Home Articles & Issues Published Ahead-of-Print CME Collections ABOG MOC II Podcasts Videos Journal Info
Skip Navigation LinksHome > April 2003 - Volume 101 - Issue 4 > Stress Urinary Incontinence Surgery in the United States
Obstetrics & Gynecology:
Original Research

Stress Urinary Incontinence Surgery in the United States

Waetjen, L. Elaine MD; Subak, Leslee L. MD; Shen, Hui MS; Lin, Feng MS; Wang, Tsung-Hsi MD; Vittinghoff, Eric PhD; Brown, Jeanette S. MD

Free Access
Article Outline
Collapse Box

Author Information

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California, Davis, Sacramento; and the Departments of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences and Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.

Address reprint requests to: L. Elaine Waetjen, MD, University of California, Davis, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 4860 Y Street, Suite 2500, Sacramento, CA 95817; E-mail: lewaetjen@ucdavis.edu.

LLS is a Women's Reproductive Health Research Scholar supported by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health (K12 HD01262-02).

Received July 17, 2002. Received in revised form October 24, 2002. Accepted November 7, 2002.

Collapse Box

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe the prevalence, regional rates and demographic characteristics, morbidity, and mortality of stress urinary incontinence surgeries in the United States.

METHODS: We used data from the 1998 National Hospital Discharge Survey and the 1998 National Census to calculate rates of surgeries for stress urinary incontinence by age, race, and region of the United States. From these data we estimated morbidity and mortality associated with incontinence surgery.

RESULTS: In 1998, approximately 135,000 women had inpatient surgery for stress urinary incontinence in the United States. The mean age of these women was 54.0 (±13.3) years. The South had the highest rate of surgery (14.8 per 10,000 women), whereas the Northeast had the lowest (9.8 per 10,000). In the 79% of discharges for which race was stated, the surgery rate for whites (11.6 per 10,000) was almost five times greater than for blacks (2.6 per 10,000), whereas the perioperative complication rate for blacks was twice that for whites (20.6% compared with 9.7%). Almost 70% of incontinence surgeries were done in combination with other major gynecologic procedures. For all incontinence surgeries, approximately 18% had complications, and mortality was rare (0.01%).

CONCLUSION: Stress urinary incontinence surgery is common, especially among white women. Differences in regional and racial surgical rates may represent differences in physician practice, patient expectations, and access to or utilization of care.

Urinary incontinence is a distressing, common, and costly condition in women. As many as one third of women older than 40 years report involuntary loss of urine. 1–3 Although not a life-threatening condition, urinary incontinence may cause women to curtail their social and physical activities, which can lead to social isolation and depression. 4–7 In the United States, urinary incontinence costs are estimated at $16 billion per year. 8

Stress urinary incontinence is the most common type of incontinence in women younger than 60 years and accounts for approximately half of incontinence in all women. 2 Behavior modification, physiotherapy, biofeedback, and incontinence devices can be effective in reducing urine loss. 9–12 However, when conservative treatments fail, surgery is the treatment of choice for women with stress incontinence. The prevalence of stress incontinence surgery in the United States appears to be increasing, 13 yet there is limited information as to how the different types of these surgeries vary by region of the country, by age, and by racial category.

To estimate the number of surgeries performed for stress incontinence by type and by region of the United States, we analyzed data from the 1998 National Hospital Discharge Survey. Additionally, we examined the demographic characteristics of the women who underwent these surgeries and described the associated morbidity and mortality.

Back to Top | Article Outline

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We used the 1998 National Hospital Discharge Survey database to estimate the annual number of inpatient stress incontinence surgeries in the United States. The National Hospital Discharge Survey uses a multistage probability sample of nonfederal, short-stay, general hospitals nationwide; this process creates a sample of hospitals with an average length of stay of less than 30 days that represents national and regional distributions. From these selected hospitals, data is collected from hospital discharges, including patient demographics, length of hospital stay, a primary discharge diagnosis with up to six secondary diagnoses, and a primary procedure with up to three other procedures. Within selected hospitals, discharges were chosen for abstraction using systematic sampling. For 1998, data were collected from over 300,000 discharges from 478 (96%) of 495 eligible hospitals.

For our analysis, we selected all International Classification of Disease, 9th Revision (ICD-9) procedure codes representing stress incontinence surgeries. Similarly, we used ICD-9 diagnostic codes to determine discharge diagnoses. Stress incontinence surgeries in our analyses included plication of the urethrovesical junction such as the Kelly procedure (59.3), pubovaginal sling (59.4), Burch and Marshall Marchetti Krantz retropubic suspensions (59.5), paraurethral needle suspensions such as the Pereyra (59.6), levator muscle urethrovesical suspension operations (59.71), and other repairs (injection implants or repairs not specified) for urinary incontinence (59.72, 59.79). Anterior repairs (70.50, 70.51) were only included if the ICD-9 code for incontinence (625.6) was among the listed discharge diagnoses. Finally, we used the following ICD-9 procedure codes to identify major gynecologic procedures commonly done in conjunction with incontinence surgeries. For prolapse surgeries we used rectocele only (70.52), uterine suspension (69.22), vaginal suspension and fixation of the vagina (70.77), and enterocele surgery and operations on the cul-de-sac (70.92). Repair of cystocele and rectocele together (70.50), repair of cystocele only (70.51), vaginal hysterectomy (68.5), subtotal hysterectomy (68.3), total hysterectomy (68.4), vaginectomy (70.44), and obliteration of the vaginal vault (70.8) were also included as prolapse procedures if the ICD-9 codes for pelvic organ prolapse (618.0–618.6, 618.8, and 618.9) were among the discharge diagnoses. Codes for hysterectomy included subtotal (68.3), total (68.4), vaginal (68.5), and other (68.9).

To estimate mortality associated with stress incontinence surgery, we used the National Hospital Discharge Survey disposition code for “dead.” For morbidity, we used multiple ICD-9 codes representing surgical complications listed in the discharge diagnoses. Bleeding complications included codes for hemorrhage (998.11, 623.80), hematoma (998.12), acute anemia (285.10), and transfusion (99.0). Surgical injury included any injury to the bladder, ureter, or urethra (867.00), accidental puncture or laceration during surgery (998.20), and other genitourinary complications (997.50, 996.76). Infections included sepsis (38.90), urinary tract infections (593.89, 595.90, 599.00, 996.64), postoperative fevers (998.89, 780.60), and genital cellulitis (569.49, 597.00, 614.90, 616.10). We used codes for seroma (998.13), dehiscence (998.30), and wound infection (998.59) in our category of wound complications. Pulmonary complications included codes for acute respiratory distress syndrome (518.50) and pneumonia (518.89, 997.30). We categorized codes for pulmonary embolism (415.11, 415.19), congestive heart failure (428.00), myocardial infarction (410.00), and postoperative thromboembolic disease (997.20) as cardiovascular complications. Other complications included cerebrovascular complications (434.91) and anesthetic complications (995.20).

The National Hospital Discharge Survey coded race as white, black, Asian Pacific Islander, American Indian/Eskimo, other, and not stated. Hispanic ethnicity is not specified. We aggregated Asian Pacific Islander and American Indian/Eskimo into “other” because of the small numbers in these categories.

The National Hospital Discharge Survey provides yearly US Census Bureau population estimates nationally, by the Census-designated regions (Northeast, South, Midwest, and West), by race, and by age group. Weights based on probability of selection and adjusted for nonresponse and other factors were used to estimate nationwide numbers of procedures of specific types. In turn, these estimated totals were divided by population totals from the 1998 Census for women aged 20 years and older to calculate population rates for various inpatient surgeries nationally, by region, by race, and by age group. Finally, constants provided in the National Hospital Discharge Survey documentation were used to compute relative standard errors and confidence intervals (CIs) for totals, proportions, and rates among all (but not subgroups of) women. In the CIs for population rates, the population totals, which are based on Census enumeration, were treated as fixed.

Back to Top | Article Outline

RESULTS

In 1998, 134,987 women underwent surgeries for stress incontinence in the United States, at a rate of 13.4 per 10,000 women aged 20 years and older. The mean age of women undergoing incontinence surgery was 54.0 (±13.3) years.

More than half of stress incontinence surgeries were performed in women between the ages of 40 and 59 (Table 1). Table 1 also shows the distribution of incontinence surgeries by age group. Overall, retropubic suspensions were the most commonly performed procedure (46%), followed by anterior repairs (27%). Retropubic suspensions accounted for almost all of the surgeries in women aged 20–29 and almost two thirds of surgeries in women younger than 60. In women aged 60 and older, pubovaginal slings were three times more common than in women younger than 60 (18% compared with 5% of surgeries, respectively).

Table 1
Table 1
Image Tools

Figure 1 presents the variation in rates of stress incontinence surgery by age group and by region of the United States. The highest rate of surgery was in 60–69-year-old women (24.4 per 10,000). Women in the South had the highest overall rate of incontinence surgeries (14.8 per 10,000), whereas the Northeast had the lowest rate (9.8 per 10,000). The rate in the Midwest (14.2 per 10,000) and the West (13.4 per 10,000) ranged between these estimates.

Figure 1
Figure 1
Image Tools

There were large racial differences in the rates of stress incontinence surgery (Figure 2). White women had an overall stress incontinence surgery rate that was nearly five times greater than that for black women (11.6 per 10,000 compared with 2.6 per 10,000, respectively). The mean age for stress incontinence surgery in black women was 50.1 (±11.6) years, whereas for white women it was 54.0 (±13.2) years. Race was not stated in 21% of surgeries.

Figure 2
Figure 2
Image Tools

Overall, 68% (CI 63%, 73%) of surgeries for stress incontinence were done in conjunction with another major gynecologic surgery. About one third (36%, CI 31%, 41%) included any procedure for pelvic organ prolapse, and almost half (43%, CI 38%, 48%) were combined with a hysterectomy.

The average length of hospital stay for stress incontinence surgery was 2.8 (±1.5) days. This varied by type of procedure, with average length of stay of 2.5 (±1.5) days for pubovaginal sling and 3.0 (±1.8) days for retropubic suspensions. Hospital stays were longer in older women: 3.3 (±2.5) days for women older than 79 compared with 2.0 (±0.9) days in women aged 20–29 years.

We also analyzed incontinence surgeries by expected source of payment and type of hospital. Almost all expected reimbursement for stress incontinence surgery was from private insurance (eg, Blue Cross/Blue Shield, health maintenance organization/preferred provider organization; 62%) or government funding (eg, Medicare and Medicaid; 30%). For the remaining 8% of surgeries, payment was listed as “other” or was not stated. About 75% of incontinence surgery was performed in non-profit hospitals, and the rest were equally divided between government hospitals (12.5%) and proprietary hospitals (12.5%).

Mortality associated with stress incontinence surgery was 1 per 10,000 surgeries. Overall, 18.3% of the women who underwent incontinence surgery had one or more complications. This rate was similar when stress incontinence surgery was performed alone (17.1%) or in conjunction with other procedures (18.9%). Table 2 shows the frequency and rates of complications by type. Infection accounted for 44% of all complications, whereas surgical injury (24%) and bleeding (16%) were less common. Serious morbidity, such as pulmonary embolism or sepsis, accounted for less than 1% of all complications. There were also racial differences in the complication rates associated with urinary incontinence surgery (overall 20.6% for blacks compared with 9.7% for whites), with infection being almost twice as frequent in black women (14.2% compared with 8.0%).

Table 2
Table 2
Image Tools
Back to Top | Article Outline

DISCUSSION

Approximately 135,000 inpatient surgeries for stress incontinence were performed in the United States in 1998. The frequency of incontinence surgery has increased dramatically over the last ten years—from 78,000 surgeries in 1988. 13 Adjusting for population growth, the rate of incontinence surgery has increased approximately 45%. Stress incontinence surgery is one of the more common procedures performed in women. For comparison, the frequencies of other operations in 1998 include hysterectomy (605,000), tubal ligation (325,000), coronary artery bypass graft (187,000), total knee replacement (169,000), and appendectomy for suspected appendicitis (119,000). 14

Rates of stress incontinence surgery varied by region within the United States. As with other elective gynecologic surgeries, the largest difference was between women in the South and in the Northeast (14.8 compared with 9.8 per 10,000 women). The variation in the regional distribution of surgeries likely reflects regional differences in physician training and patient attitudes regarding surgery.

There was an almost five-fold higher rate of stress incontinence surgeries in white compared with black women in 1998. A number of studies have reported a higher prevalence of stress incontinence in white women compared with black women. 1,15,16 Physiologic research has suggested that levator strength and urethral pressures are greater in black women. 15,17 However, the racial differences in rates of incontinence surgery may be influenced by a number of important factors, including socioeconomic status, insurance status, access to and utilization of care, patient reporting or physician ascertainment of incontinence symptoms, and variations in general attitudes regarding undergoing elective surgery. Our observed two-fold increase in surgical morbidity for black compared with white women, which is similar to the racial differences in complications described for hysterectomy, 18 is concerning and bears further investigation.

Anterior repair was the second most common type of surgery performed for stress incontinence. This frequency is surprising, given solid evidence that anterior repair has poor short- and long-term efficacy compared with all other types of stress incontinence surgery. 19–21 However, this frequency may reflect physician and patient preference for the least invasive surgery for minimal stress incontinence symptoms.

Almost three of four women who underwent incontinence surgeries had concomitant major gynecologic procedures. In this way, the rate of complications (18.3%) reflects the morbidity of combined procedures, as well as of stress incontinence surgeries performed alone. It is, therefore, not surprising that the overall morbidity rate reported here is similar to other common gynecologic surgeries. 18,22

The National Hospital Discharge Survey has several limitations. The accuracy of our estimates depends on the accuracy and completeness of ICD-9 coding for diagnoses and procedures and the collection of demographic characteristics listed on discharge summaries. Only procedures with stress urinary incontinence listed as one of the seven discharge diagnoses recorded in the 1998 National Hospital Discharge Survey were included in this analysis. The accuracy of hospital coding for diagnoses and procedures in the National Hospital Discharge Survey has been reported to exceed the standards of other data from the National Center for Health Statistics. 23 The National Hospital Discharge Survey estimates coding errors to be approximately 0.9% for procedures and diagnoses and 0.2% for demographic data. 24

Another limitation of our estimates is that stratum and primary sampling unit identifiers used by specialized programs for analyzing multistage probability samples are not included in the publicly available National Hospital Discharge Survey data set. Instead, we used approximations recommended in the National Hospital Discharge Survey documentation to compute relative standard errors and CIs. The approximate CIs for population totals may be less reliable than intervals computed using information on stratum and primary sampling unit to account for clustering. In addition, our CIs for population rates do not take account of errors in the denominators and thus may understate the uncertainty of our ratio estimates. However, unlike the numerators, which are weighted sample estimates of population totals, the denominators are based on US Census enumeration, adjusted for population growth and undercounting of some population groups. As a result, the denominator errors are likely to be negligible as compared with the uncertainty of the numerators, or to the uncertainty that would obtain if the denominators were based on sampling rather than enumeration.

This analysis only includes surgeries for incontinence that required hospital admission. Incontinence procedures performed outside the nonfederal, short-stay hospitals, such as tension-free vaginal tape, collagen, or durasphere injections, are not included in the National Hospital Discharge Survey, so we have likely underestimated stress urinary incontinence surgery frequency. In addition, because the National Hospital Discharge Survey does not follow individual patients longitudinally, our morbidity and mortality estimates include only perioperative complications and deaths. They do not reflect posthospitalization complications or readmissions and thus are likely underestimated as well.

Data on race was missing for 21% of discharges for incontinence surgery in 1998, and thus the conclusions regarding racial differences found in our study are limited. However, despite this under-reporting of race, an analysis of missing racial data in the National Hospital Discharge Survey has described an under-representation of white patient discharges, 24 therefore the discrepancy in rates of incontinence surgery is more likely to be greater than what we have reported. In addition, given that the race assignments were made by the admitting hospital, these categories likely reflect appearance rather than self-identification. Finally, the nature of race/ethnicity data collection and the small number of women in the other National Hospital Discharge Survey race/ethnicity categories allowed only the general and simplistic distinctions between black and white.

Stress urinary incontinence surgery is common, especially in white women, and the number of such surgeries performed in the United States has nearly doubled in the last decade. The large regional and racial differences in the rates of incontinence surgery raises important health policy questions regarding physician practices, patient preferences for incontinence treatment, and differential access to and utilization of care.

Back to Top | Article Outline

REFERENCES

1. Brown JS, Grady D, Ouslander JG, Herzog AR, Varner RE, Posner SF. Prevalence of urinary incontinence and associated risk factors in postmenopausal women. Heart & Estrogen/Progestin Replacement Study (HERS) Research Group. Obstet Gynecol 1999;94:66–70.

2. Hannestad YS, Rortveit G, Sandvik H, Hunskaar S. A community-based epidemiological survey of female urinary incontinence: The Norwegian EPINCONT study. Epidemiology of Incontinence in the County of Nord-Trondelag. J Clin Epidemiol 2000;53:1150–7.

3. Seim A, Sandvik H, Hermstad R, Hunskaar S. Female urinary incontinence—consultation behaviour and patient experiences: An epidemiological survey in a Norwegian community. Fam Pract 1995;12:18–21.

4. Dugan E, Cohen SJ, Bland DR, Preisser JS, Davis CC, Suggs PK, et al. The association of depressive symptoms and urinary incontinence among older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc 2000;48:413–6.

5. Brown JS, Subak LL, Gras J, Brown BA, Kuppermann M, Posner SF. Urge incontinence: The patient's perspective. J Womens Health 1998;7:1263–9.

6. Grimby A, Milsom I, Molander U, Wiklund I, Ekelund P. The influence of urinary incontinence on the quality of life of elderly women. Age Ageing 1993;22:82–9.

7. Hunskaar S, Vinsnes A. The quality of life in women with urinary incontinence as measured by the sickness impact profile. J Am Geriatr Soc 1991;39:378–82.

8. Wilson L, Brown JS, Shin GP, Luc K, Subak LL. Annual direct cost of urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 2001; 98:398–406.

9. Nygaard I. Prevention of exercise incontinence with mechanical devices. J Reprod Med 1995;40:89–94.

10. Berghmans LC, Hendriks HJ, Bo K, Hay-Smith EJ, de Bie RA, van Waalwijk van Doorn ES. Conservative treatment of stress urinary incontinence in women: A systematic review of randomized clinical trials. Br J Urol 1998;82:181–91.

11. Sirls LT, Foote JE, Kaufman JM, Lightner DJ, Miller JL, Moseley WG, et al. Long-term results of the femsoft urethral insert for the management of female stress urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2002;13:88–95.

12. Miller JM, Ashton-Miller JA, DeLancey JO. A pelvic muscle precontraction can reduce cough-related urine loss in selected women with mild SUI. J Am Geriatr Soc 1998;46:870–4.

13. Korn AP, Learman LA. Operations for stress urinary incontinence in the United States, 1988–1992. Urology 1996;48:609–12.

14. Lawrence L, Hall MJ. 1997 summary: National Hospital Discharge Survey. Adv Data 1999:1–15.

15. Duong TH, Korn AP. A comparison of urinary incontinence among African American, Asian, Hispanic, and white women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001;184:1083–6.

16. Graham CA, Mallett VT. Race as a predictor of urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001;185:116–20.

17. Howard D, Delancey JO, Tunn R, Ashton-Miller JA. Racial differences in the structure and function of the stress urinary continence mechanism. Obstet Gynecol 2000;95:713–7.

18. Kjerulff K, Guzinski G, Langenberg P, Stolley P, Adler Moye N, Kazandijian V. Hysterectomy and race. Obstet Gynecol 1993;82:757–64.

19. Black NA, Downs SH. The effectiveness of surgery for stress incontinence in women: A systematic review. Br J Urol 1996;78:497–510.

20. Glazener CM, Cooper K. Anterior vaginal repair for urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2001;1:CD001755.

21. Leach GE, Dmochowski RR, Appell RA, Blaivas JG, Hadley HR, Luber KM, et al. Female Stress Urinary Incontinence Clinical Guidelines Panel summary report on surgical management of female stress urinary incontinence. The American Urological Association. J Urol 1997; 158:875–80.

22. Brown JS, Waetjen LE, Subak LL, Thom DH, Van den Eeden S, Vittinghoff E. Pelvic organ prolapse surgery in the United States, 1997. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002;186:712–6.

23. Dennison C, Pokras R. Design and operation of the National Hospital Discharge Survey: 1988 redesign. Vital Health Stat 1 2000;39:1–42.

24. Kozak LJ. Underreporting of race in the National Hospital Discharge Survey. Adv Data 1995;265:1–12.

Cited By:

This article has been cited 51 time(s).

Bju International
The treatment of female bladder outlet obstruction
Goldman, HB; Zimmern, PE
Bju International, 98(2): 359-366.
10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.06335.x
CrossRef
International Urogynecology Journal
Monarc vs TVT-O for the treatment of primary stress incontinence: a randomized study
Liapis, A; Bakas, P; Creatsas, G
International Urogynecology Journal, 19(2): 185-190.
10.1007/s00192-007-0432-7
CrossRef
European Urology
Urinary incontinence: Ensure that the patient's voice is heard
Lazzeri, M; Novaya, G
European Urology, 53(6): 1125-1127.
10.1016/j.eururo.2008.02.014
CrossRef
Health Expectations
Goal achievement as a patient-generated outcome measure for stress urinary incontinence
Milne, JL; Robert, M; Tang, S; Drummond, N; Ross, S
Health Expectations, 12(3): 288-300.
10.1111/j.1369-7625.2009.00536.x
CrossRef
Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics of North America
Epidemiology of Pelvic Floor Dysfunction
Sung, VW; Hampton, BS
Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics of North America, 36(3): 421-+.
10.1016/j.ogc.2009.08.002
CrossRef
Bju International
The global burden of female pelvic floor disorders
Kenton, K; Mueller, ER
Bju International, 98(): 1-5.

New England Journal of Medicine
Shades of dry - Curing urinary stress incontinence
Strohbehn, K
New England Journal of Medicine, 356(): 2198-2200.

Urologic Clinics of North America
The Demographic Burden of Urologic Diseases in America
Miller, DC; Saigal, CS; Litwin, MS
Urologic Clinics of North America, 36(1): 11-+.
10.1016/j.ucl.2008.08.004
CrossRef
Urology
Urinary Incontinence After Stress Incontinence Surgery: A Risk Factor for Depression
Stoffel, JT; Morgan, D; Dunn, R; Hsu, Y; Fenner, D; DeLancey, J; McGuire, EJ; Wei, JT
Urology, 73(1): 41-46.
10.1016/j.urology.2008.08.478
CrossRef
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
The direct cost of stress urinary incontinence among women in a Medicaid poputation
Kinchen, KS; Long, S; Chang, S; Girts, TK; Pantos, B
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 193(6): 1936-1944.
10.1016/j.ajog.2005.05.055
CrossRef
New England Journal of Medicine
Urinary stress incontinence in women
Rogers, RG
New England Journal of Medicine, 358(): 1029-1036.

Journal of Womens Health
Pelvic Floor Consequences of Cesarean Delivery on Maternal Request in Women with a Single Birth: A Cost-effectiveness Analysis
Xu, X; Ivy, JS; Patel, DA; Patel, SN; Smith, DG; Ransom, SB; Fenner, D; DeLancey, JOL
Journal of Womens Health, 19(1): 147-160.
10.1089/jwh.2009.1404
CrossRef
Saudi Medical Journal
Novel technique for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence Early experience
Mustafa, MO; Wadie, BS
Saudi Medical Journal, 30(2): 234-237.

Urology Journal
In Situ Anterior Vaginal Wall Sling for Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence Extended Application and Further Experience
Mustafa, M; Wadie, BS
Urology Journal, 6(1): 35-39.

International Urogynecology Journal
Vaginal delivery and pelvic floor dysfunction: current evidence and implications for future research
Bortolini, MAT; Drutz, HP; Lovatsis, D; Alarab, M
International Urogynecology Journal, 21(8): 1025-1030.
10.1007/s00192-010-1146-9
CrossRef
International Urogynecology Journal
Transvaginal suture placement for bleeding control with the tension-free vaginal tape procedure
Neuman, M
International Urogynecology Journal, 17(2): 176-177.
10.1007/s00192-004-1280-3
CrossRef
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Effect of patient age on increasing morbidity and mortality following urogynecologic surgery
Sung, VW; Weitzen, S; Sokol, ER; Rardin, CR; Myers, DL
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 194(5): 1411-1417.
10.1016/j.ajog.2006.01.050
CrossRef
Journal of Reproductive Medicine
Incidence of concomitant surgery for pelvic organ prolapse in patients surgically treated for stress urinary incontinence
Hart, SR; Moore, RD; Miklosi, JR; Mattox, TE; Kohli, N
Journal of Reproductive Medicine, 51(7): 521-524.

Nature Clinical Practice Urology
Recommendations for urodynamic assessment in the evaluation of women with stress urinary incontinence
Takacs, EB; Zirnmern, PE
Nature Clinical Practice Urology, 3(): 544-550.
10.1038/ncpuro0605
CrossRef
New England Journal of Medicine
Burch colposuspension versus fascial sling to reduce urinary stress incontinence
Albo, ME; Richter, HE; Brubaker, L; Norton, P; Kraus, SR; Zimmern, PE; Zyczynski, H; Diokno, AC; Tennstedt, S; Nager, C; Lloyd, LK; FitzGerald, M; Lemack, GE; Johnson, HW; Leng, W; Mallett, V; Stoddard, AM; Menefee, S; Varner, RE; Kenton, K; Moalli, P; Sirls, L; Dandreo, KJ; Kusek, JW; Nyberg, LM; Steers, W; Steers, W; Diokno, A; Khandwala, S; Brubaker, L; FitzGerald, M; Richter, HE; Lloyd, LK; Albo, M; Nager, C; Chai, T; Johnson, HW; Zyczynski, HM; Leng, W; Zimmern, P; Lemack, G; Kraus, S; Rozanski, T; Norton, P; Kerr, L; Tennstedt, S; Stoddard, A; Chang, D; Kusek, JW; Nyberg, LM; Weber, AM; Ashford, RS; Baker, J; Borello-France, D; Burgio, KL; Chiang, S; Dabbous, A; Goode, PS; Hammontree, LN; Kenton, K; Lesser, D; Luber, K; Lukacz, E; Markland, A; Menefee, S; Moalli, P; Peters, K; Sagan, E; Schaffer, J; Simsiman, A; Sirls, L; Starr, R; Varner, RE; Bradt, R; Debes, K; Dinh, R; Gruss, J; Hall, L; Howell, A; Jesse, K; Kalinoski, DL; Koches, K; Leemon, B; Mislanovich, K; O'Meara, S; Parent, J; Pope, N; Prather, C; Rogers, T; Sluder, S; Tulke, M; Dandreo, KJ; Leifer, CJ; McDermott, S; Stoddard, A; Tennstedt, S; Tinsley, L; Wruck, L; Xu, Y; Gormley, EA; Abrams, P; Bland, D; Clemens, JQ; Connett, J; Henderson, W; Fenner, D; Kelsey, S; Myers, D; Mostwin, J; Wadie, B
New England Journal of Medicine, 356(): 2143-2155.

Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology
Tension-free vaginal tape obturator: Midterm data on an operative procedure for the cure of female stress urinary incontinence performed on 100 patients
Menahem, N
Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, 15(1): 92-96.
10.1016/j.jmig.2007.10.012
CrossRef
Journal of Urology
Urologic diseases in America project: Urinary incontinence in women-national trends in hospitalizations, office visits, treatment and economic impact
Thom, DH; Nygaard, IE; Calhoun, EA
Journal of Urology, 173(4): 1295-1301.
10.1097/01.ju.0000155679.77895.cb
CrossRef
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
The effects of hormone replacement on the biomechanical properties of the uterosacral and round ligaments in the monkey model
Vardy, MD; Gardner, TR; Cosman, F; Scotti, RJ; Mikhail, MS; Preiss-Bloom, AO; Williams, JK; Cline, JM; Lindsay, R
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 192(5): 1741-1751.
10.1016/j.ajog.2004.10.639
CrossRef
Bjog-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Mode of delivery and severe stress incontinence. A cross-sectional study among 2625 perimenopausal women
Fritel, X; Ringa, V; Varnoux, N; Fauconnier, A; Piault, S; Breart, G
Bjog-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 112(): 1646-1651.
10.1111/j.1471-0528.2005.00763.x
CrossRef
Bju International
The treatment of female bladder outlet obstruction
Goldman, HB; Zimmern, PE
Bju International, 98(): 17-23.

American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Impact of hospital and surgeon volumes on outcomes following pelvic reconstructive surgery in the United States
Sung, VW; Rogers, ML; Myers, DL; Clark, MA
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 195(6): 1778-1783.
10.1016/j.ajog.2006.07.015
CrossRef
Jsls-Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
Ureteral Injury Due to a Harmonic Scalpel During Laparoscopic Salpingo-oophorectomy
Vetere, PF; Apostolis, C
Jsls-Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons, 14(1): 115-119.
10.4293/108680810X12674612014987
CrossRef
European Journal of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
TVT and TVT-Obturator: Comparison of two operative procedures
Neuman, M
European Journal of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 131(1): 89-92.
10.1016/j.ejogrb.2006.03.007
CrossRef
European Urology
Tension-free midurethral slings in the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: a systematic review and meta-analysis of Randomized controlled trials of effectiveness
Novara, G; Ficarra, V; Boscolo-Berto, R; Secco, S; Cavalleri, S; Artibani, W
European Urology, 52(3): 663-679.
10.1016/j.eururo.2007.06.018
CrossRef
Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases
Bariatric surgery improves urinary incontinence in morbidly obese individuals
Kuruba, R; Almahmeed, T; Martinez, F; Torrella, TA; Haines, K; Nelson, LG; Gallagher, SF; Murr, MM
Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases, 3(6): 586-590.
10.1016/j.soard.2007.08.007
CrossRef
International Urogynecology Journal
Evolution of the female pelvis and relationships to pelvic organ prolapse
Schimpf, M; Tulikangas, P
International Urogynecology Journal, 16(4): 315-320.
10.1007/s00192-004-1258-1
CrossRef
Bju International
Editorial comment: The treatment of female bladder outlet obstruction
Blaivas, JG
Bju International, 98(): 24-26.

European Urology
Stem cell therapy in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence: a significant step in the right direction?
Novara, G; Artibani, W
European Urology, 53(1): 30-32.
10.1016/j.eururo.2007.07.041
CrossRef
Journal of Womens Health
The prevalence, burden, and treatment of urinary incontinence among women in a managed care plan
Kinchen, KS; Lee, J; Fireman, B; Hunkeler, E; Nehemiah, JL; Curtice, TG
Journal of Womens Health, 16(3): 415-422.
10.1089/jwh.2006.0122
CrossRef
Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology
Perioperative complications and early follow-up with 100 TVT-SECUR procedures
Neuman, M
Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, 15(4): 480-484.
10.1016/j.jmig.2008.04.006
CrossRef
International Urogynecology Journal
Do racial differences in knowledge about urogynecologic issues exist?
Shah, AD; Shott, S; Kohli, N; Wu, JM; Catlin, S; Hoyte, L
International Urogynecology Journal, 19(): 1371-1378.
10.1007/s00192-008-0639-2
CrossRef
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Ambulatory care related to female pelvic floor disorders in the United States, 1995-2006
Sung, VW; Raker, CA; Myers, DL; Clark, MA
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 201(5): -.
ARTN 508.e1
CrossRef
Neurourology and Urodynamics
Complications following surgical intervention for stress urinary incontinence: A national perspective
Taub, DA; Hollenbeck, BK; Wei, JT; Dunn, RL; McGuire, EJ; Latini, JM
Neurourology and Urodynamics, 24(7): 659-665.
10.1002/nau.20186
CrossRef
European Urology
TVT-obturator: Short-term data on an operative procedure for the cure of female stress urinary incontinence performed on 300 patients
Neuman, M
European Urology, 51(4): 1083-1088.
10.1016/j.eururo.2006.10.003
CrossRef
Incontinence, Vols 1 and 2
Surgery for pelvic organ prolapse
Brubaker, L; Bump, R; Fynes, M; Jacquetin, B; Karram, M; Kreder, K; Maher, C; Norton, P
Incontinence, Vols 1 and 2, (): 1371-1401.

Contemporary Clinical Trials
Design of the Value of Urodynamic Evaluation (ValUE) trial: A non-inferiority randomized trial of preoperative urodynamic investigations
Nager, CW; Brubaker, L; Daneshgari, F; Litman, HJ; Dandreo, KJ; Sirls, L; Lemack, GE; Richter, HE; Leng, W; Norton, P; Kraus, SR; Chai, TC; Chang, D; Amundsen, CL; Stoddard, AM; Tennstedt, SL
Contemporary Clinical Trials, 30(6): 531-539.
10.1016/j.cct.2009.07.001
CrossRef
European Journal of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
Suburethral sling inserted by the transobturator route in the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: Preliminary results in 117 cases
Spinosa, JP; Dubuis, PY
European Journal of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 123(2): 212-217.
10.1016/j.ejogrb.2005.04.016
CrossRef
Incontinence, Vols 1 and 2
Research methodology
Payne, C; Blaivas, J; Brown, J; Hirsch, M; Kusek, J; Peters, T; Steers, W; Stothers, ML; Van Kerrebroeck, P; Weber, A
Incontinence, Vols 1 and 2, (): 97-148.

International Urogynecology Journal
Surgical therapies of female stress urinary incontinence: experience in 228 cases
Wu, JY; He, HC; Chen, SW; Jin, XD; Zhou, YX
International Urogynecology Journal, 21(6): 645-649.
10.1007/s00192-009-1093-5
CrossRef
International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics
Comparing vaginal tape and transobturator tape for the treatment of mild and moderate stress incontinence
Zhu, L; Lang, JH; Hai, N; Wong, FL
International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 99(1): 14-17.
10.1016/j.ijgo.2007.03.055
CrossRef
Neurourology and Urodynamics
Measuring barriers to incontinence care seeking
Heit, M; Blackwell, L; Kelly, S
Neurourology and Urodynamics, 27(3): 174-178.
10.1002/nau.20473
CrossRef
Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology
Elective Cesarean Delivery: The Pelvic Perspective
WEBER, AM
Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology, 50(2): 510-517.
10.1097/GRF.0b013e31804c9cae
PDF (94) | CrossRef
Obstetrics & Gynecology
Rates of Urinary Tract Injury From Gynecologic Surgery and the Role of Intraoperative Cystoscopy
Gilmour, DT; Das, S; Flowerdew, G
Obstetrics & Gynecology, 107(6): 1366-1372.
10.1097/01.AOG.0000220500.83528.6e
PDF (199) | CrossRef
Current Opinion in Urology
Stress incontinence surgery: which operation when?
Rovner, ES; Lebed, BD
Current Opinion in Urology, 19(4): 362-367.
10.1097/MOU.0b013e32832a1f46
PDF (279) | CrossRef
Obstetrics & Gynecology
Exclusion of Elderly Women From Published Randomized Trials of Stress Incontinence Surgery
Morse, AN; Labin, LC; Young, SB; Aronson, MP; Gurwitz, JH
Obstetrics & Gynecology, 104(3): 498-503.
10.1097/01.AOG.0000136484.37027.79
PDF (186) | CrossRef
Nursing Research
Differences in Resident Characteristics and Prevalence of Urinary Incontinence in Nursing Homes in the Southeastern United States
Boyington, JE; Howard, DL; Carter-Edwards, L; Gooden, KM; Erdem, N; Jallah, Y; Busby-Whitehead, J
Nursing Research, 56(2): 97-107.
10.1097/01.NNR.0000263969.08878.51
PDF (156) | CrossRef
Back to Top | Article Outline

© 2003 The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists

Login

Article Tools

Images

Share