, even if you close your browser or shut down your
To protect your most sensitive data and activities (like changing your password),
we'll ask you to re-enter your password when you access these services.
What if I'm on a computer that I share with others?
If you're using a public computer or you share this computer with others, we recommend
that you uncheck the "Remember me" box.
Looking for ABOG articles? Visit our ABOG MOC II collection. The selected Green Journal articles are free through the end of the calendar year.
ACOG MEMBER SUBSCRIPTION ACCESS
If you are an ACOG Fellow and have not logged in or registered to Obstetrics & Gynecology, please follow these step-by-step instructions to access journal content with your member subscription.
Data is temporarily unavailable. Please try again soon.
Readers Of this Article Also Read