Chlamydia trachomatis is the most common bacterial sexually transmitted disease in the United States. In 2002, 834,555 new Chlamydia infections were reported to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). In women, the rate is now 455 cases per 100,000 population.1 The prevalence of Chlamydia varies among the populations studied, ranging from 2% to 39%. Recently, surveillance of select prenatal clinics in the United States reported an overall prevalence of 7.4% (range, 1.5–14.4%).1,2Chlamydia rates are highest among young, sexually active women. Unfortunately, as many as 60–70% of women with Chlamydia are asymptomatic3 and, if untreated, Chlamydia will persist for long periods of time. Like symptomatic Chlamydia, asymptomatic disease is associated with pelvic inflammatory disease, ectopic pregnancy, and infertility.4–6 The CDC estimates that 3.5 million cases of asymptomatic Chlamydia occur every year, highlighting the public health impact of this disease.7 Fortunately, many of the sequelae can be prevented or attenuated with treatment, which has prompted recommendations from the CDC, the U.S. Preventive Service Task Force, and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists to annually screen all sexually active women up to the age of 25 and older women with risk factors.1,2,8 Screening also is recommended at the first prenatal visit and again in the third trimester for pregnant women with risk factors for chlamydial infection. However, the high prevalence of Chlamydia in many populations makes treatment and follow-up a daunting task.
Several small studies have shown that up to 50% of persons spontaneously resolve asymptomatic Chlamydia trachomatis infection.3,9 These studies were performed using culture techniques. Because cell culture techniques are only 65–85% sensitive, questions arise as to whether the observed clearance was a spontaneous cure or failure of the cell culture. One study using DNA amplification techniques confirmed that the clearance of asymptomatic Chlamydia does occur (28%) in both men and nonpregnant women. Resolution was associated with increasing age and time from diagnosis to follow-up studies, implicating a host–immune response to chlamydial infection.10 This angle has not yet been evaluated in pregnant women with asymptomatic chlamydial infection—spontaneous resolution rates may be lower based on the potential for an altered host–immune response in pregnancy. The objectives of this analysis were to estimate the rate of spontaneous resolution (clearance) of asymptomatic C trachomatis in pregnancy and to evaluate the clinical factors associated with the spontaneous resolution.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
This study is a secondary analysis of data obtained during a randomized, double-masked multicenter clinical trial conducted by The National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal–Fetal Medicine Units Network. In the randomized trial, 21,965 pregnant women were screened for bacterial vaginosis between 8 weeks, 0 days and 22 weeks, 6 days of gestation. Screening, eligibility, and exclusion criteria for the cohort have been described previously.11 Briefly, women were ineligible for screening if they reported vaginal discharge with itching, burning, or odor; an allergy to metronidazole; ethanol abuse; antibiotic therapy within the previous 14 days; plans to deliver at another institution; cervical cerclage; preterm labor before screening; fetal death or life-threatening anomaly; multifetal gestation; or medical illness requiring long-term or intermittent drug therapy. Women who were found to have asymptomatic bacterial vaginosis were randomly assigned between 16 weeks, 0 days and 23 weeks, 6 days of gestation to 1 of 2 treatment groups: 2 g of metronidazole or a lactose placebo. The dose was repeated at 48 hours and then again at a follow-up visit between 24 weeks, 0 days and 29 weeks, 6 days of gestation. The primary aim of the trial was to estimate whether the treatment of asymptomatic bacterial vaginosis decreased the risk of preterm delivery. The results of this trial previously have been reported.11
During the study period, voided urine samples were collected before treatment at the randomization and at the follow-up visits. The urine specimens were frozen at −70°C and archived at 1 institution (University of Alabama at Birmingham). Analysis was performed subsequent to completion of the trial. A ligase chain reaction for genitourinary C trachomatis infection was performed in this central location. The ligase chain reaction is specific for C trachomatis plasmid DNA. Ligase chain reaction has been shown to be a highly effective, sensitive, and specific assay for genitourinary C trachomatis.12–15 Specifically, ligase chain reaction of urine in pregnant women has been reported to be 84% sensitive and 99.5% specific,12 which is a marked improvement over standard culture techniques. The results of the ligase chain reaction assays were not available to clinicians managing the women, and no one standardized Chlamydia screening program was mandated at the participating centers.
Women who did not have a randomization and a follow-up urine ligase chain reaction were excluded from this analysis, as were women with symptomatic C trachomatis genital infections. Symptoms included vaginal discharge and pruritus. Antibiotic use for any indication was recorded in the database. Women receiving antibiotics between randomization and follow-up reported to be effective for Chlamydia, specifically amoxicillin, penicillin derivatives, clindamycin, azithromycin, chloramphenicol, any fluoroquinolone, erythromycin, doxycycline, and rifampin, also were excluded. The study was approved by the institutional review boards of the participating centers. Informed consent was obtained from all women before randomization.
The data were analyzed using the Fisher exact, χ2, or Mantel–Haenszel tests where appropriate. Logistic regression also was performed, and odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were determined. Nominal P values were reported and adjustments were not made for multiple comparisons. A 2-sided P < .05 was considered significant. All analyses were performed using SAS 8 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC).
A total of 1,953 women were randomly assigned into the bacterial vaginosis trial published previously (Fig. 1). 11 Of these, 406 (21%) women did not have a randomization and/or follow-up urine ligase chain reaction results for C trachomatis. Of the remaining 1,547 women, 23 (1.5%) were excluded secondary to antibiotic use effective against C trachomatis, and 3 were excluded secondary to symptomatic Chlamydia infection. The final population for this study included 1,521 pregnant women without symptoms of genitourinary Chlamydia. Approximately 9%, or 140 women, were positive for C trachomatis at randomization and thus were diagnosed with asymptomatic chlamydial infection. Sixty-one of the women who initially tested positive (44%) were negative for C trachomatis on the follow-up urine ligase chain reaction, indicating spontaneous clearance of their asymptomatic infection.
The C trachomatis ligase chain reaction positive rate at randomization was not different between the metronidazole and placebo groups (9.3% and 9.1%, respectively, P = .08). Also, no significant difference was found between the 2 groups with regard to Chlamydia resolution rates (41% and 46%, respectively, P = .51). Therefore, the data in the 2 treatment arms were combined for the remaining analyses.
Table 1 details the demographic data of the ligase chain reaction–positive women who spontaneously cleared C trachomatis compared with those with persistent infection. Although race, nulliparity, and insurance status did not differ between the 2 groups, age was a significant factor. Increasing age was associated with a greater likelihood of a negative follow-up C trachomatis ligase chain reaction result (P = .01 for age as a continuous variable).
Factors previously reported to be associated with spontaneous Chlamydia clearance in animals, men, and nonpregnant women are listed in Table 2. A greater number of lifetime sexual partners and a testing interval of more than 5 weeks from randomization to follow-up ligase chain reaction testing were associated with spontaneous clearance of C trachomatis in the univariant model (P = .02 and 0.02, respectively). No women in either group had a diagnosis of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Alcohol and tobacco use also did not differ between the groups.
The vaginal milieu, characterized by using Gram stain Nugent criteria scoring and vaginal pH at randomization and follow-up, had no effect on chlamydial clearance (Table 3). Bacterial vaginosis is defined as a Gram staining score of 7 or greater in conjunction with a vaginal pH of more than 4.5. These parameters were used to assess whether changes in the vaginal milieu, consistent with bacterial vaginosis, would affect Chlamydia clearance.
Age, number of lifetime sexual partners, and the interval of time between each ligase chain reaction test all were associated with spontaneous clearance of C trachomatis. When all 3 variables were included in a logistic regression model, maternal age (OR = 0.6, 95% CI 0.4–0.9 per 5 years; P = .02) and follow-up interval of more than 5 weeks (OR = 0.4, 95% CI 0.2–0.9; P = .03) remained significant. For every 5-year increase in maternal age, the odds of ligase chain reaction positivity at follow-up decreased by 40%.
Spontaneous resolution of C trachomatis using a sensitive DNA assay occurred in 44% of pregnant women with asymptomatic C trachomatis. Maternal age was the strongest predictor of resolution—the older the woman, the more likely she was to have spontaneous resolution. Increasing time interval between testing and the greater number of lifetime sexual partners also were associated with resolution.
A number of previous studies have described the occurrence of spontaneous clearance of C trachomatis in both animals16,17 and humans.3,9,10 The limitations of these earlier studies was the sensitivity of the tissue culture-based testing (reported to be 65–85%).13,18 The argument can be made that the chlamydial infection did not resolve but that the cell culture failed. The advent of DNA amplification technology (polymerase chain reaction and ligase chain reaction) has made available highly sensitive and specific assays for C trachomatis.12,15 These tests using both cervical and urine specimens have been validated in pregnancy12 and have been proven to be more cost-effective than tissue culture techniques.19 To address the validity of the tissue culture-based studies, Parks et al10 described a cohort of men and nonpregnant women with chlamydial infection using DNA amplification techniques. In this study, 28% of patients spontaneously resolved their infection, which is similar to the resolution rate described in our cohort of pregnant women with asymptomatic disease. These 2 studies confirm that spontaneous resolution of Chlamydia frequently does occur.
The activation of a host immune response is the most likely etiology for the spontaneous resolution of Chlamydia. Over the course of time, untreated animals have been found to resolve chlamydial infection.16,17 In humans, increasing age and increasing time interval between testing have been associated with spontaneous resolution, indicating either prior chlamydial infection with the development of memory T cells or time to mount an immune response.10 Pregnancy has long been assumed to be associated with suppression of humoral and cellular immunity to allow tolerance of the fetus. The possibility of this altered immune function in pregnancy could have decreased the clearance rate. However, we also found maternal age and time interval to be associated with resolution, as was a greater number of lifetime sexual partners (increasing the chance of prior chlamydial infection). These associations are all consistent with a host immune–response mechanism.
The role of Chlamydia infection in pregnancy complications, such as preterm delivery and preterm rupture of membranes, has been controversial. Reports have varied based on sample size, study population, and diagnostic techniques used. Spontaneous clearance of chlamydial infections may also explain some of the varied results and should be addressed in subsequent analyses.
This was a secondary analysis of a large randomized controlled trial and, as such, has limitations that must be addressed. The sensitivity and specificity of the ligase chain reaction are not 100% (as with any laboratory test), and therefore the possibility of false-positive and false-negative results remain. However, this DNA test is markedly better than previous culture techniques, and DNA amplification technology has become the “gold standard.” A second limitation is that the power calculations were performed for the original study, not this secondary analysis. However, the numbers reported in this work are adequate to address the rate of spontaneous clearance of Chlamydia and to determine risk factors associated with this finding.
The public health impact of Chlamydia infection in the United States is without question. The rate of asymptomatic chlamydial infection in this cohort of pregnant women of 9% stresses the importance of screening all women during the prenatal period. Screening and subsequent treatment will not only decrease the risk of neonatal complications but also decrease the rate of long-term sequelae. Defining the spontaneous clearance rate (44%) and factors associated with resolution are important to our understanding of the pathophysiology of chlamydial infection. It also has major public health implications. Although 44% of infections resolved, most women with asymptomatic Chlamydia who were not treated had persistent infection. The importance of adequate treatment and follow-up remains a high priority for clinicians.
1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines—2002. MMWR Recomm Rep 2002;51(RR-06):32–6.
2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US). Sexually transmitted disease surveillance 2002 supplement. Chlamydia Prevalence Monitoring Project. Atlanta, GA: US DHHS, CDC; 2003.
3. McCormack WM, Alpert S, McComb DE, Nichols RL, Semine DZ, Zinner SH. Fifteen-month follow-up study of women infected with Chlamydia trachomatis
. N Engl J Med 1979;300:123–5.
4. Hillis SD, Owens LM, Marchbanks PA, Amsterdam LF, Mac Kenzie WR. Recurrent chlamydial infections increase the risks of hospitalization for ectopic pregnancy and pelvic inflammatory disease. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997;176:103–7.
5. Egger M, Low N, Smith GD, Lindblom B, Herrmann B. Screening for chlamydial infections and the risk of ectopic pregnancy in a county in Sweden: ecological analysis. BMJ 1998;316:1776–80.
6. Brunham RC, Maclean IW, Binns B, Peeling RW. Chlamydia trachomatis: its role in tubal infertility. J Infect Dis 1985;152:1275–82.
7. Makulowich GS. HIV and STD prevention update: CDC Chlamydia Screening Program. AIDS Patient Care STDS 1998;12:411–3.
8. US Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for chlamydia infection: recommendations and rationale. Am J Prev Med 2001;20 suppl 3:90–4.
9. Rahm V-A, Belsheim J, Gleerup A, Gnarpe H. Rosen G. Asymptomatic carriage of Chlamydia trachomatis
: a study of 109 teenage girls. Eur J STD 1986;3:91–4.
10. Parks KS, Dixon PB, Richey CM, Hook EW III. Spontaneous clearance of Chlamydia trachomatis
infection in untreated patients. Sex Transm Dis 1997;24:229–35.
11. Carey J, Klebanoff MA, Hauth JC, Hillier SL, Thom EA, Ernest JM, et al. Metronidazole to prevent preterm delivery in pregnant women with asymptomatic bacterial vaginosis. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Network of Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units. N Engl J Med 2000;342:534–40.
12. Andrews WW, Lee HH, Roden WJ, Mott CW. Detection of genitourinary tract Chlamydia trachomatis
infection in pregnant women by ligase chain reaction assay. Obstet Gynecol 1997;89:556–60.
13. Schachter J, Stamm WE, Quinn TC, Andrews WW, Burczak JD, Lee HH. Ligase chain reaction to detect Chlamydia trachomatis
infection of the cervix. J Clin Microbiol 1994;32:2540–3.
14. Schachter J, Moncada J, Whidden R, Shaw H, Bolan G, Burczak JD, et al. Noninvasive tests for the diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis
infection: application of ligase chain reaction to first-catch urine specimens of women. J Infect Dis 1995;172:1411–4.
15. Lee HH, Chernesky MA, Schachter J, Burczak JD, Andrews WW, Muldoon S, et al. Diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis
genitourinary tract infection in women by ligase chain reaction in urine. Lancet 1995;345:213–6.
16. Ramsey KH, Rank RG. Resolution of chlamydial genital infection with antigen-specific T-lymphocyte lines. Infect Immun 1991;59:925–31.
17. Morrison RP, Feilzer K, Tumas DB. Gene knockout mice establish a primary protective role for major histocompatibility complex class II-restricted responses in Chlamydia trachomatis
genital tract infection. Infect Immun 1995;63:4661–8.
18. Viscidi RP, Bobs L, Hook EW III, Quinn TC. Transmission of Chlamydia trachomatis
among sex partners assessed by polymerase chain reaction. J Infect Dis 1993;168:488–92.
19. Genc M, Mardh A. A cost-effectiveness analysis of screening and treatment for Chlamydia trachomatis
infection in asymptomatic women. Ann Intern Med 1996;124:1–7.
Other members of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Network of Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units are as follows: University of Alabama at Birmingham: J. C. Hauth, R. Copper, A. Northen, R. Goldenberg; Thomas Jefferson University: M. DiVito, J. Tolosa; Ohio State University: J. Iams, F. Johnson, M. Landon; National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.
M. A. Klebanoff, D. McNellis, R. P. Nugent, C. Catz, S. J. Yaffe; George Washington University Biostatistics Center: E. A. Thom, S. Leindecker, M. L. Fischer, R. Bain; University of Chicago: P. Jones, M. Lindheimer; University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center: K. J. Leveno, G. Wendel, M. L. Sherman, S. Bloom; University of Cincinnati; N. Elder, T. Siddiqi; University of Tennessee: B. Mercer, R. Ramsey; Medical University of South Carolina: J. P. Van Dorsten, B. A. Collins, F. LeBoeuf, R. B. Newman; Wayne State University: S. Bottoms (deceased), G. S. Norman; University of Miami: S. Beydoun, C. Alfonso, F. Doyle; Wake Forest University: P. Meis, J. M. Ernest, E. Mueller-Heubach, M. Swain; University of Oklahoma: G. Thurnau, C. Carey, A. Meier; University of Utah: D. Dudley, L. Reynolds; Magee Women's Hospital: S. L. Hillier, R. P. Heine, M. Cotroneo, T. Camon; and the University of Texas at San Antonio: O. Langer, M. Berkus, S. Nicholson.